YourCT.com header image 2

“You Make Too Much Money,” Ain’t A Good Reason


by turfgrrl


July 1st, 2008 · 30 Comments

What a wasted opportunity by the BOE last night. Here they finally grew a spine beyond a chocolate eclair and voted against extending Corda’s contract for another year and they failed to provide incentive or even basic guidelines as to how Corda should improve his and the school Norwalk Public School system’s performance. Instead we get this:

Board member Gregory Burnett unsuccessfully suggested giving Corda a 3 percent cost-of-living salary increase.

Jack Chiaramonte, another board member, said Corda didn’t merit the increase.

“In the current economy, many people making a fifth of that (Corda’s salary) won’t get a cost-of-living increase. As the highest-paid person in the city, I don’t think the superintendent is going to starve,” he said.

Burnett said his proposed motion had nothing to do with merit.

“Because he’s the highest-paid employee, it just appears that we’re holding that against the employee,” Burnett said. “Someone has to be No. 1. And I don’t think that should be held against them. I’m just making a point. Again, I did not tie it to merit.”

Board member Bruce Kimmel said there is precedent for city department heads forgoing cost-of-living increases in tight economic times and said Corda’s individual contract is different than negotiating a collective bargaining agreement.

Where’s the beef BOE? Where’s the direction that rising fuel costs are going to have to be addressed with building operations. Where’s the guidance about curriculum improvements targeted by school? Where’s the incentive for Corda to make changes that will improve educational opportunities, reduce study halls, reduce overcrowding in some schools, improve communication more cost effectively? I could go on. Corda’s contract and performance evaluation isn’t about what he makes, or what benefits he gets. It’s about whether the schools are improving or not, what the metrics for judging that are and how they can best be measured and evaluated. Nothing of that came out of the BOE last night.

Norwalk Federation of Teachers President Bruce LeVine Mellion said the board’s move is considered a vote of no-confidence.

“When a Board of Education sends a message to a superintendent that they’re not going to extend his or her contract or give a salary raise, it is an extraordinarily strong statement to make,” Mellion said.

Board President Susan Hamilton, however, tempered that assessment.

“Dr. Corda has indicated his willingness to work with us. We will continue discussion with him, in the hopes that concerns around communication and collaboration will be addressed,” she said.

Corda’s strengths this year included further improvements to the budget process,

Hamilton said, but his contract was not renewed for a number of reasons.
“The board does have some concerns around communication and collaboration between the superintendent, the school and community at large. There are also some concerns about his visibility in schools,” she said.

Concerns? That’s the best they can do? Will someone on the BOE please start paying attention to educational issues? Wouldn’t it be nice if they could start focusing on how to make Norwalk a world class educational system instead of worrying about how many sick days the superintendent is allowed?

source: Advocate, No raise or contract extension for Corda, By Alexandra Fenwick, 07/01/2008

Tags: Education · Norwalk

30 Responses so far ““You Make Too Much Money,” Ain’t A Good Reason”



  • 1 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:51 am

    What about the test scores? what about lack of respect for the teachers? What about lack of respect for the learning process, what about the needs of the kids? There are countless reasons why his contract should not be extended nor should he recieve a raise. Corda has no idea what it is to actually act like a superintendent. When is someone going to come right out and tell him we do not have confidence in his ability to run the educational system in Norwalk and that his holier than thou attitude alog with his bloated Central Office are causing so much dissent in the community that the taxpayers are no longer willing to foot the bill?

  • 2 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Turfie: This is a good first step and a great day!!! If some of the other BOE challengers had been elected, we would have had the political juice for more substantive change. If the new guys had not been elected, it would have been the same old Jodi Bishop-Pull-a-Fast-One stuff.

  • 3 ctyankee // Jul 1, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    OK, who will run against Mr. Gregory Burnett & Mr Kimmel? They obviously doesn’t understand that a COLA is a tool that’s only appropriate when means testing is considered. No highly compensated should *ever* receive a COLA!

    Aside from being an insult to the integrity of the person, it is just as telling of the lack of confidence in that person to do his job effectively!

    In suggesting the COLA Mr. Burnett has effectively expressed his lack of confidence in the superintendent, and demonstrated his lack of [intestinal | testicular] fortitude. Do we really want a coward on the board?

    Let’s face it; if the superintendent was doing a bang-up-job, there would bu no question about showing the city’s approval.

    In the private world, you either earn your raises or your boss concludes that you are no longer capable of developing the role to which you are currently assigned.

    Look at the ratio of kids that complete all 12 years of school; the ratio that go on to higher education. But more important that the diminishing standards; how many are prepared for life?

    Last week the state (city) announced a 17% decline in school enrollment over the next decade, I say let’s start now.

