YourCT.com header image 2

BOE Finally Approves District Improvement Plan


by turfgrrl


September 23rd, 2008 · 79 Comments

The promises made last week, were reiterated last night and the BOE finally approved the plan. Hrmm, could it be because the deadline made them do it? Nah, the butler did it with the revolver in the conservatory. If this BOE would get a clue, they would stop focusing on minority quotas and start focusing on measuring performance of educational goals irrespective of who is on what team. The problem facing Norwalk schools, is not a racial one, it is one of poverty. That is the story coming out of the CMT scores.

If the BOE were truly interested in improving educational performance they would host a panel composed of actual teachers from the system to discuss educational needs and concerns.

From the Advocate:

The Board of Education unanimously approved the district improvement plan Monday night after guaranteeing that the team overseeing it includes teachers, parents and minorities.

The board delayed a vote on the plan last week because parents and teachers were not included on the leadership team that created it. Board members were concerned that initially there were no minorities among the 19 central office administrators and school principals on the team.

In the past few days, the district has been looking for parent representatives and invited West Rocks Middle School Principal Lynne Moore and Ivette Ellis, the new principal of Silvermine Elementary School, to sit on the committee.

The school board initially was to vote on a resolution that the leadership team would include parents and teachers, but some members urged that the wording of the resolution be changed to guarantee the racial and ethnic diversity of the committee, and to make sure it is maintained.

The plan, required because the district has not made progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, focuses on analyzing student performance data, including standardized test scores and training teachers on differentiating instruction. The district also intends to improve communication with parents.

The plan includes monthly benchmarks for the district to meet, and the board should be updated monthly, member Bruce Kimmel said.

“In my mind, the success or failure of the plan rests on our shoulders,” Kimmel said.

Superintendent Salvatore Corda said the plan was submitted to the state Department of Education Monday afternoon as required, and he will inform the state today that the school board approved it.

Corda is scheduled to present the plan to the state Oct. 2.

source: Advocate, School board approves improvement plan, By Lisa Chamoff, September 23, 2008

Tags: Education · Norwalk

79 Responses so far “BOE Finally Approves District Improvement Plan”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 Aunt Bertha // Sep 23, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    I want to thank all the parents who came out last week to open house at McMahon. ALL of my classes were packed with parents! The times they are a changing! You are right Turfgrrl the BoE had to accept the plan and yes the problem is POVERTY not racial divide. I go out of my way to work to help whoever is asking for it. Seeing the child is what needs to be done and making the child comfortable enough to come to a teacher if he/she does not understand. Why would the BoE want the most disliked principal (Moore) in the city to come and sit on their committee? Why not ask some of our veteran teachers who make a difference sit on these committees? There are plenty of African-American teachers who have given everything they’ve got to our children. AHHHH, I just don’t get it.

  • 2 anonymous // Sep 23, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    Aunt Bertha, don’t you understand?–you are not supposed to “get it”–Only great educational minds like Corda and Langadonna have the capacity to fathom a comprehensive “plan” for our district. Don’t worry, McQuillan and Co. will not be fooled by these dolts. Unfortunately, the old axiom, “S–t rolls downhill” applies here. Most of the fallout will be borne on the backs of teachers and kids–these “planners” will be long gone when the bell tolls. The fact that Moore is even mentioned in any of this speaks volumes to the motives for change in our system. She is an inherent part of the problem, and will only exacerbate matters. Now do you see how we don’t really “get it”–eventhough we’ve been getting it for years under these boobs.

  • 3 anonymous // Sep 23, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Moore keeps getting mentioned by the BOE because she is their inside source of information. She makes herself useful to them - or so they think - so they will protect her and make her seem needed in the district.

  • 4 anon. // Sep 23, 2008 at 10:55 pm

    With no disrespect to the new principal at Silvermine, Ivette Ellis, but wouldn’t someone who was a veteran of the system be a better choice after having direct and close knowledge of the corrupt interior and the downfall of the N.P.S.? I would rather see a teacher with many years behind them who was knowledgeable of a past history than someone who has no idea what she’s in for in such a dysfunctional district. Aunt Bertha, you are 100% correct. Putting Dr. Moore on a committee to see that N.P.S. moves forward in the future is like putting the person in charge of designing the Edsel to take care of our transportation dept! WTF is wrong with our school district? Bruce, do something and stop this ridiculous crap! Make me proud to be a N.P.S. employee again.

