YourCT.com header image 2

The Truth About Polls and Pols


by turfgrrl


April 12th, 2008 · 11 Comments

Ha, it seems I’m not the only one who favors messing with those automated pollsters:

According to results of a survey by the Sacred Heart University Polling Institute in Fairfield, people aren’t always honest when it comes to the subject of polls. The results, culled from interviews with 800 people nationwide, asked participants their thoughts on polls.

Election polls about candidates in particular drive me bonkers, for those I reserve special answers, especially when they all call within a one hour period on my mobile phone and block out their caller ID. The annoying exchange typically goes like this:

Pollster: This is XYZ company, do you have a few minutes to take an important survey?

Me: Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?

Pollster: Excuse me?

Me: Is this survey about an Animal, Vegetable or Mineral?

Pollster: We are looking for your opinion on the 2008 Presidential race.

Me: Vegetable! What happened to the 2007 Presidential race?

Pollster: Er, this is the year that the election is held.

Me: Really? That’s strange. So no one won last year?

Pollster: No.

Me: So George Bush is still president?

Pollster: Yes.

Me: Interesting.

Pollster: On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being know very well and 5 being don’t know at all, tell me what what you think of Ron Paul.

Me: Oh, the Beatles guy, um, the square root of 9.

Pollster: Excuse me?

Me: Square root of 9.

Pollster: I need an answer between 1 and 5.

Me: I just gave you one. Didn’t they teach you math in college? What university did you go to?

Pollster: I really need you to answer according to the choices I gave you.

Me: Sad state of affairs with you young whippersnappers these days, 3.

Pollster: Thank you. And same question for Barack Obama.

Me: Oh yeah, he’s married to Oprah so 1. That would also be 1 % of 100.

Pollster: He’s not.

Me: What?

Pollster: Barack Obama is not married to Oprah.

Me: No way, that’s terrible that they broke up. I’m surprised that the news people haven’t been all over the story.

Pollster:  Barack Obama was never married to Oprah, he–

Me: (interupting) You’re calling from his campaign right?

Pollster: We are an independent survey company that is–

Me: (interupting again) Ok, Ok. Let’s make this easier. Just fill in your remaining questions by sequential prime numbers of the answer set, starting with 3 and adding 1 to the number every 4th question, and then subtracting 1 on every question ending with a vowel.

Pollster: I can’t do that.

Me: It would go much faster.

Pollster: These have to reflect real answers.

Me: That is my real answer. I did really well on the LSAT with this approach, 20 minutes and I was done.

Pollster: I think we are done here.

Me: Oh, that’s too bad. I really liked the candidate who supports the policies of James K. Polk. Make sure you write that down. Manifest Destiny.

Click.

Other people have different approaches, the Connecticut Post reports:

On that last question, nearly 11 percent of those surveyed admitted that, yes, they had been less than truthful while being polled.

Polling institute director Jerry Lindsley said he was surprised that so many people confessed to fibbing, but he doesn’t think that lack of truthfulness dramatically affects the accuracy of polling.

First off, he said, it’s unlikely that these people gave dishonest answers to every question on the polls they lied on. Rather, they probably just fudged an answer or two.
Overall, he’s confident that the polling results he sees are accurate, and a few false responses aren’t enough to throw the whole mechanism out of whack. “Not everyone is lying at the same time,” he pointed out.

But those being polled aren’t the only ones lying, according to the survey. Though politicians always claim that polls don’t matter to them, 77.1 of those who responded to the Sacred Heart survey think that’s a big fat whopper.

Do polls matter? Survey says ….

source: The Connecticut Post, SHU pollsters discover truth elusive, by Amanda Cuda, April 12, 2008

Tags: current affairs

11 Responses so far “The Truth About Polls and Pols”



  • 1 Anonymous // Apr 12, 2008 at 10:17 am

    I don’t like polls that make you listen to a really long question.

  • 2 barnstorm // Apr 12, 2008 at 6:52 pm

    I really like how you handled that imaginary pollster. That was brilliant. Square root of 9.

    I always ask for their phone number so I can call THEM while THEY’RE eating dinner.

    On a scale of one to ten, I’ll give your approach a square root of 100.

  • 3 Anonymous // Apr 12, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    Very funny.

  • 4 Anonymous // Apr 12, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Turf, if someone is learning about square roots in college, they are in trouble. I think you meant elementary school.

  • 5 Driver // Apr 13, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Ya know, I used to torture telemarkteers and pollsters too — before I worked with some and found them to be decent folks — single moms, young guys trying to make a living, young people trying towork thier way up to supervisor in the only game in town. A lot of them were working out of large telphone centers in the midwest where the farms are gone and the factories closed down. Yes the job they do is annoying but the folks who do it are decent and deserve nice treatment. Even the ones in India. Sure it’s cute to make fun of them and make them feel stupid — and make yourself feel superior. But why make their job even harder? What choice do they have?

  • 6 turfgrrl // Apr 13, 2008 at 10:43 am

    anonymous 4: Yeah, college is a little late for basic math, consider it creative license.

    driver: Choice? Where’s my choice in not having a cold call to my mobile number? I didn’t choose to have my number sold to polling and telemarketing companies.

    I should also point out that farms are not gone in the midwest, there’s actually more arable land being farmed than ever before. What you meant perhaps was family owned farms, insert rant against agribusiness here. Factories are closed, let’s keep buying those made in china products, they’re much cheaper.

    As it happens, I happily fill out plenty of opinion surveys, they email me invitations, and I choose to answer them on my terms, online, when I have time and interest in the subject. No phonebank employee was harmed in the clicking of the mouse.

    Any pollster and telemarketer that does not identify themselves with caller ID, nor provide a way to permanently remove a phone number from database should be banned from calling.

  • 7 Driver // Apr 13, 2008 at 10:48 am

    All I’m saying is be compassionate and point your rapier at the companies not the minimum wage workers making the calls.

  • 8 turfgrrl // Apr 13, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Driver: Equal opportunity rapier pointing here. Not answering questions according to “script” is not a bad thing, and hardly job threatening. In the weeds here, but they could code the call, non responsive, instead of reporting no contact was made.
  • 9 Anonymous // Apr 13, 2008 at 11:33 am

    There is a website where some guy detailed his communications, over weeks, with one of these phoney “I will share a lot of money if you help me get it out of my country” scammers. If you respond, the scammer eventually asks for some money for some trivial expenses,etc. His idea was to play with the scammer and see if he could reverse the game and get the scammer to forward him a few bucks. The email conversations were not as inventive, but almost as funny. He didn’t get any money, but he had this guy on the hook for a long time.

  • 10 Sara Sikes // Apr 15, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Very funny, always annoys me how the politicians exempted themselves from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, so they could continue annoying us with polling and fundraising calls.
    Check this out-funniest take I’ve ever seen on a call center:
    http://www.jibjab.com/view/59457

  • 11 turfgrrl // Apr 16, 2008 at 9:08 am

    Sara Sikes: Yep, they were cowards for not banning robocalls in particular. The jibjab clip was funny.

Leave a Reply