YourCT.com header image 2

Merritt Parkway Interchange Delayed Past 2012


by turfgrrl


June 26th, 2008 · 12 Comments

2012. That’s four years away already. That was then the CT DOT was planning to start construction? Hey by then gas will be at $10/gallon so maybe the the parkway will be used by motor scooters exclusively.

Redesigning the congested Route 7/Merritt Parkway interchange will take longer than projected because the state needs a new blueprint for the project.

Starting construction in 2012 is no longer realistic because the state Department of Transportation must find an alternative to the cloverleaf design that has sparked strong opposition from interchange neighbors, said Tom Harley, the DOT’s manager of consultant design.

That start date was predicated on moving ahead with the cloverleaf, he said.

“I don’t know if that is a valid time frame anymore if we’re going back and trying to find a different alternative,” Harley said; he couldn’t say how much longer the project would take.

Silvermine residents say the cloverleaf design’s looping ramps would bring traffic noise and pollution too close to their homes, while also impinging too much on wetlands.

Residents say they were not informed when the state worked up the cloverleaf design in consultation with the Merritt Parkway Conservancy.

The conservancy had sued in federal court to stop an earlier interchange design, arguing it would mar the parkway’s historic character.

Silvermine residents, along with representatives of DOT, the conservancy and other groups, met yesterday at Norwalk City Hall to kick off a series of meetings about a new interchange concept.

Richard Armstrong, DOT’s principal engineer for the project, began the meeting by saying “consensus is the goal,” although the department is prepared to make decisions about the project if unanimity can’t be reached.

“You need to educate us. We need to learn from you,” he told the group of 20 stakeholders and others in the audience. “Your priorities need to become our priorities.”

Debra LeFosse, who lives near the interchange on Valley Road, said disruption will come no matter which design the DOT ends up with.

She related the dirt, noise and disruption that has already come from development in the area.

“Your life is going to change. It will not be the same,” LeFosse said. “Norwalk is just not going to be Norwalk anymore for those of us who live around there.”

Harley said it’s hard to say how much longer the project will take because it depends on how long it takes the group to agree on a new design.

Construction will take three to five years, he said.

In coming up with a new plan, Harley said the DOT can draw on about 20 redesign options it had considered.

“In the absence of coming up with something new . . . there’s plenty more that we moved beyond or discarded for one reason or another,” he said.

Armstrong said the stakeholders’ group will revisit each one to see why it wasn’t chosen.

source: Advocate, Merritt/Route 7 exit redesignwill be delayed, By Chris Gosier, 06/26/2008

Tags: Norwalk · Transportation

12 Responses so far “Merritt Parkway Interchange Delayed Past 2012”



  • 1 Anonymous // Jun 27, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Let’s give the folks at the Merritt Parkway Conservancy a big round of applause for accomplishing its goal of preserving the beauty and character of the Parkway at the Interchange. I just love the way it looks; it’s oh so pretty!

  • 2 anonymous // Jun 27, 2008 at 9:24 am

    Yes. Thank you for slowing traffic flow and keeping the Parkway a commuting nightmare. We appreciate the MPC and the Stop Super 7 Committee for turning Fairfield County into a parking lot and adding hours to our commute every week.

  • 3 Driver's Roads // Jun 27, 2008 at 9:34 am

    I love drivng the Merrit and choose it for my commute. You can be stuck on I-95 breathing in fumes and looking at ugly or stuck on the Merrit lookng at greenery. Face it…no city has ever built their way out of congestion by adding lanes or highways. It can only be done if there are fewer cars on the road not more road for even more cars. No matter what the DOT does, the Merrit will still have rush hour congestion until there is a good alternative (one that people use) for short distance commuting in CT.

  • 4 Anon // Jun 30, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    These conservancy people need to get a life! It’s a highway people, remember? It’s not a Van Gogh! It was built for use by cars.

  • 5 Driver's Roads // Jul 1, 2008 at 7:43 am

    It’s actually a “parkway”…a route through a park. I-95 is a highway. Like the NY THruway is a highway and the Taconic is a parkway. Blue Ridge Parway, etc. All of them have an aesthetic that makes driving more pleasnat than the miserable point A to point B of the highway. I wonder if there are road rage studies about highways vs parkways? I’d be willing to be that parkways are better for our mental health.

  • 6 Van Gogh // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:05 am

    I remember commuting. Either road - Thruway/parkway, it was awful! The worst part about the parkway is that “no man’s land” Do you know why there’s no exit 43? From what I heard, it’s because the people in Greenfield Hill and Easton got together and put a stop to any exit there. Could you imagine? I wonder if there’s any truth to that? There should be a federal law to put it in. Did you ever have to go to the bathroom and got stuvk in that 5 mile area? Oh my God. It’ isn’t easy being a female then…..We’d get arrested for a POP & Squat routine.

    Oh well, I said my peace.

  • 7 Aunt Bertha // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Driver’s Roads are you kidding? Parkways are better for our mental health? AHHHH, Hello! I travel often and can attest that if you get onto the parkway after 3pm on a Thursday or Friday you crawl home going less that 30mph. The PARK in parkway is a fact. When some one does break loose and crashes it takes hours for us to move anywhere- I hop off at the first available exit knowing back roads pays off. And the emergency vehicles come down the center as the two lanes of traffic squeeze over to the sides. New drivers do not understand this concept and do not get out of the way. No man’s land is not that bad if the slow traffic would stay right. Because coming around the bend is where deer tend to become suicidal. I am sorry for SIlvermine because it is quiet and not congested however, this has been on going now for 40 years. Some thing needs to be done. I do not think it is a question of if you build it they will come, they are already there going no where fast…Help!
    Well, I left my job about 5 o’clock it took 15 mins. to go three blocks just in time to stand in line to see the freeway looking like a parking lot…Damn, this traffic jam how I hate to be late. It hurts my motor to go this slow time I get home my supper is cold… James Talyor

  • 8 Driver's Roads // Jul 1, 2008 at 8:56 am

    Life’s so short; why not enjoy the ride?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpS56KpzFLU&feature=related

  • 9 Mr. Malkn - // Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19 am

    I’ve been wanting to purchase a home in the Silvermine area, but now I fear that I will be purchasing a nightmare.

    It is interesting to learn that the MPC’s Chairman is Peter Malkin - who happens to own (among many other buildings) the Merrittview Office building and who is opposing earlier plans, which would have brought the interchange closer to his building, and yet he sounds so concerned about the precious history of this parkway.

    Please Mr. Malkin - you are looking to damage a residential community and wetlands just so you can keep your rental rates up at your building. You are making money, hand over fist from owning the Empire State Building; can’t your survive if this building doesn’t earn you as much money???

  • 10 anonymous // Jul 13, 2008 at 10:46 am

    if he puts the interchange in, think how much faster you can get on and off the parkway to your home. Time is money.

  • 11 Mr. Malkn - followup // Jul 13, 2008 at 11:05 am

    And, for what it’s worth, Mr. Malkin did not show much concern for the conservation of the parkway’s aesthetics when he and his partners purchased the Merritview Building in the 1990s and installed a lighted sign on the building - which went against convention for buildings along the Merritt.

  • 12 anonymous // Jul 13, 2008 at 11:09 am

    So don’t buy in Slivermine. There are others that will for the easier commute access

Leave a Reply