YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Corda Still Doesn’t Get Why Finance Director Needed


by turfgrrl


December 18th, 2007 · 37 Comments

Last night’s BOe committee meeting was about as depressing as a meeting could be. The majority of the meeting was spent reviewing the technology and It budget requests. It turns out that Ralph Valenzisi, sitting on a 25 person Microsoft advisory committee is busy recommending, gee what a surprise, Microsoft technology as the public schools’ preferred “tier 1″ vendor. What a conflict of interest! Hearing all the “required” computer “refreshes” and smart boards and other nonsense last night, as not a single BOE member asked the obvious question about what the totally cost of operation was going to be by these proposed solutions, and even worse, gasped at the idea that a computer that is 5 - 7 years in use is still in the schools. “Band-aids” tut-tutted Rosa Murray at the shock of hearing about the age of those computers. Meanwhile in the real world of IT, there is nothing wrong with computers that old that can’t be repurposed into other uses, particularly since the state of educational software hasn’t really advanced since 1999.

Greg Burnett was heading down the right path when he asked if all these requests were absolutely necessary or could they be scaled back. The next whopper came out of Opdhal and Valenzisi that somehow if all 195 computers weren’t purchased there wouldn’t be “equity” in the schools. How this lame ass statement passes for any kind of serious IT recommendation is beyond me. But it it is illustrative of the lack of qualifications of Corda’s staff, the inherent conflict of interests that dominate and the lack of expertise on the BOE. I reluctantly conclude that Norwalk public schools are doomed.

Which is why I can review last night’s tap dance on why Corda absolutely feels that a fiance director is unnecessary as being just another smoke screen to keep real expertise from ever shaking the country club decision making process that is deployed by Corda. Why demand the best financial mind to get maximum value out of every dollar, when the BOE will compliantly pass through budget requests that waste tax payer dollars. The IT requests indicative of waste that I can easily pick out.

So despite Brice Kimmel’s valiant efforts to outline how having a financial director and contingency line in the budget is in the best interests of Corda and the BOE, the contingency line got withdrawn and the committee will kick around the idea of a finance director a little longer. It’s too bad that Corda doesn’t get that having someone on staff that will actually make his performance better is a good thing. Corda seems determined to wallow in mediocrity.

The other depressing item to come out of the meeting was that finger pointing over playground and school facility repairs was an ongoing mess. According to Corda, 5 years ago, Hal Alvord informed the BOE that DPW would no longer handle pot hole repairs and parking lot plowing as well as playground maintenance and repairs. Naturally Mark Gorian prepared a thick book with pictures detailing all these simple infrastructure repairs that are now needed. Corda lamented that poor Hal Alvord’s budget just hasn’t been increased enough to handle the school maintenance. I thought that was a telling remark, since the DPW budget was never cut 5 years ago, simply that the Director decided unilaterally to stop performing work that was agreed to under a 1989 letter of understanding. Corda referenced that letter and the “not in writing” pronouncement by Alvord. Why this problem persists 5 years later, still with nothing in writing is beyond belief.

As always there are two sides to the story, one that I know Alvord talked about during the last budget meetings where he complained that the BOE would send over emergency requests instead of filling out a work order that DPW could better manage. Somehow I suspect that the truth of the situation lies in the petty budget fiefdoms that exists pitting one department over another because responsibilities aren’t spelled out specifically.

Here’s a solution, DPW should be responsible for all infrastructure for all property that is city owned, which would include the schools, and for all right of way that connects to private property if its being used for the public.

Tags: Education · Norwalk

37 Responses so far “Norwalk: Corda Still Doesn’t Get Why Finance Director Needed”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 MGeake // Dec 18, 2007 at 9:28 am

    Why is a Finance Director needed? Because I, for one, am going to keep my campaign promise (imagine that) and vote against any BoE budget that doesn’t include one.

  • 2 Mike Lyons // Dec 18, 2007 at 10:09 am

    Mike Geake and I are on the same page on this. I would support funding for a BoE Finance Director if it came before the BET. Of course, we can only fund it if the BoE requests it.

  • 3 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 10:28 am

    To say that hiring a finance director would enable Sal to spend time in the schools is to suggest that he has an interest in spending time in the schools, but he doesn’t. I fear that a finance director would be hamstrung by Stu Opdahl, who would second-guess and/or overrule much of what the director does.

    Norwalk needs a finance director that reports to the BOE.

    Here is my New Year’s wish list:
    1. That Corda finds a reason to resign. I don’t care if he finds another job and gets an even higher salary; I just want him out of Norwalk. He will never change.
    2. That Karen Lang retires by the end of the school year. She is a person devoid of personality and human warmth, and she does little other than have others do all of her work. She, like Corda, is arrogant and self-satisfied. I can easily understand why Greenwich was very happy to see her leave.
    3. That Stu Opdahl retires by the ennd of January. He many fiascoes speak for themselves. He is a loose cannon and he cuts too many corners.
    4. That the NFT wins its lawsuit over the give-away-the-city’s-bankroll contract that the BOE gave Corda.
    5. That the people who really care about the Norwalk public schools begin storming the BOE, demanding reform.

