YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: It’s Not Easy Being Green, For A Republican Mayor


by turfgrrl


March 12th, 2008 · 17 Comments

The Common Council MTG of 03/11/08

Tonight was Girl Scout Appreciation week and the Brownies and Scouts led the pledge and the national anthem.

Attending: Krummel, Serasis, Brown, Sutton, Lindstrom, Geake, Bolden, Moccia, Bondi, Hilliard, Conroy, Moccia, Bonnefant, Kydes , ,Hempstead,

Public Participation:

Marija Bryant speaks in support of the Silvermine Village District. Asks that the issue remain open for public input.

Leigh Grant: Speaks in support of Silvermine Village District.

Lee Levy: Speaks in support of Silvermine Village District.

Diane Lauracella: Speaks as president of League of Woman Voters on the charter revision that it is held so that the public can speak to it. Wants to have the public have an open forum. Speaks on Common Council 20% Clean Energy By 2010 Resolution. Wants to make sure that LWV supports clean energy stuff. Wants council to pass the resolution before 2010.

Mayor’s Remarks:
Speaks about the 20% Clean Energy By 2010 Resolution. This resolution does not commit the city t spending any money but that illustrates goals that everyone can do. Surrounding towns have passed similar resolutions.

Maslan: Adds that there’s no financial commitment on the part of the city and that this I policy that would benefit the city to get a solar panel if 100 residential customers sign up for the program.

Moccia: This past week we lost a valuable member of the community in Bea Brown. He spoke briefly on her contributions to Norwalk.

Hempstead: Speaks about serving on the council with Bea and praises her admirable traits and commitment to issues.

Bondi: Also served with Bea on the council. Says a few words about Bea’s contributions and working with her.

Bolden: Speaks about working with Bea and Bea’s family.

Hilliard: Says a few words about Bea’s advocacy for civil rights, and that she always let people know what her opinions were.

Then they hold a brief moment of silence.

The Mayor mentions that Kelly Straniti’s father is still ill and she is still in Arizona.

Council Presidents Remarks

Bondi: Appoints Doug Sutton to public power committee.

Everything but the 20% Clean Energy By 2010 Resolution and the appointment of the charter revision committee is approved under consent and they vote unanimously on it. The charter revision committee item is actually tabled, but in reality this is a dead issue. A quick count of votes from the statements made by council members indicates that its not going to be voted on. Too bad, since a 4 year term for both the council and mayor is the smart thing to do.

Moccia: Speaks on the 20% Clean Energy By 2010 Resolution. Says its non binding.

Kydes: Says that the policy is a good one considering the energy markets and the price of oil recently.

Geake: Says that as a commissioner of 2nd taxing district he passed a similar resolution., but he has a problem with paragraph 7. He says that it says there’s a commitment to a goal, and he doesn’t see that its revenue neutral. He says that paragraph 8 talks about ways to meet the goal, which he doesn’t see it as revenue neutral.

Moccia: Explains that it is a commitment to a goal, that might not be reachable.

Geake: Prefers committing to the goal.

Moccia: Reminds the council that this doesn’t give the Mayor the authority to spend any money. He says that if we don’t start towards a goal then nothing will progress. Reminds Geake that it was passed by 7 other towns with only 1 making a financial commitment.

Maslan: Re-explains that this is a policy statement.

Krummel: He echoes Geake’s remarks and has been an early advocate of clean energy as a engineer. He thinks that there’s much to be discussed about this in committee. Talks about geothermal suggestion for Brien McMahon that was ultimately turned down. He is an upholder of due process, but didn’t know which council person brought this forward. He asks if the city’s electric bill will go up because he sees it on his bill.

Maslan: The program that Krummel is referring to is a residential program, so the program doesn’t apply. If 100 people sign up to it the city gets a solar panel.

Moccia: Reiterates that it is a volunteer program. The wording is based on a recommendation from a non profit, virtually the same as every other town has adopted. “I’m sorry that you are surprised that the mayor would have the audacity to submit a resolution to the city” Says he doesn’t want to have paralysis by analysis.

Lindstrom: Echoes a number of people who have spoken that this is a good initiative. Her concern is that there needs to be education prior to the approval. They should hold off a wait a couple of weeks and take it back to committee and says that its not a cookie cutter resolution and thinks that the council should have input into the wording of the resolution. Wants it to go to the subcommittee of the power committee. Makes a motion to refer to power authority.

Hempstead: Chastises Krummel for how resolutions come directly to the floor. Resolutions are always sense of commitment of where we are at the time. He was around when they first came out with a recycling committee resolution, its something to shoot for. Says that this is just committing to something the whole state has signed on, and that they item that committees that should be looking at stuff on the how to accomplish the goals.

Bolden: Asks about how many buildings qualify for the solar panels.

Moccia: Responds that juust about every building qualifies and mentinos a few.

Bolden: Happy to see that this is a starting point. Suggests that the revenue issue should be a continuing dialog but is in support of the resolution.

Krummel: Asks why hasn’t the city signed up for the clean energy option.

Hempstead: The city of Norwalk gets its energy under a bidding process and that the program requires that you sign up for the program that is a renewable energy company and that the current electrical contract for 4 years, 2 years ago. That would be something to look into when the contract comes up again.

Bondi: Says we’ve exhausted a lot of the issue. Says that this is a simple thing, it was brought up in previous years and never reached the council. This

Moccia: Never thought that a Republican would have to fight so hard to be green.

Brown: Says that Democrats re not opposed to it but that they don’t have enough information to vote on the issue. Asks how much it costs to install solar panels.

Various people answer that it costs nothing.

Brown: Asks about how dirty our air is.

Moccia: Says we don’t know.

Brown: Asks then how can we get to a 20% reduction? Says that its ok for council people are asking for more information that they are not trying to offend the mayor and that they need more time and more information.

Moccia: Reiterates how resolutions come to the floor, and that the resolution is simple and that this is a concept and feeling.

Lindstrom: Makes motion to refer the resolution to the power committees.

Okay, so let me set up what’s really going on here. Resolutions like this one are mostly feel good statements that have no impact on the day to day governing of the city. It really looks like the Democrats are playing political games here, a non binding policy resolution that is so inoffensive is being stalled either because they want to show some relevance in the political process or that they don’t want the Republicans to usurp an issue normally aligned with Democratic initiatives. I guess since they haven’t been able to accomplish anything else but delay tactics this is what we get. Maybe they do have some additional energy conservation things they want to pass, but they could put forth yet another resolution, or some valid direction to departments to employ. They are not doing that, all they seem to do is react to whatever the Republicans are doing. It’s somewhat ironic that the same people who gravitate to Barack Obama’s message of bipartisan politics can’t seem to execute the new way of doing things at the local level.

Now they vote on the motion to table the resolution. This is ridiculous

Krummel Y
Serasis Y
Brown N
Sutton Y
Lindstrom Y
Bolden N
Geake Y
Bondi N
Hillaird N
Conroy N
Bonnefant N
Kydes N
Hempstead N

The motion to table fails, so now Kydes motions to adopt resolution

Krummel Y
Serasis N
Brown N
Sutton N
Lindstrom Y
Bolden Y
Geake Y
Bondi Y
Hillaird Y
ConroyY
Bonnefant Y
Kydes Y
Hempstead Y

And now they adjourn. As for the resolution? It’s below:

A Resolution of the City of Norwalk’s Common Council in Support of 20% Clean Energy by 2010

WHEREAS, electricity production is the leading cause of industrial air pollution in the United States which can result in a variety of health risks to Norwalk residents including cases of asthma especially in children; and
WHEREAS, by meeting the goals of 20% by 2010, Norwalk can begin to address the problems resulting from the above; and
WHEREAS, greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced in a cost-effective manner that enhances economic development by applying currently available energy efficiency technologies, an energy audit and such renewable energy programs as Norwalk and many towns have implemented that save money, create jobs and strengthen local economies; and
WHEREAS, clean energy resources – such as wind and solar energy – constantly replenish themselves, do not cause the buildup of global warming gases and health damaging pollutants, and if properly managed, will be available to serve our energy needs forever; and
WHEREAS, the 20% by 2010 campaign is a Connecticut not-for-profit initiative that has undertaken efforts to encourage community action in support of putting Connecticut’s customers on a path to having 20% of their electricity supply come from clean, renewable energy sources by the year 2010.
WHEREAS, the Connecticut Clean Energy Fund has agreed to provide Norwalk a solar Photo-voltaic energy system, for every 100 residential homes signing up for CL&P’s CT Clean Energy Options SM program. The units will be received and installed at no cost to the municipality and allow for direct reductions in conventional electric supply at a site to be determined by the town.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the town of Norwalk commits to the goal of making at least 20% of its municipal energy purchases come from clean energy resources by the year 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City of Norwalk will investigate options for meeting that goal, including purchasing Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and/or on-site renewable energy installations, recommendations for energy efficiency opportunities and will research additional funding opportunities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Norwalk encourages all businesses, institutions and households within Norwalk to adopt the goal of making at least 20% of their energy purchases come from renewable energy sources by the year 2010.

Tags: Norwalk

17 Responses so far “Norwalk: It’s Not Easy Being Green, For A Republican Mayor”



  • 1 MGeake // Mar 12, 2008 at 9:31 am

    What I objected to, and I thought I was clear on that, is the fraud of a “feel good resolution” that everybody knows is not going to ever be acted upon. As I said last night, when I commit to a goal, I commit to reaching that goal; it’s not so that I can later say (wink, wink) oh well, the goal wasn’t reachable.

    This goal is reachable, so we should “commit” to it unless we are truly committed to reaching it. That is not revenue neutral, as I pointed out last night, and nobody was willing — or even able — what reaching this goal is going to cost.

    So is this what the Republicans consider “going Green”, just offer the public platitudes with absolutely no intention of following through?

    Well the mayor got his resolution. And as he was leaving, he got my promise to “hold his feet to the fire” so that this goal is met. I don’t commit lightly; neither should the city.

  • 2 anonymous // Mar 12, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Brown, Sutton, Serasis all vote against “green”. Figures. This hurts the city’s green efforts. Funny how the rajun’ cajun was there directing brown sutton and serasis how to vote against the green effort and walked out with her group at the end of the meeting.

  • 3 demsknow // Mar 12, 2008 at 11:47 am

    Who ever voted for Amanda Brown should be ashamed of themselves. Here is a women who by all rights is a relatively intellegent women but can’t think for herself. If the DTC think they did such a great thing by electing Gail Wall as Town Chair, they are sadly mistaken. She has taken up where Galen left off. Sitting on her thrown, surrounded by her minions and literally influencing the outcome of the council votes. To see week after week the same group of council people looking for direction from the honcho’s in the audience is a damn shame. Grow some B@#$ guys and gals! Politics is rearing its ugly head on the council floor and its very disturbing to see the games people play in the name of partisan politics. Can someone tell these people they were elected to represent the taxpayers and not their party leaders?

    Also can someone please find the real Doug Sutton? Aliens seem to have swooped down and taken away the real guy! Serasis is yet another story, he will vote against anything and everything that the republicans vote for just because. He looks like a very angry person who is out to destroy anyone who has the audacity to buck the DTC leaders. I certainly hope that the next time around people actually look at who they are voting for.

  • 4 Anonymous // Mar 12, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    Mike since when has any council resolution been anything but feel good? Non-binding means what to you?

  • 5 Anonymous // Mar 12, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    where is the Norwalk Fire dept on this one? Mr mayor a challenge Bill Mike Rick or Doug how about it?

    SAN RAFAEL firefighters are harnessing the power of the sun to fuel their tools.

    Since October, fire Engine 52, stationed at Third and Union streets, has relied on a $260 solar panel to charge everything from portable radios to the onboard computer. Now it will be fitted with a second device that should bring full solar capability to the busy fire engine.

    The technology has performed so well plans are in place to add panels to another well-used vehicle, Engine 51 - assigned to the downtown station on C Street, apparatus mechanic Steve Rutkowksi said.

    “I’ve been pushing this technology for a couple of years,” said Engineer Dave Holland, a big believer in solar who has 30 panels affixed to the roof of his Lafayette home. “It’s taken time for them to get comfortable enough for them to go out on a limb and try it out.”

    Radios, thermal-imaging equipment, cell phones, flashlights - anything with a battery needs to be charged. Equipment assigned to engines that run calls all day long are a challenge to power, fire officials said.

    “This engine’s really busy,” Division Chief Ritt Hewitt said. “They’re in the middle of our city. They’re just busy. They don’t have an opportunity to stay in the station and get plugged in ?? (the panel) is constantly off-setting that drain.”

    So far, San Rafael fire appears to be the only Marin fire agency using solar panels on its engines, fire officials said. But that could change.

    Firefighters said they think solar has a bright future for the fire service, especially if the panels are built into engines, trucks and ambulances as the vehicles roll off the assembly line.

    “I think it will take off like wildfire - literally,” Holland said. “The cost of this is such, it’s really using your resources to your advantage. It’s really a no-brainer.”

  • 6 smokey the bear // Mar 12, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Fire Marshal Iannaccone 911 we could use your thoughts or even help

    The fire dept is having a food drive this month correct ? why not an extra 5 for a panel at the collection bins at the stations I’ll give the first $5

  • 7 MGeake // Mar 12, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    #4 — a complete waste of the council’s time and a fraud perpetrated on the residents

  • 8 Anonymous // Mar 12, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    I don’t always agree with you or the council Mike but on this one your right. Maybe the fire dept solar panel could be start its practical and the application fits current forms of energy savings which otherwise will ignored and if we have what other depts have it sounds like a great idea. It would be better served than keeping the monitors on all night at city hall.

  • 9 Anonymous // Mar 12, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Mike, you’re right. Non-binding resolutions are a waste of time and the taxpayer’s money. I’d like to see the City come up with something besides a campaign year gimmick like a hybrid car for the mayor to drive. How about a whole fleet?

    That would tell me the City is serious about doing something beside jerking off the citizens with bullshit like this.

  • 10 turfgrrl // Mar 12, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    MGeake: Ahem, I hold a fairly cynical view on resolutions myself, however, that’s just part of the process of selling politics these days. The time waster was all the “debate” on it, either you buy in to the rah-rah nature of passing such stuff, or you don’t. I can’t see why any council member would want to to spend anytime reviewing the resolution in order to “understand” it or get more info on it.

    I seem to remember you were fairly opposed to the “teeth” from last year asking the 2nd taxing district to fund a study. Care to circle that square?

  • 11 MGeake // Mar 12, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    My answer to sticking the taxing districts with the tab for funding a study for something they would only marginally benefit from remains the same: they already pay their fair share of property taxes, which funds the “city’s share”; why should they be billed a second time when their electric rates won’t be impacted one red cent?

  • 12 Heather // Mar 15, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Mayor Moccia attended Fairfield County GreenDrinks at iPark on Wednesday, March 12th and announced that he’s signed the resolution…so hats off to all of you who pushed the envelope!

  • 13 Anonymous // Mar 15, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    http://ctgreenscene.typepad.com/

    yep got his picture in 11 times on the website and the news papers that covered it certainly didn’t spend a lot of time covering his thoughts on the resolution. Shame there is a lot to talk about in Norwalk on this subject.

  • 14 Anonymous // Mar 15, 2008 at 12:57 pm

    CLEANUP THE NORWALK RIVER AND SAVE THE SOUND
    Oyster Shell Park - Norwalk , CT
    Saturday, March 29, 2008
    9AM – Noon

    Join the Norwalk River Watershed Association and Norwalk League of Women Voters for a shoreline cleanup of Oyster Shell Park at the mouth of the Norwalk River on Saturday, March 29th, 2008, 9 AM-noon. Volunteers will pick up trash and record data about what they find. Volunteers working for three hours will also satisfy the hands-on component required to earn the Norwalk River Watershed Patch. Visit www.norwalkriverwatershed.org for details and the watershed quiz. Wear boots, long pants, and work gloves. Contact Sara da Silva at 203.354.2493 to sign up, and for information on where to park.

    suppose the mayor will announce this soon but why wait its a great cause by great people.I trust someone will tell him about this if he doesn’t know with all the press he gets he will pass it along who cares who gets the credit its simply a great direction to go in isn’t it?

  • 15 SUSAN HANNIGAN // Mar 15, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    HI
    I DID NOT READ THE ABOVE, I HAVE AN ORIGINAL SIGN FOR “SILVERMINE” I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE IT BACK..I DID NOT STEAL IT. I AM 51 AND WAY BACK IN HIGHSCHOOL SOMEBODY GAVE IT TO MY GIRLFRIEND,THEY STOLE IT AND SHE DID NOT WANT IT,BUT SHE HELD ONTO IT AND ABOUT 2 YEARS AGO I SAID I WOULD TAKE IT AND RETURN IT, BUT I WAS ABIT NERVOUS, SO, I HAVE IT AND IT IS WOODEN AND BLUE, SO PLEASE TELL ME WHERE TO BRING IT AND I WILL,IT HAS BEEN IN MY BASEMENT FOR 2 YEARS TELL ME WHAT TO DO SUSAN HANNIGAN

  • 16 Scott Kuykendall, NHS President // Mar 16, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Hi, Susan, if you want to consider donating it to the Norwalk Historical Society, we would be delighted to display it alongside our original Norwalk Town House silhouette sign. If you want to contact the NHS, email our Executive Director, VivianLea Stevens, at director@norwalkhistoricalsociety.org. The NHS website can be seen at www.norwalkhistoricalsociety.org.

    Thanks for taking the time to let everyone know about this, regardless of who you decide to give the sign to.

  • 17 Anonymous // Mar 16, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    Clean up Norwalk Parks-Sponsored by NNHT.
    Saturday April 5th 9am. bags and gloves provided. Get a start on cleaning up the parks for the spring and summer. This is one project to give teens a sense of community. Bring your teens and pitch in. Ryan Park is next. http://nnhtkids.org Their doing a good thing getting teens involved. Now its up to the parents to get involved as well. It wouldn’t hurt if the Mayor and other city officials pitched in too.

Leave a Reply