YourCT.com header image 2

Political Campaigns Are About Winning


by turfgrrl


August 29th, 2008 · 50 Comments

At the end of the day, nothing scares political junkies more than campaign strategies that slice and dice the electorate into manageable chunks of issue driven GOTV. McCain’s campaign surely looked at the Democratic ticket and said hrmm. In comes Alaska governor Sarah Palin. And the howls from the left are at full screech. ChrisMC posted campaign junkie Paul Begalia’s comments earlier, which are about are very telling about what is really being said in the Obama war room. Let’s start with panic. Begalia should know, he ran Bill Clinton’s war room along the same lines, which we should all remember well. The pandering to the soccer mom begat the pandering to the Nascar dad and all the sobriquets that campaigners thrust on a voter bloc that needs to hear that the koolaid is just around the corner.

So yeah, McCain’s campaign is making a cynical play to the woman voter. And that’s what his campaign should be doing.

The number one theme that emerged from the Democratic national convention was that 4 more years of the last 8 years of the administration wasn’t what America needed. That message is now negated.

The USA Today points out the delima for Democrats:

The historic nature of Palin’s selection put Democrats in a bind, one that was vividly illustrated by the two contrasting statements the Obama campaign put out after McCain introduced his running mate to a boisterous rally in Dayton, Ohio.

One, issued in the name of the Democratic presidential candidate and his running mate, Joe Biden, was congratulatory, calling Palin’s selection “another encouraging sign that old barriers are falling in politics.”

Clinton herself lauded the choice while maintaining her ideological criticism of the McCain campaign.er ideological criticism of the McCain campaign.

“We should all be proud of Gov. Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain,” Clinton said in a statement. “While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Gov. Palin will add an important new voice to the debate.”

A separate statement from Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton offered a harsh critique of Palin’s credentials, saying McCain “put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency.”

Does the Obama campaign really want to decry the foreign policy expereince of a VP pick when their presidential candidate is vunerable to that issue?

Panic.

Campaigns are like chess matches. Part of the art of winning a political campaign is reacting to your opponents moves. McCain’s campaign just out outmaneuvered the Obama campaign in this round. Maybe this won’t be a boring campaign through the final stretch.

Tags: Presidential 2008

50 Responses so far “Political Campaigns Are About Winning”



  • 1 Anonymous // Aug 30, 2008 at 8:06 am

    Does McCain want to decry the experience of a presidential pick when his own VP candidate is vulnerable to that issue? We’ll see what happens to that position at the gathering of the reds next week…

  • 2 Anonymous // Aug 30, 2008 at 8:07 am

    Does McCain want to decry the lack of experience of a presidential pick when his own VP candidate is vulnerable to that issue? We’ll see what happens to his position on that issue at the gathering of the reds next week…

  • 3 turfgrrl // Aug 30, 2008 at 8:31 am

    Let’s look at it historically;

    1992: Bush (experience) Clinton (not really) Clinton wins
    1996: Clinton (experience) Dole ( Senate experience) Clinton wins
    2000: Gore (experience) Bush (none) Bush wins
    2004: Kerry (experience) Bush (really bad experience) Bush wins
    2008 Democratic Primary: Clinton (ran on Experience) Obama (ran on change) Obama wins
    2008 Republican Primary: McCain (experience) Romney, Huckabee (not really) McCain wins barely

    After a careful review, I can’t seen where voters have sought experience as a significant qualifier.

  • 4 Anonymous // Aug 30, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Chief Fired by Palin Speaks Out

    The July firing of Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan by Gov. Sarah Palin, who was announced as John McCain’s running mate on Friday, has unearthed a stream of soap-opera-like details about Palin, her husband, her family and top state appointees. The controversy has also cut against Palin’s reputation for holding an ethical line and standing up to colleagues in the Republican Party over matters of principle.

    Monegan, 57, a respected former chief of the Anchorage Police Department, said in an interview with The Washington Post’s James V. Grimaldi on Friday that the governor repeatedly brought up the topic of her ex-brother-in-law, Michael Wooten, after Monegan became the state’s commissioner of public safety in December 2006. Palin’s husband, Todd, met with Monegan and presented a dossier of information about Wooten, who was going through a bitter custody battle with Palin’s sister, Molly. Monegan also said Sarah Palin sent him e-mails on the subject, but Monegan declined to disclose them, saying he planned to give them to a legislative investigator looking into the matter.

    Palin initially denied that she or anyone in her administration had ever pressured Monegan to fire the trooper, but this summer acknowledged more than a half a dozen contacts over the matter, including one phone call from a Palin administration official to a state police lieutenant. The call was recorded and was released by Palin’s office this month. Todd Palin told a television reporter in Alaska that he did meet with Monegan, but said he was just “informing” Monegan about the issue, not exerting pressure.

    “She never directly asked me to fire him,” Monegan said.

    But he said Todd Palin told him Wooten “shouldn’t be a trooper. I’ve tried to explain to him, you can’t head hunt like this. What you need to do is back off, because if the trooper does make a mistake, and it is a terminable offense, it can look like political interference.

    “I think he’s emotionally committed in trying to see that his former brother-in-law is punished.”

    The allegation against Palin, “undercuts one of the points they are making that she is an ethical reformer,” said Democratic state Sen. Hollis French, who is managing a $100,000 investigation into the firing of Walter Monegan.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/08/exclusive_chief_fired_by_palin.html?hpid=topnews

  • 5 barnstorm // Aug 30, 2008 at 12:47 pm

    So both parties have experience/inexperience liabilities. The pointlessness of pursuing this subject as it relates to the election reminds me of a different Palin; Michael to be precise. I would suggest viewing his discourse in the Monty Python segment entitled “The Argument Clinic”.

  • 6 New Sono resident // Aug 30, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Turf girl you’ve compared some experience to lots of experience. Sarah Palin has none. GW had little experience but was associated with a family with lots of it, BC had been a governor for over 8 yrs and head of the DNC. Moreover he was a graduate of Georgetown and Yale. Sarah has a BA in poly sci from Univ. of Idaho. She sounds like an exceptional and nice woman (though w/5 children one of whom special needs I wonder who’s going to take care of those children–cuz she won’t have time to do anything with them).

  • 7 turfgrrl // Aug 30, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    New Sono resident: It was the experience factor in the matchups. Longevity in public office, for example, is hardly a good qualification these days.
  • 8 justSoYouKnow // Aug 30, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    I really hope that Obama wins, but if not, we could end up with a really good tv show, remember 2006/2007 ABC show?

    Commander in Chief

    http://www.tv.com/commander-in-chief/show/30463/summary.html

  • 9 Anonymous // Aug 30, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    Can’t wait to see the impending disaster that God is going to wreak on the GOP. Too bad they chose New Orleans for their convention. Would have been better if it had been Houston. Those poor folks in New Orleans don’t deserve more Republican incompetence and corruption.

  • 10 Bushie Girl // Aug 30, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    #8, my favorite was always “That’s My Bush”, but it went off the air just when it was getting good.

  • 11 Bushie Girl // Aug 30, 2008 at 9:19 pm

    #9, the Repub convention is going to be in Michegan or Minnesota (whichever, I can’t remember), NOT New Orleans. Whatever gave you THAT idea??

  • 12 Anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 5:30 am

    Turf, I read this post three times over, and I think you should stick to topics where you don’t have a loved dog in the fight. Clearly you’re projecting your own biases towards having a woman on the ticket (any ticket?).

    Panic is “an overwhelming feeling of fear and anxiety” or “sudden mass fear and anxiety over anticipated events.”

    So a partisan talking head criticized the pick and conjured some potential lines of attack - so what? As you say, campaigns are all about winning so one should certainly expect critical statements (same as when Repubs offered critiques of the Biden pick).

    But “howls from the left at full screech”? Really? Frankly this post is not your best moment…

    Beyond the fact that Democrats must criticize the pick to win (because it’s about winning and that’s how politics work), you share none of Begalia’s concerns about an inexperienced small-state mid-first-term governor who:
    - may not have been fully vetted,
    - has outstanding ethical issues at home,
    - lied to cover up her 16 y.o. daughter’s pregnancy by claiming the child is her own,
    - has basically no experience or exposure to foreign affairs (and nearly no international travel at all for any reason),
    - said last year that she is “too busy” to think about Iraq,
    - is pro-life,
    - believes creationism has a place in the classroom,
    - thinks more oil is the answer to our energy problems,
    - etc., etc., etc.?

    Hillary lost the primary. Get over it.

  • 13 New Sono resident // Aug 31, 2008 at 6:19 am

    experience in public office and knowledge of domestic and international affairs is a measuring stick for qualification. In large part that’s why 18m people voted for Hillary. Longevity shouldn’t determine who’s qualified, but the lack of almost any experience, combined with a background that’s interesting but show’s little or no grasp of the issues is not only relevant but it should disqualify someone from even running from the 2nd highest office in the nation. Some conservatives love Palin, but I’ve heard from a few staunch Republicans, including women, that they are embarrassed by the selection and in a couple of cases have stated they won’t vote this election at all.
    Watching Palin speak one can see real potential, but for the past month the McCain campaign has been hammering Obama for his lack of experience, and I’m sorry for those who argue that she has “executive” experience, but mayor of a town of less than 10,000, and the not quite 2 yr governor of a State awash w/money and w/a population of less than that of Fairfield County is minimal experience.
    If this is just about personality (which was the complaint made by the Republicans about Barak!) than Sarah Palin is a good pick, but she hasn’t to date shown the intelligence, ambition or experience to potentially be President of the United States.
    Anyone who votes for McCain now, who voted for Hillary before, either just wants a woman as Pres/ or VP or is voting on other issues, most likely race. Hillary’s policies are barely different from Obama’s and to the extent they are different are more liberal (health care), and the experience issue has become moot.

  • 14 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 8:42 am

    Anonymous 12: Frankly this post wasn’t about the ideaology of the pick, but the political calculation of the pick. Yep, I’m biased. I’ve actually run campaigns, and know all about slicing and dicing your way to GOTV for a candidate. A far different bias from your supposition that I care whether a woman is on the any presidential ticket or not.

    My analysis stands, now on day 3, as spot on.

    What is the political world talking about? McCain’s pick. What are the liberal pundits talking about? McCain’s pick. What are the conservative pundits talking about? McCain’s pick.

    Are the political pundits talking about anything but gender and politics? Nope.

  • 15 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 8:48 am

    New Sono Resident: You are making an assumption that all Hillary supporters supported all of her political philosophies.

    There are base voters, those that embrace and partisan philosophy. And then there are the rest, that support candidates for a variety of reasons often divorced from issues and ideology. Race will certainly be one, but there are many, many more.

  • 16 Anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:19 am

    Turf: Try to take a step back and look at your own posts (the posts of a supposedly “purple” citizen).

    Today you write about the politics of the Republican pick by applauding the strategy, and you characterize the predictable critiques as “panic,” “howls,” and “screeches.”

    However on August 24th, when you wrote about Obama’s pick, you complemented Biden but wrote almost nothing about the strategy itself expect to note that you “don’t think Biden will add anything to the electoral math that Obama would need to win the presidency” (no analysis). You then went right into a fantastical tangent about how McCain should pick Hillary - the object of a your obsession.

    You didn’t make ANY mention of the “screeches” or “howls” of the right or how that indicated “panic” - no commentary whatsoever on the ramblings of folks like William Kristol or Karl Rove, comments which followed in EXACTLY the same vein as Begalia’s comments.

    For example, Rove called the Biden pick a reminder of Obama’s lack of experience. But when Fox News asked Rove to compare the Biden pick to the Cheney pick (a Rove-engineered decision to add experience to the ticket), Rove claimed the situation in 2000 was totally different. Now where were your pointed barbs about Republican screeching and panic on August 24th?

    You often promote the idea of a purple nation, but I wonder if you subconsciously started promoting “purple” as a way to reconcile your own flip to Hillary and the Democrats. Now that Hillary has lost, you’re stuck pretending purple is your true color.

    Be honest and give it a break: you lean too far right to be purple, and it shows in your own blog writings.

  • 17 New Sono resident // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:50 am

    turfgirl I’m impressed with your blog, but I disagree that I presume Hillary supporters have to agree w/all her political stands. In fact the point I make, that anyone who was going to vote for Hillary not simply on the basis of her gender, race or experience is voting based largely off Hillary’s political philosophy–unless you’re saying there are other strong reasons people vote for Hillary (ie Wellesley grads-.
    If people now supporting McCain did choose Hillary over Obama because of her experience, and are likewise supporting McCain for the same reason, that issue is now moot.
    I’d love to hear a reason other than race or gender why a Hillary supporter is now choosing McCain. On issue after issue McCain is to the far right of Hillary, and even Obama is slightly to the right of Hillary’s rhetoric (primarily on medical care issues).

    I still remain shocked that social conservatives so strongly support a woman who should she win the Vice-Presidency will largely be delegating out the child rearing role to other people. It’s nice that she chose to go to term with her pregnancy, but I guess she decided she’d prefer to have power and ambition than take an active role in raising a special needs child. (and I’m not saying that women have to take care of children exclusively—but this isn’t simply a demanding job but one that should–take her away from her children and family on a 24/7 basis). As usual many conservatives are more interested in whether the baby is born than how the baby is raised.

  • 18 Nonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:56 am

    # 9 - their convention isn’t in New Orleans, it’s in St. Paul

  • 19 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Anonymous 16: Simple. While I like Joe Biden, and have written in the past that he pretty much has the best grasp of Middle East policy, I don’t think his pick as VP moved the needle, in a campaign strategy way.

    Why should I care what the pundits were saying at that point? There’s no identifiable voter bloc that was going to change how they picked which ticket to support based on Biden being the VP pick. And certainly, the right wasn’t panicked over the pick. I think they might have been if Obama picked Jim Webb, or Colin Powell or Wesley Clark. But that’s not what happened.

    As for your questioning my purple nation street cred, I’m rather amused by that. In a purple kinda way. I’m a fiscally conservative, social liberal, make government streamlined-transparent-effective type of purple.

  • 20 anon // Aug 31, 2008 at 10:51 am

    There is no denying Obama is a rock star, but we must never forget he is a politician. Even Whoopie Goldberg had stated, in her support for Hilary, that Obama lacked substance and solutions to very real problems. Women who supported Hilary, we would hope, supported her because of her focus on very real issues, not because she was a woman, and not because she was a Democrat. For me, it is very hard to forget that Obama gave Hilary “the finger” during one of his speeches. Embracing Democratic principles over that gross insult is hard to do. If one looks into the warrior mode of the campaign, you can clearly see it is all a game. Obama was willing to chop Hilary down at all costs to win. Unfortunately, die-hard Hilary supporters may ultimately remain at home on election day or vote for McCain/Palin out of spite. It should be very interesting how this all plays out.

  • 21 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 11:26 am

    New SoNo Resident: I actually touched on this with Chris MC in another thread, but I’ll repeat it here. If you look at the 2004 presidential election turnout by county in certain states, New Mexico, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Ohio you will see high Democratic voter registration by county and yet these same counties voted for Bush over Kerry. The meme coming out of that election was something about “values voters.” which I always took for meaning, “we have no clue why they voted that way.” analysis.

    Despite that, it’s a real effect. I can certainly say that federal income tax reform, social security reform and gun rights will play some role. Or some form of regional issues, economic impact of a policy point, or job security. All of these issues will have some personalized context to the voter.

    As for social conservatives, does it really surprise you that they would be hypocrites?

  • 22 New Sono resident // Aug 31, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Do you really think Obama gave her the finger??? You need to watch a couple of Seinfeld episodes. Obama’s campaign was hardly slash and burn. Most say he was too gingerly. Sadly the policies, such as health care, middle-income relief, Supreme Court justices, international policy and the like are not games. Even Paul Krugman is supporting Obama these days. There is a huge difference in the Republican platform and Democratic. 4 more years of Republican, even w/McCain are likely to provide continuing compromising of the Justice Dept, HUD and the like. McCain isn’t an ideologue but many who will follow him are. Sadly, Palin gives me little hope in McCain’s appeal to moderates, at this point her main selling point is that she didn’t abort her down’s syndrome child. There are lots of loving parents who are pro-choice who do the same, that doesn’t make them VP timber

  • 23 Anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    OK Turf — let’s take you at your word: “fiscally conservative, social liberal, make government streamlined-transparent-effective type of purple.”

    So you must be an ardent Obama supporter:

    1. Fiscally conservative: unparalleled growth of government, deficits, debt etc. over the last 8 years. You want 4 more years?
    Advantage: OBAMA (or Barr)

    2. Social liberal: Need I say *anything* at all on this one? Just look at who Dobson is endorsing.
    Advantage: OBAMA (or Barr or Nader)

    3. Streamlined-transparent-effective government: besides the point in #1, add the erosion of your civil rights, wiretapping of US citizens, FBI/CIA/NSA access to more of your banking transactions and library transactions, suspension of habeas corpus, etc. I could go on forever.
    Advantage: OBAMA (or Barr)

    And yet you’re still on the fence, right? Still not convinced about Obama, right? Don’t entirely trust the Democrats, right?

    Politically you’re red: it’s written all over this blog, between every line where you claim to be purple!

    Not to mention so “red” with anger and frustration about your idol Hillary dropping the primaries to soon-to-be-president Obama.

    Puhleeze — purple my eye! You’re proof that while many claim to ride the fence, in the end we all have an allegiance to one side or the other.

  • 24 anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    Yes, and who exactly is at home taking care of Palin’s 4 month old child with Down’s syndrome?

  • 25 #24 GOD'S GONNA GET YOU FOR SAYING THAT // Aug 31, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    Yes, and who exactly is at home taking care of Palin’s 4 month old child with Down’s syndrome?

    Get some new material that disgustingly stupid statement has been on the Daily Kos and Move-On.org for 3 days.

  • 26 Anonymous // Aug 31, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    I would imagine that being Governor of Alaska affords her a modest salary and as indicated prior, her husband is somewhat of a Mr. Mom and I would also imagine that should she become Vice President the family would have a house within close proximity to the White House. One more thing, what the heck makes you think that a women cannot take care of her children while holding a high powered job? Did we suddenly go back to the 1900’s where only men have the brains and right to work outside of the home? A down Syndrome child does need special care and even a stay at home mom would need extra help with the child. Your logic is astounding and an insult to all women who not only take care of a home and the children but also hold full time executive positions in major corporations. Give it a break. Sounds like a typical old world ignorant comment at best!

  • 27 anon // Aug 31, 2008 at 5:39 pm

    I have adopted the socially liberal, fiscally conservative title myself. I don’t care what you do or causes you support, as long as you use your own money to support it. Abortion? Go ahead as long as you don’t use tax dollars. Gay marriage? Don’t care either way? Gun control? As long as you don’t break the law, own as many as you want. If you use them illegally, go directly to jail without parole. I like Ron Paul more each day and hope he runs in 2012.

  • 28 turfgrrl // Aug 31, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    anon 23: Why so obsessed with the labels? You must be unfamiliar with Obama’s platform, because for you to characterize any of his policy intents as fiscally conservative is laughable. And no McCain hasn’t said anything better.

    Yep social policy is clear advantage Obama, for the most part, but other than really addressing poverty (which Edwards addressed the best) I don’t have any strong positions much.

    Obama voted to support the the patriot act in March, and never did anything about net neutrality in the senate, both of which happen to be two of my bigger issues.

    And again, Obama’s supported the Republican FISA law, so he’s not Mr. Civil Liberties guy either.

    In short, neither Obama nor McCain actually track along the issues I pay attention to, hence my dissatisfaction of my choices.

  • 29 New Sono resident // Aug 31, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    26 misses the point. Palin is a “social conservative”, arguably believing in traditional roles, including the importance of a family taking care of their own children, not delegating it to someone else. Her husband may well be the primary care giver to her child, but I’d be a little concerned about a male claiming to be a “family” guy that had a 4 mo. old down syndrome child together with 4 other children that took a job like VP (potentally President), you are confusing being President of the United States w/being a senior director at IBM. If she does her job properly (and spends the umpteen hours learning all the things that at this stage of the game she appears to have minimal knowledge about) than she will have no time at home. Men like JFK in 1960 had very little involvement w/raising his children, but we’ve come a long way since 1960, today its considered desirable for both men and women to take an active role in parenting their children.

  • 30 Nonymous // Sep 1, 2008 at 9:27 am

    Very good #26. I don’t agree with the woman’s positions on anything and I’m definitely going with Obama/Biden, but go after her for her OPINIONS, even her lack of experience, but not her FAMILY.

  • 31 Anonymous // Sep 1, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Is this how people should act and do the democrats condone this behavior

    Some turn violent in march to GOP convention
    Members of the Connecticut delegation said they were attacked by protesters when they got off their bus near the Xcel Center, KMSP-TV reported. Delegate Rob Simmons told the station that a group of protesters came toward his delegation and tried to rip the credentials off their necks and sprayed them with a toxic substance that burned their eyes and stained their clothes.
    One 80-year-old member of the delegation had to be treated for injuries, and several other delegates had to rinse their eyes and clothing, the station reported.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_convention_protests

  • 32 Chris MC // Sep 1, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    #31 -
    No.
    This behavior is that of fanatics, not Democrats.

  • 33 Anonymous // Sep 1, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    Reminds me of how the Rethugs used intimidation and mob riot tactics during the Florida recount in 2000.

  • 34 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 9:43 am

    #33-your Rethugs comments are boring and old. Find something new to say. Your obvious distain for anyone who is a Republican eaks all over this blog like maggots on raw meat. You seem to believe that Democrats are the only ones with rights in this country. What a shame you are so narrow minded. You seem to think that anyone who leans toward Republican tendencies has some sort of plague, what a shame you are so uninformed and only care to spew hatred whereever you go. There are good people in both parties and its a shame you continously choose to demean all republicans and place a black eye on the Democrats by your venum.

  • 35 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 11:22 am

    Did you mean to say “leaks” or “ekes?” I believe maggots “infest” or “colonize” rancid meat, sort of the way that Karl Rove has infested the Rethuglican Party with his brand of hatepolitic.

  • 36 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Oops, my bad, I meant “ekes” Just as you have infested this blog with your brand of hate all Republican’s

  • 37 DEM TERRORISTS/ANARCHISTS // Sep 2, 2008 at 11:55 am

    It would be fun to watch if the police stopped these Left Wing lawless thugs with RUBBER BULLETS, instead of Mace.

    That might get their attention.

  • 38 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    That would really solidify the apt use of the phrase (oops, can’t say it here). Weren’t you born late? I think the Gestapo could have used someone like you, or maybe the KKK.

  • 39 concerned and disgusted // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    This should incite a few riots on this blog: While I doubt there will be anything said that hasn’t already been said about Sarah Palin, I thought perhaps hers vs Obama’s credentials would make for good conversation for a while until the extreme left and the extreme right start the nonsensical bashing and bad words that keep appearing on each posting. Now you can really have something to pick apart and dissect. Leave the kids out of it and this should be interesting reading no matter what side of the isle you are on.

    Office being sought Vice President
    Full name Sarah Louise Heath Palin
    Nickname Sarah Barracuda
    Public opinion Smoking hot in a “naughty librarian” sort of way
    Age 44
    Children 5: two sons, three daughters
    Religion/Church attendance Evangelical Christian;
    attends Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau and grew up attending Wasilla Assembly of God
    Current Job Governor of Alaska
    Previous Public Jobs Mayor of Wasilla, AK (1996-2006); President of Alaska Conference of Mayors;
    City Council member (1992-1996)
    Executive Experience Governor for 2 years;
    Mayor for 10 years
    Foreign Relations experience Governor of state that borders two foreign countries (Canada and Russia)
    Military Affairs experience Commander in Chief of Alaska National Guard;
    Son is enlisted Infantryman in U.S. Army
    Private Sector Experience Sports reporter;
    Salmon fisherman
    Speaking ability Beautifully executed initial stump speech in Dayton, OH hockey arena without a teleprompter
    Spouse’s name Todd Mitchell Palin
    Spouse’s occupation Salmon fisherman;
    Former North Slope production supervisor for BP Oil
    Reaction to spouse’s political success Quit 17-year BP oil job when BP became involved in natural gas pipeline negotiations with wife’s administration
    Coolest thing about Spouse Tesoro Iron Dog Snowmobile race champion (longest snowmobile race in the world);
    In 2008, while defending his championship, was injured when he was thrown 70 feet from his machine. He was sent to the hospital but still finished in fourth place
    Most Courageous Moment in Public Service Resigned in protest from position of Ethics Commissioner of Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in order to expose legal violations and conflicts of interest of Alaska Republican leaders, including the former state Attorney General and the State GOP Chairman (who was also an Oil & Gas Commissioner), who was doing work for the party on public time and supplying a lobbyist with a sensitive e-mail.
    In Current Office Because… Upset sitting Governor in GOP primary due to public support for her efforts to clean up corrupt government establishment
    Theme: Change and Clean Government
    What they’ve done to live that theme: Replaced entire Board of Agriculture and Conservation because of conflict of interest;
    Resigned from position of Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in order to expose corruption among members of own party
    Family Affairs May have removed State Public Safety Commissioner as part of effort to protect sister in messy divorce and child custody battle
    Union affiliation Union member, married to Union member
    Iraq and Troop Support Formerly (pre-surge) critical of apparent lack of long-term strategy for Iraq;
    Visited wounded U.S. soldiers in Germany;
    visited AK National Guard soldiers deployed to Kuwait;
    Son deploying to Iraq on 9/11/08 as Army infantryman
    Bipartisan/”maverick” credentials Married to a non-Republican;
    Exposed corruption within own party;
    Campaigned for Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell against corrupt GOP congressman Don Young;
    Called out Sen Ted Stevens (R-AK) to “come clean” about financial dealings that are under fed investigation
    Legislative Record Passed a landmark ethics reform bill;
    Used veto to cut budgetary spending;
    Prevented “bridge to nowhere” that would have cost taxpayers $400 million dollars.
    How they dealt with corrupt individuals in home city/state Exposed legal violations and conflicts of interest of Alaska Republican leaders;
    Campaigned against corrupt GOP Representative;
    Ran against and defeated corrupt incumbent governor in GOP primary
    Guns Lifetime member of NRA and avid hunter;
    video can be found on YouTube of Palin firing an M4 at a military firing range
    Earmarks Opposed “Bridge to Nowhere” project;
    Said Alaska should avoid relying on federal money for projects;
    Campaigned against porker Don Young (R-AK) in 2008 primary
    Abortion Pro life;
    gave birth to 5th child knowing that it would have Down’s syndrome
    Energy Believes energy independence is a matter of national security;
    For drilling in ANWR, which is in her state
    Environment Chair of Alaska Conservation Commission (2003-4);
    Announced plans to create sub-cabinet group of advisors to address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in AK

    Office being sought:
    President of the United States and Leader of the Free World
    Barack Hussein Obama II
    Barry Obama; “The One”
    May be The Messiah
    48
    2: two daughters
    Attended Trinity United Church of Christ for 20 years, a “black liberation theology” church formerly led by Rev. Jeremiah Wright and governed according to theBlack Value System

    Junior Senator from Illinois
    State Senator (1997-2004);
    Community Organizer
    None
    Chaired Senate subcommittee on Europe but never called it into session;
    once gave a speech to 200,000 screaming Germans
    None
    Associate at civil rights law firm
    An enter…wait–did you say without a teleprompter??
    Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama
    Vice President for Community and External Affairs at University of Chicago Hospitals;
    former Associate Dean of Student Services at the University of Chicago;
    former Executive Director for the Chicago office of Public Allies;
    former Assistant to the Mayor of Chicago;
    former associate at Sidley Austin law firm
    Promoted and given 160% pay raise by UofC hospitals within months of husband’s election to U.S. Senate;
    Employer rece ived $1,000,000.00 federal earmark, requested by husband, after her promotion
    Sister of Oregon State University head basketball coach Craig Robinson
    Gave an anti-Iraq war speech to a crowd of anti-Iraq war demonstrators in Hyde Park in 2002
    Republican opponent, who was leading in the polls, was forced to leave race after unsealing of divorce records exposed a sex scandal
    Hope and Change;
    “Bringing Change from Outside Washington”
    Selected 36-year incumbent Senator as running mate
    Often says, “I am my brother’s keeper”;
    Brother lives in a hut in Nairobi on $12 per year
    Endorsed by a union
    Gave an anti-Iraq war speech to a crowd of anti-Iraq war demonstrators;
    almost visited wounded troops in Germany, but decided to go shopping in Berlin instead
    Talks about bipartisanship
    Voted “present” over 100 times as IL state senator
    Launched political career in home of unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers (and still refers to him as a part of “mainstream Democratic Chicago”;
    Purchased home with help of convicted felon Tony Rezko
    Worked to pass legislation in Illinois that would prevent all law-abiding citizens from owning firearms
    Secured federal earmarks for wife’s employer and for campaign bundlers

    Pro-choice;
    only IL state sen. to speak against the Born Alive Infant’s Protection Act, which required medical care to be given to live infants who survived abortions
    Says Americans should “get tune-ups” and “check tire pressure”;
    Says “we can’t expect the world to be okay with” our use of heating and air conditioning
    Talks about the environment a lot

  • 40 #39 WARNING // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    STEP AWAY FROM THE FACTS

    STEP AWAY FROM THE FACTS

  • 41 An Obama-nation // Sep 2, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    Very Good #39!! I enjoyed reading your comparisons on Palin and Obama. But the loony left will spill their verbal diarhea all over this blog again after reading it. I saw a reporter asking all those leftist loons protesting outside the convention this morning to identify pictures of Joe Bidden, Sarah Palin, Mitt Rommney, Pelosi and other others and they had no idea who they were. He ended the report with “Seems the protesters have a cause, but they haven’t got a clue.” Weeks ago the younger voters were asked to name a specific piece of legislation Obama has produced. Again, clueless. They shouldn’t feel that bad though. Not even adults can answer THAT question. They must think they are picking an American Idol. At least the contestants on American Idol have a talent that is needed to compete in their field. Obama has a 2 word vocabulary - Hope & Change, that’s it. When he’s done upping the capital gains and other taxes, we’ll HOPE to find CHANGE left in our pockets with all the entiltlement programs this charleton desires.

  • 42 An Obama-nation // Sep 2, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    See the Obama Tax Plan

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj-EAMgZWtE

  • 43 An Obama-nation // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:03 pm

    See Obama’s adoptation of the Clintonian diplomatic dialogue

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3GPc_yMCE

  • 44 An Obama-nation // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    See Obama’s Speeches of Change and every other cliche he can think of

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx0KQXtLl0Q

  • 45 Just the facts please // Sep 2, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    An Obama-nation, there’s no need to play kindergarten politics, the news which Obama depends on to make him win isn’t very helpful these day.

    Barack Obama’s post-Democratic National Convention bounce in the polls appears to be slightly smaller than the norm of past conventions, and it’s gradually depreciating.
    Sept. 1, 2008
    The Gallup daily tracking poll has found that since the conclusion of the convention, Obama has risen 4 percentage points in the polls, to lead McCain 49 percent to 43 percent today. That’s a slightly smaller uptick in the polls than the 5- to 6-point bounce earned by a typical party nominee, by Gallup’s measure, since 1964. Obama and McCain were evenly split at 45 percentage points apiece prior to the Democratic convention, according to Gallup.
    That outcome comes despite Obama’s speech before more than 80,000 people at Invesco Field in Denver on Thursday night, a political event that was also seen by about 40 million television viewers. It also comes as the Republican convention quietly got under way in St. Paul, and the national media gaze focuses southward to Hurricane Gustav.

    Daily tracking polls by Gallup and Rasmussen Reports demonstrate that Obama has taken his greatest lead since July, if not the general election. But while Obama’s support remains significantly stronger than weeks ago, it appears that the post-convention bounce he earned may have already peaked.

    On Saturday, Gallup reported Obama was ahead by 8 percentage points. By Monday, that lead had shrunk to 5 points. Rasmussen pegs Obama’s standing as relatively stable in recent days, with a 49 percent to 46 percent lead over McCain when “leaners” are included, a small but statistically insignificant improvement for McCain of 1 percentage point since Saturday.

  • 46 The Hothead Ticket // Sep 2, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    So the Republicans are wanting us to vote for “McNasty” who thrives on confrontaton, backed by Pistol Packin’ Palin who likes to get down and dirty with her (suppossed) enemies. And see how well that worked for Knopp in Norwalk.

  • 47 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 5:37 pm

    Biden is considered one of the biggest hot heads in Washington. Do your homework please. Knopp was just mean and a control freak!

  • 48 An Obama-nation // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:11 pm

    Just the Facts please: There’s isn’t any reason we can’t have a little fun here too. Just tell me you didn’t laugh at that Eddie Murphy clip!! Is that your typical Obama speech or what?

    Seriously, The Gallup poll you referenced was the most generous for Obama. Rasmussen and the others are much closer than the Gallup poll. The Palin nomination wiped out Obama’s bounce. It was pathetic for Fowler, a DNC big wig, to chide that Hurricane Gustave hitting New Orleans was proof that GOD is on the dem’s side. That was a sick comment. How about that fat lard ass Micheal Moore-0ns comments (here it is):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGD1AgiAi7M

    However, my view, as well as others, is that it backfired on the Dems. The storm was well prepared for by both Republicans & Democrats. No Looting at all, evacuations went well, no one really got hurt except for a few trees that fell and killed a few people. Any levy’s that breeched were attended to quickly. And Now we have our Convention. How big a bounce we get, time will tell. I will bet that McCains in the lead by this time next week when the Republicans get their bounce.

  • 49 Anonymous // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Hey,48. Go easy on my Jewish brethern. The Levy’s that breached are a personal matter between them and their God.

  • 50 Anonymous // Sep 3, 2008 at 12:37 am

    #46, there was a reason that his fellow colleagues up in Hartford named Knopp “the person most likely to do nothing”. Just look at the mess he made out of Norwalk. All he could do was convene a committee to examine another committee. He couldn’t make a decision if his life depended on it.

    And #47, you’re right - not only was Knopp mean and a control freak, he also was one of the most unintelligent people I’ve ever come across.

    And as far as Knopp goes, he never met a photo op he didn’t like. He was like a bloodhound - he could smell photo ops from miles away. Bring out a camera, and suddenly you see Alex Knopp getting out of the car and putting on his suit jacket.

Leave a Reply