YourCT.com header image 2

Cupcake Controversy In Greenwich


by turfgrrl


May 30th, 2008 · 24 Comments

The blog is not complete without a good cupcake story. This time a principal is under fire for enforcing the “cupcake policy” in Greenwich. Apparently, the Greenwich BOE does not feel compelled to ban the cupcakes from schools, but does have one about the delivery of cupcakes. My recollections of school way back in the days when horse and buggies delivered milk daily was that parents only showed up in school for two things; parent/teacher night and the time you got suspended for …. er, I digress. But its the modern era, where milk is made of soy and parents feel obligated to deliver cupcakes.

The Advocate reports:

A controversy consuming Glenville School began as a mission to deliver cupcakes to a third-grader’s classroom and a dispute between a principal and a parent over school policy on celebrating birthdays.

At stake is the job of suspended Glenville School Principal Marc D’Amico, who, his lawyer said, does not deserve to lose his job.

“This man is being proposed for removal,” Hamden lawyer John Gesmonde said. “I will confirm it was about cupcakes and birthday cakes.”

But parent Frank Carbino, who said he was prohibited from delivering cupcakes to his daughter’s classroom earlier this month, believes his reputation is on the line.

“All I’ve wanted to do was just clear my name of the whole thing,” Carbino said. “It’s more of an integrity thing.”

Carbino said he went to the main office of Glenville School shortly before 2 p.m. May 6 to deliver cupcakes to his daughter who was turning 9 that day. But, he said, the school secretary said the cupcakes were to be left at the counter for his daughter to pick up and take back to her class without him. He protested, saying his wife had cleared the birthday plans with the teacher the day before.

Carbino said he was asked to wait to speak to D’Amico, who told him school policy prohibited parents from personally delivering birthday cakes or treats.

Carbino said that when he returned home, he fired off a letter to district officials telling them D’Amico had singled him on that particular occasion.

But district officials told Carbino the principal was right and the school had a policy dating back to “forever” asking parents to refrain from delivering birthday treats, Carbino said.
Carbino said that when he went to the school’s Web site, he found the document with a section titled, “Birthday Celebrations,” had been created at 2:18 p.m. May 6, a few minutes after he had argued with D’Amico and left the school.

But Gesmonde said that after the run-in with Carbino and learning that other parents ignored the rule, D’Amico believed that he needed to make things clear by adding the section to the student handbook.

Celia Fernandez, co-president of the parent-teacher association and a parent who supports D’Amico keeping his job, said she sees it from both sides. Parents deliver birthday cakes to their children’s classrooms, but school officials also have a practice of telling parents who sign in at the main office to leave cupcakes for pickup.

source: Advocate, Cupcake delivery started dispute that led to principal’s suspension, By Hoa Nguyen, 05/30/2008

Tags: Connecticut · Education

24 Responses so far “Cupcake Controversy In Greenwich”



  • 1 Retired from DRG I // May 30, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    and this is how we expect administrators with grad degrees to spend their time and risk losing their jobs… can we deal with the daily deluge of parents delivering things to classes walking around the building with a policy that says leave things in the office? so if your dad is a lawyer you don’t have to follow policy? or maybe the teacher should have quoted policy to mom? perhaps this is what happens when you have a 5+ inch binder of policies on educational law required of every BOE and few can wade through them fast enough to dance with parents.

  • 2 Anonymous // May 31, 2008 at 6:40 am

    Please tell me that the story leaves out an important detail or two because any superintendent who would even discuss recommending the dismissal of a principal for the reason stated in this article would, in my opinion, be guilty of incredibly bad judgment. If true, the charge that the principal added the rule to the website after the fact, saying that it had been there all the time, would be grounds for a meeting and conversation about honesty, nothing more.

    Either there are other issues that haven’t been stated, or it is the superintendent who is the problem.

  • 3 Aunt Bertha // May 31, 2008 at 10:45 am

    I feel that you should keep the birthday parties at HOME. Celebrate with your FAMILY. There are many parents in the elementary schools trying to rule over the teachers and principals. They walk in with out signing in and disrupt the learning process. Since when was it a necessity to deliver birthday cupcakes to a child at school? It was not going on in the 70’s when we had more stay at home moms. Now we have kids with peanut allergies and egg allergies and wheat allergies, and who wants to take a risk at eating one of those cup cakes when the ingredients are not listed? (or give them out to others with unknown allergies) This is petty. Get back to teaching and stop the parenting. I have been in education for a long time, and I like the teachers who handle birthdays with a calm recognition of a special birthday pencil or ruler as a recognition of the day. After all, the party is up to the family not the school. How about the students who are not recognized with parties and cupcakes because of single parent families or poverty? Insanity. Mr. Carbino life is short, in the long run your daughter will remember the TIME spent with you on any given day not the cupcakes delivery you feel obligated to make in person. If they make it to the class because she was called to the office to pick them up with a friend she knows that you were there for her to drop them off. Turfgrrl, thanks for the sample of what teachers are dealing with in our schools.

  • 4 Anonymous // May 31, 2008 at 11:15 am

    This story is among the craziest I have read in a long time. I want to scream, “Are you out of your ever-loving minds?”

    The Greenwich Board of Education and its superintendent have some explaining to do. If there is a lot more to the story, including performance that warranted suspension, the superintendent is not at liberty to discuss it, but she could have said that there are facts beyond those reported that counsel has advised her not to discuss. How could Greenwich let a matter so trivial turn into such a major embarrassment for all involved? Is this how we want to teach our students about conflict resolution? People have long thought Greenwich to be a superior school system. This story does not reflect the actions of a superior system.

    Oh. As for Mr. Carbino, I say, “Grow up. You are a spoiled cry-baby.”

  • 5 MGeake's wife // May 31, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I remember one of my birthdays in elementary school. Because it was my birthday it became ‘my day’. I got to go to the front of the line & lead everyone out for lunch & recesses. My teacher also gave me a hand made birthday card that was signed by all my classmates. It might have cost the teacher 5 cents to give a card to someone, but it was so special. I kept it for a long time.

    Maybe teachers & parents should look at the simple things that make an impression on their child, rather than having a big party at school that takes away from the teacher & put the mom in the spotlight.

  • 6 Anonymous // May 31, 2008 at 5:14 pm

    Aunt Bertha, you are right on with your comment. In addition to the excellent points you have made (allergies, etc.), there is also the issues of juvenile diabetes and diverse belief systems in our public schools. For example, Jehovah Witnesses do not celebrate birthdays. Like it or not, public schools need to exercise caution when possible conflicts might occur. After all, this is what a “public” school is. Also, parents need to remember that not every child has the good fortune to have a parent who would bring cupcakes to school. Parents need to be sensitive to the feelings of all children and not just their own.

  • 7 Sherlock // May 31, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Hey Aunt Bertha….Welcome BACK!!!!! How are you?!?!? And you are right about the cupcake business. Ya’ think this happens in Stamford?!;) It’s hard, isn’t it?!

    Great to see your writings.

  • 8 turfgrrl // May 31, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Aunt Bertha: I am still stunned at how far derailed Education has become in modern public school systems.
  • 9 Lindsay // May 31, 2008 at 10:16 pm

    My friend is a 4th grade teacher in Greenwich..you wouldnt believe the stories she has. If you heard the CRAP she had to put up with from parents it would make your hair stand on end. I dont know how she deals with it! Example
    “Im leaving at lunchtime today because my dad is taking us to pick out our pinball machines” or how about “Were leaving tomorrow to go skiing in France for 3 weeks..can you give me my work?” or “Dear Mrs L-Please dismiss Buffy at 12pm sharp today-her nanny is picking her up and were going out on our boat.” She has tot hink twice about giving honest grades (ie anything below a B-) to the students for fear of retribution from the parents..SICK!!!!!!!!!!

  • 10 Sherlock // May 31, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    Everything you say is true! They don’t think so, though. Ask any wife who lives there. They’ve sold their soul. I’m so happy to be here in a real world!

  • 11 Anonymous // May 31, 2008 at 11:28 pm

    I’d rather teach in Norwalk any day.

