YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Sparks Fly at BOE Budget Committee Meeting


by turfgrrl


February 28th, 2008 · 13 Comments

The clamor for a finance director from the people of Norwalk, the Common Council, and the Mayor is apparently causing Greg Burnett and Sal Corda to circle the wagons around Stuart Opdahl. They dumped a sheaf of finance job descriptions on the table at last night’s meeting challenging Bruce Kimmel and Jack Chiaramonte to find anything that Norwalk’s Opdahl isn’t doing. Kimmel and Chiaramonte were not amused.

Heated words were exchanged, and the end result was that it seems with this year’s budget seemingly in hand, Corda has no interest in fixing the state of finance. In fact, he had the audacity to ask the budget committee to approve a $1 million transfer to cover a 33% soft cost over run to Gilbride Gilbane, the project/construction management firm rennovating the schools. Notably, there was no detail of what those costs entailed.

Think about it. Here’s a budget committee being asked to rubber stamp a cost that has not been vetted by anyone other than Opdahl. Apparently the Price Waterhouse report that specifically cautioned in the lack of construction and project management experience that Opdahl had would cause problems. Problems that are only readily apparent now.

The BOE has run through hundreds of millions of dollars on operational costs that runs through Opdahl’s fingers. Corda and Burnett were quick to deride the Price Waterhouse report, and did not want a new forensic auditor hired.

Looks like Corda, Burnett, and Opdahl have plenty to hide here. Why isn’t Susan Hamilton, current chair of the BOE, concerned about this? Why aren’t the people who say they care about educational dollars makingit into the classroom demanding that every dollar is maximized for education, and not for unchecked cost overruns?

Here’s the reality, Cord has no problem asking for millions from the taxpayer when it comes to anything but a finance director. He has no problems with replacing the same textbooks every 4 years, with first class travel to conferences, with laptops in the classroom, with vice principals and other administrative hires in elementary schools. Whether any of this benefits students or not is not the question here. He has shown no restraint in asking the taxpayer for money for these things. But when the taxpayer asks for a finance director, he balks. He not only balks, but smirks his way through meetings without even providing detailed finance reports on current spending.

Yeah Norwalk has a huge crime problem, but it’s not on the streets it’s on the third floor of City Hall.

Tags: Education · Norwalk

13 Responses so far “Norwalk: Sparks Fly at BOE Budget Committee Meeting”



  • 1 always watching // Feb 28, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    Turfgrll-While I wouldn’t defend the Corda administration under any circumstances, I do NOT feel this blog reflects what happened at the budget meeting. Since you were not there, I suggest you vet the information you get before putting it on this site. Otherwise the credibility of the site will wane.

  • 2 turfgrrl // Feb 28, 2008 at 4:39 pm

    always watching: You’re right, I made a factual error, it is Gilbane not Gilbride. I’ve corrected it. Wish Corda would do the same, and hire a finance director and stop playing these silly cya games.
  • 3 Anonymous // Feb 28, 2008 at 5:22 pm

    1 million dollars without accountability.

    Thats a lot of dough. A lot more than any bankrobber can expect to take in a years worth of stick ups.

    Only when our Attorney General Richard Blumenthal opens a file will the truth be known.

    For those that feel its an American right and duty to demand accountability, let your voice be heard.

    attorney.general@po.state.ct.us

  • 4 Anonymous // Feb 28, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    A new forensic auditor needs to be hired, but the BoE won’t do that because the outcome would cause such an outrage by the taxpayers. Many of these people both on and off the BoE would be in hot water.

    The taxpayers should demand an audit.

  • 5 Anonymous // Feb 28, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Let’s see. Corda gets slammed in the Cambridge Report, and so he does his best to discredit the methodology of the assessment, as well as the report. Cambridge Education is an international company that has had experience in thousands of schools.

    Now he doesn’t like what Price Waterhouse reported, so he “derides” that report. Price Waterhouse isn’t a fly-by-night company. If only he would see how others perceive him. Then again, he would dismiss our perceptions because only his matter.

    Why is he reluctant to have a forensic audit? The taxpayers have the right to know that their tax dollars are being spent appropriately.

  • 6 always watching // Feb 28, 2008 at 10:59 pm

    turfgrll: your response in 2 above does you no credit.

  • 7 Anonymous // Feb 29, 2008 at 7:57 am

    “They dumped a sheaf of finance job descriptions on the table at last night’s meeting challenging Bruce Kimmel and Jack Chiaramonte to find anything that Norwalk’s Opdahl isn’t doing.”

    They asked the wrong question because Stu Opdahl is probably doing all of it. The right question is: Can you find anything that Opdahl isn’t doing WELL? The question is one of the quality of his work.

  • 8 MGeake // Feb 29, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Where can I get a copy of the the Price Waterhouse report?

  • 9 Anonymous // Feb 29, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    MGeake: Go to the superintendent’s office. The report is subject to FOI.

  • 10 Anonymous // Feb 29, 2008 at 9:40 pm

    Students informed Dr Moore 3 black males Pulled up in a car and told the boys to give them money.One had a gun. This was yesterday afternoon before press time This was at West Rocks middle school. This was in a handout given our children by Salvatore Corda today. What a lovely city we live is. Why wasn’t it in the papers this morning? Our kids mean nothing anymore for us parents we are told after the fact and no description of the vehicle. We could of been alert this morning .City run by assholes. Why didn’t the police notify the news papers?

    at least the Corda did more than our public safety personal and to think we are not told what kind of car why?

  • 11 MGeake // Mar 1, 2008 at 7:50 am

    Two different people — one a BoE member — sent me Volumes 1 & 3, so now all I need is Volume 2.

    #9, I appreciate the suggestion, but I commute to New Jersey every day, so it will be a while before I can go during business hours. :(

  • 12 Anonymous // Mar 2, 2008 at 1:12 am

    Government by the people, of the people, for the people should be accessible to the people. Corporations often exist on a similar scale; legally they usually remain unaccountable private centrally planned empires, but the same principle applies. Every citizen has a right to know about activities, decisions and policies which affect them. Freedom of information is not a law, it is non-negotiable; it is a fundamental principle of democracy and good governance. We believe documents pertaining to large public institutions, such as governments and corporations, should presumptively be available to the public. The burden is on a government or corporation to argue that a document should be kept secret. And if someone leaks a document, at great personal risk, they probably have a good reason why they believe that secrecy is wrong.

  • 13 dem4life // Mar 2, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    What is really going on here? Who’s advising the BOE behind the scenes?

Leave a Reply