YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: How Are We Doing?


by turfgrrl


September 2nd, 2008 · 41 Comments

Today’s Hour runs with a state of the city report. All of my favorite topics are there, roads, pot holes, zoning and art. From the Hour:

If roads paved, property taxes paid, redevelopment projects advanced and open space preserved are yardsticks by which to measure a community’s health, Norwalk has evolved under Mayor Richard A. Moccia.

Moccia, while declining to equate Norwalk to other cities — “we’re very different” — said he believes progress is being made on a number of fronts, including striking a balance between urban and suburban living.

“We maintain the hometown atmosphere, but we’re also growing as an urban center. And it’s a difficult balance,” Moccia said. “Compared to other cities, I think if you look at us, as far as economically, as far as culturally, we’re growing as fast as any city in this state, maybe faster than others.”

Moccia took office in November 2005 with promises to promote fiscal discipline, hire a full-time grants coordinator and negotiate a firefighters’ contract. Since then, the Republican mayor has delivered on those promises and advanced redevelopment projects, while encountering fresh challenges along the line.

Roads and taxes

Moccia has sought to streamline city government by hiring fewer outside consultants than did his predecessor, Democrat Alex Knopp, and saving dollars where possible. The Department of Public Works, for instance, instituted a worker safety program aimed at reducing compensation costs.

Over the last three years, the city and school district have run on operating budgets that have boosted the annual tax levy, on average, by 5.2 percent. After factoring in non-tax revenues, the actual annual increase to taxpayers has hovered in the 4-percent range — at or near inflation rate.

The additional dollars, in large part, have gone toward public safety. Under Moccia, the Police Department has hired extra officers and transferred officers from office to patrol duties.

In the area of infrastructure, the city boosted capital spending on road paving and reconstruction from $2.5 million in fiscal year 2006-07 to $4 million in fiscal year 2008-09. In a policy shift aimed at saving money, the public works department last year began putting its annual slate of roadwork out to bid in mid-winter, rather than mid-summer, to catch paving firms when they’re looking for work.

Over the last two years, nearly 60 city streets, or portions thereof, have been repaved. They include East Avenue, Fort Point Street, Grand Avenue, Keeler Avenue, St. Mary’s Lane, William Street and Weed Avenue, according to the public works officials. Overall, the city has 260 miles of streets.

“I think, on the infrastructure of the city of Norwalk, (Moccia) has made (road maintenance) a priority and addressed the flooding,” said Councilman Douglas E. Hempstead, a District D Republican.

Several projects aimed at curbing flooding, including in the Buckingham Place and Lockwood Lane areas, are advancing from design to construction. Moccia and others concede, however, that there are never enough dollars available to repair and upgrade each and every section of the city’s aging sewer system.

I don’t think we have invested enough in road maintenance, traffic light maintenance and upgrades, and we have not held third party contractors responsible for restoring our roads to the same or better condition once they have been dug up. Osborne ave anyone? Our sidewalks are impassable in some areas (Harbor Ave.) too.

Urban renewal, business  climate and city planning

Moccia has made advancing several large urban renewal projects a priority of his administration. Under him, District 95/7 SoNo, Spinnaker Real Estate Partners’ plan for the Reed-Putnam area, has moved from drawings to groundbreaking. POKO Partners LLC recently received site-plan approval to construct new housing and retail in the Wall Street area — a priority under the Knopp administration.

And, after two decades of debate, Stanley M. Seligson Properties’ renewal plan for West Avenue — the development is called Waypointe — is advancing toward site-plan review and construction. That said, debate continues over whether eminent domain will be employed for the project. Several private property owners haven’t sold their properties to Seligson. The use of eminent domain ultimately would rest with the council.

Norwalk continues to be a magnet for business. In 2006, Virgin Atlantic Airways decided to move from Belden Avenue to North Water Street in South Norwalk rather than relocate to Stamford. This year, Wuesthof-Trident of America, a German knife manufacturer, chose to relocate from Briarcliff Manor, N.Y. to the former Norwalk Community College property on Wilson Avenue, also in South Norwalk.

Under Moccia, the city’s updated its Plan of Conservation and Development. The revised master plan, years overdue, will serve as a blueprint for zoning regulation and determine what’s built where.

Councilwoman Laurel E. Lindstrom, a District C Democrat, is pleased that the new master plan has been completed. She followed the effort from its beginning. At the same time, Lindstrom says similar planning is needed to address other issues, such as traffic and speeding.

“Speeding has not gone away. We have really not gone forward with any traffic-calming projects for several years. There’s only so much that slow down weeks can do,” said Lindstrom, who represents District C.

Last week, as school resumed, the city launched another Slow Down Days. Federal grant money will pay for police overtime for more enforcement. A plan to make Strawberry Hill Avenue safer by installing a new traffic light, more striped crosswalks, bicycle lanes, and upgrades to school zone signs, remains in the works.

Speeding is hardly a problem these days, except for Strawberry Hill because or traffic congestion and poor road conditions. The DOT drags its bureaucratic foot when it comes to approving plans that would reduce traffic or regulate it, ie. traffic lights.

Arts and parks

Moccia said he is extremely pleased with the expansion of the Mayor’s Advisory Commission on the Arts and Culture, which recently published an arts walk brochure highlighting the city’s cultural attractions.

“Economic growth is wonderful and infrastructure (is important), but I think that to expand on our arts community, which I think has been a little lacking in Norwalk over the years, was very important,” Moccia said.

Also on the cultural front, the city has become a star attraction for movie makers. Last year, The Connecticut Film Center, based in Stamford, set up a film studio at 345 Ely Ave. — the former Swank, Inc., leather manufacturing headquarters. City officials credit a state tax-incentive program for the local film industry.

The Department of Recreation and Parks, under Moccia’s administration, this summer opened the Fodor Farm Community Garden. Residents can rent a garden plot for $5 annually. The project has proven so popular that the city is seeking additional grant money to expand the garden and allow more families to plant.

In recent years, the city has installed bocce ball courts, refurbished restrooms and made other improvements to Calf Pasture and Shady beaches in East Norwalk. The projects are part of an effort to draw more people to city parks parks. Improvements have also been made to Cranbury Park in the northern section of Norwalk.

Elsewhere, the city has partnered with residents and neighborhood organizations to preserve open space. The former White Barn Theatre, once slated to become a housing subdivision, will become home to an eco-friendly school operated by The Connecticut Friends Schools.

Last spring, Norwalk Land Trust, with help from the city and others, created a 16.2-acre contiguous public nature preserve along Farm Creek in Rowayton.

We are fortunate to have a Mayor who gets why the creative economy fuels economic diversity. Norwalk has many cultural assets and I am proud to serve on a commission that advocates support for the arts and cultural heritage within Norwalk.

Norwalk’s history

For the Norwalk Preservation Trust, saving buildings has proven difficult. To the regret of the trust, the Capt. Daskam House at 134 East Ave. was torn down. The fate of the Grumman St. John House at 93 East Ave. remains in the hands of a court, after the trust, and later state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal intervened.

The owners of The Norwalk Inn & Conference Center want to raze the house, which they own, to expand the inn. Moccia has sided with the innkeepers, saying the matter revolves around private property rights.

While having disagreed with Moccia on the limits of historic preservation, Trust President Tod Bryant said furthering historic preservation is as much about raising awareness as who’s in the mayor’s office.

“I don’t think you can put it down, as much, to any administration, as to a raising of awareness about how valuable our historic resources are,” Bryant said.

That said, Bryant believes historic preservation fared better under former Mayor Alex Knopp, whom he credits for the city’s 90-day demolition delay ordinance. The Historical Commission has taken a turn for the worse under Moccia, according to Bryant. Moccia’s appointees to the commission have focused their attentions to commission-managed properties, rather than private properties such as The Norwalk Inn.

“The Historical Commission seems to be stepping away from the active role it had taken,” Bryant said.

Preservation goes beyond individual buildings and should be out street scapes and neighborhoods. This is where Mayor Moccia has focused attention. Under Moccia’s administration, funding for maintenance and repair of the City’s historic properties was increased. While 93 East ave. remains a contentious issue for the Norwalk Preservation Trust, it is not the fulcrum to judge whether Norwalk is doing a better job in preservation.

There is much in the way of facade improvements, architectural restoration grants and other things that should be available to property owners in historic areas of Norwalk. The success of cites like Mysitc, CT and Salem Ma, offer case studies on how to merge former industrial basedeconomies with information age economies coupled with tourism. That convesation, just hasn’t happened in Norwalk.

New challenges

The last three years have not been without setbacks for Moccia. The council this year rejected a request to appoint a charter revision commission to consider extending the city’s mayoral terms to four-years.

Moccia and other supporters of the measure maintain that two-year terms leave mayors concentrating on reelection in the second year of their terms, rather than on city business. Moccia noted that four-year terms, if approved by voters at the ballot box, would not take effect until the 2009 election when his current term expires.

Also this year, the council shot down a municipal solid-waste disposal contract that would have used a private transfer station on Meadow Street. Moccia and public works officials labeled the plan a money saver. Council Democrats and South Norwalk residents countered it would add odors, noise and traffic to the neighborhood.

Moccia said he’s not pleased with littering in Norwalk. Despite boosted fines and tougher regulations, litter continues to accumulate along major arteries, such as Westport and Connecticut avenues, as well as Wall Street, according to Moccia. He said much of the litter originates from fast-food restaurants. And while Moccia doesn’t blame the restaurants, he believes the city can work with them to find a solution.

“Once the summer is over, I’m going to talk to some people, to see if perhaps we can work with the fast-food chains. … maybe putting more trash baskets out in the parking lots,” Moccia said.

The city has stepped up enforcement of zoning regulations addressing illegal apartments, vehicles parked on lawns, illegal contractors’ yards and other infractions.

The Board of Estimate and Taxation approved Moccia’s request for funding to hire an attorney to focus solely on zoning enforcement. The attorney, Assistance Corporation Counsel Brian L. McCann, last week secured in Stamford Superior Court an agreement requiring The Original Grasso Construction, Inc., to construct an enclosure for sand, gravel and other construction materials at its Wilson Avenue property.

Littering is a huge problem. The fact that people still put out trash bags instead of using enclosed trash containers is a major contributing factor. Wall Street, North Main street are prime examples.

Tags: Norwalk

41 Responses so far “Norwalk: How Are We Doing?”



  • 1 Waiting for this to happen // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:58 am

    Roads!! There is going to be a head on collision at the intersection of Ponus and Rt 123!! I’ve seen it happen almost 3 times in a week! Any street you drive on in Norwalk is a mess!! Liter even our garbage personal drop garbage and leave it where they dropped! I wont even get into the rest!

  • 2 Observer // Sep 2, 2008 at 12:47 pm

    “While 93 East ave. remains a contentious issue for the Norwalk Preservation Trust, it is not the fulcrum to judge whether Norwalk is doing a better job in preservation.”

    EXACTLY!! Turffie GETS it.

    “It is not the fulcrum to judge whether Norwalk is doing a better job in preservation.”

    Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it for a while.

  • 3 Observer // Sep 2, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    As far as the traffic and road problems are concerned, if CL&P ever get through tearing up the town in order to support their expansion, then MAYBE we might see some improvement on the roads, which are absolutely disgusting as they now stand.

    And IMHO, we did not “need” a new bridge across the river at the junction of Riverside and Rte. 123 - the old bridge was working just fine. Not only has it taken an extraordinarily long time to build, but they have completely destroyed the riverbank in the process. One wonders who gave permission for THAT.

    I was forced to move out of Norwalk a few years ago due to rising rents and lack of affordable (and desirable) housing. When I come back to visit the City, I am appalled at the amount of litter - the unmown weeds all over - the general dirtyness and unkempt-looking business areas - and the never-ending construction.

    Whose great idea was it to plop a Walgreen store in the middle of West Avenue? I feel for the residents of Garner Street, who will have to put up with the increased traffic on what USED TO BE a nice, quiet residential neighborhood. Did anybody bother to concern themselves with the detriment to the Garner Street residents’ quality of life once this building is completed and the only access and exit is on Garner Street? Did anyone think of how treacherous that Garner Street HILL is in the wintertime when covered with ice and snow? Who gave any thought to reimbursement of car owners who live and have to park on Garner street, when their cars are smashed into by some fool losing control on the ice this winter? And did anyone give any thought to the increased traffic at the top of the street where it meets Fairfield Avenue - already a heavily driven thoroughfare? No, I bet nobody did. And it’s obvious when one looks at this bit of mis-planning by the city.

  • 4 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    #2 - Take away 93 East Ave. from any discussion about “preservation” in Norwalk and there would be nothing to discuss. The Historical Commission does nothing to facilitate preservation of historical properties in Norwalk. It can barely manage to take care of what historical properties the City owns. So far developers have accomplished more in terms of supporting preservation than the City has.

    I was down at the Isaac St. parking lot the other day looking at the mural that Morgan Sign Co. painted on the side of the theater that the Kydes klan owns (now there’s an vulgar idea for you) which depicts the Norwalk Green in 1855. The mural was commissioned by the Norwalk Historical Commission.

    What a far cry from the group of incompetent cronies that serves on the HC today. At least back then, the HC actively promoted interest in Norwalk’s history.

  • 5 anon // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    93 East Ave issue is played out. Can we move on to a fresher topic. We have all heard both sides of this issue ad naseum and know where everyone stands

  • 6 OK! HERE // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    After todays full front page add for Moccia in the Hour today, which stated roads are improved, Lets each give a road or more that is absolutely a disaster. One that makes you drive on the wrong side of the street.

    I will start with Osborne Avenue.

    Anyone else?

    Maybe we can get something done to repair the worst of the worst.

  • 7 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    What about the crime and gangs in Norwalk, what about the traffic and speeding in Norwalk, what about the schools doing so poorly in Norwalk, what about the current infrastructure of Norwalk (flooding, over crowding, litter, graffiti, housing project crime) and yet a new contracts for Corda and Rilling. Shame on the mayor of Norwalk. We need someone that cares about quality of life issues for all Norwalk residents. Never mind growing Norwalk Mr. mayor until you can manage what you already have. Look around you it’s a shame what is happening, there no reason to be proud. Clean up Norwalk and the residents need to clean up city hall next election. We need some good candidates unlike last election.

  • 8 Al Bore // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    Fox run road Nursery road

  • 9 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    Kellogg Street

  • 10 OPEN GOVERNMENT // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    While listing all the planned development in Norwalk, this story missed the news that the mayor proposes the first subsidy of a devloper in Norwalk history. Trying to follow the convoluted hsitory of Seligson’s plans, first he asked the city to “back” the bonds needed to pay for the project. That seems to have morphed into a $100K subsidy by the city, and then they’ll have the opportunity to buy the garage? The city needs another garage to pay for and maintain like a hole in the head. If a parking garage is essential to the plan,let the developer pay for it like all the developers before him. Remember the road improvements that Phelps was required to pay for Merrit 7? Next thing you know, the developer will be too big to fail and we’ll be asked to bail him out. Just because our state and federal governments are subsidizing businesses doesn’t mean the city governemnt has to waste our tax dollars that way.

  • 11 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Why don’t we just rename the Post Rd. after CL&P? They get to do whatever they want with it anyways.

  • 12 anon // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    Stuart Ave!

  • 13 MGeake // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    #10: not $100K, it’s $104M.

    And it’s not “Seligson”, it’s “Waypointe LLC”.

  • 14 YIKES! PUKE // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    10: not $100K, it’s $104

    If the council lets them get away with this one while senior citizens are losing their homes becasue of the taxes being too high, they had better get ready for the tar and feather treatment. Cuz the S–t is really gonna hit the fan.

  • 15 Diane C- compared to what? // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    How we doin’? Compared to what? I totally agree with #7 - we are having a heck of a time dealing with what we have now- how on earth we will cope with the massive amount of redevelopment?
    All city services are over-burdened, and no relief in sight. You can add staff, or improve efficiency and productivity, or reduce the need for services.
    We need elected officials who will demand the very best for Norwalk, starting with the smallest of quality of life issues and working our way up.
    Compared to other communities, how does our city appear? How are the SAT scores? Are police visible and enforcing laws? I got a kick out of the Hour article the other day when the patrolman on duty said many can go 3-4 nights without getting a single call and then spend their shift time reading and studying for tests - WTF - no wonder the gangs, speeders, and vandals are having a field day in Norwalk.

  • 16 Al Raymond // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Stuart Ave the southern end is a mess.I have been asking for help on this issue for quite some time now. WHY should we the people that live in this area have to deal with an unsafe road because the developer is having problems.What about our quality of life?What about when the firetrucks and the ambulance and the police have to use this road,know wonder our city vehicles are in such dis-repair.Springhill/hospital area is a very large part of the citys tax base and we deserve better.

  • 17 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    It is my understanding that the Historical Commission is following the scope of their duties under the City Charter, which is limited to managing the city-owned historic properties - not painting murals around town and saving private historic properties. Is this not correct?

    The loss of the Capt. Daskam house was due to the failure of the NPT to have a written contract with the developer regarding what was to be saved, along with oversight of this by the zoning department of the city.

  • 18 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    Turf is on zoning.

  • 19 Observer // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:08 pm

    #17, another one who GETS it.

    See? There are a few of us in this town who know the truth, and we don’t have to disseminate in order to get the facts out there.

    And we can lay the facts out without lies, without resorting to suing everyone in sight over made-up slights, and without whining in the newspapers like a bunch of demenia-suffering crybabies.

  • 20 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    Lord, I hope you don’t “disseminate”. And the image of “demenia (sic) suffering crybabies” is a treasure. Please, keep using those big words wrong. I need the laughs.

  • 21 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    Can anyone provide a link to the Historic Commission’s Charter? Is it on the City’s website?

  • 22 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    #20 - Let’s hope it doesn’t. Disseminate. We have enough of these idiots around already.

    And the only demenias I know are the ones on the Hysterectomal Commotion.

  • 23 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Wow - you guys are really mature. Can’t win with the facts, so you resort to sick jokes and name-calling. Really shows your character. You need to look in the mirror and see who has really been responsible for the divisiveness in the Historic Preservation community in Norwalk.

  • 24 Litter- pick it up // Sep 2, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    My street has a litter problem. No trash cans and a lot of foot traffic from the little bodegas.

    I called public works customer service and asked about getting some trash cans and a littering sign (there are signs on wilson Ave and on trolley lane so why not my street?)No luck on either of those.
    I think a trash can near the bodegas should be required and one for every half block maybe. People might just use them!

    But the city WILL give you a litter pick up tool and gloves and bags (I think they got them from Keep America Beautiful). So I try to go out each Monday night and pick up the bottles, cans, bags of food, styrofoam cups, etc.

    BTW: the city needs to remind the residents of SOUTH Norwalk that they need to use their recycling bins. I don’t see any on the street (except for mine).

    Speaking of bins…how often does the city distribute the blue bins? I think it is time to distibute them to any folks who do not have one on the curb.

    ALSO a note should be left at houses that do not recycle, that encourages them to recycle.

  • 25 OPEN GOVERNMENT // Sep 3, 2008 at 11:58 am

    Dear M. Geake,
    Thanks for the correction on the amount of the subsidy, $104K, but the article said Seligson’s development plan is called Waypointe. Not sure what your point was,isn’t Seligson and Waypointe one and the same?

  • 26 MGeake // Sep 3, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    The Master Development Agreement is with “Waypointe LLC”, which — at least at present — is a Seligson subsidiary.

    Remember two things:

    1. The “LL” in “LLC” stands for “Limited Liability”. There will be no liability at all for Seligson Properties, and the LLC’s liability will, for all intents and purposes, be limited to its assets (which I suspect will be that development and nothing more). So take with a grain of salt anybody who says the city will always be able to go after Seligson for any short-fall in parking revenues, etc.

    2. An LLC is owned and controlled by its members, which can be changed at will without reporting to any state agency (except for a change in “managing member”). The city can start out with Seligson as a “partner” and end up with somebody totally different.

    Look, I’m not faulting Mr. Seligson for isolating the rest of his assets from this development; it’s what I was taught to do in grad school. I’m just interested in making sure the city and its taxpayers are protected in this venture also. The MDA is over 200 pages, and I’m nowhere near done reviewing it.

  • 27 anono // Sep 3, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Has anyone ever asked Tom Hamilton to determine the “savings” to Waypointe if the City issues the bonds versus the cost to Seligson if he issues the bonds( assuming he was able to)?
    That would seem to be information worthwhile to have.

  • 28 Anonymous // Sep 3, 2008 at 8:26 pm

    Read the paper, #27. Hamilton completed the analysis of the “savings” a week ago and signed off on the deal.

  • 29 someone // Sep 3, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    Stuart Ave. is to be repaved in 2008 and Osborne Ave. (#1 - means only part?) is to be repaved in (at least according to http://www.norwalkct.org/dpw/pwdpw.asp#chap6 ). I only just recently noticed that West Avenue is also a mess in need of repaving. I suppose that job will be postponed til after the major construction of the developments is done. West Ave. does not appear on the DPW schedule (which seems to become more ambitious further into the future, where funding is much less certain).

  • 30 nwlknative // Sep 4, 2008 at 8:42 am

    How about Wilton Avenue? That project has been on going for at least six months and is nothing but dirt. I hear that the money ran out for paving! That is a major cut through from US 1 to Route 7 and a major road for the newly built and formerly known affordable housing project that no longer will be affordable. It is almost impossible for the people who live in that neighborhood to get to where they are going with 123 dug up, and Wilton Avenue and Main Street all at once. A real challenge.

  • 31 Anonymous // Sep 4, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    I was just on Osborne yesterday afternoon, and it doesn’t seem so bad to me.

    But I wonder when the City will get around to reconstructing the bottom of Nursery Street, where the water runs under the roadway and the frost heaves always leave giant potholes EVERY year. Driving on that end of the road is a definite hazard, as most people avoid the potholes by cruising up on the lefthand side of the road, oncoming traffic or not. It’s way past time for the City to dig that part of the road up and install piping to keep the water from undermining the road and necessitating repaving every year. Talk about saving thousands to the City!

  • 32 Anonymous // Sep 4, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    Sad so much was wriiten for a mayor who has done very little but move smoking mirrors around.

    Worker safety? How is the DPW worker who was almost killed when he was asked to go against DPW policy about a month ago?

    How are all the unprotected city workers who have gone into the old police station without respiratory protection?

    A grant writer who was unable to help the fire dept out when in cam to their grants?

    The list clearly goes on..

  • 33 Nonymous // Sep 6, 2008 at 8:38 am

    The condition of most roads in this city makes me furious, and agitated, and I believe makes drivers nastier and ruder, and also creates confusing situations. Now that I have a new car, I’m almost afraid to drive down Wall Street ’cause I so much don’t want to deal with that first dent in my beautiful silver baby. BUT, that said, I think until CL&P finishes whatever the devil it is they’re doing with Route 1, it would be difficult for the city to do much with the roads - people’s nerves are already frayed by dealing with Route 1 and if they then had to deal with work on the roads they deliberately take to AVOID Route 1, we’d have an entire city full of road-raging warriors.
    I think CL&P owes us all a year of free electricity!

  • 34 Anonymous // Sep 6, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    How could all these postings be so negative against Dick? What did he ever do for you?Grow up or move Norwalk needs Dick not any of you.

  • 35 Diane C: Negative? Who, moi? // Sep 6, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    #34 -you asked the question yourself: “what did he ever do for you?” Or was that Freudian slip meant to be “do TO you?”.
    At any rate, every mayor has his or her detractors, and da critics, and da enemies. What you have here sometimes is a percentage of folks who don’t make up the group of men who want to be Dick, the women who want to be with Dick, and the little children who want to be just like Dick. That group is called re-pub-li-cans. Can you say re-pub-li-cans? I think you can……….
    Crap, here comes the rain - damn, that Dick guy has some connections, huh?
    Anyway, since you obviously believe we are children and that you are mature, perhaps you will enlighten us as to why you think Norwalk needs Dick.