  • 4 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    #3 Corrupda needs to lose his job on the spot. It is very simple. Hire someone to hold him accountable. Corrupda is on the hunt for that special applicant for the position if the BoE should request it.

  • 5 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    3. Would you find a reason to resign with a contract extension worth $1 Million dollars to line his pockets with nobody holding him accountable?

  • 6 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    Turfgrrl, Thank you for the time and effort afforded to the readers of this insightful blog. Blog technology is an effective tool for systemic change. The blog represents the realistic difficulties of change about school improvement and is useful to show how difficult transcending the limitations placed on our school system are to our city employees and the public. More personal experiences of the ineffective leadership is vitally important to offer practical advise for more effective leadership to our leaders. Your note taking and perspective of BoE meetings are valued, respected and more importantly heard.

  • 7 Vet Park Junkie // Dec 18, 2007 at 6:26 pm

    Let’s see… Why would we want a Finance Director?

    So that we could get this:
    http://stamfordpublicschools.org/filestorage/68/117/BOEBudget0708.pdf

    Instead of this?
    http://www.norwalkct.org/Budgets/2007approved/Education-p.pdf

  • 8 Vet Park Junkie // Dec 18, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    Why would we want a Finance Director? Perhaps…

    So that we could get this:
    http://www.darienps.org/board_of_ed/2007-2008_boe_budget_calendar.pdf

    Instead of this?
    http://www.norwalkpublicschools.org/show/announcement/949

    Oops! Guess they figured we’d read The Hour instead of trying to find the minutes…

  • 9 My MONEY is the reason // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    Norwalk Public School leaders year after year pay more than double the cost for new technology such as new computers than what the going retail price is for the average joe public.

    Dr. Corda, the waste of taxpayers money is the reason.

  • 10 Think BIGGER // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:30 pm

    The political process in Norwalk is the problem. We are in this together. It’s time to change Norwalk by fighting like hell to open that closed door.

  • 11 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    politicks

  • 12 Aunt Bertha // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    Well, I know that we are living and teaching students in the 21st century. Many schools are doing it with out the technology that surrounding communities provide. I would like to see the training and the hardware for all the teachers in the system. It will make a difference. I am pretty good with technology and when I get stuck I ask a student to help me out. I learn from them and they feel smart teaching me how to upload or fax or import files. It is something that High School seniors should have access to, most colleges are doing online applications. Our elementary staff should be able to have electronic grade books and the possiblities of email conference and posting of report card grades. Those who have computers at the high schools and get the attendance in a daily email save on the copy paper and printer ink…it just makes sense. We need a financial director to allocate funds in the right direction and not in to the pockets of those who do nothing. Ralph is doing his best to get us what we have asked for to do our job. I am with #3 on his wishes for the new year. We need less administration and more tech guys. Sorry I have not said much in awhile it has been a crazy month.

  • 13 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:51 pm

    Our computers are underutilized, but our Crim de la Crim Microsoft rep will solve our woes with Office 2007.

  • 14 Aunt Bertha // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    The problem #13 is that not everyone is on the same page with having the computers in the first place. Microsoft is what it is, which is that it is everywhere. So, what is the alternative that you use instead?

  • 15 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 7:57 pm

    Aunt Bertha,

    Who are the other admin. leaders in technology? And don’t forget the tech girls.

  • 16 Real IT Pro // Dec 18, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Microsoft is not everywhere. As an operating system it requires anti virus software, and constant administration to keep working in an education environment. The district would be better off investing in Unix servers, make every computer a terminal and offer web apps or open office as applications. Put the money into computers in the classroom instead of expensive per seat costs on “Microsoft” branded “solutions.” Unless you are doing video editing, graphics production, or sound editing, there is no reason why a computer should ever be considered old.

  • 17 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    #14 I bet our neighboring districts don’t pay Crim de la Crim prices (double to triple) for new outdated technology like Norwalk. The waste in purchasing is my complaint not the new technology.

    The mistake is the purchasing contracts. Big money and big waste of tax dollars. Aunt Bertha, Norwalk has spent more per classroom in technology than neighboring districts computer per computer yet we have less and then we go to the clueless board to say we have 5 to 7 year old computers. No, we have bought computers at double to triple the price that were outdated when installed into the classroom.

    The neighboring district cry for help would garner my sympathies if the district was responsible with the money but instead they want to hide the line by line items.

    Shame on you Corda.

    Aunt Bertha I feel your pain but the money has and continues to be wasted. I am 100 percent in favor of technology like our neighboring towns but it will never happen with secret accounts.

  • 18 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 8:17 pm

    Crim de la Crim prices is right.