  • 12 Anon432 // Jun 1, 2008 at 6:14 am

    Oh, Norwalk has some of this going on. Don’t kid yourself into thinking this is just a Greenwich thing.

  • 13 Sherlock // Jun 1, 2008 at 8:01 am

    While you may be right, Anon432, Greenwich really wins the prize for dysfunction. Hey Anon432, how are you?!?!? ;)

  • 14 Anonymous // Jun 1, 2008 at 9:48 am

    Sherlock, is Greenwich so dysfunctional that it is possible that the principal was suspended for the reason stated in the press, or do you think there may be more to the story? (This isn’t a rhetorical question; I really don’t know.)

  • 15 anonymous // Jun 1, 2008 at 10:41 am

    This does not make any sense. Finally, a principal respects the classroom learning environment by not interrupting it with a non-curricular activity, and he is suspended by the board? Isn’t it true we are driven by data and NCLB? Isn’t it true that schools today must be very vigilant when outside traffic enters a building during school hours? Isn’t it true that there are policies in some schools prohibiting food items? What exactly is the message Greenwich is sending to its professional staff, and to the Connecticut State Department of Education? This simply has to be distorted news or there is more to it. Did Mr. Carbino show up with a camera? That is a red flag right there since media access is not granted to all kids. Parents take liberties with other peoples’ children and the schools must protect those kids from other parents, no matter how well-meaning their intentions. No, it is not the way it used to be when we were in school, Mary Geake, and something tells me this principal was doing his job.

  • 16 Silence Dogood // Jun 1, 2008 at 1:20 pm

    #15: You ask about the message this sends to the CT SDE? Don’t forget that immediately prior to her becoming superintendent of the Greenwich Public Schools, Betty Sternberg was the CT Commissioner of Education. The words I would use to describe this incident include: despicable, ludicrous, insane, embarrassing and unprofessional.

  • 17 Sherlock // Jun 1, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    #14, Anonymous. I don’t know any more than the next person regarding this issue, but my point is just that it’s such a funny article. Only in Greenwich would anyone be reporting about something so stupid. I know people who work in that school system now and they’ve been there for years. How they’ve gone for this long is beyond me. Medication? They’re “different” there. An I once used to want to be like them….Gosh, I’m so glad I know a little bit more now. Even though Norwalk’s got its plethora of problems, it’s a lot more on the “real” side here! Ugh!

  • 18 Ethel Mertz // Jun 6, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    Now the principal’s back at his job. Cupcakes. Can you imagine?????

  • 19 Aunt Bertha // Jun 6, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    I can’t believe it all took place.

  • 20 Ethel Mertz // Jun 6, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    But only in Greenwich. What else could be more upsetting?! It’s a cross between the Cleavers and OZ over there. Help me….

  • 21 Anonymous // Jun 6, 2008 at 11:28 pm

    I have yet to hear any details that justify the measures taken against the principal. I have no respect for the parent, Mr. Carbino. I have less than no respect for the superintendent, Dr. Sternberg. By the way, I don’t even know the principal, and so I’m not taking his defense, but this seems to be an example of a runaway train — a parent who took a concern way too far, a superintendent who played along.

    Shame on Greenwich.

  • 22 anony // Jun 7, 2008 at 9:38 am

    I think Carbino must be an a$$. Why would he go complaining and making a big issue about not being allowed to just walk into a classroom and deliver something for the entire class to eat. These days, I wouldn’t want anyone just walking into my child’s school and giving them food that I have no knowledge of. Between allegries and sadistic people out there, I want to know that someone is not going to be allowed to show up and give my child food without my permission.

  • 23 Anonymous // Jun 7, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    #22: You think? Is this a man who is used to getting his own way and so he threw a fit when he couldn’t have it? What an embarrassment for his child.

    Also, you’re right about giving food to other people’s children.

  • 24 Anonymous // Jun 8, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    22 has a valid point. In today’s crazy society, it would be nice for the parents to have some comfort that the food offered to their children is safe. Better not to just hand out junk food day after day when we have such an obesity problem. Let the parents donate a book and come in and read it on a birthday.

Leave a Reply