YourCT.com header image 2

State Tax Dollars At Work; Overbuilt Schools in Portland, New Haven and West Hartford


by turfgrrl


July 25th, 2008 · 15 Comments

When we look at the bacon bits that Norwalk and Stamford get for ECS funding, let’s not overlook the capital spending our Hartford legislators dole out on a regularly basis for building schools. The Courant reports on the errant enrollment projection figures submitted in order to qualify for the most state money and the subsequent shocking reality of low enrollments. The Courant:

Faulty enrollment projections led the state to overpay three districts for construction projects audited over the last two years. The state Department of Education initially sought money back. But in each case, state officials let the districts off the hook, leaving state taxpayers to pick up the tab of more than $6 million.

In other cases, school districts have sought state money for construction projects using enrollment projection methods that violate state law, according to a state auditor’s report released last month. By potentially overestimating student enrollment, the auditor warned, districts could build schools that are larger than necessary — at a greater cost to build and operate — to state and local taxpayers than might otherwise be required.

Oops

The flawed projections happened for various reasons. Some districts projected enrollment for the entire school system rather than just the school, as state law requires. Others used 10-year projections, even though state law calls for state funding to be calculated using projections extending only eight years.Not every instance of inappropriate projections led to enrollment disparities big enough for the state to seek money back, but it did in West Hartford, New Haven and Portland.

West Hartford used a 10-year projection to estimate student enrollment for an expansion and renovation project at Conard High School, according to a state Department of Education audit. The figure overestimated enrollment by 80 students, leading the audit to recommend that West Hartford repay some of the money.

New Haven, meanwhile, didn’t use any standard enrollment projection method when applying for funding for The Sound School, a $28 million aquaculture magnet school built entirely with state money.

Officials there decided how big they wanted the school to be, then determined how many students the space would accommodate, the Department of Education audit said. A 1994 proposal called for a 30,800-square-foot school for 185 students. By the time the school was built, the proposal had ballooned to a 68,600-square-foot school for 360 students.

But the school never enrolled more than 319 students in the projection’s eight-year time frame, and a state Department of Education audit suggested that New Haven be docked $1.7 million.

In Portland’s case, officials applying for state funding in 2001 initially estimated that student enrollment would peak at 780 within eight years, then changed the figure to 1,070 three months later.

State and Portland officials offer different explanations for how the figure was reached and who was responsible for it. School board Chairman Chris Hetrick said the state Department of Education recommended the change, which reflected estimates using housing starts. State Department of Education spokesman Tom Murphy said that’s not the case.

Regardless, the school was built for nearly twice as many students as now use it. Some of the space has been used for special education, and officials have considered opening space in the school for outside educational groups to use for a fee.

Hetrick said the state should have stopped the project before construction if the figures were off, rather than letting it go forward and checking the numbers only after the school was built. But Murphy said it was the district’s responsibility to use accurate figures.

The department audited the project after it was completed and recommended that Portland repay the state and taxpayers $4.6 million.

Off the Hook

That didn’t happen.

In fact, the Portland, Conard and Sound school projects had one thing in common: When the districts were faced with repaying money the state said they overspent, state officials bailed them out.

At least West Hartford has decent capt scores.

source: Courant, Faulty School Projections Prove Costly To Taxpayers, By ARIELLE LEVIN BECKER, July 25, 2008

Tags: Connecticut · Education

15 Responses so far “State Tax Dollars At Work; Overbuilt Schools in Portland, New Haven and West Hartford”



  • 1 In the Know // Jul 25, 2008 at 9:05 am

    After reading this article, I conclude that Norwalk should be very nervous because of Stu’s enrollment projection for NHS, which overstated enrollment by the better part of 500 students. Stu said that NHS would have an enrollment of nearly 2,000 students by now, and that justified the addition of the square footage for the science wing and the orchestra room. Actual NHS enrollment is only slightly above 1,500 students because NHS has been growing smaller, not larger.

    This is not about what BMHS got and NHS didn’t, so let’s not go in that direction. This is about state money that was based on a per pupil allowance for space. We have to hope that the state doesn’t go after Norwalk to get money back.

  • 2 Anonymous // Jul 25, 2008 at 9:14 am

    Again, it points to the failings of the CO and the superintendant not overseeing what is going on. Really lets hope the state doesn’t want their money back because the enrollment at NHS is dwindling because parents are sending their kids to priovate schools more often thatn not and others are transferring over to BMHS because their offerings are much better. Once again, Stu Opdhal leaves us in a mess. When is this trickle down effect going to stop? I certainly hgope where he is now reads our papers and this blog and realizes sooner than later what a huge mistake they made. I certainly hope the BOE hires a financial director soon so that we can finally know where our tax dollars are going and not leave it up to CO to divy up expenditures in anyway they see fit.

  • 3 In the Know // Jul 25, 2008 at 9:51 am

    I went to the Courant’s website and I read the entire article because, unlike The Hour, the Courant doesn’t charge a subscription fee for online access to news.

    The article suggests that, while the State can do it, it is unlikely that the state will go after a community to get the money back, and so maybe that isn’t a necessary worry for Norwalk. To give the devil his due, maybe there was no way for Stu to foresee that so many students would begin to opt out of attending NHS. However, CO should have begun investigating and addressing the reason(s) for this because it has been happening over the past few years. This is a responsibility of the director of secondary education, but the superintendent should also have been aware and he should have insisted upon an analysis of the problem. That didn’t happen.

    Okay, so even if Norwalk doesn’t have to repay the money, Norwalk is paying the bill for heating and cooling and cleaning and maintaining a lot of extra square footage.

  • 4 Anonymous // Jul 25, 2008 at 9:54 am

    West Hartford lost the shirt of their back when the developers moved in and took over the city all they had to do is cry poor mouth and got funds for almost everything.Once built not even Blue back is paying taxes until bills are paid for that project just like Norwalk is doing.Build it and we will pay taxes later for now simply double your tax rate just like West Hartford.

    What was West Hartfords projection of kids once the developing was underway? I guess taking money from the state was a ripe time.

    New Haven lost control of their police dept and had a poorly run city that gave them the opt to get money they were looking real bad for a while.

    Portland at least dealt with Ethics and passed a measure,Citizens need to see the Town’s business being conducted openly, providing them with access to the information on which Town decisions and actions are based. At the same time, citizens should be assured that the privacy rights of all persons are protected and confidentiality regarding their affairs is assured.

    So when you step back and look at others wonder what they are doing to correct their problems and then look at Norwalk.

  • 5 BoredofEductation // Jul 25, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    “Portland at least dealt with Ethics and passed a measure,Citizens need to see the Town’s business being conducted openly, providing them with access to the information on which Town decisions and actions are based. At the same time, citizens should be assured that the privacy rights of all persons are protected and confidentiality regarding their affairs is assured.”

    As a Portland resident, I have no idea where this information is coming from. Portland has an ethics code, but it’s not enforced. Portland officials used housing permits pulled to build a 55+ community as a basis of enrollment. Not only did Portland Officials not meet the current enrollment projections, they also did not even come close to the first set of enrollment figures that were presented.

    Portland BOE, BOS, and members of the committee should be very nervous that the AGs office doesn’t get bored and pay them a visit.

  • 6 anon // Jul 25, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    #1, if Norwalk High got a science wing,and a bigger space for band, it wasn’t just based on enrollment projections in any case. For gosh sakes, it’s an upgrade to an old beat up building and science is where the world is going. And the band addition is tiny, bigger than it was, but not particularily impressive. Nothing new built at Norwalk High is worth a raised eyebrow at the State DOE.

  • 7 Anonymous // Jul 25, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    anon #6: What you wrote is untrue. You are confusing renovation with new construction. All new construction is based on enrollment projections.

  • 8 Townie // Jul 26, 2008 at 6:50 am

    The truth be known: Brien Mc Mahon (with the exception of the Global Studies space) was overbuilt and exceeded the space standards set by the State BOE for projected enrollment. Due to this some reimbursement was reduced. Norwalk High also exceeds the space standards along with Roton. At both schools the State will not pay for the excess. In the past Brookside was grossly overbuilt, as was Kendall. If you don’t believe this just ask the State BOE. It’s all public information and known by the City - but they are very embarassed to admit to it. This is what we can expect when the City establishes a building committee for each school project with members selected by the Mayors. The selected members don’t care what it costs, they just want more than the last guy got and are always comparing what everyone else received so that they get more and don’t lose out. Most folks don’t understand that these school construction project are not run by the BOE. I repeat they are not run by the BOE, but by the CITY and Gilbane and the architects and engineers hired by the CITY and the committee members that have been and will be politically appointed by whatever administration is in power at the time. Stop blaming the BOE for these screwed up projects…it isn’t their fault. If there is blame to be had, go after the CITY.

  • 9 Anonymous // Jul 26, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Townie,

    You left out a couple of very important details.
    First, while it is true that a building committee will try to get whatever it can for its project, the committee has no actual power. All it can do is recommend to the city commission that oversees construction. The committee is important in keeping watch on what is planned and what is actually built. The educators and sometimes the parents on the committee are also able to tell the architects and construction management company when something simply doesn’t make sense in a school building. Doing that saves many change orders later on. The debacle at the High School shows what can happen without close oversight.
    Second, the BOE is responsible to the extent that it provides the enrollment projections that the state uses in determining the allowable square footage.
    I have no information about the schools you list as “overbuilt,” and so I won’t debate that.

  • 10 Anon432 // Jul 27, 2008 at 11:13 am

    TURFGRRL #10 must be removed!!! It is a link to something bad.

  • 11 turfgrrl // Jul 27, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Anon432: Removed it thanks.
  • 12 Anonymous // Aug 21, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    KNOXVILLE, Tenn. - A student fatally shot a 16-year-old classmate during a dispute Thursday at a Knoxville high school, as other teenagers watched in horror as the victim clutched his chest and fell to the floor.

    This just transpired an hour ago, I hope security is on the minds of most who are planning Norwalks opening day.More kids more trouble.Couldn’t find a better thread to throw this on,if you have kids going to school its on most of our minds.

    Has there been any new news on enrollment in our schools in Norwalk or does it all wash out opening day?

  • 13 Anonymous // Aug 21, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    At the larger schools, it takes a few weeks before they really know. The forecast is further growth at McMahon and loss of enrollment at Norwalk High School. What is happening there that so many are going elsewhere?

  • 14 Anonymous // Aug 21, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    thanks #13 it will be interesting to see what goes on.

  • 15 anon432 // Aug 21, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    I’d like to know if the teaching staff is larger at NHS when they service fewer students than BMHS. Does anyone know the student teacher ratio?
    There is not enough security at either high school. I don’t know about Briggs.

Leave a Reply