    All workers must strive to do more with less, otherwise they becoming a parasitic load on the system. While I would typically reserve comments like this for low-end jobs, it’s equally applicable at all levels.

    It is unconscionable to allow the system to do less with more, after all it’s *OUR* tax dollars they’re using without accountability.

    Mr. Burnett, Mr. Kimmel, I’m calling you out.

  • 4 Watchdog // Jul 1, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Well said, posters 1, 2, and 3!

  • 5 No dog in this fight // Jul 1, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    I find it interesting that some of the people criticizing Corda and the BOE make so many grammatical errors. Are these suppossed to be teachers? Scary. To an outsider, this whole thing begins to sound like a high school clique trashing those who aren’t in the clique. Maybe too much time dishing the dirt in teacher’s lounges?

  • 6 ctyankee // Jul 1, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    OK, who will run against Mr. Gregory Burnett and Mr. Bruce Kimmel? They obviously don’t understand that a COLA is a tool that’s only appropriate when means testing is considered. No highly compensated employee should *ever* need to receive a COLA!

    In suggesting the COLA Mr. Burnett has effectively expressed his lack of confidence in the superintendent, and demonstrated his lack of [intestinal | testicular] fortitude. Do we really want a coward on the board?

    By citing precedent Mr. Kimmel has essentially done the same. Perhaps his friendship with the superintendent is his justification for defending an unearned raise?

    By not flatly refusing the COLA, the superintendent has indicated that he believes he is _entitled_ to the COLA. I feel that the head of the school system should not be advocating a position that encourages entitlement. Quite the opposite, he should be demonstrating that the only way to get ahead is to earn the increase through merit. Anything less is a disservice to the city and the children. (Don’t ya’ hate it when the kids are dragged in?)

    Aside from being an unearned increase, I would personally find the offer of a COLA insulting. Tell the man we have no more $$$, we cannot give you an increase at this time, you must cut the budget, or say this in the increase you’ve earned.

    The offer was the guilt of the board members that didn’t have the nerve to say we’re not happy with your performance, but we’re afraid to voice that opinion, so we’ll hide behind some ritual or custom. Make no mistake, that action (or inaction) is as telling of the lack of confidence that they feel, but are incapable of expressing in superintendent to do his job effectively!

    Let’s face it; if the superintendent was doing a bang-up-job, there would be no question about showing the city’s approval with a merit increase.

    In the private world, you either earn your raises or your boss concludes that you are no longer capable of developing the role to which you are currently assigned.

    Look at the ratio of kids that complete all 12 years of school; the ratio that go on to higher education. But more important that the diminishing standards; how many are prepared for life?

    Last week the state (city) announced a 17% decline in school enrollment over the next decade, I say let’s start now.

    All workers must strive to do more with less, otherwise they becoming a parasitic load on the system. While I would typically reserve comments like this for low-end jobs, it’s equally applicable at all levels.

    It is unconscionable to allow the system to do less with more, after all it’s *OUR* tax dollars they’re using without accountability. But this post isn’t about Dr. Corda…

    Mr. Burnett, Mr. Kimmel, I’m calling the two of you out.

  • 7 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    When will the exsanguination of the Norwalk taxpayer end?

  • 8 Aunt Bertha // Jul 1, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    “You Make Too Much Money,” Ain’t A Good Reason-was the title of the post. And it is right it is not a good enough reason. The BOE should take it one step further and list the reasons on why Corda is not working out. It would be beneficial to the tax payers to know what is happening. It would be helpful to Corda to see it in black and white. Would he do anything about it? Who knows. It is like when you just give a test a grade with no explanation of where it went wrong, the student will be repeating all of the mistakes he/she made on the test. One should always give out helpful and positive comments so that growth can happen.

  • 9 Educator // Jul 1, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    While I agree that COLA increases shouldn’t be given to administrators, it seems as if the members of the board are more concerned with Dr. Corda’s salary than his job performance. Turfgirl raises good points.

  • 10 anon // Jul 1, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Corda did not get a COLA Solely because “he makes too much money”, The Board reasoned he hasn’t done a good enough job to get any increase. Chiaramonte and other BOE members, figured with all the cuts Corda has done and his manipulative tactics with the board, how could they in good conscienous vote for a COLA increase, when there have been so many cuts to the children, teachers and classrooms and his poor results. The teachers and schools have been asked to tighten their belts, so why not Corda as well. As Midalia Rivas said, “It looks like we already pay for his gas, meals, and many other perks. So why does he need a cost of living increase if we are alrady paying for it?”
    Tomato - Tomah-toe…Who cares??? The message was sent to Corda - NO EXTENTION - NO PAY INCREASE - that’s all that really matters, isn’t it?

  • 11 There is a GOD! // Jul 1, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    I agree with #10. The Board did not unanimously vote not to extend Corda Contract because “he make too much money”. This is absurd! As Educator #9 stated “I agree that COLA increases shouldn’t be given to administrators”, the Board felt the same way - while Corda didn’t deserve a raise, he certainly doesn’t need a cost of living increase. Way to go BOE! You shot Corda a stern message across the bow. Kudos!

  • 12 Was There // Jul 1, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    This thread is quite ridiculous. To think the BOE didn’t extend Mr. Corda’s contract was because he made too much is just irresponsible. I was there at this meeting and this topic was just a segment of the discussion. Please attend the meeting if you intend to write about the dialog that took place. I am proud of the Board for taking a positive stance against Corda’s administration of mediocraty.

  • 13 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Congratulations to the Board!

  • 14 Sue M // Jul 1, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    Corda didn’t get his COLA because he didn’t deserve it.

    He’s already overpaid, not as much as neighbor Westport’s fine Superintendent, who did get a nice increase recently, but at least the Westport guy performs well.

    In these trying times, Corda shouldn’t get a COLA, he doesn’t even deserve a Pepsi; he should get store brand.

  • 15 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Sallie Boy didn’t help himself with shutting down the City Hall newsstand; depriving an educational experience for special needs kids and depriving his detractors the convenience of basic refreshment without having to drive a mile to get it. That was petty manipulation.

  • 16 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:18 pm

    So the board thinks communication and visibility are the only problems with Sal Corda? What about graduation rates, drop out rates? What about NCLB results? The cambridge report? Sal Corda doesn’t deserve rewards for the job turned in, but the board isn’t much better.

  • 17 Anonymous // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Turfgrrl–Great job! Now seems the time for a musical interlude from a group called Blue Magic–the song? “Sideshow”–can you get this out of the vault for all these edu-mi-cation folk–Everybody’s assignnment is to listen carefully to the lyrics–yeah, just like in music class…it’s a new day in Norwalk, people…embrace it!

  • 18 Van Gogh // Jul 1, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    WAS THERE sounds like BEEN THERE. Gee……sounds like……Dr. Corda!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a pathetic “sack”.

    Well, whoever WAS THERE, BEEN THERE is, they surely AREN’T HERE in a positive way.

    (Turfgrrl….what DO you do about such ninnies???)

    Thanks be to JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Amen & Halleluia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 19 Ethel Coochie // Jul 1, 2008 at 10:51 pm

    Van Gogh:

    I love it!!!!!

    It’s not Corda, though, Van Gogh.

    I will say this, though: whoever it is, they can’t spell “dialogue”, “probably” or “Coochee”. And they’re criticizing me. Whoever it is, Van Gogh, leave them alone. Don’t dignify that person any longer.

  • 20 Anon // Jul 2, 2008 at 12:21 am

    Van Gogh & Ethel Coochie have to be two of the stupidest and dumbest this blog has ever seen. ‘Nuff said.

  • 21 Ethel Coochee // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:25 am

    :)

  • 22 ExTeacher // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:29 am

    Way to go #15 - He probably has a stash in his office, but if he doesn’t, he’ll get reimbursed for his gas if he has to go out to get refreshments!

  • 23 Van Gogh // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:39 am

    Good job, Ethel. Like you said….don’t dignify. Keep posting! I know I will!!!!! (Regardless of the bitter & nasty comments. At least we come up with more creative names)

  • 24 Lucy // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:40 am

    Turfie…boring strand..yawn.

  • 25 Galileo // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:48 am

    Lucy, spice it up!!!!!!

  • 26 Ethel Coochee // Jul 2, 2008 at 8:00 am

    Hey Van Gogh:

    Want to meet for lunch? If you aren’t doing anything tommorow at noon, I’m meeting a few other people I know who post here. We always go to one of the restaurants down on Washington St. and we’re going to the Bulldog tommorow. We haven’t been there yet. Come on by!

    The Bulldog tommorow (Thursday) at noon.

    Hey Turfgrrl, I hope it’s ok to do this on the sites.

  • 27 Van Gogh // Jul 2, 2008 at 8:11 am

    Thanks Ethel, I will pop by after an appointment I have at 11:15. Just so you’ll know it’s me, I’ll bring a red balloon!

  • 28 turfgrrl // Jul 2, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    anonymous 17: Sorry it took awhile

  • 29 turfgrrl // Jul 2, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    Ethel Coochee: No worries. I think its great that y’all can have a “realworld” blog experience. Make all the hookups you want ;)
  • 30 Ethel Coochee // Jul 2, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    OK, so I fooled everyone.

    VanGogh, thanks for the lunch, and everyone who showed up today. I wonder who’ll show up tommorow? We should stand across the street, VanGogh, & see who’ll go. That would be a hooch!
    (No, I didn’t say it, ok?)

Leave a Reply