YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Higher Food Higher Fuel Costs Impact On Schools


by turfgrrl


May 12th, 2008 · 13 Comments

The Hour leads today with a story about the rising costs of food, and the impact it will have on the school lunch programs. The other elephant in the room is the higher energy costs that will be a bigger hit. With no new finance person, or I should say, since the Norwalk Public Schools never had a real high level finance person, no financial operations planner, the impact in the next 5 years will be really significant.

Already the  BOE budget is suffocating the average tax payer in Norwalk, so it is of utmost importance that the BOE and Corda look to staff position that will plan and forecast rising costs and mitigate their ipact on the system.

For starters that means a forensic audit of past operational expenditures. Opdhal spent too much time moving money for accounts. Real cost impacts need to be determined and projections based on historical expenses need to be real and data based. Corda will have to seriously consider the viability of each school building, not just from an enrollment perspective but of an operation perspective. The worst energy performing schools need to be evaluated. Investment should be made into more energy efficiency.

There needs to be a real effort to seek out grants to max energy improvements to educational facilities. While the council somehow dithers over the municipal power committee, it should be looking at how all public facilities can upgrade to more energy efficient systems.

But back to food, and The Hour reports:

Rising food and fuel costs have prompted many schools to cut some items from their menus, and Norwalk schools may soon be feeling the pinch.

An e-mail sent last week from the U. S. Department of Agriculture to schools and providers said school lunch providers won’t receive some commodities in September and November from the National School Lunch program.

This means Whitson’s Culinary Group can’t purchase some products, such as cheese and poultry, at the lower price provided for schools with free and reduced-lunch students.

Norwalk schools receive meals from Whitson’s, a catering company that provides dining for schools, corporations, residential healthcare and events.

“It’s scary because you don’t know what will happen,” said Lisa Evans, director of the Norwalk Whitson’s program. “All school districts are feeling this, and the cost (of food) is definitely an issue.”

Evans said Whitson’s hasn’t changed its menu yet, but may do so in the fall for the new school year. She also mentioned the rising cost of everyday food is a “double whammy” when coupled with federal guidelines that state healthier, but more expensive, food must be served on menus for proper nutrition.

“We’ll probably stick to having more standard items on the menu,” she said. “We may have to use more frozen vegetables instead of fresh but all of this could change.”

Elsewhere in the region, school and colleges have been cutting back. Several schools have eliminated trays on the theory that students will grab less if they have to carry the food in their hands. Other schools that charge students by the item are increasing the cost of healthier choices.

Food prices rose more than 4 percent in the United States last year, the biggest jump since 1990, according to the USDA.

 source: The Hour, School menus squeezed by higher food, fuel costs, by Nina Sen, May 12, 2008

Tags: Education · Energy · Norwalk

13 Responses so far “Norwalk: Higher Food Higher Fuel Costs Impact On Schools”



  • 1 Norwalker // May 12, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Maybe they should look at grants for solar energy for Jefferson school. It has electric heat!

  • 2 BIG // May 12, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    Hey Turfgrrl:

    What YOU should get your hands on is the letter that Corda sent to all the teachers regarding how the budget cut will impact teachers. I really don’t know how it could get to you, but it would be interesting to start a blog on the comments he makes in his e-mail to all of them. It sounds like what happened in the 2003-2004 school year. That year alone did so much damage, that none of us thought that it could happen again. It was beyond nightmare. Inform this site how you could get a hold of it. Thanks. If anything, that might just be a way to force HIM out. He’s trying to be every teacher’s “best friend”, and it “ain’t” going to work.

  • 3 NPS // May 12, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    A Note from the Superintendent

    Of Budgets and Budget Problems…

    Dear Colleague,
    We are faced with the difficult task of having to reduce our proposed budget for the 2008/2009 school year by approximately $1.4 million dollars. The Board of Estimate reduced our proposed increase of 4.9% to an increase of 4%. Reconciling a budget is never easy and never pleasant, because, to find dollars of that magnitude, many times the result is the reduction of positions and that can impact people’s jobs. Our hope is that these reductions can be accomplished by attrition, but we are never sure.
    This year’s situation is further exacerbated by the fact that the State budget does not contain any money for the Early Reading Success program. For us, that translates into the loss of $1,038,000. These funds cover the positions of nine of our literacy staff at the elementary schools.
    I want you to be aware of how we will approach this task. Our goal is to maintain the integrity of a sound instructional program that will serve all of our students, especially in light of the significant urgency to improve student performance.
    • We will examine all of our proposed expenditures to see if refinements can be made because of new information. These include:
    o re-examining class sizes and the number of staff assigned to each building based on the number of teaching sections we need and the specific services that must be provided to youngsters with special needs. We already know that we can reduce some staff at the secondary level, but we also know that at the elementary level we have three grades in three different schools where it may be necessary to add staff.
    o re-examining allocations in operations and maintenance, health insurance, and any other budget lines where reductions may be possible
    • We will delay until next year the addition of proposed additional staff wherever possible. This will impact our ability to deliver some support services.
    • We will examine all staff allocations to ensure that secretarial and clerical staff is equitably assigned based on student enrollment and building needs to see if any reductions are possible.
    • We will make reductions, as necessary, in areas where we will clearly reduce our capacity to deliver service, but which will minimize the impact on direct instruction to students.
    • If program reductions are necessary, we will make those decisions on the basis of impacting the fewest number of students possible.
    Your suggestions, within those guidelines, are welcome. None of this will be easy, but there is no choice. I shall keep you posted as we proceed.

    Sal

  • 4 BIG // May 12, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    Dear NPS:

    WOW!!! Thank you very much. I just posted a note on the Norwalk Operating Budget blog site. I really thank you!

    “BIG”

  • 5 Anon // May 12, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    I just hope that the letter itself wasn’t posted on this site by Sal……Eh! If it was, let him take “BIG” ’s suggestion. It might do him good.

    NOT!!!!!!!!

  • 6 Anonymous // May 13, 2008 at 9:17 am

    How do you think the school system should be funded, if not by the local tax payer?
    Should Norwalk create a school tax based on how many childern you have attending school?
    How about going after the students who don’t live in Norwalk? How about using more “green” technologies?
    How about going after the parents who only see the school system as “Free” babysitting?

  • 7 old timer // May 13, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Jefferson, heated by electricity ? Wonder if anybody has considered windpower. It might make sense at that location and could not only save a lot of money, but lead the way for other windpower projects in the City. A feasability study would be a good idea. Solar is not much use in the kind of weather that requires a lot of heating, but should certainly be considered. Some electric heating systems benefit by installing an alternate boiler to supplement the electric during the day when electric rates are highest.

  • 8 old timer // May 13, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Jefferson, heated by electricity ? Wonder if anybody has considered windpower. It might make sense at that location and could not only save a lot of money, but lead the way for other windpower projects in the City. A feasability study would be a good idea. Solar is not much use in the kind of weather that requires a lot of heating, but should certainly be considered. Some electric heating systems benefit by installing an alternate boiler to supplement the electric during the day when electric rates are highest.

  • 9 dawn // May 13, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    When they are doing all of these rennovations have they not thought to work in some alternative energy sources. Solar panels on the roof they are such a simple thing and in the huge costs of the rennovations they would pay for themselves in time.

    Turfgirl. Wondering when the illustrious agenda will be posted for the up and comming council meeting. Wouldn’t want to speak out of turn.

  • 10 MOJO // May 28, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    More costs least food 3 chichen nuggets . Now wonder my kids come home hungry.

  • 11 The Virginian // May 29, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    Mojo: Are you speaking english? What are you saying?

  • 12 Sherlock // May 29, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    MOJO, I’m sorry, but I was laughing all day at what you were tryng to say in your entry - #10. Honey, what ARE you tryng to say? Are you trying to say that you have to pay more for fewer chicken nuggets? (I can’t figure it out…..)

    If you’re so worried about hungry children, I’d advise you to go to Shop Rite or Stop & Shop, go to the deli, get some turkey. Then go get some mayo or mustard, then some good hearty bread and make sandwiches for your children instead of more costs least food 3 chichen nuggets. Oh my God, there I go!

  • 13 Sherlock // May 30, 2008 at 8:03 am

    Hey MOJO:

    How’s it going? Come on now. What you wrote was funny. Don’t be upset, but it does help. I’m still crackin’ up. Yea’, I know…..it probably doesn’t take much to get me laughing, but what you wrote was funny!

    Keep posting, ok, MOJO? You’re on the right track!

Leave a Reply