YourCT.com header image 2

Westchester’s Spano Sees Regional Future


by turfgrrl


December 6th, 2007 · 6 Comments

I have always thought that Fairfield county has more in common with Westchester county than the rest of Connecticut. Our economies are intertwined, connected by the proximity to NYC, but also generating its own set of issues. With the combined populations of nearly 2 million, the the combined counties rivals cities like Cleveland. Regional thinking within Connecticut is practically unheard of, and between counties in different states, certainly a new way of thinking. But it should happen.

The tax revenue that gets sucked up into NY and CT state governments could better be spent reinvesting in infrastructure that would improve the quality of life for all residents. State legislators don’t think that way, which is a shame. But Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano does, from The Hour:

Spano urges unity between Fairfield, Westchester

By CHRIS BOSAK
Hour Staff Writer

“We have an opportunity here — here — with the talent, the economy, the energy and the people here to make something different that can be a model for the rest of the country,” Spano said. “We should be addressing this together because the things that are happening will require it.”

Spano was the keynote speaker at a Business Council of Fairfield County member luncheon held Wednesday at Westin Hotel in Stamford. It was the first time the top government executive from Westchester County had addressed the Business County.

“There’s synergy between Westchester and Fairfield counties,” he said. “The things we have together we can strengthen and make more viable in the 21st century.”
The counties have approximately the same population (just more than 900,000), number of businesses and number of housing units. They also share a unique geographic proximity to New York City.

“Look at the numbers, you can see it,” Spano said. “We’re the same.”

Fairfield and Westchester also have similar problems, such as transportation, housing, education and competing in an increasingly global economy.

Spano took a unique view on addressing the problems, such as not building new roads and stressing creativity over math and science in our classrooms.

“The biggest asset we (both counties) have is quality of life. If we expand our roads to eight lanes and expand our airports to look like LaGuardia, what does that do to our quality of life,” Spano said. “If you build a road, what happens? It fills up with cars. Pretty soon we’ll have all roads and no houses. This can’t be solved in one state.

“In the 21st century, the key to everything is creativity,” he added, “not math or science, but creativity.”

Spano started his talk with high praise for Joe Carbone of Bridgeport-based The WorkPlace, which has taken the lead with the WIRED initiative. Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Labor to address the challenges of global competition by preparing America’s workforce for high-skilled, high-wage job opportunities.

The Southwestern Connecticut region was competitively selected to receive one of 39 WIRED grants nationwide. The region includes Westchester and Putnam counties.

Tags: Transportation

6 Responses so far “Westchester’s Spano Sees Regional Future”



  • 1 MGeake // Dec 6, 2007 at 10:49 am

    Part of the problem is that in Connecticut, counties are little more than mythical lines on a map. New York has county governments looking out for county issues. Connecticut has miriad cities and towns each looking out for their parochial concerns only; there is little true cooperation, so Fairfield County gets table scraps from Hartford.

    I hesitate suggesting yet another layer of government, but that may be just what the doctor ordered.

  • 2 anon // Dec 6, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Having the SWRPA towns secede from the state is a better option. And I’m not kidding!

  • 3 former SWRPA delegate // Dec 6, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    Really nice words from Mr. Spano, and an important message. Talk is cheap though, wonder why he appeared to have no walk to support the talk.

  • 4 Innominate // Dec 6, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    To Mr. Geakes point, while I feel that another layer of government to unify synergies is understandable, it might not get us where we want to go completely. Instead, it would be better in the near-term to link up non-profits, community organizations and other similar entities and find efficiencies along those lines. Mass transit is also another important place to find ways to share the burden of massive infrastructure costs to the taxpayers in both states.

  • 5 MGeake // Dec 6, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    “it might not get us where we want to go completely”

    The fundamental problem is who is “we”. Spano already has a county government; we have a bunch of towns that are more likely to compete than cooperate.

  • 6 Chris MC // Dec 6, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    Mike is correctly pointing out that this is a structural issue, and there is still no obvious solution.

    The Westchester County Executive is a position with real power - to duplicate it here would require the abdication of control over a large set of services by the local communities of each county, and that means loss of political power.

    This is the most fundamental political issue in this State, defining what can reasonably be considered in terms of policy, from taxes to infrastructure to education to economic competitiveness.

Leave a Reply