YourCT.com header image 2

Survey Says; Police Doing Good Job


by turfgrrl


July 3rd, 2008 · 37 Comments

The report card, if you will, overall B+, drug enforcement C and Traffic Safety B. Looks like the NPD could boost some of its drug enforcement efforts. The Advocate reports:

When neighbors were concerned about her well-being, Joan Dale got a call from the police. When she didn’t immediately respond, an officer showed up at her Cranbury doorstep.

Dale, 42, gives Norwalk police high marks for their responsiveness.

“My experience was very positive,” Dale said.

She’s not alone.

In a recent Sacred Heart University survey, Norwalk residents overwhelmingly approved of the city police officers’ overall job performance.

According to survey results, 92 percent or more of respondents said Norwalk police officers were professional, respectful, knowledgeable and handled a situation appropriately.

The lowest marks came for the department’s drug enforcement and traffic safety efforts, which received 73 percent and 84 percent positive ratings, respectively.

Though the survey was mailed to 600 residents - 300 chosen at random and 300 who have had some interaction with police over the past year - only 50 people responded.

Police and the lead researcher said they had hoped for a larger sampling but said the results provide an adequate baseline measure of the public’s perception of the department.

“Even though the rate of return was small, scientifically, the methodology is very strong,” Deputy Chief Rosemary Arway said.

Based on the response, the survey has a 93 percent confidence level, or a margin of error of 7 percentage points. Arway said she was hoping for a confidence level of at least 95 percent.

The department plans to work with Sacred Heart again in the fall to repeat the survey.
The survey was conducted for free as part of Sacred Heart Professor James McCabe’s criminal justice classes. McCabe, a 20-year veteran of the New York Police Department, said the survey was conducted with the same approach used in New York City.

“The satisfaction levels were higher than in New York,” McCabe said. “I was surprised how high it was.”

McCabe said that one of the few areas where respondents gave the department lower than 90 percent approval was for how quickly it responds to calls. He said the survey should help in reinforcing how quickly officers respond to calls.

“It’s a service business,” McCabe said. “Officers help the public and make sure problems are resolved the best they can and they just need to be mindful of that when they respond to calls.”

Police Chief Harry Rilling said the results confirm his belief that, overall, the community appreciates police and believe they do a very good job.

“It’s interesting here that we have questionnaires not only from those who called police, but also from people who were stopped,” Rilling said. “It verifies that officers acted with courtesy, respect and professionalism and the person that had the interaction felt the officer acted appropriately.”

Among the 14 respondents that had either been issued infractions, summonses or had been incarcerated, nearly 93 percent said they were satisfied with the way the situation was handled and satisfied with the overall performance of the police department.

source: Advocate, Survey: Residents approve of work by police, By Jonathan Lucas, 07/03/2008

Tags: Norwalk

37 Responses so far “Survey Says; Police Doing Good Job”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 MGeake // Jul 3, 2008 at 11:45 am

    One of the “benefits” of pursuing academics for a very long time is you become very critical of surveys like this. 600 is a very small percentage of the number of calls in a month, and there is no indication how those 600 were selected or by whom — was it a truly random sample or cherry-picked by somebody?

    An 8% response rate from a small sample — and less than 5% for those receiving infractions — does not give valid results, regardless of what the deputy chief.

    While we’re talking about the deputy chief, might I suggest she go out the front door of headquarters, walk one block west on South Main Street, turn left, and walk one block down to Ryan Park if she really doesn’t know where the drug problem is. Or she can stand in Joe Mann’s office at NEON and get a bird’s eye view.

  • 2 anonymous // Jul 3, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Mike- I have to wonder how scientific the poll on the police is here. It seems like there aren’t all that many posting their opinions here, and most that do have an agenda.

  • 3 Dick Dale // Jul 3, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    Less than 10% response?

    I’m glad my cousin Joan thinks the po-lees are doing a good job. That makes one of us.

  • 4 anonymous // Jul 3, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    What’s the percentage of voters in a national election?

  • 5 anon // Jul 3, 2008 at 7:40 pm

    I talked to a lot of my neighbors and friends today. They all seem to think the Norwalk police are doing a good job.

  • 6 Ex-cop // Jul 3, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    There a lot of dedicated young men and women trying very hard to make Norwalk a safe place. A lot of them are from somewhere else and go back there when the day is done. Many are waiting for an opening on another department where the money is good, the work load lighter. They know, better than any of us, how few they are in a City this size. They know how easy it is to get hurt, or worse. They know how easy it is to get in trouble for being too eager, too aggresive. Before long, most adopt a don’t make waves attitude and do no more than they are told to do. That defines reactive as opposed to proactive. The system does not encourage proactive police work. The few who are not that easily discouraged, do more than their share, collect many commendations, and get frequent complaints from unhappy criminals. Every complaint gets full investigation and the officer wonders how much real support he has from the dept. We wonder why groups are not dispersed from street corners. TV has taught us to expect crimes solved in less than an hour. We complain when that doesn’t happen. The cops wonder how much support there is from the public. Retired cops complain about promised health care being cut back at age 65. An insignificant response to a survey like this one is no help.

  • 7 Norwalker // Jul 3, 2008 at 10:24 pm

    I have to send a letter to Chief Rilling soon. I will say that the dealings that I have had with the Norwalk Police have been VERY POSITIVE (now watch me get a ticket tommorow, or something…..) This past week, I had to call them regarding an issue on my mother’s street with a broken water main and didn’t know who to call. A report had to get filed in order to get the work properly done because this wasn’t a regular break that the CITY was involved with. The officer that took care of this issue was so nice! I believe that, for the most part, their job is hard, they get probably NO credit, and need our prayers.

    Thanks Norwalk Police - from at least one person!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:)

  • 8 Anonymous // Jul 3, 2008 at 11:09 pm

    child from washington village just shot!

    How does it change the shooting at washington village tonight.Stop patting everyone on the back as we all dance around in joy a report was favorable yet another child was shot tonight.

    They doing a great job give them more resources they will be even better.There is enough crime isn’t there?

    where is the rationale here?

  • 9 Lindsay // Jul 4, 2008 at 12:05 am

    another insightful and relevant post.

  • 10 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 12:18 am

    we would of been home sooner but there was a head on accident in front of washinton village on water st so traffic was rerouted .Appears the driver was drunk that caused the accident,probably no license or reg.So many things are happening,while the rest of the cops are on woodward ave arresting someone else a real busy Sono.

  • 11 MGeake // Jul 4, 2008 at 8:03 am

    Please don’t misconstrue what I said in #1.

    My criticism is of the study, not the police. I know the job they do and how little we give them to do it.

    All I want is honesty here — if you’re going to use survey results, at least use a scientificly valid survey. Don’t try to make us “feel better” by saying we don’t have a drug problem or gangs; we have eyes and ears and some level of intelligence.

  • 12 anon // Jul 4, 2008 at 8:41 am

    No one is saying we don’t have a drug or gang problem. We live in a city and like almost all cities, there are drug and gang problems. What the survey seems to indicate is that in spite of the fact that there is a rise in gang violence, the majority of the community feels that the police department is doin a fine job. Maybe they realize the the police department is not responsible for the social and ecomomic problems behind these issues that stem far deeper than the police department. Maybe they understand that even with 100 additional dedicated officers, these gang wars and drug abuse would continue. Maybe they should do a poll to see if the community feels that the social services programs, prison systems, and especially the parents are performing adequately. I left the fireworks a little early last night to avoid the traffic, and as I passed Water St, a police officer was stationed right across from Washington Village standing right outside his car. This wasn’t long before the shooting it appears that these kids knew he was there and it didn’t make much of a difference.

  • 13 turfgrrl // Jul 4, 2008 at 9:06 am

    MGeake: It would seem that the methodology is the same in use by the NYPD. 300 random, 300 random from a pool of those who had interaction with the NPD. That being said 50 respondents would mean that the response rate would fall below averages usually expected for a mailed survey. I guess that’s why they are doing another.
  • 14 MGeake // Jul 4, 2008 at 10:28 am

    #12 No one is saying we don’t have a drug or gang problem. Really? From the same article:

    “I was rather surprised because I think that our narcotics unit is doing a fine job, but this is based on people’s perceptions about drugs in the community,” Arway said. “We want to know what are they basing that on? Are they seeing things that we are not?”

    It’s comments like that I’m objecting to.

  • 15 Norwalker // Jul 4, 2008 at 10:31 am

    oh….if you think WE have problems. I laugh. Do you know of the rampant problems that the suburbs have?!?!?

  • 16 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 10:44 am

    Herion is the choice of drug in Norwalk, Rillings is in trouble ,Moccia is still thinking he is running for mayor what a joke his time is up and the dep chiefs who mislead Al,Laura,Daine,ect and everyone else in a East Norwalk meeting are simply puppets.There is no one Norwalk police officer qualified including the one who had their professor write a poll for Norwalk police able to take the healm of the police dept.

    Now might be the time to look for another police chief.

    2 more shootings last night how can anyone think Norwalk residents are so stupid? What 50 happy campers who need to look at the whole picture just not glancing shot.

  • 17 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 10:49 am

    there doing another survey without Norwalk PD stationary please do some research get some facts let the public know the truth not some slanted way of delivering the next round of crime.What Norwalk police officer is directly involved in the school?

    This would of been better having Pace do a survey their reputation speaks for itself doesn’t it?

  • 18 anon // Jul 4, 2008 at 11:27 am

    Pace is a joke. Should have used Quinnipiac.

  • 19 anon // Jul 4, 2008 at 11:31 am

    I believe Arway was referring to the drug issue specifically, and not gangs. Although the two issues are closely connected, they are not one in the same. Even without gangs, you would still have an active drug trade. And let’s not forget, Arway has no direct control over the rand and file for enforcement. She is in charge of Administration. The other Deputy Chief is in charge of personnel deployment and day to day operations of the department.

  • 20 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 11:34 am

    them go with Quinnipiac obviously you have thoughts on this I respect anyones opinion.Crime now is a topic of coversation in the city they simply want slo mo to take his sidekicks and leave.How sad is that for men with years of service to the city?

  • 21 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 11:40 am

    if you have to defend them replace the none of them have a clue.Our officers are getting tired of it all.Before we lose more good men to other departments wake up Norwalk by supporting the officers one need to ask Rillings and Moccia to leave.

    Rillings almost left in the middle of the night to another town over too bad it would of been a blessing yet replacing him has to be outside the department with someone who has street and classroom experience not strings to the mayor.New police board as well thats geting old as well.

  • 22 anon // Jul 4, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    Any serious survey should also be broken down by geographical areas within the city, age, race, employment status, etc. You may find that dissatisfaction with police is non-existent, widespread, or only limited to a few specific geographical or socioeconomic groups.

  • 23 Anonymous // Jul 4, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    Rillings is pissing into the wind it shows how desperate his boss has become.What about us what about tonight?

  • 24 anon // Jul 4, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    as I have said before, the gang violence problem is something much deeper than a police department can resolve. The solution belongs more in the realm of social services and parental management than in law enforcement. Law enforcement is primarily reactive by design, especially with Supreme Court rulings since the 70’s that hamper law enforcement’s ability to prevent crimes by decriminalizing many quality of life issues such as loitering. The best they can do is saturate a high crime area in hopes of deterring crime by a visible presence. Unfortunately, the gang members merely move out of sight of officers to commit their activities, much like the shooting that occurred last night with officers around the area.

  • 25 Patriot // Jul 4, 2008 at 4:31 pm

    I think for the most part, the NPD IS doing a good job. Norwalk, like any city, ain’t easy, and nobody is perfect, the mayor, the chief, the cops on the beat. Or me or you guys.

  • 26 MeToo // Jul 4, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    The city has a rainy day fund, several million dollars I believe, well I think it is a rainy day & we need to hire 25 officers! Not men & women who have to learn how to be police officers, I mean qualified officers from other cities! Offer them a bonus to come to Norwalk! WE NEED MORE OFFICERS! We are expecting our officers to do more than anyone ever has done in the past, cops that have to run from call to call & then have problems with their brass. HIRE MORE OFFICERS NOW! I believe that if we would all come together, like what happen with the Meadow St. problem, we could force the city to use some of the rainy day funds to help our officers, our city, ourselves before one of our dead people turns out to be a mayor, a chief, a common council man or woman & then the city has to answer to everyone. Personally I think that the mayor should answer to all of us now, before it’s too late.

  • 27 MeToo // Jul 4, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    FYI MGeake has said that when he took office as a councilman, he was given the comittee that the police answer to. He says that at that time he contacted the Chief & told him that when there came budget time to let him know & he would fight for more officers. Chief Rillings never came to MGeake, never asked for more men, never even gave him a copy of the polic’s budget. Just so you don’t think that there are councilmen who do care about the police & what is happening to them! Most council people don’t respond to this blog, but most of them do read it.

  • 28 THE HOUR NEEDS TO GET ITS PRIORITIES IN ORDER // Jul 5, 2008 at 8:30 am

    In today’s hour their commentary gives a BRICKBAT to people who are shooting off fireworks and making noise which bothers them. They are pleading for peace and quiet. WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, Norwalk has become like the lawless mountains along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border. People getting shot up 3 at a time. Give me a freaking break, OK. Is the Hour trying to help the police so that it is easier to identify GUNSHOTS from fireworks? IN FACT I think the HOUR has it wrong, those are not fireworks they are hearing THEY ARE GUNSHOTS. Can someone please tell them mayor the NPD chief that the TIME FOR THE GUARDIAN ANGLES HAS PASSED. WE NOW NEED THE NATIONAL GUARD.

    TILII

  • 29 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2008 at 4:25 pm

    they closed calf pasture beach early, unruly crowd ,kicked out 150 people using west rocks school field,police action all over the city.

    Your right #28 the National Gaurd is our next option,

    but others will paint another picture,the word is out Norwalk is no longer a destination,evacuation plans are being drawn up from the bunker at city hall.

  • 30 Mrs. Kravits // Jul 5, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    This is what I think everyone needs: Binoculars. Don’t laugh, it works! One night, I heard all this commotion from across my busy street. I opened my window, turned off my lights and looked out with my binoculars. I told them that I saw them and I was calling the cops. They ran. They were young kids, it was last summer, yes I could’ve gotten hurt, but I didn’t. Would I do it again? My binoculars are ready! It’s like the subway vigilante. You’ve got to be ready to snitch. Once you do, attendance at the local Churches will be up. Laugh all you want…..

    WalMart. Great binoculars in the camping section. Gotta go!

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply