YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Common Council Tee Vee


by turfgrrl


April 13th, 2008 · 7 Comments

Another proposal that gained legs in the 2005-2007 council advances at the pace of government that I can only describe as the drip-drip that formulates a stalagmite. From the Hour:

Look for a television camera and beefed-up audio system in the Common Council chambers of City Hall in the future as part of a plan to televise council meetings.

Karen Del Vecchio, the city’s director of Information Technology, said two consultants walked through City Hall last month and bid on the project, which will be paid for using grant money.

“We need to upgrade the audio in that room. The video in that room is a challenge, but getting a good audio is the bigger challenge in the room right now. So we’re working on that,” Del Vecchio said. “We have to purchase a stationary camera (and pay for) installation, wiring, mounting brackets.”

“The grant does not provide for labor for a technician to actually do the filming, so that’s why we’re going with a stationary camera,” Del Vecchio said.

Del Vecchio said the council meetings will be broadcast — likely live — on Cablevision Channel 79, which is the local government broadcast channel.

Members of the 2005-07 Common Council proposed televising government meetings, as part of a discussion during their informal bi-partisan meeting last September. Democrat Michael W. Coffey, council president at the time, and Republican Richard A. McQuaid, council minority leader at the time, endorsed the concept. Several council members expressed hope that council, council committee, school board and other municipal meetings would be televised.

McQuaid is not disappointed. For him, televising Common Council and Board of Education meetings are most important. He is hopeful that residents will turn on their televisions to watch the meetings.

“A lot of people are watching television to catch up on sports events that are local. And for a lot of people who can’t make it out to the council meetings, this is a good way to go,” McQuaid said.

McQuaid sees only one drawback in televised meetings: Public participation loses. In other words, residents can listen to and watch their councilman or councilwoman — but not speak back. At City Hall, the first several minutes of each council meeting are reserved for public participation.

According to Del Vecchio, the city has received a $4,000 grant and has another $2,000 grant available through Area Nine Cable Council to purchase and install the camera, wiring and other equipment.

Del Vecchio couldn’t give a firm date for when the system will be up and running.

“We have to purchase a stationary camera,” Del Vecchio said. “Whenever we can get the equipment ordered and installed.”

Mayor Richard A. Moccia has lent his support to the plan, while noting the technical issues involved. He said the council meetings will be broadcast live rather than rebroadcast. Moccia reminded that a council reauthorization of the plan also may be in order.

“I think we’re going to broadcast it live. It’s a lot easier to broadcast it live — assuming that this council wants to do it,” Moccia said. “It was voted on by the previous council. We’ll bring it back to this council and see if they want to do it.”

Live is good, but please rebroadcast it so that those, er, like the BOE, can watch if they have other commitments.

source: The Hour, Televised council meetings coming to your living room, by Robert Koch, April 13, 2008

Tags: Norwalk

7 Responses so far “Norwalk: Common Council Tee Vee”



  • 1 Diane Cece- // Apr 13, 2008 at 9:41 am

    Right, TG, I haven’t read my papers yet this morning, but why wouldn’t the plan be to rebroadcast in the first place? The point was to ensure viewing by those who could not attend the meetings, not those who are home watching another tv show!
    This might be another fine example of “better to do nothing at all, than do the wrong thing and be stuck with it”. Our common council sometimes rushes to push thru a popular item, with the note: we can always revisit it later. We seldom revisit things later. Sorry guys and gals, but not this time. I’m no techie, but it makes sense to me that it would be easier & cheaper to plan and install recording and taping the first time, than to later retrofit a system that was intended for live feed only. The burden to have a rebroadcast on numerous days and at different times rests with out IT department and others; in this day and age the burden should not be on the public to either be at city hall, be home in front of their tv at 8pm, or own a vcr or dvr. (Although, my dvr will be running so come election time we can “go to the tape”!)
    To Mr. McQuaid’s point about public participation, I remind him that at a live council meeting, no member of the public can speak back after listening to the council. As he noted, they can only speak beforehand. I believe taping and rebroadcasting the council meetings (and others, hopefully), will actually encourage more public attendance AND participation, by demystifying the government process here in Norwalk and encouraging a non-intimidating atmosphere in the council chamber. I think a 15 or 30 minute show produced in conjunction with The League of Women Voters could explain our local form of government; local districts; the council, commissions, committees and boards; and most importantly, the process of action items from the committees to votes at the council.
    We’ve been waiting patiently for televised city hall meetings, and I truly hope the council meetings are only the start - let’s do BOE, P&Z, Recs & Parks, Public Works, etc. as soon as possible.

  • 2 All in favor...but! // Apr 13, 2008 at 9:52 am

    I had hoped this would have been implemented sooner but with the live coverage I find a few faults. First of all, why wouldn’t there be rebroadcasts? I thought when I heard it last year that this was a convenience for the taxpayer in that many of them have children, jobs, other committees etc andare unable to attend council meetings so, my question here is, if they can’t attend these meetings because of othr committments, wouldn’t it be wise to rebroadcast on a weekend morning or evening when most are home relaxing? This way they could see what is going on and decide that perhaps its time they made some exceptions and get out to a meeting and lend their voice. I think there should be a biy more planning before this is implemented.

  • 3 old timer // Apr 13, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Broadcast, live and re, are good ideas. Making the entire, unedited, tape/record available online for anyone to look back on later would help keep them all more honest. At some point, a similar, easily accessed record of all public meetings should be routine. I go to a lot of meetings and am frequently amazed at what gets left out of the official record minutes. I wonder what it will cost to operate the equipment. It will probably be cheaper than the stenographers they use now. Someday soon they should do the same thing in the courts and in state government.

  • 4 Anonymous // Apr 13, 2008 at 11:08 am

    What is going on with zoning ? I hear stories about people who have not changed anything on their property for many years and are now suddenly being threatened with legal action for not enough off street parking or off street parking that is too close to property lines…They say they have complaints.
    Has there been some change in the law requiring all properties, regardless of when the house was built, to conform to present day zoning rules ?
    I know they can make you comply with new rules when you are getting a permit to make changes, additions, etc., but can they really take action against older properties that do not meet new rules about off-street parking when nobody is trying to make changes ? A lot of older houses were built before people had one car and now some families have two or three cars.

  • 5 turfgrrl // Apr 13, 2008 at 11:39 am

    anonymous 4: There’s an easy answer to determine compliance with existing zoning regulations– call zoning. The helpful staff will answer any questions.
  • 6 Anonymous // Apr 13, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    It is zoning staff that pursue complaints and threaten legal action.

  • 7 Anonymous // Apr 16, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    I hear Zoning does get complaints and they are all from the same lady who has taken on the unofficial job of zoning enforcement. They can’t ignore her, so each complaint gets investigated and each property owner gets threatened with the law dept.(not by the law dept, but a threat to turn the so-called violation over for prosecution by the law dept) Some resolve the problems by parking on the street for a while, surely, an unintended result. I understand she even complains to the police about pickup trucks parked in residential neighborhoods and the police send an officer and tickets get issued, sometimes.

Leave a Reply