YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Hempstead Outlines Council Priorities


by turfgrrl


November 18th, 2007 · 65 Comments

The official swearing in of the Common Council is on Tuesday but Doug Hempstead is out of the gates early with a priority list for members to focus on.

From the Hour:

The Republican representative of District D said he supports an improved demolition delay ordinance, finishing the master plan and also a stronger focus on infrastructure issues.

“We have some serious unfinished business and hard economic decisions which we should immediately take up,” Hempstead said. “I am asking all members of the new Common Council to pull together and address the unfinished business of the past council. We need to work together and establish and act on our priorities in the first 120 days of this term.”

Hempstead believes “the most important issue facing Norwalk involves infrastructure repair, upgrades and maintenance.”

“We need to establish early the priorities of our infrastructure improvements, which includes paving additional roads, drainage and flooding issues,” he said. “It is important that we establish early what needs can be responsibly addressed in this budget cycle, and the costs associated with them, prior to establishing a budget cap.”

Hempstead said the council should also “finish its changes and comments on the Master Plan and return it to the Planning Commission for further action.”

The Master Plan of Conservation and Development is the source of guidelines used by other departments and agencies with the city to make policy and regulatory decisions as it affects land use.

Hempstead said he and Democratic Councilman William Krummel, District E, had already started presenting a list of recommendations to the planning committee for review.

These recommendations include that the council should make the necessary revisions to the proposed 180 demolition delay ordinance and include the recommendations put forth by Mayor Richard A. Moccia and also include a funding source and guidelines for establishing a registry of historical properties that should be the only properties subjected to this ordinance.

“There are existing ambiguities about the process of identifying properties and there is no mechanism to incentivize property owners to preserve historical properties,” Hempstead said. “This is a good debate and discussion to have. The Council needs to provide the funding for an updated historical building inventory, while also providing incentives for property owners to preserve and improve buildings.”

Hempstead also believes the next two years will be extremely challenging from a budget perspective.

“The Council should hit the ground full speed in addressing the budget,” he said. “Our citizens are reeling from huge increases in fuel and food and mortgage costs. The citizenry and the city are facing the same challenges in rising costs, this means the city has to be very prudent with its spending. We must choose wisely, and separate the “have to-s” from “the want to-s.”

A focus in infrastructure and how we can pay for it is the biggest issue facing the council this year. The budget season has started within the departments, and committees will have to work quickly to get a handle on what was spent, what worked and what didn’t work from the previous year.

The Republicans have only 2 new council members to bring up to speed, although both have served on the council previously, so its more of an issue focus. The Democrats have 4 new council members to bring up to speed, none having previous council experience.

The planning committee likely has the most outstanding big issues to deal with. The master plan should be a priority.

It will be interesting to see how the Demo Delay Ordinance gets tweaked. There’s a misconception by many that a 50 year benchmark would cause every building to be subjected to a delay. That’s not the case. If Hempstead is promoting the idea that the city should maintain a list of historic properties that would be the properties that would trigger a delay ordinance, that is a very good thing. There were many silly arguments made by the Republicans when they voted against the ordinance. With the election past everyone, now is indeed the time for smart arguments and discussion. Let’s hope that this council can start off working together.

source: The Hour, Hempstead calls for council to focus on Norwalk issues, by James Walker, November 18, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

65 Responses so far “Norwalk: Hempstead Outlines Council Priorities”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 9:46 am

    What a stupid headline in the Hour “Hempstead calls for council to focus on Norwalk Issues”…WOW - that’s great that he isn’t urging focus on Bridgeport or Stamford issues! And then there is Reilly’s nasty little column - like it would kill him to have said something nice about the Briggs’ public service - instead an italicized blurb about them “losing big”. What a petty little man…

  • 2 anon // Nov 18, 2007 at 9:56 am

    Number 1 - Just to clarify, The Hour is specifically entitled The Sunday Hour and not The “Norwalk” Hour. This newspaper is read by Norwalk and its surrounding towns. Therefore, it follows that the article be specific for those readers who live outside of Norwalk.

  • 3 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 10:05 am

    just buy the Advocate and watch the new team take the news over in Norwalk. Kick ass Advocate its your turn to shine.

  • 4 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Number 2 - oh please…like anyone outside of Norwalk reads the Hour. “Hempstead urges focus on Norwalk Issues” - it’s great that Hempstead is forcused on Norwalk. duh.

  • 5 enough already! // Nov 18, 2007 at 10:54 am

    What petty little comments you stoop to. You have all been bitching about leadership and their ability to move Norwalk forward and when someone steps up to the plate and addresses the issues that you want addressed, you still bitch. You can’t have it both ways folks. Two of our incumbents are working together to make things happen and all you do is xomplain. I read the same article you did and came away from it with hope. Mr. Hempstead is one of the most highly respected gentleman I know and one of the most dedicated to the city of Norwalk. The incumbents on the council have the advantage of moving things forward in the right direction. Flooding, infrastructure, preservation, budget, maintenance etc. isn’t this what we have all been writing about? So why the petty comments. Look at the incumbents, Hempstead, McQuaid, Straniti sometimes even Kydes as well as Krummel, Bolden, Hilliard, Sutton and sometimes even Bondi have all been a huge benefit to Norwalk and they know the ins and outs of what needs to be done. Hopefully they will work across party lines for the best interest of Norwalk and it seems to me as if they are making strides to do just that. So to take what can be a very productive two years and turn it into petty trash talk is counter productive to the needs of Norwalk. Kudo’s to Mr. Hempstead for addressing the issues early on that face us each and every day and Hopefully the BOE will follow suit. By the way, people in surrounding towns are huge readers of the Hour and the advocate and they do take notice of what Norwalk is doing. So maybe instead of petty remarks we start woeking with our council people instead of working against them.

  • 6 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Hey enough! Who’s complaining about Hempstead or the Council - it is our pitiful excuse for a local paper that is the issue. I admire Hempstead for trying to seize the leadership initiative and define the first “120 days” agenda, even if he is in the minority party - it is a bold move - it is a good thing for him that Reilly is so anti-democrat that he colludes with the republicans on newspaper coverage…

  • 7 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:23 am

    yeah, if a Democrat issued the same statements as Hempstead, the Hour would publish headlines about Galen Wells trying to “fix” the agenda for the council and everyone on the blog would blame make nasty remarks and somehow blame it on Knopp!

  • 8 enough already! // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:27 am

    I was referring to the following statement, which is really petty. “Hempstead calls for council to focus on Norwalk Issues”…WOW - that’s great that he isn’t urging focus on Bridgeport or Stamford issues!
    If you have ever worked with Mr. Hempstead on a professional basis or on issues concerning the city you would know where his allegiance lies. If the Council were smart they would elect Hempstead or McQuaid as their president but that’s not likely to happen so they will continue to work diligently for the best interest of the city and we should work with them.

  • 9 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:28 am

    So what do the Democratic incumbents plan to do? They have no agenda because they don’t pay attention to what goes on in Norwalk. Voters will have a big case of buyer remorse soon enough.

  • 10 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Kudos to Hempstead for showing leadership. Let’s all support the council in tackling these issues.

  • 11 demsknow // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:34 am

    #7-As most democrats will agree, Galen Wells is a train wreck waiting to happen. She is a hindrance to the Democratic Party and is a nasty person who cares nothing about those she throws to the wolves.
    Reilly is an equal opportunity trasher of both parties. Whatever is said about Galen Wells is well earned by her manipulative backhanded way of systematically destroying the local Democratic Party. For you to say differently just leads the rest of us to believe 1. You are totally niece, 2. You are one of her puppy dogs, 3.what world are you living in?

  • 12 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:42 am

    #7. if the Democrats issued that statement they would have never mentioned their Republican counterpart nor given them any credit. Unlike Mr. Hempstead who remarked that he and Democratic Councilman William Krummel, District E, had already started presenting a list of recommendations to the planning committee for review. It would have been a me, me, me thing orchestraed by Galen Wells because she hopes that the Democratic council willwork against anything the mayor does.

  • 13 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:55 am

    That’s not true #12. Mike Coffey and Bill Krummel always mentioned Republicans in their speeches.

  • 14 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 11:59 am

    The new council has not yet been sworn in and already Galen is talking total control. When is her chairmanship up? It can’t be too soon for the rest of us. Do you honestly believe with this new council it will be happy happy we’re one big happy family. Today the dems are meeting at a brunch and the Queen will be making her laws know. Mess with me and you’re out like Coffey and Grant.

  • 15 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    nothing like a little righteous indignation from republicans…

  • 16 CuttingOffYourNose... // Nov 18, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    Coffey and Grant may have left (on their own terms) but the party and the town were the losers.

    The Dems need a united party - a leader who is not fighting and dictating - someone who does not bully and cause divisions but seeks ways to talk out differences. I can think of several who could calm the waters and create a peaceful, united party.
    Wells wants out but we must be careful who comes in next. Bullies and dividers need not apply!

  • 17 anon // Nov 18, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    Oh, please 15.

    Stop being counterproductive. Your comment reeks of sour grapes or just plain stupidity.

  • 18 anon // Nov 18, 2007 at 12:41 pm

    Bravo, 16!

  • 19 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 1:24 pm

    #16. They left because of undue influence by their own party because they chose to work for the city and not the party. Much can be said about undue influence in political parties. Seems the city is the loser. We lost 3 good council people from either coersion or promises from political parties.

  • 20 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    The inside track says that Galen Wells, Bruce Morris and Bob Burgeess are pushing for Bill “Colonial Village is a Ghetto” Krummel to run for council president. That the democrats could push for a person who says such things is a slap at democratic core principals, such as racism will not be tolerated at any cost. It is something that Morris, Wells, and Burgess would push such an agenda of intolerance and insensitivity. What else have we been accustomed to expect from these morally corrupt individuals.

  • 21 anon // Nov 18, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    #20 If it’s not a ghetto, what would you call it?

  • 22 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    #21-Its the lack of oversight by the housing authority that makes it what it is. They don’t care how many people they pack into one area as long as they don’t overflow into the community. How do you expect it to be a nice place if no-one does anything other than add more units to an already problem area.

  • 23 Anon432 // Nov 18, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    That is a major problem. Over crowded areas where there are many renters or people who do not take care of the properties. I have seen this area go from bad to worse in the past thirty years. It is too bad and many people do not remember how green and beautiful it once was.

  • 24 anon // Nov 18, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    The question is: what other term should Bill have used to describe Colonial Village?

  • 25 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    Why would someone fixate on Bill Krummel’s choice of words long ago? Bill has been a true friend to the minority communities in Norwalk. He cares about working class people in this city and civil rights. The cabal that that is pushing for Fred Bondi should look deep within themselves and ask themselves who is a healer and not a divider?

  • 26 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    If someone cared so much about civil rights they would not use the term “ghetto”, period. The use of such a term is just plain morally wrong. Kelly Straniti should be the council president. She would do a much better job.

  • 27 Anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    The Norwalk dems have collected the most racist people in town. Bruce Morris, Galen Wells, Fred Bondi, Walter Briggs and Kevin Poruban. If you are Hispanic and a Democrat you will be sent to the back of the bus.

  • 28 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    Seems like Fred can work with both Democrats and Republicans. I would think you would want someone like him that can mediate and compromise so something can get done.

  • 29 anonymous // Nov 18, 2007 at 4:10 pm

    Fred Bondi versu Bill “Ghetto” Krummell. It is a no brainer. Bondi is way better. Top democratic vote getter, even with the corrupt democratic party rusting machine against him. He will do a much better job than the wily octogenarian.

  • 30 No Thanks // Nov 18, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    Fred Bondi wants to sell our parks to his cronies. If there’s a buck to be made he’s for it. Anyone else please. Why not a real Republican?

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply