YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: The Greening of Oyster Shell Park


by turfgrrl


December 5th, 2007 · 23 Comments

Oyster Shell Park might be able to qualify for grant money to transform into one of the first LEED certified parks in the country. That would be a cool thing for Norwalk. I like walking through the park, although in the late summer you almost need a machete to hack through the plants taking over the pathways. From Tim Stelloh’s Advocate article:

New rules for “green” parks could transform Oyster Shell - a former city dump on the Norwalk River - into one of the first LEED-certified parks in the country, said Susan Sweitzer, a senior project manager with the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency.

The first round of standards for that certification - which was created by the U.S. Green Building Council to rate a building’s environmental impact - were issued last month for parks, plazas, zoos and other open spaces by the Sustainable Sites Initiative, a joint project between the American Society of Landscape Architects, the Ladybird Johnson Wildflower Center and the United States Botanic Garden.

Additional standards will be developed in coming years, and a rating system will be incorporated into the green building council’s “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design,” or LEED, certification system, according to the sustainable sites report released last month.

“Like buildings, landscapes can conserve resources or degrade and waste them,” the report states.

“However, landscapes are unique in that they also have the additional capacity to enhance and regenerate natural resources,” the report adds.

For Oyster Shell Park, that means using photovoltaic cells and wind to generate power, according to Tom Tavella, a landscape architect and a consultant working with city redevelopment officials on the park.

It also means filtering pollutants from stormwater emptying into Long Island Sound; managing construction waste and using recycled materials for building and planting; reusing water; and weeding out invasive plant species.

Conventional park practices, such as using chemicals on vegetation or using highly reflective pavement, which increases air temperatures, will be avoided.

source: Advocate, Oyster Shell Park could gain new luster under plan, By Tim Stelloh, December 5 2007

Tags: Norwalk

23 Responses so far “Norwalk: The Greening of Oyster Shell Park”



  • 1 MGeake // Dec 5, 2007 at 8:07 am

    The possibility of generating electricity from the park definitely intrigues me. Since the park lies in the Second Taxing District, I would hope the SNEW be used as a resource (and perhaps even the operator of any facility built).

  • 2 Concerned Citizen // Dec 5, 2007 at 9:32 am

    Very nice. Another Pie in the sky idea but no idea of resulting problems. Where are the buses that bring tourists to see the BEAUTIFUL MASTERPIECE PARK, going to park????????

    Is the Maritime Center and this administration going to let them continue to park in Veterans Memorial park, until that watershed is a monoxide contaminated, gas and oil contaminated disaster site???

    Big ideas need big planners. Planners with the foresight to see past the next 30 days. Is there going to be a parking area in this Sacred Cow (Oyster shell park) or will the Maritime Center keep parking its buses until they line Washington Street? It is time someone on the council re examine the reason that they let buses continue to park and run their engines all day to keep them cool in the summer and warm in the winter and where parents bring and send their children thinking that they will be safe from traffic and pollution. OH! I forgot no one gives a damn about the residents of this city, only the tourists. As usual the tourists get the gold while the residents get the shaft. Less than 23 months to the next election.

  • 3 anonymous // Dec 5, 2007 at 10:26 am

    yes, concerned, let’s just not do anything to Oyster Shell Park and leave it a capped dump site. Let’s ban people from Vets park because they might pollute as well. Only 23 more months until the next display of voter apathy in Norwalk!

  • 4 Anonymous // Dec 5, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    great article, where are the facts from the EPA? This is the kind of reporting I expect from our local reporters, headlines less the facts.

    Can we see a link to the last thread we had on the old landfill containing toxins from xmas pasts.

  • 5 Concerned Citizen // Dec 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Shall we then just say “Screw it” do what the hell you want anywhere. I am not sure it was apathy or just a feeling that the politicians are going to do what they want so don’t waste your time. Hell! maybe a playground on the Guard All Chemical property. Or the EX Gault site.

    Yeah that’s the ticket don’t think just do. Yeah that’s it don’t worry if it feels good do it.

    That’s the ticket

    Leave it vacant what a stupid answer. What difference does it make if you walk across a mine field in boots or soft slippers, it is still dumb.

  • 6 Anonymous // Dec 5, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    http://www.yourct.com/new/2007/07/08/norwalk-oyster-shell-park-development-moves-along/

    planning or lack of is the question

  • 7 The last straw // Dec 5, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    It appears that anonymous seems to think that what you don’t know wont hurt you.

    He thinks that kids that play in some locations and then start to glow in the dark, is a big joke.

    What city position do you hold?

  • 8 Sacred Cow // Dec 5, 2007 at 1:08 pm

    Why does it seem that someone or a very few in this city are determined to turn one of it’s parks back into a CITY DUMP?

  • 9 Anonymous // Dec 5, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    http://www.yourct.com/new/2007/08/12/norwalk-oyster-shell-park-overtons-folly/

    how could a reporter forget what he wrote in August?

    nice try Advocate go back to childrens books.

  • 10 parks are for people // Dec 5, 2007 at 10:26 pm

    The anti-urban misanthropes are out in force again. Whenever Norwalk tries to join the urban renaissance that is happening across the country, our local naysayers show up to whine about it.
    Downtown Norwalk deserves better than empty streets, decaying neighborhoods, and empty parks, but a few stuck-at-home sociopaths who frequent this blog seem to be stuck in the outmoded and sad suburban hell that drained the lifeblood out of this city and most others in the last century. Wake up folks! We live in a post-industrialized economy now, and reclamation of decayed downtowns and former industrial sites as an answer to solving the sick sprawl that is devouring our beautiful countryside is the way the world is going. I say, go Norwalk Redevelopment! It takes vision to get us out of this car-oriented hellhole, and 50 years of waiting for something
    to happen in this town is now coming to a long-overdue end. Historic preservation and economic development are mutually beneficial, as well as vibrant urban parks and public spaces. There are plenty of people looking forward to Oyster Shell Park’s improvement.

  • 11 too many naysayers // Dec 5, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    Reading all the negativity here is a real downer. Can’t people do anything positive in this town?

  • 12 parks are for people // Dec 5, 2007 at 11:01 pm

    The whiners usually don’t have any solutions, only complaints. Imagine a country built on that!
    There are now enough forward-thinking people in this town to demand action, and the psuedo-activist Chicken Littles who see toxic contamination on every blade of grass and behind every corner ought to just end their self-induced pain and move up to northern Canada, and let Norwalk move forward and become the city it deserves to be. Vibrant, fun, affordable, socially and economically integrated, walkable, cultured, and full of great public spaces that enhance the quality of life of everyone. It is happening everywhere else, and Norwalk deserves it too. Even Bridgeport is turning around-a city with far greater problems than Norwalk.

  • 13 Shorefrontgroupie // Dec 6, 2007 at 12:23 am

    your right Bridgeport is moving ahead, but solutions cost money.

  • 14 Anonymous // Dec 6, 2007 at 6:12 am

    yes they could call it a city now that we have 8,000 or so illegals that would be a positive thought.

  • 15 congrats all around // Dec 6, 2007 at 8:46 am

    Congratulations to Norwalk Redevelopment for this innovative plan. Congrats to Tim Stelloh for finally writing an article about the positive direction Norwalk is heading in, and the Advocate for publishing it. Congrats to all the hard-working people in our local government who want what’s best for Norwalk. No congrats to the 3 or 4 miserable do-nothings who fill this blog with their complaints about anything and everything, and never offer solutions and who probably never roll up their sleeves and jump in to make the city better.

  • 16 Anonymous // Dec 6, 2007 at 9:19 am

    Re #4 parks are for people

    aka “anon.”

  • 17 Stick your head in the sand // Dec 6, 2007 at 9:25 am

    Re poster 5 “parks are for people”

    Sounds like “anon” How ya doin?

    Since the new site started it seems that besides me there are only about 3 people posting here, and they are using several alias names each.

  • 18 CIA // Dec 6, 2007 at 9:28 am

    My god, Anonymous, it is true, “Great minds DO think alike.”

  • 19 # 1 of the Miserable 25 // Dec 6, 2007 at 9:41 am

    To breath some life back into this blog, I would like to re-start the only gang that did not believe everything that they were fed by our politicians and their lackeys. “The Miserable 25 were disliked by many politicians and their ilk, because we told it like it is, not like they wanted it to be told. The truth hurts was our goal, and it was “truth” that aggravated a lot of those that hated to see Norwalk become transparent in it’s workings. Transparency stood for honesty and truth and a lot of people did not like their stones turned over and the sun shine in on their shenanigans, especially when it was being subsidized by TAXPAYERS MONEY. If you are interested pick a number between 2-25 and make your voice heard again if you dare.

  • 20 anon for now // Dec 6, 2007 at 10:20 am

    Once it became the teacher’s lounge at West Rocks, the blog stopped being interesting. It was more like endless group therapy…and who wants to sit through that?

  • 21 Anonymous // Dec 7, 2007 at 10:19 am

    #19, being lectured about honesty and transparency by someone who won’t reveal their identity is funny. Criticism is easy. Action is harder. Rather than paint all politicians as horrible crooked evil-mongers, why don’t you take a look at yourself first. Civic duty is a virtue, and when you look at how hard it is for local politicians to sacrifice their time, and sometimes their reputation, for little or no pay, while complainers like you hurl the insults like you’re at a carnival dunking booth, I think the real heroes are the hard-working politicians, and not the do-nothing “watchdogs” who never contribute anything except what are often hysterical and unfair rants.
    Run for office, then see how it feels. Most of the “Miserable 25″ can dish it out, but wouldn’t be able to take it.

  • 22 Anonymous // Dec 8, 2007 at 1:29 am

    Most of the “Miserable 25? can dish it out, but wouldn’t be able to take it.

    your good, share some more with us,please.

    I think the real heroes are the hard-working politicians,

    I thought it was our police, fire and dispatchers,oh my Houston we have a problem!

  • 23 Anonymous // Dec 8, 2007 at 1:30 am

    sorry showed a error page but did not send 3 times please remove additional comments.

Leave a Reply