YourCT.com header image 2

Common Council TV Coming To You


by turfgrrl


August 31st, 2008 · 33 Comments

Former Common Council member Herb Grant has been out of office for close to a year, yet here he is, still working diligently on behalf of Norwalk shepherding the television coverage of Common Council meetings. The Hour reports:

Within weeks, Norwalk Common Council meetings could be televised on Cablevision Channel 79.

Council members hatched the idea last September during one of their informal bipartisan meetings. Since then, the city has received grant money to purchase the wiring and camera.

“The wiring has been done. The programming is pretty much completed and we’re waiting on one part that should be here in two to three weeks. We’re in pretty good shape,” said Karen Del Vecchio, the city’s director of information technology. “The camera is fixed (in place), but we have some ability to go left and right, and up and down.”

In addition to receiving the issuing part, a sound person must be trained to operate the system, according to Del Vecchio.

On Tuesday night, former Councilman Herbert A. Grant, treasurer for Area 9 Cable Council, which provided the grant money, told members of the council’s Land Use & Building Management Committee that more money is available to expand the system, if the city so chooses.

“You have to render a report to Area 9 Cable Council. Then you have to do an analysis, ‘What else do we need to make this complete?’” Grant said. “Then you would submit another grant (request) between now and the end of the year.”

Grant advised committee members to visit other towns that televise their municipal meetings for ideas about how to expand the current system.

“Darien is fully operational on Channel 79. You’ve got a variety of capabilities, and it’s a unique thing,” Grant said. “My suggestion would be visit Westport and visit Greenwich. Get an idea and cost from them, and that would be the request you resubmit to the Area 9 Cable Council.”

To date, the city has received two grants, one totaling $4,000 and the other $2,070, to purchase equipment for the system. To receive more dollars, the city must submit a report to the cable council, detailing how that money was spent, and prepare another grant request, Grant said.

“We have an opportunity to get money to do things for the public,” said Douglas E. Hempstead, Land Use Committee chairman.

Alan Lo, city building and facilities manager, said the Norwalk project, as currently designed, is 90-percent complete. One camera has been installed. Wiring, however, is in place for four cameras.

“We pointed one camera … the widest angle lens we could get. It doesn’t cover the speaker (podium). It covers the council. And it’s not designed to pan,” Lo said. “If you want a full access to view the audience, then you do need more cameras.”

The council meeting — and perhaps other municipal meetings held in the council chambers — will be broadcast on Channel 79, a public access channel operated by Cablevision.

source: The Hour, Televised council meetings pending, By ROBERT KOCH, August 30, 2008

Tags: Norwalk

33 Responses so far “Common Council TV Coming To You”



  • 1 anon // Aug 31, 2008 at 10:42 am

    Excellent. I know this might seem a little rash, but can we also get BOE meetings televised?

  • 2 Anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 11:48 am

    I think its great that even though people are no longer on the council that they are still working at making things better for the city. The idea of the former coucil group at the bipartisan meetings was a great idea. What ever happened to those meetings anyway? Too bad they stopped. Coffey, Hempstead, McQuaid, Romano, Grant and sometimes others worked towards getting the community involved in committees and commisions and and advocating televised meetings to keep the public informed. Good job!

  • 3 Old timer // Aug 31, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Wonderful news, long overdue. I hope they have figured a way to get the council persons to use the microphones so viewers will be able to hear.

  • 4 Diane C- and the Emmy goes go... // Aug 31, 2008 at 6:31 pm

    I can’t wait to see the theatrics come to a halt….or perhaps this will only encourage them- yikes! Just in case, here are some award categories for the upcoming season:
    Best Prime Time Soap Opera:
    Best Actor in a Supporting Role:
    Best New Actress in a Comedy Series:
    Best Cameo Appearance in a Drama:

    Sorry - I just can’t help myself - this is going to be SO much fun…….

  • 5 AND EVEN MORE // Aug 31, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    How about a camera running for a 1/2 hour after the meeting closes, so that we can see when the real in fighting starts.

    I would like to see it eventually also show the citizen speaking on the podium, and the attendees.

    MAKE UP! MAAAAKE UP.

  • 6 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    Old Timer: I don’t think its anyone on the council is purposely not using the microphones. The acoustics in the council chambers is just bad. The mics do a great job of picking up papers knocking into to them, but as for voices, they seem to not do so well on some days. Then the council chamber is not set up for multi media presentations all that well either.

    Maybe its time to revisit how public meetings should be accommodated, and have city hall become more state of the art technology and recording wise. There’s no reason a verbatim digital audio mp3 can’t be archived and uploaded the day of the meeting for example. And that goes doubly for the committee meetings.

  • 7 Joanne // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    Thank God I’m not going to have to worry about all my bad hair days, I am glad they are finally going to put this in place. We talked about it many times and I always hoped that it would actually happen. i think its important that people in the community are able to watch and listen to how city government works and to see who they voted for make deisions that affect everyone. By the way the mic’s are kind of ard to speak into if you are short. Thankfully I have a voice like a megaphone and never had to worry about anyone hearing me.

  • 8 Nonymous // Sep 1, 2008 at 9:24 am

    I’m with #1. With the exception of this recent Amanda Brown brouhaha, I think most of the people on the Council are concerned citizens, trying to do their best, obviously not always agreeing with each other, but that’s democracy.
    But the Board of Ed! Not so. Most of them see that as a stepping stone to some other political plum up the road and don’t care much about the kids. And we have an administration that’s an embarassment to the city. I’m not sure I could STOMACH watching a board meeting, but I’d love to have the option.

  • 9 Diane C- series premiere // Sep 1, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    I’d still like to see the League of Women Voters or some other civic group do a segment on how local government works, similar to the information spot done on CT-N (the state legislature program on cable tv 83.) Ours could talk about government structure here (council, mayor, committees, commissions, boards, staff, etc); how items are brought up in committee and potentially moved on to the full council; rules of order; public hearings & public participation; consent calendars, roll call votes,& executive session; resolutions; agendas & actions (minutes), etc etc. I know many people who are not familiar with the process and who feel “ignorant” or “inadequate” when attending local meetings. Maybe even each council member could take a topic, and do a little piece of the video. Staff members like department directors could describe the role they play on committees and commissions, and the mayor could talk about the appointee process.
    The final video could be shown once on month on channel 79, and should also be available on the city website.

  • 10 Anonymous // Sep 1, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    Stay tooned for Nutty Nick @ Nite! Unless he somehow becomes camera-shy. Maybe this is the end of his coat-tail riding days come the next election.

  • 11 To Diane C // Sep 1, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    Excellent suggestion!

  • 12 turfgrrl // Sep 1, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    Diane C: Great idea, if CT-N or even CCM does it. But isn’t that what school house rock, I’m Just a Bill was supposed to do?
  • 13 Diane C- and now we return to "As City Hall Turns" // Sep 2, 2008 at 9:33 am

    TG: You’ve made the school house rock comment in the past in regards to a televised “Norwalk Government Video” and it still sounds to me like your point is “screw them if they didn’t learn this stuff in elementary school”. It seems clear you have very little tolerance for the ignorant (note ignorant, as in “not exposed to or informed of” vs. stupid). I, on the other hand, applaud and encourage anyone who wants to learn and participate, especially in that order. However, one can also “participate” by just showing up and observing the process, although it is difficult to ask questions of anyone while business is being conducted. I also think the video would be helpful for newcomers of any age, and that one should not be penalized for not watching school house rock (some may not have even had a t.v. back then, much less Conjunction Junction play dates!), or for not particpating in local government earlier.
    CT-N does do a great video on the State Legislature, especially on tips for speaking at public hearings. (I’ve tried to follow their tips on brevity and submitting comments in writing, but alas….). Here is link for list of their educational programs, but there are loads more on their website:
    http://www.ctn.state.ct.us/videos_educational.asp

    Unlike School-House Rock, our program would be specific to our Common Council form of government, list all of the permanent Council Committees, and possibly even be followed by weekly or monthly video segments on each major city department and what they do. And while I think having reconizable faces in the video would be helpful, you might not want to volunteer for the one on public hearings. But I digress……

  • 14 OPEN GOVERNMENT // Sep 2, 2008 at 9:52 am

    What is “School House Rock”? I like Diane C’s idea for educating the public on how the local governemnt works.What a useful thing that would be..Having served on the LWV’s education committeee some years ago, I think it’s safe to say that they do not have the resources to produce the suggested video. Hmm. Who else might take on this task? MAybe a high school civics class?

  • 15 turfgrrl // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Diane C: School House Rock, rocked. Where else could you learn about conjunctions, adverbs and how a bill becomes a law, in song? My point is that learning about stuff doesn’t have to be all mind-numbingly boring.

    And you betcha, the city form of government should be taught in elementary school.

    Why on earth would you think that I don’t advocate learning about and participating in local government?

  • 16 Diane C- and now we return to "As City Hall Turns" // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:06 am

    Open Government: here is link to School House Rock history (1973-1985)and site. Quick version is that it was the idea of a Madison Avenue ad-man who noticed his young child knew the words to every song, and wouldn’t it be nice to have songs that taught- the cartoon like vignettes were sandwiched in between Saturday morning cartoons. Grammar ones like Conjunction Junction What’s Your Function and how government works like “I’m Just a Bill” became instant classics.

    http://www.school-house-rock.com/history.htm

  • 17 turfgrrl // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:09 am

    Open Government: Oh yeah, another reason to post a youtube clip!

  • 18 Diane C- and now we return to "As City Hall Turns" // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Hey TG; I posted a reply comment to “open government” and it got nuked. Am I banished?

  • 19 turfgrrl // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:19 am

    Diane C: No one has ever been banished. Every once in awhile the spam filter gets aggressive and I have to go in an fish out the real comments from the viagra, hot, hot, hot and get rich comments that little evil spambots post.
  • 20 Diane C- and now we return to "As City Hall Turns" // Sep 2, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Thanks - the comment is up there now as #16 - I think you and I pushed enter at the exact same time. At any rate, you can remove this entry and also my #18.

  • 21 MGeake's wife // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    Mike and I have talked to the SOTS (Secretary of the State) about an idea that we would like to share with you. Why not make a video telling people what they have to do once they are registered to vote? Go through the steps, from signing the application and submitting it, to what to expect at the polls, how to actually vote. Then explain where your vote goes, how it is counted and how it counts in any election.

    This video whould be in Spanish and English and any other language that they (SOTS) feel might help. It could run at schools, churches, civic centers and of course at the polling places thenselves so that people can look at it and get re-educated while waiting to vote. It goes a step further than what is being seen now via the internet at the polling places. This could be set up to be seen anytime via the internet.

  • 22 Diane C- Kinda School House Rocks the Vote // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    MG- Excellent idea, and one that should be supported by local and regional Registrars of Voters. You should pass this along to Karen Lyons and Betty Bondi in hopes that Registrar of Voters Association of CT (ROVAC) could add to their next board meeting agenda. Again, too, I think the League of Women Voters, and perhaps the new groups of First Time Voters could step up to the plate and solicit SOTS to support this.
    I agree on all the aspects of the video, especially the “how to vote”. I voted for the first time MANY years after I was eligible, and will never forget getting to the booth and not having a clue as to what to do. Some kind volunteer showed me how to operate the curtain and levers, etc.
    The other thing that should be explained, timely for this year in particular, is our bizarre Electoral College, in which a person can win the popular vote and still lose the election.

  • 23 Registered Voter // Sep 3, 2008 at 6:16 pm

    With all due respect - may I ask why we would provide voter information in other languages? Plus, if we provide that for one, we really should do it for all of the languages represented in town.

    I guess I get my back up because my family very happily learned English when they got here and they all came from different countries - Italy, Germany, Ukraine and Poland. Just my 2 cents.

  • 24 meToo // Sep 3, 2008 at 10:18 pm

    #23 Mine came from Norway, my dad repeated 1st grade because he did not speak english, but that was in the 30’s when anyone who came to America wanted to be like the America that they loved. Not like it is today! they (people who do not speak english) feel that they don’t have to, that we as americans have to learn their native language. Somewhere there should be a law that a person can’t become an american until they can speak english fluently.

    But then that is only my 2 cents too.

  • 25 Diane C- parlez vous anglais? // Sep 4, 2008 at 10:21 am

    You must be a U.S. citizen to vote, and here is excert from the U.S. Visa Bureau as ONE of the requirements for citizenship:

    Be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language, unless on the date of filing the applicant:
    Has been residing in America subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 15 years and is over 55 years of age;
    Has been residing in America subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 20 years and is over 50 years of age; or
    Has a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, where the impairment affects the applicant’s ability to learn English;

  • 26 meToo // Sep 4, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Then why can’t the people understand what we are saying? Why does everything have to be helped with a translator? Or are you saying that they are not US citizens, and if that is so, then why are they voting? Now, know that, I am more confused than ever!

  • 27 Diane C- early & often // Sep 4, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    I think Mary Geake was trying to be inclusive & compassionate in the process of educating voters, but was mistaken regarding the requirements to vote. One MUST be a citizen to vote and in order to be a citizen you MUST be able to read, write, and speak some level of English. The exceptions are noted above.
    But you bring up a great point: we all know or have seen many people who do not speak a word of English. Are they citizens? Do they vote? I don’t have a clue. As for me, well, I vote early and often …

  • 28 Anonymous // Sep 5, 2008 at 12:01 am

    Cops get what an extra $100 if they speak spanish?If you only speak spanish you get what medicare,medicaid,SS or assistance without a drop of english,ever wonder what you get if you go there?I think its time to learn spanish and get what every American deserves.

  • 29 Registered Voter // Sep 5, 2008 at 12:45 am

    I forgot to add Finland to my family (blood and otherwise). I agree, Diane C and truely believe Ms. Geake was trying to be inclusive, so please understand that this is not meant to be disrespectful, but there are so many other groups besides Spanish speakers and this is not meant to be disrespectful of Spanish speakers at all.

    When I was a kid, the kids from Greece, Italy and Czechoslovakia, were kept back a year and got at best some extra help once a week. Somehow they all learned English.

  • 30 Diane C- p.c. = censorship? // Sep 5, 2008 at 8:41 am

    #29 Registered Voter: I took no offense at your inquiry - I think we are all in sorry shape in this country when “political correctness” prevents us from asking valid yet often unpopular questions or from challenging the status quo.

  • 31 Unafilliated Voter // Sep 5, 2008 at 10:04 am

    #29, the difference is that back when we were kids, people WANTED to assimilate and become more like us and the country they lived in. They WANTED to become American citizens.

    Today, many of these immigrants are only here for the short haul - long enough to get our schooling, make a bunch of money to send home, and then they plan to return to their country of origin where the money they’ve sent back will set their families up so they can live like kings. These people say, why should they bother assimilating when they don’t plan on being here forever?

  • 32 Registered Voter // Sep 5, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    Thanks, I remember my grandparents saying that people asked them if they missed Europe and they replied, that if it was so good they never would have left.

  • 33 1 of the SMD 3 // Sep 6, 2008 at 8:51 am

    Here we go again with this “every other language” Except ENGLISH !!!! It’s way overdue to make English the “Official” language of the United States!
    Don’t get me started about all the ILLEGAL Aliens that have taken over whole sections of Norwalk….

Leave a Reply