YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: BOE Budget Still Lacks Finance Director


by turfgrrl


January 4th, 2008 · 30 Comments

Despite the conciliatory tones coming from Mayor Moccia and Board of Estimate Chair Fred Wilms, the 4.8% budget increase coupled with the close to $1 million over run in construction at Norwalk High School should be enough to give pause on what authenticity numbers prepared by the eerstwhile Stuart Opdahl contain. Teachers,  here in the comments, have been throwing red flags for months. The enrollment figures, the renovations, the overcrowding in some some schools, are all being mismanaged by Opdahl because he can’t seem to understand how to create accurate estimates.

In a year that saw the dramatic breakthrough of $100 a barrel oil, Opdahl is recommending that the status quo is fine, instead of aggressively seeking energy costs savings. No one is asking an obvious question such as why do the lights and heat burn at Norwalk High School most nights past 11 pm? Night school, understandably would be a good reason, but night school shouldn’t require an entire building to be ablaze, at least without a cost benefit analysis of infrastructure costs and alternative sites.

The continued lack of accountability of administration is another issue. Corda maintains he needs every administrator, whether it is on the third floor or in the schools. Yet recent hires of a housemaster at Brien McMahon, had been AWOL, and the continued handling of food services, Bruce Morris, and curciculum screw ups by Karen Lang show that money is wasted on teaching materials, textbooks, technology and staff.

A longer review of the budget will be forthcoming, but until then feel free to add other areas that deserve comment or greater scrutiny.

Tags: Education · Norwalk

30 Responses so far “Norwalk: BOE Budget Still Lacks Finance Director”



  • 1 Anonymous // Jan 4, 2008 at 8:10 am

    Night school has been at Brien McMahon for the past two years, and so that isn’t a reason for having all of the Norwalk High School lights on.

    The entire BOE must approve the budget, and if they submit one without funding for a finance director, the City of Norwalk should fund the schools an amount that is minus the cost of salary and benefits for a finance director, with the understanding that that money will be there when the BOE decides to do the right thing.

    I am surprised that the budget committee allowed this proposal because I thought that Greg Burnett would be able to stand up to the superintendent.

  • 2 MGeake // Jan 4, 2008 at 8:34 am

    I found it particularly amazing that Dr. Corda has taken to calling one of the women on his staff — I missed her name — his “budget director”, as though she has the skills required and no true Finance Director is required.

  • 3 An hour in the garden puts life\'s problems in perspective // Jan 4, 2008 at 11:15 am

    The waste of electricity in the 19 schools is one example of waste. The majority of schools in Fairfield county have not only installed light sensors but replaced older light sensors for the latest generation of sensors. Norwalk uses the on/off switch.

    Life is a garden. Teachers and administrators are hired as the constant gardeners to improve the schools, yet teachers and administrators under an authoritarian rule are treated like dirt and threatened with glyphosate. We are dirt amongst dirt.

  • 4 Anonymous // Jan 4, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Amazing how our Superintendent has the nerve to use energy, insurance and teacher salaries to ask for another five large. No need to enter the schools to see the waste. Simply drive by the school. No telling what is happening inside Norwalk High School.

    Will a teacher count the light bulbs in the classroom for me with an approximate number of classrooms? How much is it per kilowatt? And I can figure in how much we will waste next year too after CL&P receives the 50% increase in transmission rates. But don’t waste your time counting light bulbs, it’s just your money.

  • 5 Anonymous // Jan 4, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    Posting #4 is yet another reference to things, presumably bad, happening at NHS. What is going on?

    Corda and Opdahl hired an old buddy to find a new principal. Did the buddy do a good job for the large amount of money he received?

  • 6 anonymous but not stupid // Jan 4, 2008 at 5:15 pm

    #3 and #4 - I would encourage both of you to get your facts straight before you make such grand and outrageous allegations. Had you taken the time to do so, you would have discovered that the schools have all had your “state of the art” sensors for over 10 years and that the total kwh electric usage at all 19 schools has been very stable for the past several. This info & data is available in the budget books put out by the BOE, and you may want to take the time to read them before you insert your foot in your mouth again.

