YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Vets Park Future On Meeting Agenda


by turfgrrl


January 7th, 2008 · 10 Comments

The Hour is reporting that a informal meeting will be held at city hall regarding the future of Vets Park. The drive? Parks and Recs needs $30k in the budget for a parks master plan. From The Hour:

The informational meeting is set for 6:30 p.m. Wednesday in the Community Room of City Hall, 125 East Ave.

Thomas R. Tavella, vice president and senior associate with BSC Group, which developed a master plan for Oyster Shell Park, has been invited to the meeting to discuss the nature of master planning, according to Michael A. Mocciae, the city’s director of recreation and parks.
Representatives of Friends of Cranbury Park will speak about their experiences working with the city to make improvement to that park. The League of Women Voters of Norwalk will be on hand to facilitate the public portion of the meeting, Mocciae said.

“At the end, we’re going to do a question-and-answer (session),” Mocciae said. “We’d like to see a nice representation from the whole community, because this is a larger city park. It’s such a vital park and (with) all the things we’ve been doing. We’ve finished the Little League fields. The new playgrounds are in. There will be a lot more (improvements).”

The informational meeting, originally slated for last fall, comes as Mocciae seeks $30,000 in capital funds to develop a master plan for the 35-acre park off Seaview Avenue, and as some residents continue to fight what they view as commercialization of the park.

Ed Pulice, a Seaview Avenue resident and member of Save Vets Park, which mobilized last year against the city’s plan to build a privately operated miniature golf course at the park, said he has e-mailed residents, encouraging them to come to Wednesday night’s meeting.

“I’d like to see that the city is approaching this in a very rational manner. We’re concerned that the park be developed in a way that is compatible with the residential community. We’re very much concerned about noise and congestion,” Pulice said.

Arthur A. Santella, a Seaview Avenue resident who helped found Save Vets Parks, shares a similar view. He also plans to be at City Hall Wednesday night.

“I’m positively going to be there,” Santella said. “I want to make sure that park isn’t commercialized in any way to any private interest. That is a park of the people and should be the people’s. Not one foot of it should be fenced off for a private business from the public.”

Mayor Richard A. Moccia said he is receptive to a master plan for the park, provided dollars are available and residents, the parks committee and Moccie’s department believe such a plan will help.

Last year, Moccia halted plans for a miniature golf course at the park. He said his feelings about that haven’t changed — “I think it’s too big a project there.”

At the same time, Moccia said the city needs recreational facilities at the park.

“There’s been talk of maybe putting a portable ice-skating rink during the summer, and things of that nature, which I think are fine,” Moccia said. “We’ll get a good balance to keep the neighbors relatively happy, but also recognize it is a park to be used. … usage but not over-commercialization.”

source: The Hour, Public has chance to sound off on future of vets memorial, By ROBERT KOCH, January 7, 2008

Tags: Norwalk

10 Responses so far “Norwalk: Vets Park Future On Meeting Agenda”



  • 1 Ralph Fabrizio // Jan 7, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    MORE NOISE & CONGESTION IN VETS’ PARK?

    THE THREAT TO OUR PARK - The Parks and Recreation Committee is planning to commercialize Vets’ Park. They need to generate revenues to make up for budgetary shortfalls. The current plan is to build an amphitheater in the Park as the opening salvo in a likely future of further commercialization.

    DO YOU WANT A REPEAT OF LAST SUMMER’S FESTIVAL MANIA - If you felt last Summer’s program of festivals upon festivals, noise and congestion was not appropriate in a large residential community, come to the hearing. Listen to the proposals. Judge for yourself.

    WHY SHOULD OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BE THE CASH COW FOR THE CITY While all Norwalk’s parks need better funding, is it fair to force the surrounding community to suffer the noise and congestion to raise revenues, while a beach and park sticker program, in place in most communities except Norwalk, would generate the necessary funding from the wider community? Would it not be fair to keep Vets’ Park as a park, peaceful, flexible for a variety of uses, as are many of Norwalk’s Parks, rather than to develop it according to the short-sighted plans of its current officials? Is it fair to expect our community to generate revenues for the parks’ budget while other communities enjoy the peace and quiet a park should provide?

    QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ASKED:

    • Is this commercialization plan a sure bet to even generate the needed revenues?

    • How is our community going to be protected from the congestion and traffic these plans will create?

    • What are the standards for noise pollution. The commission currently sets the level at 80 decibels (the sound of a passing garbage truck!!) , no limits on duration or bass frequencies, despite a growing body of evidence of sound’s deleterious health effects.

    • What are the environmental consequences in an obvious flood zone?

    • What is the risk of contamination in disturbing soil that is potentially contaminated?

    Come to the hearing, currently set for

    Wednesday, 9 January 2008 at Town Hall at 6:30 PM
    Watch the announcements for further details or changes and visit our site:
    www.SaveVetsPark.com

  • 2 Anonymous // Jan 7, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    why after all these years does the park have to be change ? we were all content with the way the park has been used untill now. what has change? IS IT BECAUSE THE CITY OF Norwalk has catered to all the not tax payers and disrecard the people who have supported the city thru thier taxes ? please be a little considerate to the many home oweners who have met thier obligations to the city by paying thier taxas year after year some of thoes who could not not pay thier taxes but somehow did meet thier obligations should they not be considered? think twice ( city) before you act once. leave it has it is

  • 3 barnstorm // Jan 7, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Some of us won’t be able to attend the meeting, but are nonetheless concerned about the future of Duffy Field.(for you newbies, that’s the old name for this former landfill).

    Any chance proposals could be put in the form of a referendum that the voters could weigh in on?
    (that is, the few voters who bother to show up to vote)?

    Do we really need to spend a bunch of money on a “master plan” for this (or any other) park? Seems like all our other “master plans” are either ignored or constantly amended to the point of uselessness. Why not just have something in writing that says Parks & Rec has the ability to regulate activities at each park?(and if we already don’t have that wording, why not?)

  • 4 Anonymous // Jan 7, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    does anybody see a great outcome? where will the city employees go after work and drink? where will the homeless live if its taken over and cared about? Enough already.

    Why don’t they simply take some samples and enter them into a lab and see if there is any toxic material there.Put that maybe to bed once and for all.

    you can’t build on anything until a clean bill of health is given correct?

  • 5 A Dempsey // Jan 8, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    Re Post 4
    “you can’t build on anything until a clean bill of health is given correct?”

    WRONG WRONG WRONG. This is Norwalk, some in this city would build a playground on a Atomic waste dump if they thought no one would question it.

  • 6 J Halderman // Jan 8, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Will this meeting Wednesday be a sham? Is this a matter of the Lords Mocciae, and Bondi, letting the ignorant serfs, and peasants speak, but only briefly and with their permission? Will this be another situation where Vets park is expected to pay for the shortfall of the P & R budget by jamming as much traffic into that park and destroy it? Something smells quite unusual here. Will the 2 lords be the ones who recommend who sits on the commissions that control what goes into the parks? If Vets park is under utilized, that when are these two going to look at Taylor Farm that now is only used for dogs to crap in 99% of the time. Maybe Mr Mocciae and Mr Bondi can devise a plan where each dog owner is charged $5 when their dog takes a dump and it is not cleaned, and only $3 if it is cleaned. That could be another full time city job to create for another relative.

  • 7 Anonymous // Jan 8, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    Bondi has another son?

  • 8 Jack Lions // Jan 9, 2008 at 8:48 am

    Now that’s funny

  • 9 anonymous // Jan 9, 2008 at 9:30 am

    If everyone in this town volunteered as much as the Bondi family does for the city and other organizations, most of the city’s problems would be solved. It is much easier to sit on your butt and anonymously blog, complain and criticize others.

  • 10 Butt // Jan 9, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    This thread reminds me of the posts advocating a mini golf course inside the school classrooms to give Corda some motivation to enter the buildings.

Leave a Reply