  • 36 #34 STAND AGAINST THE WALL AND PUT THIS BLINDFOLD ON // Sep 6, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    “Grow up or move Norwalk needs Dick not any of you.”

    I said about a month or so ago when we were talking about taxes, politics, and Norwalk in general, and one poster came up with the “Then why don’t you move,” and I said that if anyone told me TO MY FACE that if I did not like something here TO MOVE IF I DIDN’T LIKE IT, I would drop them in their tracks with one punch.

    It seems like there are one or two posters on here that seem to think that if you have a problem with something in Norwalk, that you should move. You really don’t want to say that to people who had family in this city from the late 1800s, or for that fact any one who lives in this city especially if they are lifelong residents and property owners. Your statement that Norwalk needs Dick more than us is the dumbest statement I have ever heard. Maybe you should stand outside of the polling booths in the next election with a sign that says “Dick does not need you or your vote, SO MOVE.” If Moccia has friends like you, he sure as hell will not need any enemies. I think you are the one who needs to seriously GROW UP.

  • 37 Anonymous // Sep 6, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    According to The Hour our mayor has shown leadership and sincerity to its taxpayers and residents.He has given consideration to developers and shown he has contributed to the arts and made parking what it is today in Norwalk.How can anyone think he won’t be the next mayor he has saved the convention and flown home without a plane and was going to appear with the rest of the Marvel heroes at the fest tommorrow.You simply don’t get it when you think Dick has seen his last term in Norwalk.This guy has cleaned up our streets and put a cap on spending and made example of the greedy firefighters who thought they deserved more.Rowyatonites sleep comfortable nights that the trucks have been removed from their subcity and now owe him the next term.How could anyone say he has done less than any other mayor since the invention of sliced bread.Our city owes this man so give it up and stand behind him.

  • 38 Diane C: funny stuff! it is funny, isn't it? // Sep 6, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    Anon #37 - your sarcasm is so pithy and cohesive, I almost fell for it! Thanks for the laugh….
    (however, on the off chance you might ACTUALLY be serious, please advise, so I can duly rebut))

  • 39 Anonymous // Sep 6, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    naw it took a lot to write like that I’d hate to think it would be expected from me all the time and to think I didn’t have help.

    :)

    Mr G

  • 40 Diane C: reveal thyself // Sep 6, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Mr. G Anon: You must serve your devoted fans, and channel your energy into writing - we know each use of your special powers diminishes you (some super-hero affliction), but for the good of mankind, you must continue…for God’s sake man, unmask yourself that we may know this writer of writers and thinker of thinkers. We are mere mortals here on yourct, you are king, and all others bow before you.
    (Too many Mr. G’s out there for me to guess)

  • 41 Anonymous // Nov 11, 2008 at 10:05 am

    16.9 percent of Norwalk’s 5.7 million square feet of office space was available for lease or sublease. The current amount is up from 13.6 percent in this year’s second quarter and 15.2 percent at this time last year

    Digitas Inc., a digital marketing company plans to transfer more than 100 jobs in January from 230 East Ave to somewhere in Stamford

    we did have 1.5 million to spend on this

    Slated for modernization are the traffic signals at
    the intersections of West Avenue with Arch, Chapel, Merwin, Maple, Orchard, Leonard and Berkeley streets. In addition, new signals are proposed for the intersections of West Avenue and Elm Street, and Belden Avenue and Burnell Boulevard, according to Yeosock.

    Officials say the up-grades are needed as part of the redevelopment of the West Avenue corridor. The area lies at the center of Waypointe — Stanley M. Seligson Properties’ planned mixture of new retail, housing and offices.

    now we have

    A $469,000 budget cut that will reduce patrol, community police and the vice and drug squad will not affect service, Chief Harry Rilling said Friday.

    How are we doing?

    Wait until the next round of cuts and ask us all again.That should be sometime next week if predictions are right.

Leave a Reply