  • 7 Anonymous // Jan 4, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    Even before renovation projects, schools had the sensors that would turn off classroom lights when there was no movement in the room for a prescribed period of time. With renovation, not only are the sensors helping, but there has been a concerted effort to install energy-efficient lighting.

    #6 didn’t mention that the renovation projects have included very sophisticated heating, ventilation and cooling systems that cost far less to operate than did the technology of years past. Moreover, these systems are far more effective.

  • 8 anonymous // Jan 5, 2008 at 8:03 am

    MGeake #2 - The women on Dr. Corda’s staff that you refer is Joanne Cegan. She has been the Budget Director for the BOE for some 8 to 10 years. She came to Norwalk highly qualified, with similiar experience in at least 2 other CT public school districts. She has a BA & I believe an masters in accounting. She is certified by the state of CT, as is required, to act in the capacity of a public school business manager. She is very qualified to keep the books and to report the finances of the school distict, but unfortunetly she does what she is told by the person she reports to, and that person is not Dr. Corda. The person she reports to does not have an accounting or finance background, and is not certified in the State of CT to act as an assistant super, or a public school business administrator. That is essentially why they created the title of Chief Operating Officer for Mr. Opdahl. The real problem is not the lack of a Finance Director! The real problem is with the man that the budget coordinator reports to, and who controls what funds go where, and how, and then what is said and what is reported about them. Does anyone really think that the situation will change just by hiring a Fiance Director who will report to the same people? Let’s stop this insanity and get it done right.

  • 9 Anonymous Too // Jan 5, 2008 at 8:12 am

    I have lots and lots to say but I have a really good reason to want to make sure you can post something here without your name showing up. So this is a test before I can start having some real fun.

  • 10 Silence Dogood // Jan 5, 2008 at 8:51 am

    #8: You are so right! Stuart Opdahl micromanaged the central kitchen while Frank Harris was still running it, and he did the same afterwards. He micromanaged construction projects, even though the City of Norwalk was paying a construction management company. He has micromanaged purchasing. He has micromanaged maintenance and custodial services, even though there is a director of facilities who is perfectly capable of doing his job. He will micromanage a finance director, unless that person answers directly to the BOE. (Then again, it seems that the superintendent manages the BOE.)

    Sal Corda seems to be intensely loyal to the wrong people, and I refer not only to Mr. Opdahl. We need a superintendent who is a good judge of competence and character.

  • 11 Stupid is as stupid does // Jan 5, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Most schools do not have sensors for the lights. They are on or off. The new editions added to schools have the feature. Most schools were built in the 1950s and still have the 1950s switch. Mr. Stupid Censorship, Provide us the Board of Education minutes detailing the mysterious 1998 technology you describe? Dr. Corda should make a new years resolution to visit one school every three weeks to understand in one years time that most schools do not have the sensors. At the current rate of one school every 5 months Dr. Corda will not realize the energy wastes until the year 2016.

  • 12 Stupid is as stupid does // Jan 5, 2008 at 10:46 am

    “#6 didn’t mention that the renovation projects have included very sophisticated heating, ventilation and cooling systems that cost far less to operate than did the technology of years past. Moreover, these systems are far more effective.”

    Moreover, you failed to mention the specific details of these “renovation projects”. Provide the schools affected, the year of the project completion, the exact parts of the school affects (the whole school or a small part of the school), etc.

  • 13 Anonymous // Jan 5, 2008 at 10:56 am

    “Even before renovation projects, schools had the sensors that would turn off classroom lights when there was no movement in the room for a prescribed period of time. With renovation, not only are the sensors helping, but there has been a concerted effort to install energy-efficient lighting.”

    A concerted effort? You must be talking about the new Norwalk High School building or you are including the 1950s fluorescent tubes in schools versus incadescent light bulbs. Most of the schools do not have light sensors and the idea the light sensors were implemented ten years ago is false information. Sure, we can a renovated wing added onto a building to claim we are saving taxpayers money dating all the way back to the 1998. If you did hard enough you might find a classroom with a light sensor installed in the 1960s. You should include a security sensored flood light outside to make your statement seem more valid. Turfgrrl, We need a how to guide on how to keep yourself honest while posting. Nevermind that is what the public is here to do without a local paper to keep these politicians from stating nonsense that we all know is a stretch of the imagination.

  • 14 anonymous but not stupid // Jan 5, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Stupid is as stupid does - #11 and #12 - You are dead wrong my freind. DEAD WRONG!!!! I’m afraid that you don’t have a clue as to what you are talking about. Ever since 1996/97 the Norwalk Public Schools (all of them) have had motion sensors in every classroom, electronic ballasts in all fluorescent lights, 34 watt bulbs and timers on outsdie lighting. It was a retrofit project accomplished by Ventana Corp., CL&P. the BOE and the City of Norwalk. At least one third of the cost was funded by CL&P. I also know that Marvin was worked on a few years ago with an energy conservation project (remember the electrican that got zapped?) which was in the TTD and Columbus as well, with SNEW. All you have to do is call them up, or do a little research on your own. But until you have the fact straight please stop running you foolish mouth you idiot!

  • 15 Anonymous // Jan 5, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    #12: BMHS and NHS both have sophisticated systems. BMHS is a completed project, and the technology and lighting systems are throughout the entire school, while NHS is still underway, and the technology and lighting systems are still being installed.

    Everyone, let’s try to keep the conversation civil.

  • 16 Norwalk idiot // Jan 5, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    I don’t know about the high schools. The high schools may have motion sensors. Turfgrrl, why would the lights be on after 11pm if there are motion sensors for the light? Turfgrrl must be leading us on and must be an idiot or maybe the “sophisticated system” isn’t sophisticated. The can’t speak for all the schools, but I know the elementary and middle schools that I have been inside are on/off switches in the classrooms. I’m quite confident the sensors are not in most schools, but I would appreciate information explaining which schools received the light sensors and the date.

  • 17 Norwalk idiot // Jan 5, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Please educate us. I want to know if motion sensors are in every classroom in all 19 schools. Why are lights on at Norwalk High School after 11pm? I want to be sophisticated, too.

  • 18 anonymous but not stupid // Jan 5, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    All 19 Norwalk schools have room sensors. All of them! Anyone can go on this blog and make all sorts of unsupported claims & allegations, which I suspect is at least 50% of what is written. Do some of you people even know what a sensor looks like? Have any of you been into the schools to look? If you can identiy a sensor, and you have been looking around the insides of the school classrooms, then you would have noticed that they are in fact installed. They are not a very sophisticated piece of equipment. They don’t have to be. They break the flow of electric current to a bank of lights if motion is not sensed over a preset period of time, which can be anywhere from a few minutes to 15/20. Did you people know that the school system has been 20 years ahead of the City in making their buildings energy efficient? Why not? All you have to do is ask. If you think I’m wrong please formally ask the questions to the BOE. Go to the meetings and make your comments and questions known. Write the letters and request an FOI. Are you afraid that you will hear of the good things that have taken place, as opposed to what you seem to want to dwell on with all these negative, unfounded and unsupported claims and allegations? Lots of good things have occurred, dispite what most of you think. There seems to be plently of true issues that you people can harp on, so why do you find it necessary to create false ones?

  • 19 Anonymous // Jan 5, 2008 at 4:17 pm

    18. You’re very aggressive toward education posts. You may be correct about light sensors. i do not know. I have not investigated lighting systems. My classroom at my elementary school does not automatically turn off. I stay late and when I forget to turn off the light the light stays on until I return the next day. The classroom may have a sensor, but I drive by the school on my way to my home and I see random lights turned on at all hours of the night. I do not agree that half of the posts are false, however you are welcome to comment on the posts you believe to be false. I am afraid to ask questions at the Board of Education. I do not believe lighting problems are the concerns I would bring to the Board of Education. My concern is about the complacency among the Board of Education about how administrators treat teachers that raise concerns about improving education in Norwalk. “You’re an idiot post” is evidence that you may be qualified for the job of administration. Let’s say you are correct about lighting and that all 19 Norwalk schools have room sensors. Let’s say the comments you have addressed in this thread are false information. Please go to the other education threads and explain the 50% of posts you believe to be false information.

  • 20 anonymous but not stupid // Jan 5, 2008 at 8:32 pm

    #19 - Let’s say that you are correct. How often do you forget to turn your light off. Once a week? Once a month? If the sensor isn’t working shouldn’t it be reported so it can be fixed. If the lights are being left on by the janitors wouldn’t you think that this too should be reported. I’m told that before the janitor locks the building and leaves at 11:00pm each night they are required to check all doors and windows, and turn off any lights that might be on, leaving only a few night lights running around the inside for security and safety reasons. This makes sense to me. If you or others are not reporting these things to the principals, so that he/she can correct, wouldn’t this be considered complacency? It sounds like things have gotten so bad at the schools that it’s not only he “administrators” that apparently don’t care, but some teachers and janitors as well.

  • 21 Anonymous // Jan 5, 2008 at 9:33 pm

    Is this the same anonymous that told teachers to stop the bitching because they have the cush job with summers off? Walk a day in our shoes…

  • 22 Aunt Bertha // Jan 5, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    #15 and anon BMHS is not completed yet. There are lights that do not have sensors on them in some of the rooms and in some of the larger storage closets. If your custodian is good they take care of a light left on. I am a little on the OCD side so I don’t leave without shutting down my room completely. I also pull my blinds down at night and make sure my desk is neat. What we need is a line item budget so that all is out in the open about spending. You need not get the bloggers of the beaten path by directing them to the issue of light sensors. Let’s have an accounting for the money in and out. Honest reflection on money spent brings thoughtful savings ideas based upon facts. No line item accounting = no facts. How can one run a household like this, let alone a school system? Oh, my job is far from cush and I work during my summers at a university to better my practice. :)

  • 23 Anonymous // Jan 6, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Re: anonymous but not stupid 6.

    “you would have discovered that the schools have all had your “state of the art” sensors for over 10 years”

    The high schools are receiving the sensors first and the K-8 schools are hit and miss. The technology has not been implemented. I do not believe anybody on this blog can speak so matter of fact about which schools have what until they walk into these schools to make such assessment. The fact of the matter is both of you are completely wrong in stating all 19 schools have the light sensors and the other posters are completely wrong stating the sensors are not in all 19 schools. Aunt Bertha is correct that BMHS is hit and miss with regard to sensors. The majority of elementary and middle schools are the worse off with regard to this technology.

    “and that the total kwh electric usage at all 19 schools has been very stable for the past several. This info & data is available in the budget books put out by the BOE, and you may want to take the time to read them before you insert your foot in your mouth again.”

    Is there a link to obtain this information?

    Re: Anonymous 7.

    Your statements sound good, but they lack concrete examples. It would be helpful to provide the factual information for this concerted effort of which you speak clear to the readers. The schools that have been renovated. Brookside may be a good example for you to use.

    Re: anonymous 8.

    The real problem is the lack of transparency of line by line spending. I too would become a professoinal golfer with $150 million dollars to spend and lump the spending in broad categories without any fear of anyone knowing what the specifics were for what I did with the money.

    Re: anonymous but not stupid 14.

    “Ever since 1996/97 the Norwalk Public Schools (all of them) have had motion sensors in every classroom, electronic ballasts in all fluorescent lights, 34 watt bulbs and timers on outsdie lighting. It was a retrofit project accomplished by Ventana Corp., CL&P. the BOE and the City of Norwalk. At least one third of the cost was funded by CL&P.”

    Really? Then we need to do an investigation on a major scam. Nothing would help our cause more to expose the money corruption more than to realize you are correct in the above quotation. Of the school in which I am familiar, the majority of classrooms are on/off without a sensor.

    “I also know that Marvin was worked on a few years ago with an energy conservation project (remember the electrican that got zapped?) which was in the TTD and Columbus as well, with SNEW.”

    I am not familiar with the electrician. I am not sure the significance of this information, but I would like for you to elaborate on what you mean here. Is this evidence for a completed project? I am not familiar with these schools, so any information you can provide would be helpful.