  • 5 Anonymous // Sep 23, 2008 at 10:59 pm

    The previous postings are yet more evidence that this is a badly dysfunctional district.

  • 6 anonymous // Sep 24, 2008 at 5:59 am

    You could get into a whole racism debate here on whether singling out minorities to be on a planning team and saying you aren’t going to vote for to approve the plan because there were no minorities on the team who wrote it really does anything to help eliminate racism or if it continues the cycle. Bruce has the right idea in that teachers and parents need to be on the team. Color and ethnicity should be irrelevant. Sorry BOE, I disagree on this one. Your expertise in the area comes from your position, not the color of your skin. To say one is less needed because their skin is white is reverse discrimination. Isn’t it supposed to be about content of character and what you have to offer? I think there were a lot of qualified administrators writing the plan but I agree that to be implemented it needs to be spread out to include teachers and parents - could have been done earlier but hind sight is 20-20.

  • 7 Lucy // Sep 24, 2008 at 6:52 am

    WTF????? The BOE “invited” Moore to be on the committee! I thought they were just lacking balls. Obviously brains too. Nice move JC and company. Well I’ve got to give you this…you sure as hell aren’t letting anyone tell you how to do you’re job…you’re f##king it up ALL BY YOURSELVES.

  • 8 Watchdog // Sep 24, 2008 at 7:12 am

    Lucy, I am so moved by your comment. You really are angry and hurt. This is so outrageous. Jack, Please… can you give your spin on this? Honestly, these abusive principals MUST go. Why are they allowed to stay? This move simply shows the apathy of both central and the board in addition to rewarding bad behavior with empowerment and confidence for - worse yet - a matter of convenience.

  • 9 Sick of the PC BS // Sep 24, 2008 at 7:35 am

    There is nothing wrong in being racist. The “wrong” is in the fact that in today’s climate we are expected to be secretive about it. I liked things the way they were in the past - at least a person knew where they stood with other people and there were no hidden meanings behind everything.

  • 10 Anonymous // Sep 24, 2008 at 9:40 am

    You are a sick puppy, my friend. I pray to God I don’t know you in real life.

  • 11 Anonymous // Sep 24, 2008 at 10:29 am

    #10: Sick of the PC BS is looking for attention. He/She is very likely a person of low intelligence and low community standing. Someone like that needs to feel superior to others, and so feeling a sense of racial superiority is all he/she has. Sick of the PC BS is more to be pitied than censured.

  • 12 Anon. // Sep 24, 2008 at 10:31 am

    I hope Corda presents Moore’s past reverse racism to the state on Oct. 2nd. It will just prove to the state how incompetent this school system is.

  • 13 Anonymous // Sep 24, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    #9-you are kidding right? Where the hell do you live? You mean to tell me that you still harbor these feelings? I feel very sorry for your kids! And why the hell is Lynn Moore on any board? She has managed to get a nice little salary at the expense of the taxpayers and at the risk of the kids. Only in America! And this has nothing to do with her color, my comment is because she doesn’t belong in charge of any children no matter what race they are.

  • 14 Lucy // Sep 24, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    Thank you, watchdog. Angry, yes. Hurt, no way. Just absolutely amazed at how this BOE has it’s head so far up it’s butt they could remove their own tonsils! Maybe that’s why they don’t hear and see what is so damn obvious to everyone else.

    Anon 12…Corda would need a session just on Moore to cover this witch’s 10 year reign of terror.

    #13…you hit the nail on the head. It’s not a matter of color. She’s unfit to be in charge of any children no matter what race they are.

    And #3 There is probably some truth to what you say but I cannot imagine why except the whole system is so F**ked up and corrupt that it’s just spiraling out of control.

  • 15 Lucy // Sep 24, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    “If the BOE were truly interested in improving educational performance they would host a panel composed of actual teachers from the system to discuss educational needs and concerns.”

    So Turffie, what does that tell you??????????

    Perhaps they really aren’t that interested in improving performance?

    We’ve had many postings to back that fact but not too many that show that they really care.

