YourCT.com header image 2

Wanna Be More Environmentally Effective?


by turfgrrl


June 26th, 2008 · 27 Comments

The Courant today delves into what is hampering even more envirnmental success at cleaning our air and water. It’s soylent green! Yep, people are the ones dragging the whole progress thing down. What a surprise. They report, you discuss, especially in light of recent claims made about trash contracts and recycling:

Although anti-pollution laws have gone a long way toward cleaning up the state’s air and water, a new report says that solving some of the more intractable environmental problems won’t happen unless residents change how they live.

Despite the steadily rising cost of gasoline and electricity, commuters and homeowners do not appear to be stepping up to the plate, according to a report issued Wednesday by the Council on Environmental Quality.

“We’re looking more at lifestyle changes vs. statutory changes,” said Thomas Harrison, chairman of the state advisory group.

For example:

Related links
Connecticut’s Environment Report Photos
Connecticut’s Environment: A Report Card

• Connecticut drivers, on average, drove more miles in 2007 than the year before, which could wind up offsetting efforts to cut the state’s output of greenhouse gases associated with global warming.

• Recycling rates in 2007 declined — again. The state already had failed to meet a goal of recycling 40 percent of solid waste by 2000.

“The consequences have been enormous,” the report says. “Hundreds of thousands of tons of waste are shipped out of state each year, putting thousands of diesel trucks on the highways for trips of many hundred miles.”

That means more traffic and more air pollution.

• Most appliances bought in Connecticut are not energy-efficient models, even though residents could cut electricity use by purchasing Energy Star-certified refrigerators and other devices.

By persuading more people to do so, “Connecticut could see a noticeable improvement in the use of energy,” Harrison said. That, too, would help the state meet long-term goals that can contribute to the battle against climate change.

The annual report card on the environment found several reasons to crow, including the cleanest air in decades, continued improvement in cutting back nitrogen releases into Long Island Sound from sewage treatment plants and a drop in overall greenhouse gas emissions.

On the wildlife front, the state is now home to 15 pairs of nesting bald eagles — a substantial victory that reflects decades of effort to clean contaminants such as the insecticide DDT out of the food chain.

But for every gain, the report found nagging problems, some of which threaten to undermine progress already made.

Businesses succeeded in becoming more productive while cutting electricity use, but homeowners consumed more. Upgraded sewage treatment plants helped reduce excessive nutrients flowing into the Sound, but storm-water runoff from sprawling development adds to the problem.

“Connecticut residents will fail to meet several important environmental goals, including those for land conservation and waste recycling, unless we make a more earnest effort,” the report concludes.

The final grade for 2007?

About a C-plus, said Harrison, who spoke about the report at a press conference in the state Capitol on Wednesday.

I’ll sum up, residents must drive less, recycle more and use less electricity. Now, wasn’t the whole point of going with City Carting the ability to recycle more?

source: Courant, Report: Solving State’s Tough Environmental Problems Requires Lifestyle Changes
By DAVID FUNKHOUSER, June 26, 2008

Tags: Connecticut · Energy

27 Responses so far “Wanna Be More Environmentally Effective?”



  • 1 MGeake // Jun 26, 2008 at 9:31 am

    City Carting is handling Norwalk’s recycling TODAY.

    It also has a very large, somewaht under-utilized transfer station.

    Why can’t RECYCLING be at Meadow Street????

    It’s this all-or-nothing crap that’s destroying this administration’s credibility (that, and the bold-faced lies).

  • 2 turfgrrl // Jun 26, 2008 at 10:00 am

    MGeake: To expand the recycling separating they need more space so the drive in truck bays have to be moved somewhere, I understand it.
  • 3 old timer // Jun 26, 2008 at 10:52 am

    That may have been the whole point, but it sure wasn’t sold effectively. The City Carting deal was presented as a way of saving or making money by handling construction & demolition waste they had never handled before, competing with private businesses, and recycling more.
    The idea of privatizing a traditionally government operation, and saving or making money at the same time is not simple to understand. The idea of having all that garbage processed nearby is not appealing to the neighbors. It sounded like garbage from seven towns was coming to Meadow St. The failure to provide answers about the environmental effects, the true costs, the traffic impacts, the City Carting people, all made for a very difficult idea to sell.
    Hal Alvord, may be competent, but he is a lousy salesman who does not inspire trust. He raised too many questions that he would not answer. That raised a lot of suspicion. People thought he must know, and is hiding something. A lot of people figured there must be something crooked. He was in a tough position by not starting the process sooner so there was time to get answers. He told some people he tried to get started on this a full year earlier and was unable to get the money. He apparently does not have the full trust and confidence of the council, either.

  • 4 Anonymous // Jun 26, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    with all said the fire dept uses the old bus depot isn’t there room there to take lets say paper? Glass or tires? The oil collection station is at the Volk fire station but is a huge problem according to Hal why not address it now?

    Whats odd about this is when Norwalks handlers get their hand slapped they cry wolf or say the dike is leaking.Suck it up or we simply find someone else to do the job.Its like big business you can’t do the job get someone else.To pummel the public with scare tactics because someone doesn’t get their way is childish and shows maybe replacing more than Hal is needed.

    I agree with you old timer but some issues were true,we as it is take trash from what 2 of the proposed six? The waste stream from other cities and towns were proposed to come to meadow st,like if you had a trailor on a car you would go to meadow st through Rowyaton if feasable truck route or not.

    What we havn’t heard about the future traffic flow disruption on cresent street and the other areas of the city that may be used for recycle of course was that option even explored?

    Hal isn’t a god salesman look at his product and bosses he would of stood a better chance working for Enron.

    We don’t address problems in Norwalk until its a big problem,like the police department proactive response is limited by the people in charge.

    Mention environmental complexities and the whole conversation changes.Yes it cost money to everyone discourage big business from coming to Norwalk by showing them we are savy and what? They will still come.

    Everyone is now looking at environmental problems yet Norwalk past performance only tells you we have a long ways to go to catch up.Where is our grant writer? Where is the mayor on all this?

    Norwalk has never been proactive,yes we found brownfeilds yet what have we done with them? Maybe a recycle lot or two tax free while its cleaned up maybe?

    The brownfeild lot on water street is a work site but what about the prognosis? antother secret maybe?

    No lets just do the doom and gloom walk and think we will get some grant cause we look needy.Its not going to happen anymore even the state is on to us.

    Hal is full of excuses ,why would anyone wait a year its been said the council is to blame,this conversation can go on for another year before a solution is found.

    Maybe we are all to blame leave it up to one man who with the help of Bondi to solve our crisis and we have this.A lesson learned now lets see a board who has some talent some savy and no hidden agenda maybe then they can sell the same idea.

  • 5 Anonymous // Jun 26, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    I guess that all that trash that is already at Meadow is from Norwalk? And that City Carting doesn’t use the Stamford facility for Stamford trash?

  • 6 MGeake // Jun 26, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    TRASH (MSW) doesn’t go to Meadow Street today; only C&D.

  • 7 turfgrrl // Jun 26, 2008 at 5:10 pm

    MGeake: For $200 you can dump anything there.
  • 8 Anonymous // Jun 26, 2008 at 6:30 pm

    who is going to stop the dumpsters from being washed out into village creek? Some of them are from Lajoies,who is going to clean up the oily bottoms that have been wahed out already?

    A power wash company goes into the yard at night after hours at the transfer station and washes dumpsters I wonder if that is legal?

    Its funny we havn’t actaully scratched the surfice of what goes on on Meadow st the traffic as it is now has to dodge existing companies that take up the street.

    What Hal said about the debris that is trucked away is minimal as it stands right now.If its two trucks out that means what 60 tons a day?

  • 9 Anonymous // Jun 26, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    I fund it odd the Housing Authority dumps at meadow st transfer station now instead of our own city facility why is that? What kind of deal is that?

  • 10 old timer // Jun 28, 2008 at 8:54 am

    You read about all the people convicted in the case of James Galante and his garbage companies, including big names in NY organised crime and local politicians and you would think the City would be very careful who they deal with. It is called due diligence and Mr Alvord should have been able to answer any questions his presentations raised. Maybe hizzoner should look for another DPW director.

  • 11 Anonymous // Jun 28, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Maybe thats a great idea,but while Dick is looking for someone to fill Hals spot maybe we should be looking to fill his.

  • 12 Lindsay // Jun 28, 2008 at 11:48 am

    I wonder why we cant recycle #4 and 5 plastics…only 1 and 2. If something has changed please let me know.

  • 13 garbage in garbage out // Jun 28, 2008 at 7:06 pm

    The ” increase recycling ” was part of the sales pitch .
    I heard nothing that isn’t already being done .
    Currently our recyclables go to the Recycling facility in Stratford . ( also home of the childrens recycling museum) .
    Revenue from the recycling plant is shared with
    all the member towns ( including Norwalk) . Did
    Hal tell you that.
    Stratford Plant is offering 15/ton if we stay with them. Same as City Carting .
    WE PAY TO DISPOSE our GARBAGE SO WE DON”T HAVE A LANDFILL HERE .
    OLD TIMER > your on the right track !!!! Keep looking .
    Lindsey > 3,4,5,6,7 plastics are made of a blend of plastics that cannot be processed with our(CT)current system. This will change .

  • 14 Anonymous // Jun 28, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    Except that you are spreading wrong information. This blog has even pasted about the drive you have to make to dispose of many household items. Too bad you can’t relay facts.

  • 15 garbage in garbage out // Jun 28, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    All of 13 is fact.
    Almost every Fairfield Cty Town
    Recycles : Co-mingle and paper ,Oil, cardboard, car batteries , Brush , etc. . If Norwalk does not it is because it chose not to.
    http://www.crra.org/pages/recycle.htm
    You May have to drive for hazardous waste.

  • 16 anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Yeah. At 4.50 a gallon, I am going to take time out of my day and drive somewhere to recycle.

  • 17 Anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    If we can’t get residents to recycle at the curb what makes you think all the best laid plans in the world will increase it at a transfer station.How many residents have ever seen the existing transfer station?

    Talk to the guy who runs the truck for those blue buckets,I imagine Hals facts are in for that as well.When the facts are coming from Hal I have to trust the facts from others instead .

    Where did all the glass come from on washington st ?The street is covered with glass in front of the Black bear .Someone said the shopping cart recycler had an accident last night picking through the trash cans that don’t get picked up anymore till monday.I wonderful sight to see on your much talked about map walk of Norwalk.Vistors get to see overflowing garbage cans full of food bottles and rats such a lovely picture for those who planned the brochures.

    Hal did stop the weekend pickups now we spend money on overtime for a crews to sweep the glass up and clean up the trash.The Norwalk way elimanate regular hours and replace them with overtime ones for what the city still looks the same a mess.

    Now all of the experts can tell me was it worth the cost cutting savings our image I thought was worth more but experts run this city not the taxpayers.Time for a full sweep i’d say and I’d start with washington st.

  • 18 anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Norwalk should pattern Washington St as a Bourbon St. Type atmosphere to attract tourists and nightlife. Close off the street to traffic from 6pm on. Let the bars and restaurants set up tables outside and make it an outdoor party til closing. Then clean it up afterward for opening the next day. This would encourage Sono to be the hotspot not just on thurs, fri, and sat nights, but all through the week.

  • 19 Anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    The police already close the street when the bars close,The downtown will support the kind of drug tade in the area your suggesting and the hookers will have even a better chance for businees if the city did do what you suggested.

    But then again if we can’t find the police resources to clean up what we have the development mentality seeps in and not taking care of what we have will prevail, we will have the largest and the most widespread crime area in Ct.

    One way or the other Norwalk will put itself on the map with or without city halls help.

  • 20 anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    The Washington St area is the most economically successful area in Norwalk. Why not take advantage of it and pump outside dollars into the economy.

  • 21 Anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    You would here otherwise from Wall st and the whole point of new development is to replace that area whats left of it.Read the last article on business complaining about the absence of what it was and what it has become.It was conveniantly overlooked by all it was not a favorable areticle it was not done by The Hour.It was factual and done by talking to more than one or two vendors in downtown Sono.It started out by mourning the loss of a annual fair Sono had for years one of the foremost events that helped downtown Sono.

    But we are working on connecting the city in a green way correct so there is something in the works isn’t there?

    I agree Sono is still a pearl yet to be sold out from the city residents.

  • 22 anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    I think those businesses that were complaining were ones that don’t fit it with those businesses that are established and successful there. The bar restaurant business is booming down there with lines to get in on most nights. Successful businesses in that area would gear their merchandise to fit the consumers that frequent there.

  • 23 PRIORITES BASS ACKWARDS // Jun 29, 2008 at 6:36 pm

    I also think the NPD should post an officer in the SoNo area to enforce the drunk driving laws, which can cause death, dismemberment, and life long suffering. KINDA like the officer that is wasted at the beach with his only MISSION IN LIFE being to stop all motorcycles, and cause them to be guilty until proven innocent. I think it is called selective enforcement. It it certainly keeps him out of harms way, and he does not have to worry about coming in contact with REAL CRIMINALS.

  • 24 Anonymous // Jun 29, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    your right #22 rolling papers and coke spoons would be the way to go if your selling merchandise in downtown Sono.

    The draft business without food is not what any city wants.Last weekend was what 15 arrests from our lovely downtown Sono. Last night 25 parking tickets in less than an hour a very good second time draw incentive for any visitor, I think not.

  • 25 anonymous // Jun 30, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Cocaine is illegal and not sure a headshop would do too well down there. Maybe a late night diner that people could grab a bite after closing. Maybe a variety time store that sells snacks. Pizza by the slice. Most of the bars do serve food down there too.

  • 26 Anonymous // Jun 30, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    Tell that to the customers who come here to Norwalk and buy their drugs? The cash crop right now is pot from our own country.Problem I see is the market on coke,its a turf war right now maybe that explains the voilence everywhere even outside of Norwalk.

    last report in The Hour they gave prices of the drugs ,they either have a lot or the stuff or it has has been cut many times to bring the price down.

    Hal isn’t the only one in Norwalk that understands bringing the price down hurts the other guy.Competition is good keeps the price down no matter what your trade is.

  • 27 Anonymous // Jun 30, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    I heard the Jamaican restaurant that used to be on the corner by the new police station would slip a little extra something in with that jerk chicken if you knew the right menu item to ask for…

Leave a Reply