YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Carbon Emissions And The Non Story


by turfgrrl


March 20th, 2008 · 4 Comments

At first, I looked at this story and skipped through quickly because the tantalizing DPW budget and sewer pipe cleaning beckoned. But then, I realized this was a story, because The Hour, was covering it, like, well, like a newspaper should. Political flunkies hold a press conference and then vanish into the still of the night is all too common. Someone, ahem, the media, is supposed to be keeping an eye on them. Naturally, we’ve forgotten how that once worked, unless we revisit His Gal Friday for details.

But here’s Jared Newman on follow-up:

Of the five state legislators who championed a reduction in carbon emissions during a conference at City Hall last month, only one has co-sponsored the resulting bill.
State Rep. Toni Boucher, R-143, does not serve on the environment committee, which raised the bill, but she said it was important to show her support early in political process.

“You want to attach your name onto things that you believe in, in order to give it more legs to run on — in other words, to get it passed,” Boucher said.

Well, all-righty then, let’s make this an ongoing thing Jared.

The legislators who spoke at the conference who haven’t signed on are state Reps. Larry Cafero, R-142, house minority leader and Christopher Perone, D-137 and state Sens. Bob Duff, D-25, majority whip and Sen. John McKinney, R-Fairfield, senate minority leader.
“I will be a co-sponsor. I just haven’t got around to doing that yet,” McKinney said. As ranking member of the environment committee, he plans to be involved with the bill as it moves forward. He said he will sign on as co-sponsor within the next week.

Perone, another member of the environment committee, said he’s been busy with bills related to earned income tax credits and health care pooling. He also wants to co-sponsor the bill, but said he hasn’t had a chance to do so.

“I support the bill, and I plan to vote for it when it comes to the house (floor), and I plan to be a co-sponsor,” Perone said.

Cafero said he’s also been tied up, but he’s not as steadfast in his support as other legislators. Though he favors a cap on carbon emissions, he doesn’t want to take any drastic steps that could hurt industry.

“I just want to look at the details of the bill, because we are facing really bad economic times right now,” he said.

Duff is also approaching the bill with caution, waiting to see how the language changes over time before deciding whether to sign on.

“It’s a pretty complex piece of legislation,” Duff said, “and it’s probably going to continue to change up until the day it gets voted on.”

source: The Hour, Some local officials no-shows for sponsorship on carbon emissions, By Jared Newman, March 20, 2008

Tags: Energy · Norwalk

4 Responses so far “Norwalk: Carbon Emissions And The Non Story”



  • 1 fed up // Mar 20, 2008 at 10:41 pm

    I’m glad they didn’t show, or sign on to this garbage. This whole global warming, carbon emmisions nonsense is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on a sheepish people who are just rolling over and accepting it without question.

    Al Gore didn’t invent the internet, but he did make up global warming.

  • 2 Anonymous // Mar 21, 2008 at 9:41 am

    It’s attitudes like that which will insure that the Republican neo-con, right-wing agenda dies a permanent death with the next election. Go crawl back under your rock. The science bears out the facts. The detractors need to listen to something besides the Fox propaganda channel for once and tune back into the real world.

  • 3 fed up // Mar 21, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    the science does not bear out the facts, and until you warmers acknowledge that the warming of the earth (1 degree!) has coincided with the increased output of radiation from the sun you have no credibility. Or, how about the fact that it was warmer in the 1600’s than it is now? Or, as you cry about melting ice in Greenland, they are finding the remains of ancient farms under the ice. hmmm, maybe that’s why it’s called Greenland instead Whiteland.

    tell me why the poles on Mars are melting, the only vehicle there is solar powered.

    I don’t crawl under rocks, I have a Jeep and go over them. Take your socialist agenda elsewhere.

  • 4 Anonymous // Mar 25, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    Here’s a tidbit for F***ed Up (#3):

    March 25, 2008:

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A chunk of Antarctic ice nine times the size of Manhattan has suddenly collapsed, putting an even larger glacial area at risk.

    Satellite images show the runaway disintegration of a 220-square-mile chunk in western Antarctica.

    British scientist David Vaughan says it’s the result of global warming.

    The rest of the Connecticut-sized ice shelf is holding on by a narrow beam of thin ice and scientists worry that it too may collapse. Larger, more dramatic ice collapses occurred in 2002 and 1995.

Leave a Reply