    Re: Anonymous 15.

    “BMHS and NHS both have sophisticated systems. BMHS is a completed project, and the technology and lighting systems are throughout the entire school, while NHS is still underway, and the technology and lighting systems are still being installed.”

    I am not sure if this is a multiple personality disorder post or a different person. Aunt Bertha and turfgrrl must be wrong and you must be correct. I hope you are correct for the smoking gun factor effect.

    Re: anonymous but not stupid 18.

    After reading this post of yours I have decided the smoking gun factor effect was foolish of me to consider. Your motivations shine brightly in tihs post. Half of the posts are false information huh? Okay, well start commenting on the information you find false. Are you the sexist “Boobs on Expedition” poster or are you the crime statistics poster that yells for whistleblowing? The teachers have stopped posting for the most part, so I am not sure why you are still obsessed with this education thread. I suspect you have something to lose.

  • 24 Norwalker // Jan 6, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    It’s too bad the money for Jefferson is gone. It would have saved the city money if they replaced the electric heat.

  • 25 Anonymous // Jan 6, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    Didn’t anonymous say he would be out of here should turfgrrl record IP addresses. Either a scare tactic or he/she fears identity. The proxies are wonderful, aren’t they.

  • 26 anonymous but not stupid // Jan 6, 2008 at 4:13 pm

    Anonymous #23 - I can’t believe how reckless you are with your comments. I encourage you and all the other non believers to start your investigation. You and the others apparently know more then everyone else, so prove me wrong. The only thing that you have proven so far, from the comments you have made, is that you really don’t have a clue about this subject. Have a wonderful day Mr. know-it-all.

  • 27 bewildered // Jan 7, 2008 at 7:00 am

    “Posting #4 is yet another reference to things, presumably bad, happening at NHS. What is going on?

    Corda and Opdahl hired an old buddy to find a new principal. Did the buddy do a good job for the large amount of money he received?”

    Would someone please do some research to find out what is going on at NHS? Why does it seem that things are falling apart? With a new building administrator it shouldn’t be hard to find out what has changed.

    The old buddy (consultant) hired another old golf buddy of Corda’s - another NY retiree - someone with no CT experience that I know of. His experience was with a school 1/4 the size, grades 7 - 12, different demographics, different state. Remember the old saying - it isn’t what you know it is who you know?! So far no one seems impressed. PLEASE, PLEASE - do some investigative reporting. It would be great to know what is going on at NHS.

  • 28 Anonymous // Jan 7, 2008 at 7:25 am

    I have no first-hand knowledge of what is happening at NHS, but if it is true that the school is suffering because it lacks effective leadership, someone has the responsibility to act. Someone is responsible for evaluating this principal, and because the he doesn’t have tenure, it wouldn’t take an act of Congress to fire him.

    Sal Corda has a director of secondary education to supervise the secondary principals, and I hope he allows the director to take a tough stand, if that is what is required. Sal, however, has a history of overlooking some very serious deficiencies in people he likes, probably because he doesn’t want to see their flaws. If this new principal is Sal’s buddy, I very much doubt that Sal will do anything, unless parents make public demands that he act. Parents need to be at the BOE meetings, they need to call BOE members and/or write them letters, they need to talk to councilmen, they need to collar newspaper reporters.

    Can we get comments from NHS teachers on this blog? Is there a serious problem? If so, what is the nature of the problem?

  • 29 Anonymous // Jan 7, 2008 at 7:58 am

    #28 It doesn’t take an act of Congress to force resignation of tenured teachers at West Rocks.

  • 30 Anonymous // Jan 7, 2008 at 9:08 am

    I doubt anyone will investigate Norwalk High School administrators. The administrators have a lot at stake to voice what they know about various administrators. Even the subject supervisors forced out of Norwalk refuse to talk about what goes on behind closed doors. I will provide an example. Some administrators do consulting work for other districts. Districts shy away from a consultant with a history of addressing management problems. Consulting work can pay hundreds an hour. An administrator is not going to risk it all unless they are planning to retire. The system is more complicated to understand. I am probably not making sense.

Leave a Reply