YourCT.com header image 2

Guest View: Rogers-Rich-Merritt House Needs Architectural Historian


by turfgrrl


April 7th, 2008 · 19 Comments

This is part of an ongoing series of guest posts about issues in Norwalk. yourCT.com is a non-partisan site dedicated to airing all sides of a issue. That can’t happen without valuable contributions from our readers.

By Scott Kuykendall

Mr. David Park
Chairman, Norwalk Historical Commission
Norwalk, Connecticut
Dear Mr. Park:

I am writing to comment on the Historical Commission’s review of the future of the Rogers-Rich-Merritt House, currently in storage awaiting final determination as to the outcome of the project.

While I am not privy to knowing exactly what the details of this project’s history have been, I do know that it was begun with worthy intentions and that its completion, should the committee decide to move forward in that direction, would prove that the Commission is dedicated to not only maintaining Norwalk’s historical legacy but enhancing and promoting it as well. In addition, the Historical Commission would likely gain much-deserved credibility and stature in the eyes of the public if it undertook the completion of this project.

I am also aware that since the RRM House project was placed in limbo, it has been plagued with rumors and innuendo, partly due to adverse press opinionating and also by its political detractors. I urge the HC committee to focus on the facts of the matter before determining the feasibility of its re-construction. I also urge the committee to engage the expertise of an architectural historian and include that person as a member of the committee before moving forward to insure that the final decision, regardless of the outcome, is one that is properly informed and not subject to criticism.

With respect to the alleged cost of the reconstruction, the million-dollar price tag that has been affixed to the project by the consultant which estimated what the project would need to be finished has also been detrimental to the generation of any popular good will to this effort. I believe that private parties, if approached, would be willing to donate funds, expertise and services to defray the cost of reconstruction. This has already been proved by the donation of $10,000 from the Norwalk Kiwanis Club, among others comprising the private funds in the capital account. As well, the project already received a Technical Assistance Grant for the Engineering Master Plan from the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation. Now that the Mayor has a full-time Grants Coordinator as a staff member, something that did not exist when the project was started, the efforts of this person could prove to be invaluable in procuring more state and federal funding.

Lastly, not only does the Mill Hill Historical Complex represent Norwalk?s history in ways that other historical attractions in the City don?t, but also those aspects of early American history that help us to grasp what life was like for our forebears. Generations of colonists, Norwalk citizens and American patriots lie at final rest in the Mill Hill Burying Ground. The Town House is testimony to hundreds of years of the practice of popular democracy by citizens in local government. The Fitch Law Office, once occupied by an early Governor of the Colony of Connecticut - accountable to the King of England, and predating the American Revolution - represents one of the few structures to survive the burning of Norwalk by British troops in 1779. And the Down Town School House, the walls of which since 1820 saw untold numbers of children who during the formative years of the American experiment in democracy had few options for education other than to practice their reading and writing within its humble walls. Who can speculate what that formative experience led to for any of those students, who may have gone on to become prominent citizens and leaders of their society?
The Mill Hill Historical Park must be considered in the context of the committee’s deliberations. Within its boundaries are represented elements of local government - the Town House - and executive goverment - the Fitch Law Office. There are the people who created this community at rest in the Burying Ground. And the School House, one more aspect of a varied community in early America. But what?s missing? An example of domestic life in early Norwalk. An example of Norwalk?s very important maritime history - a sea captain’s residence. In addition, the house represents an aspect of Norwalk?s commerce which was instrumental in the success of Norwalk as a vibrant, bustling sea port filled with oystermen and fishing schooners. This alone could be a very attractive stimulus in gaining private sponsorship from local businesses to help complete the project.

The addition of the Rogers-Rich-Merritt House to the Mill Hill complex would be invaluable to help educate visitors as to what life was like for 18th-century Americans. Reading about history in a book can be informative, but experiencing it in person can be educative and something that impacts a person?s character and development for the rest of their life. Every year, hundreds of Norwalk third-grade students tour the Mill Hill complex by attending the Norwalk Historical Society’s Little Red School House Program, where they are exposed, for the only time in their school curriculum, to a first-hand account of Colonial life. How were early Norwalkers schooled? Governed? Fed? Kept from the harsh elements of nature? How did they entertain themselves?
The opportunity to add yet another layer to the rich fabric of history that the Mill Hill Historical Park weaves for its visitors is within the capability of the Historical Commission?s committee in its deliberations to preserve this important aspect of Norwalk?s past. Whether the structure predates the American Revolution or survived the burning of Norwalk by the British is a question that may remain in doubt. But what is not in doubt is the potential that this structure holds to enhance and strengthen our understanding of those who have gone before us, and thus to understand ourselves and our society better.
I urge the Historical Commission to not abandon this worthy project by capitulating to the opinions of those who claim the cost is not worth the expense. Considering the value that we place on education, the price of completing this project would be well worth the effort and time, and the investment in our children’s education cannot be figured in dollars. The payoff is the esteem of the community, the strengthening of our school curriculum, and a renewed sense of Norwalk?s historical legacy. You have a opportunity before you to leave a lasting impression by your actions. Please do the right thing and complete the Rogers-Rich-Merritt House project.

Sincerely,
Scott Kuykendall
President, Norwalk Historical Society

Tags: Norwalk

19 Responses so far “Guest View: Rogers-Rich-Merritt House Needs Architectural Historian”



  • 1 historian // Apr 7, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    Thank you Scott for your very intelligent and perceptive comments on the RRM House. You have seen and commented about the project and its problems exactly. The present make-up of the HC has no way to determine the history of the project without having been a part of it or to at least consult with the persons that have been involved with it since the beginning. Its value to the city is immeasurable. How could anyone argue another worthy museum added to our cultural inventory We talk a lot about Norwalk’s maritime history, but when there is the possibility to enrich and display it, there is nothing. This museum would actually recount it in stages. Not only will it complete and add to the already rich historical
    significance of Mill Hill and Norwalk, but the added basement will add greatly needed storage space. I seriously doubt the dedication and intelligence of any Norwalk person or local HC that thinks that throwing away this project for a miserly $150M is a good idea. In fact, I think it is incumbent on the HC to see that this project, despite its past problems, go forward to completion. All preliminary work has been completed; all that is necessary is the fundraising. The million dollar price tag was the extreme amount and included reproduction at 100% level. It did not include any pro-bono work which could easily bring the price down substantially. It seems to me that the present HC has already made up its mind; appointing a research committee was just a smokescreen. The HC is supposed to preserve history not destroy it. Let’s hope that good historical minds prevail here and this project goes forward with the same good intentions with which it began.

  • 2 Anonymous // Apr 7, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    My thanks to both of you for taking the time to talk about this subject. The suggestion floating around the new and improved political historical structure is that we auction off the contents of the trailers and pay for other things, I’m opposed to that idea I’m for what you two are trying explain and suggest.

  • 3 anonymous // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    I think they should start their fundraising efforts now and see how much they raise in private donations before they make any decisions regarding the house. If there is enough interest in private individuals and corporate sponsorship to fund the reconstruction, by all means do it. If on the otherhand, their is not enough raised privately to support the reconstruction, then maintain it in storage or sell it.

  • 4 Norwalker // Apr 7, 2008 at 3:33 pm

    If the 1 mil was for completetion of the job, what would it take to get the shell up and weather tight? It might be easier to fund raise if there was something to actually look at.

  • 5 Anonymous // Apr 7, 2008 at 7:28 pm

    Thank you Scott for explaininghow worthy the project is. I would also like to add that the Friends of the Norwalk Museums also donated $10,000 to this project.

    If we can keep the politicized Historical Commission and their incompetent staff personn out of the project, it could work.

  • 6 anonymous // Apr 7, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    The house was disassembled 6 years ago under a another administration so it’s not really a political issue, other than neither party wants to champion the cause. And it doesn’t evince sufficient historical merit to create excitement -and the cause wasn’t helped any by misattributing its vintage to the pre-burning of Norwalk era.

  • 7 Anonymous // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:38 am

    And where exactly are the funds to complete much needed repairs to keep the existing but barely standing and crumbling buildings intact, after decades of irresponsible neglect by prior HC members who had great ideas but didn’t understand or take very seriously their legal responsibility to maintain what we already have?

    While they sat around and argued over minutia about a lousy curator the existing buildings were and still are literally rotting into the ground.
    Great ideas are easy, running the boring but necessary day-to-day seems to have eluded many HC members in the past.

    Every year that passes the current buildings get worse. It is a crisis that needs to be addressed first before limited time and resources are spent on future projects. I say keep the house in the trailers for now, and stabilize the current buildings with the earmarked funds that are desperately needed but just sitting in a bank account doing nothing for a project that sounds great on paper but is years away from resolution. The reality is that we just don’t have a Rockefeller to bankroll our little Williamsburg. Someday we may, but current repairs must take precedence.

    Prudence and legal responsibility come first.

  • 8 Former HC Member // Apr 8, 2008 at 8:53 am

    There was alot done with prior HC’s for Mill Hill such as new roofs, new boiler for the Town House, new heating for the Fitch Law office, after the ceiling with the radient heat system collaped. The Fitch Law Office was painted inside and out and the windows were replaced because of a trapped squirel scratching to get out. The front door to the same building was replaced with a reproduction also.
    Even the attic in the town house had it’s bricks pointed up because of the deteriorating morter. Somethings didn’t get done because the Curator wasn’t qualified to get construction quotes. So don’t put it on the former HC members.

  • 9 another former HC // Apr 8, 2008 at 10:08 am

    The HC for years labored under a budget of $4000 per year to maintain all — ALL — the buildings under its care. Not much repair could get done on that. The “old” HC was critical in raising the awareness of finance and budget review committees to the condition of our buidlings and that the HC needed a more realistic amount for maintenance. That led to an increase to $10,000 a year for maintenance — still not enough but certainly better. Then, of course, the big hurdle was the “I’d prefer not to” attitude of the curator where every attempt to get repairs moving forward was blocked by some excuse that slowed things to a glacial crawl. What can be more furstrating than getting the money and then not being able to spend it because someone keeps putting roadblocks in your way? This HC is asking for an even more realistic budget and I support their efforts 100%. It’s peanuts compared to other City budgets but it could do so much…

  • 10 oldenorwalker // Apr 8, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    anonymous 6 and 7 - Please reread Scott’s letter and historian. This is whatI mean about the politics of this project. You do not have any idea about historical research and what it all means. I cite an example with the Capella Sistena frescoes by Michelangelo which were always believed to be of certain colors and overall tones until the most recent cleaning. Well now, don’t the colors turn out to amazingly bright and very different from what scholars and Michelango experts have believed for centuries! The books need to be rewritten and opinions changed but it does not take anything away from the art or the history.
    This is what research is all about. You two try to attack under the radar in order to continuously plunder a project that you did not want from the beginning. 30 years or so here does not change the value of this historic house. It only gives us more true information which could not have been determined in any other way but to peel the layers of history. There would be no Mill Hill Fitch building or red schoolhouse or Lockwood-Mathews Mansion if historic-minded people
    of that time thought as you now do. So who is being shortsighted and thinking with half a brain?

    Anonymous 3 - Fundraising for a project that neither the mayor nor most of the members of the present HC do not support, will not get this project going. We already fundraised over 50M and those donors see their money is now going to be absorbed by the city. It needs full support and excitment as we had before staff to the commission started a personal vendetta against the project. But I certainly appreciate your suggestion as to one way to get the project going again.
    anonymous 4 - An excellent suggestion and exactly what was originally planned by the HC supporting the project and went forward with these plans. That way people could see a tangible project making headway and elicit more people to donate. However, the city then told us that they would not release any money unless we rebuilt the entire project in one fell swoop. That hurt as you can imagine. That is when the HC went for a line item price for a completed projecty the very high number came up which the naysayers and the press
    used to negatively impact the project and continue to do so. The negativism on this project is so distorted and has nothing to do with fact.

  • 11 Anonymous // Apr 9, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    Oldenorwalker: You are correct to say that there is NO support from the commission and the Mayor. The past Historical Commission(s) had their hands tied with the incompetent “staff” person and could not get projects done because their staff was working against them. Now their staff has a hand picked commission(by her Daddy and the Mayor).

    As with the over 50 HC commissioners that came before them, these hand picked commissioners will see that the problem lies with their staff person who was unqualified for the position. This commission needs to be decommissioned.

  • 12 anon // Apr 9, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    In these times of fiscal crisis, couldn’t there be a successful case made for cutting the staffer’s job rather than continuing to pay daddy’s girl for no services rendered? Couldn’t this $ be put to better use?

  • 13 Anonymous // Apr 10, 2008 at 8:52 am

    Until this HC takes steps to rid themselves of the albatross that is Soo Gunn, they will have no credibility. Too bad the mayor finds that acceptable.

  • 14 Anonymous // Apr 15, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    Isn’t April when Daddy’s check clears?

  • 15 Anonymous // Apr 16, 2008 at 10:03 am

    The HC is just going through the motions with the committee they’ve formed to review the feasibility of this project. It’s a done deal. If they’re to be be believed they would have consulted an architectural historian.

  • 16 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 7:55 am

    The Historical Commission is meeting at 7:00pm to announce their sham of a study by the committee that was appointed to figure out how to redistribute the money in the capital account for the Rogers-Rich-Merritt house.

    For anyone who cares about preserving Norwalk’s past, the meeting is open to the public and takes place on the second floor of the Norwalk “Museum” on Main St. in SONO.

    If the HC is nice to her, maybe their staff person, Soo Gunn, will decide to attend for a change.

  • 17 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    I thought that there were ordinances about monies not being used going back into the general fund. I hear the Hysteric Commission plans to use monies on a rental space namely the Norwalk Museum. Could they be any dumber? Dumb and Dumber are leading them right to self-destruction. They must be listening to their incompetent staff person. Re-dick-ulous! As far as their staff person attending the meeting…dream on. She’s got a no-show job…or is it a snow-job…on the taxpayers.

  • 18 Anonymous // Apr 23, 2008 at 12:16 pm

    I was amused yesterday to discover in the past minutes of the ZBA posted on the city’s website this Freudian slip:

    “§ Ms. Bryant stated she was a board member of the Norwalk Preservation Trust, noting that they support the application. She read a letter into the record and submitted it outlining their support. She went on to say she just came from the Hysterical Commission meeting and a developer was there who restored a house half the age of the proposed house. He was told the only alternative was to demolish his house and rebuild it. So she commended the applicant on trying to maintain the historic integrity of the house and for restoring it.”

    Is this a case of ignorance in the extreme, carelessness, or is something else lurking between the lines?

    The link is at http://www.norwalkct.org/AgendaAction/ZoningBOA/ZoningBOA2005/PZzoningBOAMinutes20051103.htm

  • 19 Anonymous // Apr 23, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    The HC meeting tonight is at 7pm, at the Museum on Main St. The RRM house funds will be thrown to the wolves. Anyone who wants to witness back-room politicking at its lowest should be there.

Leave a Reply