    I’ve heard the lip service from JC and the gang…talk about PC BS!

  • 16 Aunt Bertha // Sep 24, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    Lucy,Are you comparing Sal Corda to Jesus Christ? Who is JC? I would not make that comparison he is closer to beelzebub (the prince of demons). I can’t imagine as to why the BoE wants Moore on this committee? Watchdog, as for the worthless, abusive, and sub standard principals, why does the BoE not take notice? Are there votes of no confidence? Parents and teachers on this committee are needed not the down town clowns.

  • 17 noname // Sep 24, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Bob Henry is retiring.

  • 18 Lucy // Sep 24, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    No Aunt B…not Jesus…Jack Chiarmonte. Didn’t think I was being that subtle.

  • 19 Aunt Bertha // Sep 24, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    Sorry Lucy, I start to fade early during the week.

  • 20 anonymous // Sep 24, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Send in the clowns…..the down town clowns…there ought to be clowns….don’t bother, THEY’RE HERE! Yes, step right up folks, and get a front row seat to the demise of the NPS that you once knew and loved! No confidence? No problem–other than the constant turnover of staff that makes the young ones and newbies scared to speak up—Sound like a few of the staffs of the offending principals?? It’s just the way they want it–and the sleeping BOE is none the wiser–I love it–the down town clowns!!

  • 21 Madame X // Sep 24, 2008 at 11:24 pm

    Oh #17, my eyes almost bugged out my head. Do you know how many people are looking forward to that man leaving? But, are you telling the truth? Do you know this for sure?

  • 22 Townie // Sep 25, 2008 at 5:40 am

    Naramake - J. Robert Henry, Principal of Naramake Elementary School since 1992,officially announced his retirement yesterday in a meeting with his staff, effective February 1, 2009.

  • 23 Anonymous // Sep 25, 2008 at 7:47 am

    The district will probably keep him in the position for the rest of the year, so he will be a retired consultant from February through June.

  • 24 Madame X // Sep 25, 2008 at 7:55 am

    So did everyone pee their pants for joy? I’ll never forget when Fred Urban retired from Silvermine and the photo was in the Hour, showing staff members crying, bidding Mr. Urban goodbye. Later, teachers said they were tears or sheer joy. He paled in comarison to this crank! Imagine when Mr. Henry officially exits Naramake. It’ll be a happy day over there! That school will deserve the sigh of relief when he goes. Well another search will be on for another principal. But the big question: Will Bob really leave when he’s done, or will he do stints as a long term assistant principal? Heaven help us all….

  • 25 Anon and on. // Sep 25, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    Did they celebrate until Ithiar walked in?

  • 26 Anonymous // Sep 25, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Surely they began crying again when Iziar (correct spelling) arrivied.

  • 27 anonymous // Sep 25, 2008 at 6:13 pm

    I feel a bit ADD reading this thread.

  • 28 anonymous // Sep 25, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    Yes. Your’re getting off task boys and girls. Believe me, Henry is the least of the worries in this here district–Hey, Jack C.–are you still scoping out this site?? We would love to hear from you again to impart some of your wisdom to the latest goings-on and concerns of many staff, parents, and kids in town–but, won’t blame you if you stay as far away as possible from any of this edu-crap game–Sort of damned if you do, damned if you don’t…..

  • 29 Jack Chiaramonte // Sep 26, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    Hello People. A friend called and told me of this on going discussion on this blog and said I should check it out. As far as the district improvement plan goes, we had to, by law, have it passed by this past Tuesday. So a special meeting was held this past Monday evening for this purpose. Why did we have to have a special meeting? Several weeks ago, Dr. Corda gave a power point presentation at a BOE meeting and we were told it would be distributed shortly to all. At last weeks BOE meeting it was to be voted on. Now I have to tell you, I was not in attendance at last weeks BOE meeting. This was the first BOE meeting I could not attend because I was already committed to being a chaperone for Nature’s Classroom. Upon my return, I was told that it came to light that the District Improvement Plan was not distributed to the public. So the BOE voted unanimously to table and postpone the vote for almost a week later until the last possible moment they had by law, so the public could have ample time to review it. I went to Monday night’s special meeting expecting to see a packed room full of teachers & parents eager to share their thoughts on the District Improvement plan. Do you know how many people made a public comment? TWO! That’s it, just two. Bruce Mellion on behalf of the teachers union and a citizen named Paul Blumenthal, who is a regular at the BOE meetings. Paul started his comments by stating that he was astounded, as he was disappointed, that so few people showed up for this meeting. He actually anticipated so many would come that the meeting might have to be moved to the community room. Do you believe it, only Two people!
    Now this brings me to the writings of our friend LUCY. She seems to have a lot to say, doesn’t she? Well, where were you Lucy on Monday night? It amazes me the things people write here at times. Did you know that all the BOE members phone numbers & e-mails are listed on the Norwalk Public School web site under “Meet the Board”? Yet Lucy never contacted me or any other BOE member as far as I know. If she had and wanted to know why Dr. Moore or any other principle, such as Silvermine’s principle, was put on the committee, then all she had to do was pick up the phone or type an e-mail or even attend a meeting and simply ask or just listen. This is the answer. The committee for the district improvement plan lacked diversity. Since we are a diverse community, it would make perfect sense that proper representation should be reflected on the committee. So BoE members asked (I believe it was Magdalia Rivas) that African-American and Hispanic PRINCIPLES be added to the committee. I also believe Ms. Sumpter was also asked. So there you have it.
    Lucy, all you had to do was ask instead of posting disparaging comments as your following post:

    “7 LUCY
    WTF????? The BOE “invited” Moore to be on the committee! I thought they were just lacking balls. Obviously brains too. Nice move JC and company. Well I’ve got to give you this…you sure as hell aren’t letting anyone tell you how to do you’re job…you’re f##king it up ALL BY YOURSELVES.”

    I not only find your post offensive, but I also find it humorous how you have taken fancy to that “don’t tell us how to do our Job” quote. You should know the context in which that quote was attributed to me by THE HOUR. So here it is: McQuillan came into our meeting to accuse the BOE members of not working together and not working with Dr. Corda. He said it was documented and he had read certain e-mails to come to this conclusion. I was the first to retort to McQuillan because I was infuriated that he would make such an accusation against the BOE without even consulting with us first. I felt Dr. Corda complained to him, maybe he even showed him selected e-mails. However Mr. McQuillan NEVER asked us (BOE) what was going on. He came into that meeting with guns blazing against the members without any previous consultation and blind-sided us. I will elaborate on the “job” quote. It is the Boards JOB to set policy. It is the Superintendents JOB to follow that policy. We may ask the superintendent for his opinion on any given matter, but it ultimately is the decision of the BOE that sets policy. The Superintendent works FOR the BOE. The BOE does NOT work for the Superintendent. We WILL work WITH the superintendent to help make sure board policy is carried out. When we set policy, and that policy is circumvented or manipulated, it does not help in building team workmanship between the BOE and the Superintendent. Quite the opposite. I also told McQuillan that “Respect is not given, it is earned.” As a board we expect answers to questions when we ask them and we expect team workmanship. I don’t think I am wrong in my expectations. I view myself as very pro-teacher since I have great respect for the JOB you do for our children. My only wish is when you have a concern or question, you pick up the phone, type an e-mail or even stop in my store in SoNo and ask. It can be disheartening to read some of these postings when you feel you are doing the best you can for the community, especially when these people don’t even come to the meetings and get involved or even, just correctly informed. Thanks for the opportunity to respond. Now I got to get back to work. Bye.

  • 30 anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 3:51 pm

    See, I disagree with the wording - don’t care if it is written somewhere or not. BOE is not your “job.” The superintendent does not work for the BOE, he works for the people of the Norwalk and the members of the BOE are simply the agents of that time and you are supposed to work together with the superintendent of that time. The part that is right is that the BOE sets policy and is to make sure policy is being followed. If it isn’t, it gets difficult. And in this case with the plan, it was a good call to adjust and put additional people on for the future but the reasoning should have been for educational reasons, not racial. Racism won’t improve CMT scores. Parent and teacher involvement will.
    It again seems to have been a case of BOE losing sight of their mission. Improving the Norwalk Educational System is your mission. Not pissing off Corda and whoever else may be on your list. I understand the BOE is frustrated and still feels there is no trust and things are being done underhandedly but if the document itself was good, that was the issue. Deal with the other parts ie lack of communication, transparency, team makeup as a separate issue. Stop making yourselves look bad if it isn’t you. Do you see what I’m saying? By being difficult in a way that impedes the educational process (even if it is by distracting staff) you are the negative. If in fact, the problem lies with CO and not the BOE, you need to find a way to show that without hindering Norwalk schools with bickering and negativity. Ask the right questions at meetings -but ask them politely and respectfully. The one who takes the high road always ends up on top. Don’t know if that’s true but it sounded like it should be :)

  • 31 Just my view // Sep 26, 2008 at 4:48 pm

    I think the problem lies in the fact that Sal Corda has absolutely no respect for the BOE members, the teachers, the parents and most of all the students. Everything is done behind closed doors and he expects everyone to take what he dishes up to them with little or no say at all. Mr. Corda smirks at people, he undermines everyone and with a little luck this board will refuse to extend his contract. It is time that Norwalk grows some and starts hiring from within. Someone who has worked their way up the ladder from teacher to principal to administrator etc. Why do we need to waste taxpayers money to look outside of a very qualified school system? This has gotten out of hand and that is why there is always so much negativity from the public. We hire from outside of Norwalk/CT to run our schools and then we get the carpetbaggers that come with them. I can fully understand why people are questioning the placement of Lynne Moore on this committee since she is part of the problem, not the solution. She has underminded each and every teacher who has had the displeasure of working under her, she has caused numerous lawsuits because of her bias to those who don’t fall lockstep with her beliefs and she has basically frightened people away from WRMS. Very few are willing to work with her so how can she be someone we want working on the future of N.P.S.? Its not the B.O.E members that are causing the problems, its the ones they are charged with overseeing who have gotten away with so much before that they believe they answer to no one.

  • 32 Anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    #31: The “hire from within” approach is what gave us TD as director of curriculum and instruction. What happened to hiring on merit, the knowledge and leadership skills to get Norwalk out of the quagmire?

  • 33 Just my view // Sep 26, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    #32 that is what I meant…not give it as a gift, but give it to someone who has a proven track record and has shown that they are ready to step up and do the job right!

  • 34 Jack Chiaramonte // Sep 26, 2008 at 5:21 pm

    Dear #30, you seem to be stuck on this word “job”. I see you would you prefer the word mission? Well O.K., Toe-may-toe, toe-Ma-toe. You say:

    “The part that is right is that the BOE sets policy and is to make sure policy is being followed. If it isn’t, it gets difficult.”

    Well then, all I can say is BINGO! Now you got it #30! It is our job, excuse me, mission, to make sure policy is set and followed. And yes, when it isn’t followed, it does get difficult. Hence my response to McQuillan, “respect is NOT given, it is earned.” I’m sorry to say #30, but you are misguided here. When the policies we set are not followed, we are not being stubborn. We set the policy and the policy is to be followed, period. Look at this next statement of yours:

    “It again seems to have been a case of BOE losing sight of their mission (JOB). Improving the Norwalk Educational System is your mission (JOB). Not pissing off Corda and whoever else may be on your list.”

    Excuse me?? Pissing Corda off?? or whoever is on our list??? Let’s see now, we set policy and Corda doesn’t follow it, yet we (BOE) are pissing HIM off. Did I get that right? Let me understand this “we are losing sight of our mission”. Please explain how we set policy, only so it can be manipulated. Please #30, I understand you’d like to see nice-nice going on, but please re-read my quote on respect. Respect is a two way street.

    And what is this racial comment all about? People of this diverse community have different needs and they expect to have those needs addressed. We all want equal representation and this is what all branches of our government aspires to fulfill. If you don’t see the need to have a diverse committee that represents and reflects ALL of it’s citizens, then there is nothing I can say that would clarify it any better to you. Take the high road?? Are we to “turn the other cheek” when our policies are not followed? Understand #30, the policies we set ARE for the improvement of the Norwalk Educational System. Please re-read your response and by all means attend the meetings and please ask questions of your BOE.