    Apple, Microsoft, Linux, etc. are side items. The headline news story is the waste of money we spent on items each year. I know why Dr. Corda does not want a finance director.

    I worked closely with those in charge of technology since the 90s. I can tell you the issue is how we waste money on technology and not what brand we adopt.

    The cost of Microsoft is peanuts compared to the waste on hardware. Teacher training is important, yet it is a different issue.

  • 19 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 8:26 pm

    Would you pay $1500 on a computer that sells for $650?

  • 20 Aunt Bertha // Dec 18, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    Well then I would check the for some one getting some kind of kick back. If there were a financial director this might be avoided. I have only seen 4 IT people and Ralph…I know of no others.

  • 21 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 10:57 pm

    Does anybody recall the name of the New York organization inwhich we bought overpriced computers? I can’t remember. Out of Brooklyn? I am not completely certain it was NY, but I have Brooklyn in mind for some reason. It was an organization for a “good cause”. My memory escapes me. The only thing I remember is the organization allegedly had children, high school students? if I recall correctly, build the computers to order. The prices were out of this world. Our school system used them exclusicely to support some cause. We were forced by the system to order mediocre computers at premium prices. We didn’t have online anonymous blogs back then but I wish I saved the documents. Oh well.

  • 22 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 11:11 pm

    Per Scholas

  • 23 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 11:39 pm

    Does Norwalk use Per Scholas? If so, can the public get a price list of their products?

  • 24 Anonymous // Dec 18, 2007 at 11:58 pm

    Correct me if I am wrong. It appears that the school administration plops down their plans without giving the BoE any opportunity to review the financial plans. The administrations throw so many demands that the BoE is like a deer in headlights. If this is the case then the BoE needs to demand additional information before proceeding. Demanding 195 new computer might be a good move, but the equity issue would raise the question of needing the documents to confirm the existing inequities. There are too many public dollars in this. There isn’t evidence to support the argument that 195 computers will provide a windfall for the equity. I worry about misuse of funding for schools. Did the BoE roll over and take this at face value?

  • 25 Anonymous // Dec 19, 2007 at 12:09 am

    The situation at West Rocks Middle School, where many teachers have at least tried to remedy race relations and now teachers say it’s really tough on the kids to express their feelings at sexual harassment and bullying meetings by Bruce Morris. Do you mean to tell me he is still working for the school system without a college degree? His position requires an advanced degree! Norwalk could use an education goals panel to report on educational goals compared with reality. You don’t establish a world class education system by lowering the standards. Norwalk does suffer from a sociological dimension of education problem. The Board of Education committee must demand an explanation for Superintendent Corda’s use of taxpayers’ funds to finance his proposals to solve our inequities. I am an optimist that Norwalk’s new board members will stand against misuse if we stand by them. They need information to make the right decisions. We will survive and will continue to do as well as we can do to help our community.

  • 26 Townie // Dec 19, 2007 at 5:58 am

    #21- As reported, Per Scholas was the firm that suuplied so many of the district computers several years ago. Jeff Konspore, a BOE member at the time and now repub party chief, was a VP with Per Scholas at that time.

  • 27 anonymous // Dec 19, 2007 at 8:16 am

    Interesting you would bring up the issue of the lack of degree as having a direct impact on lowering the standards. Yes, we would all agree that Morris’ position requires a degree. But let’s just go back to the Common Council, or for that matter, the mayoral position. These people are making major decisions that directly impact upon our city. Of course, we can’t expect them to have specific credentials unless they are paid for them, but the fact remains that, according to the previous poster, the standards are lowered as in Morris’ case. It’s interesting that one can take the side of devil’s advocate in this argument and support either side fully. Victor?

  • 28 Vet Park Junkie // Dec 19, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    Here is a Per Scholas link. Given the board members and list of contributors, do you think that there was price gouging?

    http://www.perscholas.org/

  • 29 Anonymous // Dec 19, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    I don’t know any teacher or administrator who would would prefer Per Scholas equipment to name brand equipment. I suppose there may be people out there who like it, but I’ve never met any of them.

  • 30 Vet Park Junkie // Dec 19, 2007 at 7:30 pm

    #29, I don’t doubt that at all. There may, however, be some needs where such a machine would fill the bill nicely. Of course, we’ll never know.

    We need a Director of Finance for our schools.

    I’m guessing that the large Stamford school budget gave my earlier posts negative selection.

    I think that my points were lost.

    In the first post, the Stamford school district provides a 600+ page budget right on their website. There is a description of the budget process, multiple types of breakouts, trend lines, budget to actual comparisons, projections, — nice information. Compare that to our 5 page wonder.

    Look at the Darien schedule for BoE Budget review. Multiple stages, agendas, deadlines, site visits, etc. You’d be hard pressed to find such a schedule for Norwalk.

    Those are examples from a half hour web search. Imagine what a professional could bring to the table.

    Are we so numbed by mediocrity that we can envision something better?

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply