YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Betty Bondi Runs Again For Democratic Registrar


by turfgrrl


April 21st, 2008 · 24 Comments

Maybe the this is a sign that the era of Mme Defarge is truly over. Despite rumours that one of the Wells was going to step in to challenge 4 term incumbent Betty Bondi for the postition of Democratic Registrar, the Advocate is reporting that newly minted Democratic chair Gail Wall says that Betty Bondi will not be challenged.

Betty Bondi has quietly brought change to the office since she began 8 years ago in the role. Unbelievably, the office ran on a DOS based database when Bondi first started. The transition to a modern system proved invaluable once the state system started having problems.

Secretary of State Susan Bysciewicz sued the Norwalk registrars over failing to adopt the centralized state system in 2006, but both registrars ended up being somewhat vindicated when the state system crashed, on election day, and most recently during the heavy turnout Democratic primary.

Under Bondi’s administration, improvements to the yearly voter canvassing process has resulted in reduced operating costs. The introduction of the new voter machines was smooth.

Part of the voter outreach Bondi performs has included educational campaigns, try outs of the voting machines and visits to Norwalk’s High Schools. I have worked with the Secretary of the States office to ensure that all election laws are followed. With the yearly demand of 125 poll workers, Bondi has built a roster of experienced workers to draw from in addition to seeking new workers.

From the Advocate:

Bondi pointed to her work in improving technology and maintaining a backup system of voter rolls that prevented major problems during February’s primary elections when the state’s computerized voter information system crashed.

The Secretary of the State’s Office fined Bondi and her Republican counterpart, Karen Doyle Lyons, $1,500 each in 2004 for not fully complying with an order to put all their voter records on the state’s voter system. The two were vindicated earlier this year when the system, which is designed to prevent voting duplication, crashed forcing registrars in some municipalities to revert to paper and other record-keeping methods.

“My suggestion of having two databases with regular spot-checks to make sure that they are in sync, gives us the edge when it comes to having the information at our fingertips when we need it,” Bondi said.

Bondi still will need to get the nomination of her party, but it does not appear she will be challenged, said party chairwoman Gail Wall.

Lyons said she plans to discuss whether she will seek another term with her party over the weekend and expects to make an announcement soon. She said she is leaning toward running again.

Bondi and Lyons often have been at odds over the office’s management squabbling over budget and redistricting issues. The two offered no opinions on either one’s plan to seek another term.
Both registrars have served since 2000 and make about $47,000 annually.

Since taking the job, Bondi said she has made the office more efficient and has cut costs. She said that when she arrived, sending postcards to voters cost about $18,000. She said she cut those costs to about $3,000 by mailing letters to voters who have had a change of address since the previous election.

source: Bondi seeks 5th term as Democratic registrar, By Jonathan Lucas, April 20, 2008

Tags: Norwalk

24 Responses so far “Norwalk: Betty Bondi Runs Again For Democratic Registrar”



  • 1 Anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    Betty is a good registrar. I’m glad to see the dems sippet her.

  • 2 Anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    I wonder if she is the reason Fred got all those (Republican) votes.

  • 3 anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    Betty is a good registrar. Fred got all those Republican votes because he is perceived as bipartisan by the Republicans. Betty’s integrity is unquestionable and she does an amazing job!

  • 4 MeToo // Apr 21, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    Betty is NOT a good register! She is always late, never there when you need her, always the first to leave, & she never ever comes to the DTC to let them know how she is doing. Let anyone go into her office, & I have been in there 6 times in the past year, she is never there but she has the room temp at 78 degrees. There are so many things wrong with her, I hope the DTC comes up with someone else who can do a job better than she does. I guess she really can pull the wool over peoples eyes since she has gotten 3 people to blog in her favor. In less it’s her family that sent the blogs.

  • 5 Anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    What a joke on both sides.

  • 6 anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 9:40 pm

    Betty is a great registrar. Number 4 sounds like Stewart Wells.

  • 7 anonymous // Apr 21, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    #4 sounds like Karen…I don’t hear anyone ringing her bell!

  • 8 AnonymousToo // Apr 21, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    Apparently you have never gone into the Register of voters looking for Betty. She is never there & everyone ends up asking help from Karen Lyons, a republican. Not that her party should matter, it’s just that Karen is always there to help a voter, never Betty. I might not be able to vote, but I hope that those that do vote, vote for a change in the register of voters.

  • 9 longtimer // Apr 21, 2008 at 10:21 pm

    Either Galen or Stewart would destroy this important position. Galen couldn’t even follow rules that govern how the Democratic party operates, and Stewart can’t manage a mailing list. Neither one sends notices of meetings. Neither one knows who to communicate. This is is just another pay off they are seeking.

  • 10 Anonymous2 // Apr 21, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    Yeah we have tried to talk to Betty but she is always out till at least 10-11am & leaves around 3pm. I have gone in 3 days in a row till I finally got to talk to her. I thought when you needed her, she was supposed to answer all our questions? Man, I think that if your a Bondi you can do anything, after all isn’t this an in-house appointment after all? Didn’t she start 8 yrs ago under a Knopp adminstration?

  • 11 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 12:24 am

    It’s spelled “RegistRAR”, not “RegistER” ! jeez!!!!

  • 12 Registrar dilemna // Apr 22, 2008 at 6:49 am

    Since everyone wants to get rid of the registrars who would you suggest in their place? It has to be someone who knows that doing real estate during business hours is not acceptable, they have to understand that the hours are 8:30am to 5pm and not when ever they feel like being there. They have to be able to get along with both parties and the public and they have to understand that their salary is acceptable to most people who do part time work that is actually a full time salary. The work load is not that burdensome that they should expect to be making 60,000 a year. They are really only busy for a couple months a year and that is why they can be out selling real estate most of the time. Besides the assistant is the one who is there most of the time and she is quite personable. So any ideas? Maybe the DTC and RTC will get the message.

  • 13 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 6:58 am

    Anyone would be better. I am appalled that she is paid to run her real estate business on our dime. I don’t think that just because she is a Bondi she should get away with it. Besides, I don’t remember when the Council passed the Bondi employment act, but it must have been close to a holiday, when people weren’t paying attention.

  • 14 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 7:04 am

    Keep in mind its not one but both who need to get a wake up call. go back a few years and remember all the headlines in the papers? The animosity in that office has caused alot of problems and someone should take notice. If they are to continue in their roles as registrars they both need to understand that they work for the people and are accountable to the people. Their own agendas and personal problems need to be outside the office. The registrars office should be a friendly atmosphere where people feel comfortable and informed. They don’t need to walk into a hornets nest of personalities.

  • 15 anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 7:23 am

    Maybe we need to bring in the Wells family. They are great for stirring trouble, favoritism, scandal, incompetency and politicizing. They are leaders of the democratic party, isnt that a conflict of interest ?

  • 16 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 7:28 am

    I see dead people. 223 of them, to be exact. Didn’t Mookie win his first election by about that many?

  • 17 Bye Bye Betty // Apr 22, 2008 at 8:37 am

    Stuart Wells will be a better Registrar than Bondi. Wells is organized, diligent, and a True Blue Democrat. Stuart Wells has the support of the entire Town Committee. Stuart Wells will win this year. Bye Bye Betty.

  • 18 Anon // Apr 22, 2008 at 9:50 am

    Turgirl, You seem to be pro-Bondi. why not post the front page story in the Hour:

    Names of deceased residents discovered on local voter lists:

    The Norwalk Registrar of Voter’s Office is among a number of registrars offices to be investigated statewide for allegedly not adequately removing deceased residents’ names from voter rolls.

    On Monday, Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz announced that she had asked the State Elections Enforcement Commission to determine whether local registrars and town clerks failed to remove such names.

    “The integrity of the voting process is paramount here in Connecticut,” Bysiewicz said. “Sloppy lists only compound human error. Our voter rolls are only as good as the lists produced at the local level. That is why I am stepping in and working with both the Department of Public Health and the State Elections Enforcement Division to ensure we greatly reduce any chance of voter fraud come Election Day.”

    Bysiewicz’ directive comes in response to a study by the University of Connecticut students, who found a number of communities continued to keep the names of deceased voters on their voter rolls, according to Adam Joseph, spokesman for Bysiewicz’ office.

    “(The students) came up with numbers and cities. Norwalk was one of them,” Joseph said. “The number of deceased voters on the roll for Norwalk was 223. We’re requesting kind of a broad investigation to look into this.”

  • 19 turfgrrl // Apr 22, 2008 at 10:23 am

    anon: Hey I’m working on it. Got that day job thing going on. Plus I had to go to the PDF version of the Hour since that story didn’t make it to the web version, and then take a look at the Courant version. We’re looking as bad as Bridgeport! Wonder what the breakdown of dead people is regarding R, D, I and U.
  • 20 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 10:32 am

    See comment #16…

  • 21 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 10:50 am

    At my residence alone there are 5 mistakes, 2 people dead (5 yrs), 2 moved (3 yrs), & 1 that is still in her maiden name (4 yrs). How’s that! & I even went in & told her about it but nothing has been done. My neighbor’s husband has died but even though Betty was told twice, my neighbor’s husband is still on the voter roll, he was on last year & he has been dead 2 yrs! See why we don’t trust her!

  • 22 read the news // Apr 22, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Don’t beleive Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz. In by gone years the two Norwalk registrars tried to purge the list for people who moved and did not respond to post cards etc. They were told by the Dems who control Hartford to stop. We all know the Dem party favors having unregistered folks being allowed to vote; except for Waterbury where it is the Repubs who favor dead voters.

    On this one you can’t blame Betty and Karen.

  • 23 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Maybe Susan Bysiewicz should be looking at the person in her office named Bromley. Any relation to the curator’s husband? Also, isn’t it a conflict of interest to have Betty’s husband working at the voting booths? Especially when his father is running for Council?

  • 24 Anonymous // Apr 23, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Betty and her good friend the curator have the same schedules. Too busy doing other work to actually do their jobs.

Leave a Reply