YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Operating Budget Recap


by turfgrrl


February 12th, 2008 · 1 Comment

Last night the BET reviewed Norwalk’s operating budget. Key details:

1.

The budget proposal would translate to a 3.7 percent property tax increase, or an estimated $5,701 tax bill for a median single-family home in the city’s Fourth Taxing District.

“As you know, we have a long way to go. This is just the start of the budget season,” Hamilton told the Board of Estimate and Taxation.

“We can find some savings and bring taxes down, but I think this is a very good starting point,” board chairman Fred Wilms said.

2.

Not including $18 million in Board of Education debt service, the “lion’s share” of city spending will go to education, at about 54 percent, Hamilton said. The rest is divvied up between public safety, comprising 13 percent of the municipal budget, public works, at 6 percent, debt service and employee benefits, for 9 percent each and another 9 percent toward all other expenditures.

3.

Driving factors in the budget proposal include debt service, or interest the city pays on loans, which will increase $2.4 million, or 10.3 percent next fiscal year, including city and school district debt.

Why are these details key? Decisions were made to throw more money at Education, we see that we are not getting any results, and those that should be held accountable hold no one accountable for the mismanagement of educational funding. Five schools will not be renovated because there’s no money left. Why is that? Are we willing to accept Corda’s excuse that it’s all a perception problem? I say numbers don’t lie. Stuart Opdahl is directly responsible for the shoddy implementation of the school renovation problem and Corda doesn’t seem to want to hold him accountable. Opdahl has yet to provide any evidence that any cost savings occur on the BOE budget. Corda refuses to hire a finance director, or conduct a forensic audit to see how the costs overruns and a variety of missing renovation items happened.

The Price Waterhouse report of 2001 predicted the construction project problems because of a lack of financial and construction project experience by the existing staff.

The general theme though, which has not been adequately improved under the Sal Corda administration are is a consistent lack of written management plans, inadequate management controls, performance evaluation and financial oversight. This is a classic problem with organizations, not unique to Norwalk, but I find it shocking that even Corda would be so dismissive of this report.

Your Common Council is planning to set a preliminary operating budget cap on Feb. 26.

source:Advocate, Proposed city budget would hike taxes 3.7 percent, By Alexandra Fenwick, February 12 2008

Tags: Education · Norwalk

One Response so far “Norwalk: Operating Budget Recap”



  • 1 Anonymous // Feb 12, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    “even more distressing” since Connecticut would be guaranteed only $750,000 in 2009, down from $15.5 million in 2005 this was an article by the Post on line today by PETER URBAN purban@ctpost.com

    Connecticut Gov. M. Jodi Rell called on the state’s congressional delegation to oppose President Bush’s 2009 budget blueprint saying it would have devastating effects on state and local budgets.
    The Republican governor sent letters (via fax) to the state’s five representatives and two senators on Monday expressing concern with the Republican president’s plan to “eliminate, reduce or revise” more than 150 programs.

    A preliminary analysis of 30 key discretionary programs on the chopping block found that Connecticut would lose nearly $56 million, or about 6 percent of the federal funds the state received through the programs in the current fiscal year.

    “Eliminating programs such as the Preventive Health and Health Services and the Community Services block grants would be extremely shortsighted. These grants help reduce preventable infant deaths, improve the health of low-income people and fight poverty in urban areas,” Rell said.

    The Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant provides a variety of public health services such as reducing preventable mortality and the Community Services Block Grant assists state and local communities to reduce poverty, revitalize low-income communities and help transition families from welfare, she said. Rell also complained about proposed cuts in homeland security grants as “even more distressing” since Connecticut would be guaranteed only $750,000 in 2009, down from $15.5 million in 2005.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Advertisement
    ——————————————————————————–
    share of these funds has dwindled every year since 9/11,” Rell said.
    Bush would also eliminate the Justice Assistance Grants diminishing the ability of the state to increase offender accountability, reduce recidivism and protect communities. He would also reduce the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program by 22 percent, shrink Social Services Block Grant funds by 29 percent, and place a 50 percent ceiling on matching state Medicaid administrative costs, costing Connecticut $7.1 million, she said.

    “These cuts would have a devastating impact on Connecticut,” Rell said.

    Connecticut Sens. Chris Dodd and Joe Lieberman have expressed similar concerns with Bush’s budget proposal.

    not that its what the thread was about but everyone is going to hurt next couple of years best to plan on that I’d say.

Leave a Reply