YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Amanda Brown Rips Laurel Lindstrom


by turfgrrl


December 14th, 2007 · 77 Comments

According to today’s Advocate (story not online), Democratic council members are puzzled by the latest salvo from Amanda Brown. Apparently, a functioning Democratic caucus is not in the cards as long as Brown decides to publicly bash her fellow Democrats. The controversy started when Brown sent off an email accusing Democrats of causing her to be “harrassed[sic] and bullied”. She said, “I will not be apart[sic] of any “behind close[sic] door deals” that will ultimately increase the public’s distaste for politics and elected officials, nor will I sell out the trust and responsiblity that was entrusted to me by 6,454 voters.”

Someone is pretty full of themselves. Of course who gets on what committee is decided in caucus, and apparently Laurel Lindstrom, citing her long involvement in the ENNA and neighborhood organizations, suggested that a switch between her and Brown would be a better fit. Laurel currently sits on the personnel committee, which typically works on fair labor agreements. Brown in real life is a paralegal.

Lindstrom has a solid track record of working on planning issues in every district, most recently attending a Saturday morning Redevelopment Agency(RDA) charrette in District A hosted by the RDA and Westhab, Brown’s home district. Brown did not attend. Earlier this week Brown spoke against reappointing Ellen Wink to the RDA, citing a lack of minority representation on the 5 person commission, even though a hispanic serves on the commission. Brown did not vote to appoint Wink.

Tags: Norwalk

77 Responses so far “Norwalk: Amanda Brown Rips Laurel Lindstrom”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 10:19 am

    amanda brown is a joke. she voted against six minority candidates last week and complained about lack of diversity. she now goes after laurel lindstrom, who in one month does more that amanda brown has done in her lifetime for the city of norwalk.the people of the city know and like laurel lindstrom, and many of us will stand up for her against mrs. brown, who is drunk with her power. she owes laurel a public apology for her bad actions. someone should also give her a dictionary so she can spell a word properly.

  • 2 # 1 of the Miserable 25 // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:04 am

    If the Democrats that are actually stealth Republicans, and the Republican Old Boy political buddy gang can give Laurel a chance and not treat her as the Step Child who had the nerve to get the most votes in her district than any of the old guard, she can become one of the best things that ever happened to this city. I would guess that is why she will be shunned until this closed club recognizes that she can be a big vote getter in any office she decides to run for. This is why they will try to beat her down. What they do not recognize is that she can be quite the in fighter and rally the troops if she sees fit.

  • 3 Andrew // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:25 am

    The Democrat caucus just keeps splitting apart. Pretty soon there will be 3 differenct factions on that caucus.

  • 4 anon for now // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:25 am

    Laurel scares them because she actually wants to get things done instead of gladhand and posture.

  • 5 amen // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:28 am

    #1 of the Miserable, you have the right idea, but the wrong, story. Laurel bested the likes of Kevin Poruban in her district, who is the one giving advice to Amanda Brown. Kevin would never be considered a stealth Republican, he’s just a bad Democrat.

  • 6 just wondering // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:30 am

    Why is Amanda Brown not being a team player? She keeps complaining that she doesn’t like anything, but she never offers a better solution?

  • 7 Anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:35 am

    Looks like Bill Krummel is getting closer to what he wants: a Council that mirrors Congress; i.e. a Dem caucus that’s ripping itself apart. Is Laurel the local version of Nancy Pelosi?

  • 8 Deep Throat // Dec 14, 2007 at 11:48 am

    Laurel is a great addition to the council. For any Democrat to publicly dismiss her qualifications is crazy. Amanda Brown should be ashamed of herself. I hope the rest of the council Democrats recognize and support Laurel’s request. It makes sense for the city of Norwalk. Amanda Brown may have a promising future, but she needs to learn that experience and respect are earned, and are not an entitlement.

  • 9 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 12:15 pm

    Laurel Lindstrom is showing what she is about: Laurel Lindstrom. Why is she entitled to the spot ? For that matter, neither is Mrs. Brown, who is stumbling drunk with her new found supposed power. Typical self serving democrats.

  • 10 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    #5 “Kevin Poruban…who is the one giving advice to Amanda Brown”. Do you have evidence of this or is this just Nick?

  • 11 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    Amanda Brown has no creds to be on the council. Laurel Lindstrom should get her spot on that committee and take her chair spot on the lawmaking committee. Laurel desevres it more than Mrs. Brown.

  • 12 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Laurel Lindstrom is one of the best democrats in the city. Why doesn’t her party support her more than Amanda Brown ? They shouldn’t be picking favorites.

  • 13 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    Why doesn’t Amanda have the nerve to come on the site and explain herself and why she feels she is better than Laurel Lindstrom ?

  • 14 Who Cares // Dec 14, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    Doesn’t the full council vote on these things anyways? Either of these people are fine to be on the committe. Laurel does have more experience and I hope that Amanda works with her instead of giving TG yet another issue to use against Dems.

  • 15 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Number 14, why go after TG ? Miss Brown has herself to blame for her own plain stupid acts. She called for diversity but votes against six minority appointments. Now she picks a fight against Laurel Lindstrom, who is a fellow democratwho has done nothin but campaign for Amanda and support Amanda and go to Amanda’s political fundraisers to help her. Amanda Brown is picking her own political fights while intoxacated on power against someone who has done nothin but support Amanda Brown. It looks like someone owes someone a public apology.

  • 16 Anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    I guess with all the talk about the council has anyone time to run the city?

    This must make Dick a real happy person bout now, a council who’s issues does not pretain to running a city.

    merry xmas Dick looks like the budget, taxes, sewage treatment plant, shellfish commisiion ,Harbor commission, more police and fire and quality of life is in the crapper until next year.

    what a way to run a city.

    looks like 6,454 residents got what they voted for more chaos on east ave.

    they use to say meter maids eat their young sounds like that may apply to some of our elected officials.

  • 17 number one of the suckered 6454 // Dec 14, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    It looks like 6,454 got suckered into voting for an idiot. As one of the suckered 6454 I want to take my vote back and give it to someone else.

  • 18 Anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:14 pm

    to number one of the suckered 6454 , my hats off to you to admit to a mistake, now what about the 6453? suppose lead by example is not in Norwalks fiber.

  • 19 Anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    to #14 like TG needs to find something, we do it to ourselves by backing voting and relying on outdated thought. At least we didn’t do that bad with the others Mike and Bill in the morning was a good combo.

  • 20 Anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    Amanda Brown is an unguided missle. I wouldn’t be surprised if she plays the race card in this controversy and self-destructs.

  • 21 number 3241 of the suckered 6454 // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    I feel suckered too by voting for that idiot Amanda Brown and her scheming ways. She is a bad person and should not have voted against all the good qualified minority candidates that were put up for jobs in the city.

  • 22 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    maybe her fellow church member bruce morris is giving her advice on how not to handle a situation. she voted against every minority canidate put up, so how can she play the race card ? I think she just plain not smart.

  • 23 disgusted non-partisan voter // Dec 14, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    I think that it is unfair to characterize her as “playing the race card”. She is rightfully concerned that there will be no African Americans on an important committee if she is “taken off”.

    And this is not about who is or is not qualified. This is about one council member seeking to take a spot away from another party member after the fact and with no real justification. Brown has done nothing to prove herself unworthy of the appointment THAT SHE ALREADY HAS. Should Laurel be able to simply state that it should be taken away from Amanda and given to Laurel because she thinks she could do a better job? Categorically no.

  • 24 one of the miserable 6454 // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    Amanda Brown is showing the 6454 why we should not have voted for her. I voted for her and LAurel, but Amanda is no Laurel Lindstrom who is a true community leader.

  • 25 I Can Count // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    Excuse me, last I looked, the chair of that committee is Phylis Bolden, who is a black woman. Are you saying that Brown is the only black woman that counts on that commission? And if you want to go by qualifications, what has Brown done for Norwalk? Nothing. Laurel has been working on behalf of all of Norwalk for years. She shouldn’t have been left off planning in the first place. Kudos to Fred actually trying to help instead of blindly listening to the Republicans. Try arguing with some facts instead of saying ridiculous statements “disgusted non partisan voter.”

  • 26 TooGreenToLead // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    If Laurel knew what she was doing (politically) she would have suggested this switch to Amanda. Then, if they had agreement, they could have proposed it to the council leadership. There are plenty of mistakes to go around here. Neither Laurel nor Amanda seem to be getting good advice. This is an embarrassing episode that exposes what is wrong with the Democratic “team”. They are too green to lead.

  • 27 anonymous // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    Amanda Brown cannot hold a candle to Rev. Phyllis Bolden, who is a true leader and someone with real accomplishments. Mrs. Brown has a long way to go to even be mentioned in the same sentence as Rev. Bolden. Amanda Brown should hold her tongue and listen instead of mouthing off like someone drunk with power.

  • 28 Andrew // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    I think that if Rev. Bolden had been Majority Leader, these issues would have been brought up quietly, and solved quickly.

  • 29 Ark // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    Why do the many anon Dems keep blaming the R’s for this fight. This is purely Laurel’s faultand the R’s Mayor and most Dems have nothing to do with it. Laurel did not fight to get on Planning at the past meeting and she now suddenly wants to ice out a fellow Krummel Dem who asked for and was voted on to that committee by a wide council majority. Amanda has a right to be upset but is probably over playing her hand with this big public letter. Looks like a purely in Dem party cat fight and neither Amanda nor Laurel lined up with the Bondi Dems; so this is another Krummel team melt down. He really knows how to run a caucus! They made him majority leader instead of Rev Bolden and now this is what we get.

    Can we please just get back to keeping taxes in line, paving roads, getting a new trash contract and fixing the education mess.

  • 30 Real Problem // Dec 14, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    This is not a cat fat. This is about people in the Democratic party trying to push around blacks. There are extremely racist people in Democratic leadership.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply