YourCT.com header image 2

Hartford Worries About Clotheslines


by turfgrrl


February 28th, 2008 · 4 Comments

Last week it was bottled water. Today its clotheslines. I guess because property tax reform isn’t an issue residents really care about. The gist of this hot issue apparently is that there’s some energy costs savings to be had if people dry their laundry on clotheslines instead of in dryers. Yeah, ok, call captain obvious on that one.

But some people apparently live in condo associations or communities that have by-laws that prohibit the venerable clothesline. Not just the clothesline, but some associations take great pleasure on prohibiting and regulating all sorts of things under “aesthetic” reasons like flags, window treatments, garden sheds.

I’ve never understood why anyone would want to live in these types of soviet-era style behavior modification developments subjected to the whims of what doormats are allowed. Naturally, our Hartford legislature just can’t stand idly by while these people figure out how to wrangle with their condo association to allow for a clothesline or two. Apparently the mere thought that someone might be able to negotiate a dry your underwear on Tuesdays between 11 and 2 program, is just too difficult. It might not happen. Or it might include Wednesdays.

So rather than deal with some sort of constitutional issue about whether these associations have a right to evenĀ  regulate themselves to the extent they do, which is something that occassionally pops up in the legislature, they are proceeding with a hearing today.

Martin Mador, legislative and political chair of the state chapter of the Sierra Club, wrote the original proposal that became House Bill 5596 An Act Concerning The Right To Dry.

“The real driver to this is the global warming crisis we face,” said Mador, who will have a 9:30 a.m. press conference in the Legislative Office Building. The bill includes language to give associations control as to where clotheslines might be used in a complex.

“This bill goes to what an individual can do,” Mador said. “It doesn’t force anyone to use a clothesline.”

Today’s hearing on the clothesline bill and five other energy proposals begins at 10:30 a.m. in Room 1-B of the Legislative Office Building.

What’s next, deliberations on the use of garden hoses?

source: Courant, Airing Their Wet Laundry; Hearing Today On ‘Right To Dry’ Bill, By BILL LEUKHARDT, February 28, 2008

Tags: Connecticut · In the News

4 Responses so far “Hartford Worries About Clotheslines”



  • 1 Fart-Remorse // Feb 28, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    In my humble opinion, the carbon foot-print of a Connecticut citizen chomping on Mexican-style bean-heavy food is much more deleterious than drying my shirt in a clothes dryer. Plus, my dryer is silent but not deadly. I firmly believe that every Mexican food bean fart spewed in Connecticut is 100 times more carbon heavy-stinky than my dryer-dried shirt. But for the sake of Global Warming, I believe that every Mexican Cuisine restaurant in Connecticut should be taxed to fund a Connecticut Carbon Credit account to offset Mexican food bean-farts. A good idea is to levy a tax on Connecticut consumers of chili during Superbowl games as part of a Nutmeg Omnibus Fart Footprint Initiative.

  • 2 Anonymous // Feb 29, 2008 at 8:55 am

    How about taxing the amount of gaseous vapors emitted by the Common Council debating Nick Kydes’ refund?

    FR, can you give us a breakdown on the emission footprints from Norwalk’s various Mex restaurants? El Mexicano, Los Portales, etc…

  • 3 Anonymous // Feb 29, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    It ain’t easy being green-o so ya better take Bean-o!

  • 4 Fart-Remorse // Feb 29, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    I think this proves the point.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMMf2LratsU

Leave a Reply