  • 35 anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    Wow, Jack, you are really stubborn. You actually read #30 and saw nothing positive in it? I thought it was somewhat supportive of the BOE. It compliments you for making a good call for adding people to the team when CO missed the boat. It acknowledges many resaons for you to be frustrated with CO. And then it gives some advice so the BOE isn’t looked at as the bad guys - which actually reads like common good manners. It doesn’t matter if Corda is making faces and being disrespectful - respect starts somewhere - if you need to be the grown up and set the example, then set it. And no, you don’t turn the other cheek if policies aren’t followed, that is why you ask the right questions, but ask them politely. Be smart not attacking.

  • 36 anon // Sep 26, 2008 at 6:58 pm

    You are doing just fine Jack. You question and expect answers. You and the others on the board are holding CO accountable. That is not stubborness. My husband and I have seen the school system failing and falling into an abyss year after year. Many cordial BOE’s of the past have gotten us into this mess. Finally, Corda and CO sre being held accountable. That is why we elected you. Keep up the good work.

  • 37 anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    However, the CO is NOT being held accountable–what a joke–Jack, how about the guts to address the Moore “problem”–Please don’t play the role of being unaware of this elephant in the room. This woman is toxic to our system–Are you, or anyone else on this rubber stamp board willing to take her on? I doubt it, and until somebody does, you are doing our kids a disservice. There is no argument here on your part–many very distinguished and acccomplished educators in YOUR system have been victimized by this harridan–yet you allow her to continue. Stop the BS–we are on to all of you–we don’t have to “show up” at meetings–hence, your party of two at the last meeting. This is looking like another Dr. Grey payday of a few years back–You hope she doesn’t play the race card–but she will if you press her. Time to grow some and do what is right for our kids–The problem comes in hiring these idiots without proper vetting. Improve that process, and it won’t cost you as much in the end. Many excellent teachers and support personnel are awaiting your response–but I doubt we will get one. The “diversity” cliche is getting very old—if anything, we should be putting many more Hispanics on our committees, because they are the future of NPS. Wake the hell up and get into our schools–and while you’re at it, have a couple of those overworked CO dolts follow you. I must agree with #35–time for somebody to be the grownup here–and quick!!

  • 38 anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    And Jack, I’m the anonymous #30 and I’m sorry you only chose to focus on the negative and didn’t see any of the positive I found in the board. You guys are doing some good stuff but there is a lot still to be done and the approach leaves a lot to be desired. If it continues on this path I fear things won’t be accomplished. And diversity isn’t the main goal when working on a document, educational excellence is what we want to achieve. Don’t fall into that trap. The town of Norwalk has beautiful diversity. It’s time for BOE and CO to set the example for their students -model behavior. Respect and cooperation.

  • 39 Jack Chiaramonte // Sep 26, 2008 at 9:28 pm

    So #37 what do you think the BOE should do? Start going after everyone or anyone who is written about on this blog? Not to be rude, but Are you out of your mind? Who should we “witch hunt” today? Next week? Tomorrow? The point is #37, you can write all the hearsay you want and it proves nothing. If there is any injustices going on in the school system, and I’m sure that just might be the case, then don’t you think it should be brought before the board? How the hell do you expect for ANY action(s) to take place if no one brings it formally to the board? Your post is cynical. If you have something to say, then come to a meeting and SAY IT and most importantly, with PROOF to back it up. I see everyone complain on this blog but only two people come to a meeting and voice their concerns. Now that is the REAL joke #37 and worse, it’s the truth. Instead of giving a sour rant, how come you haven’t come to a meeting and let us in on whatever injustices you are privy to. We’d all love to know, then, and only then , can the board react to a problem. Get it. The only disservice here is when people hide behind anonymous name tags and spew accusations that they are not willing to step forward with. Do you expect me or any other Board member to go into a meeting and demand “justice” over something I read on the blog by some anonymous person? Get Real. You are the one who needs to wake up #37. Come to a meeting and put your money where your mouth is and speak up if you truly have something to say. If not, then please spare us the diatribe.

  • 40 anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Ah yes but the rub is that isn’t proper procedure and we all know it. There is a route that we have have to follow, whether you are a parent or a teacher. First you talk to the person you are having a problem with. If nothing is accomplished, you can go to their boss, then one up, etc. In this case, there would be a few layers before it would get to the BOE and someone would be worn out by then. And if you read the papers, I believe two teachers have a lawsuit right now, which would seem to indicate the BOE probably did nothing to help. So people sometimes probably feel more satisfaction this way (on the blog). Not accomplishment, but a bit of momentary relief perhaps.

  • 41 Anonymous // Sep 26, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    I always loved that quote “Respect is a two-way street” and its twin, “Respect has to be earned”.
    Both comments could be sound bites from a pissed off 13-year-old having a temper tantrum with his dad.

    “Earned,” my sweet patootie! You GIVE respect. You GIVE it to your elders. You GIVE it to authority figures. You GIVE it to veterans and soldiers.

    And you GIVE it to the taxpayers who elected you and who are paying your salaries with the tax money they pay to the city.

    You want some respect of your own? Then grow some balls and do something to WARRANT it.

    Quit your bellyaching and DO YOUR JOB.

    Ooops, I mean (mission).

  • 42 Lucy // Sep 27, 2008 at 6:59 am

    Excuse me but I have talked to you and others about this. That’s the fact, Jack. And it’s obvious to all of us that our complaints and concerns are falling on deaf ears. You say you are concerned about what’s going on at the Rock. You told us not to worry, that you are going to do something about it. Well is this what you meant by “doing something”. Puting Moore on yet another committee! Thanks but no thanks.

    Oh yeah…I stand by my comments.

  • 43 Webby // Sep 27, 2008 at 7:25 am

    Hey Jack, the complaints about LCM are NOT hearsay and you know it! Lucy and the others are right in being outraged by this newest apointment of Moore to another committee.

    Go back to the 90s and start reading the letters of complaint that have been given to the BOE year after year, mine included (with a date stamp to prove I sent it). I still have copies! You make it sound like no one has ever put their butt on the line and come forward with an official, DOCUMENTED, complaint. That it’s all “hearsay”. That is not the truth and you know it. Dozens of teachers,support staff and parents have filed complaints with both the BOE and Dr. Corda against L. Moore, in writing. I followed my complaint (letter) up with a phone call to Corda, only to find out he never got my letter even though it was date stamped by human resources proving I dropped off copies not only for him but for EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THE BOE. And from the BOE, not one response to my letter, NOT ONE! So basically, Jack, I got jack for my efforts!

    You and I have spoken already…a waste of time. Let’s just continue to agree to disagree and leave it at that. You already know how I feel.

  • 44 Anonymous // Sep 27, 2008 at 8:28 am

    Sal Corda may have turned over the letter to Tony (as director of secondary education), but it doesn’t matter because both of them are afraid of L. Moore. She is painfully blunt with both of them, and they do nothing.

  • 45 Aunt Bertha // Sep 27, 2008 at 8:32 am

    My outrage about Moore’s appointment to this committee is that she is NOT in the mix of children like our teachers are. There are a bunch of QUALITY hardworking teachers who can be the minority representative on this committee. If you need a principal on the committee then call back some one with experience in helping out to solve problems and someone who did not point fingers, like Ms. Wilson.

  • 46 anonymous // Sep 27, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Let’s all look back at #3 - it’s one of the only things that makes sense to explain BOE appointment of LM. They like their informant. Would bet they even listened to her on the whole McCain/TD issue. She had strong reason to want TD not McCain. Look who got the job over the recommended candidate. Things don’t make sense but it all starts to come together.

  • 47 anonymous // Sep 27, 2008 at 10:19 am

    Oh, and if you are wondering what those reasons she wanted TD - to start, she knew he was a bit intimidated, he really didn’t make her change her ways when he was director so he probably wouldn’t as AS, she didn’t like how McCain came in and improved NHMS and would probably make her make changes if he got AS job, he isn’t easily intimidated. You get the idea.

  • 48 Anne Sullivan // Sep 27, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    So getting back to the district improvement plan – who is in charge of overseeing that everything the district has promised to do gets done in a timely manner? There’s some pretty serious promises in this document.

  • 49 Azul // Sep 27, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    Jack maybe the reason people do not come to the BOE meetings is because they have lost all respect and hope. Wearing down the client is not only an insurance tactic.

  • 50 Anonymous // Sep 27, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    Maybe someone can start by explaining how a person as conceited and egotistical as Jack Chiaramonte could have garnered enough votes to even get ON the BOE?

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply