YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: I-95 Bridge A Cause For Harbor Contamination


by turfgrrl


November 9th, 2007 · 29 Comments

Sorting through the Hour’s article this morning, it appears rather straightforward. The Norwalk Harbor is contaminated because unfiltered sotrm drains dump directly into the harbor. The state DOT once again is indifferent to Norwalk’s requests.
pa280013.JPG

Photo Credit: Another One of the Miserable 25

As the city presses forward with an innovative storm-drain filter program, which public works officials estimate has kept 1,200 gallons of oil from entering Long Island Sound — and as Conservation and Zoning commissioners work to ensure that contaminants from development projects do not seep into groundwater — nothing is being done to protect Norwalk Harbor from I-95.

Harbor commissioners became acutely aware of bridge runoff and its costs during Phase One of the Norwalk Harbor dredging project. That work, which wrapped up in 2006 and cost at least $4.5 million, entailed removing 150,000 cubic yards of sediment from the upper harbor — the area between the Stroffolino Bridge and the Wall Street Bridge at the Head of the Harbor.

“One of the major problems that we have had this past dredging effort, was a swath of territory in the harbor, 1,400 feet and 1,000 feet, fore and aft, of the I-95 bridge,” Pinto said. “The problem that was cited by the (state Department of Environmental Protection) was that we had a very high level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons … combustion products.”
dscf0879.JPG

Photo Credit: One of the Miserable 25

Such hydrocarbons come from vehicle emissions, tires, and smoke and soot from furnaces. They bind onto dust and dirt, which are picked up by rainwater and strewn across roadways, Pinto said.

According to Pinto, the goals of the harbor commission and the state Department of Transportation aren’t necessarily in concert. Harbor commissioners are concerned with protecting the harbor. The transportation department is concerned with keeping I-95 safe. That means keeping the highway free of water, and the dozens of unfiltered drains along the Yankee Doodle Bridge generally do that job just fine.

Pinto explored the relationship between I-95 runoff, water quality and dredging in the Harbor Management Commission’s spring 2007 newsletter. Geoffrey Steadman, commission planning consultant, continued on the theme in the fall 2007 newsletter.

According to Steadman, the Yankee Doodle Bridge carries 130,000 cars and trucks each day. Sixty-five feet beneath the bridge is “another type of highway — one that predates the turnpike by over a century.” And that earlier highway, Norwalk River and Harbor, require maintenance dredging.

Before Phase One of the latest dredging project began, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers found river sediment under the I-95 bridge “so contaminated with highway pollutants that it could not be dredged and safely disposed of in Long Island Sound,” Steadman wrote.

“As a result, the city had to pay over $200,000 for its share of the cost to bury the contaminated material in (Confined Aquatic Disposal) cells excavated by the Corps in the river bottom,” Steadman continued.

dscf0878.JPG

Photo Credit: One of the Miserable 25

Looks like its time to call Congressman Chris Shays, Senator Chris Dodd and Senator Joe Lieberman and get some federal funds to fix the storm drains. Maybe Senator Charles Schumer would be interested in this too.
source: The Hour, Bridge runoff concerns harbor commissioners, by Amanda Pinto, November 9, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk · Transportation

29 Responses so far “Norwalk: I-95 Bridge A Cause For Harbor Contamination”



  • 1 anonymous // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:24 am

    I don’t know about your conclusion about Federal Funds - they are already trying to get $8M (which Bush has promised to cut in half) for the dredging project. Rell tried to force cuts in the spending bill by veto that had allocations for Norwalk projects but instead ended up costing taxpayers an extra $2M.

    Isn’t it great that we have all these republicans to count on in office?

  • 2 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:40 am

    without writing a novel

    Sorting through the Hour’s article this morning, it appears rather straightforward. The Norwalk Harbor is contaminated because unfiltered sotrm drains dump directly into the harbor. The state DOT once again is indifferent to Norwalk’s requests

    It part of the problem but not the whole problem.

    We have runnoff from Oyster park, the sewgae treatment plant and its hard to say without the DPW head not at the meeting what the numbers are with the sponges in the storm drains. As one commission member said until we see numbers from the maunfacturer which said they are going to submit the jury is still out in other words.

    Another true concern is what can come down the rivers from other cities and towns and what the commission has done out of the city to ensure we are not given pollutants from other towns.They have done a lot but there still is that concern above the bridge on the river. Lets not mention the dewatering in the river by the power company what a secret that is. :)

    The problem that was cited by the (state Department of Environmental Protection) was that we had a very high level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons … and what else? come on lets see the data

    open a can of worms where are the parts per million data, what other chemicals and heavy metals could also be present.what about the additional testing that is going to take place to support old data?

    Read waht you want, report what you want post what you want , for once I’d like to see what actually is transpiring with facts data and accontability to what is said , this is a tremendous undertaking for any city and the money involved seems to be coming from private concerns as well.Some of the business owner paid for permits that they may never use, the loss is tremendous to them.

    I truly had wished to see all the dats and facts uncovered in the last meeting to pardon the expession drain out to the public so they can make a informed decision and not leave it up to the news reporters who seem not to have a back ground in environmental subjects to be able to ask questions that are consistant with the subject.

    In short there are ducuments including Schumers press release’s more than one reporting whats in the dredge material including mercury, arsenic and cadium
    which all have been found in Norwalk in and around the 100’s of brownfeild we have but to date no data has been given, maybe its time to ask or find it before we try and solve the yankee doodle bridge problem.

    Maybe I expect too much, yet others who are working so hard seem not to have some of this data and are all qualified to read it digest it and comment on it.It may even help the cause so where is it?

    Give credit to the Norwalk Harbor commission , give them some more tools to do their job, right now they are waiting for answers from a year ago exact words were “364 days ago” I assume it meant the last annual meeting where no one from the mayors office or the dpw could come to. I could be wrong but annual means a year?

    seems like we are waiting for water to boil and no one turned on the stove.

  • 3 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:52 am

    #1
    one of the comments on funds was there are three other harbors in Ct who get more faster from the state and the feds they are commerance harbors with larger drafts than Norwalk. We are considered a recreational harbor but one of if not the largest up and coming one. So that would mean we will need more funds for the police, fire and harbor master soon. We also are adding docks for commercial and recreational boats soon. So if you want to be a big dog in the water world we as a city will need more money for our 5 plus boats the city has in the water.

    yes we need money from the state and feds to keep out tax dollars coming in, while we are asking for money we will have to spend some so keep that in mind. This was again pointed out the other night so it shouldn’t be a surprise that our overworked and under staffed water officials will need helop before long a subject that I assume will be addressed shortly by the mayor.

  • 4 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:55 am

    sorry
    state and feds to keep out tax dollars

    should read

    keep our tax dollars

  • 5 #1 // Nov 9, 2007 at 10:10 am

    Greenpeace - I absolutely agree with you - we need more money for the harbors - I’m just not optimistic about getting it. We have a republican mayor, governor and president and we can’t get what we need!

  • 6 Anonymous // Nov 9, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Ignoring the needs of Norwalk’s harbor is certainly one way to make sure it really becomes a recreational harbor. Eventually all the barges going upriver won’t be able to navigate the channel. The industrial areas on the riverbanks will be ripe picking for developers to turn into more cash cow condos…

  • 7 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 10:27 am

    I think a good start is to stand behind the Norwalk Harbor management commission and observe the the other commissions that are permitting building and expansions.

    The meeting the other night should of been packed with people hearing what it is they do and the cooperation they need to move forewood.I’m sure the mayor won’t miss the next meeting or send someone there to observe.There needs to be fallout in the right direction. Nothing gets solved by pointing fingers in this city just stand in line for that.

    I’m asking for accountability and some decent reporting, not that we don’t get it at times but when help is offered and its not taken well its open season on anyone who fails to reconize what help is.

  • 8 Vet Park Junkie // Nov 9, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    This thread hasn’t generated many posts. Are we numb from the election? This topic is a problem.

    Oil, water, and waste from the bridge dump directly into the Norwalk River.

    With every rain, highway crud drops into the river.

    Spills from accidents end up in the river.

    The city of Norwalk ranked #5 in 2004 for Connecticut traffic accidents. Route 95 ranked #1 in CT Interstate accidents. 1% of all Connecticut accidents occur on bridges. I heard that our interchanges have high accident rates. These facts appear to bear that out.

    I remember that accident a few years back on a Bridgeport Rt. 95 bridge when the tanker dumped 9,000 gallons of fuel oil.

    Yes, yes, yes. We can have a final fling of election animosity. We could blame the Republicans — or Democrats. We could blame Knopp — or Moccia. We could even try to blame Garfunkel — or Romano. …

    One glorious Sunday before the election, I pulled myself away from our blog chatter and I puttered on the Norwalk River with my boy. Passing under the Yankee Doodle Bridge, I looked up. Wow!

    Thank you for your work and focus, Norwalk Harbor Commission.

  • 9 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    tell them taxes will go up to get their attention and the Oyster park may be leaking and if King Industries has a problem it could cripple the shellfish industry and the raw sewage could shut down the river and shellfish beds, vets park is leaking something green out of its shore and we found this in the river , link below.

    http://www.travelizmo.com/archives/two-headed-turtle.jpg

    then maybe someone will take the time and involve themselves.

    I think the next election will be based on environmental issues, by then the gun slingers will have killed each other off.So I suggest to get started with the real issues and not who was wearing to the ball.

    I was in Bridgeport when the tanker went over, we chased oil into the city even U HAUL IT had stuff coming up in their illegal floor drains tied into the storm drains when the fired dept flooded the area with foam and water.

    Is Norwalk really set up for a spill half that size?

    The caretakers need money the reasons vary but there is many, are we as a city prepared to cut them a check?

    The water industry brings in a lot of revenue and tax dollars to the city do most know how much? the figures are with who?

    anyone?

  • 10 barnstorm // Nov 9, 2007 at 8:13 pm

    I was told many years ago that underneath what is now Oyster Park (and beneath the old town dump that was there too) lies dozens of barrels of ??? (I was also told I didn’t want to know what was in those barrels)

    I was told this by a chemical engineer.

    The old town dump was put on top of this toxic mess, and then we dumped more dirt on it to make it a “park”.I remember as a kid this dump used to frequently burst into flame, and not because it was full of “pure” refuse.

    A little further downriver you have Vet’s Park, that used to be Duffy Field, and before that….a city dump.

    There’s no telling what might be under these two sites, but please don’t be surprised when the river along that stretch turns out to be polluted! The turnpike bridge and the waste treatment plant might be adding to the soup, but are hardly the only contributors.

  • 11 Bill McDermott // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:01 pm

    Re #10

    Someday that water might be so polluted that even an Atheist could walk across it.

  • 12 Anonymous // Nov 9, 2007 at 9:15 pm

    simply look on water street next to sono seafood, there is a new wellfield grid and collection site.The crush stone was deliverd by the 18 wheelers and the back hoe worked for days with a drilling rig and site planners.This is not a perk test to build, and power has been installed on an empty lot next to the field.Its been brought to the attention of many but no one is talking. Money talks thou and the work so far has cost money to install what?

    The company that sat there for years had oils including transformer oils. they now in another location make electrical componets and use cooling fluids of another kind more friendly to the environment than what was in Norwalk on water street years ago.

    like the dumps there is history there also, who holds the memories for that site?

  • 13 East Norwalk Native // Nov 9, 2007 at 10:32 pm

    #10 several years ago I heard that the barrels buried at Oyster Shell Park were filled with the mercury dredged from the Mill Pond.

    The mercury was used to make hats at the hat factory.

  • 14 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 9, 2007 at 10:55 pm

    you would figure the EPA which hold the purse strings on most sites including Oyster park would know all this
    an would be waiting for Norwalk like most cities and towns that have stepped up to the plate and not ignore articles like Tim Stellohs from the Advocate.
    The rants of Mr. Greenpeace have been distilled into a nice story by Tim Stelloh about Oyster Shell park. It’s a must read, and raising some intriguing questions. I’vm pulled some highlights:

    That report - along with numerous violations the DEP issued the city during the 1970s - describes a landfill from another era: Garbage was left uncovered or burned, sending plumes of smoke into the air. An unknown number of drums packed with aluminum chloride sludge were dumped there by King Industries, the Norwalk-based chemical manufacturer, the DEP report said. The chemical is used to disinfect slaughterhouses and manufacture rubber. It is also a component in antiperspirant, according to the federal Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry.

    The DEP and the federal Environmental Protection Agency inspected the dump a few years after Esposito announced the Heritage Park plan. The agencies found harmful contaminants like pesticides, benzene and PCBs at levels exceeding state regulations but determined the site did not pose a serious public health risk, said Doug Zimmerman, an environmental analyst with the DEP.

    Neither agency has visited Oyster Shell since 1994, and officials did not know whether the drums containing aluminum chloride remain beneath the park.

    This tainted history led the city to cap the landfill with 18 inches of clay, an impermeable plastic sheet and 6 inches of topsoil before proceeding with the park, said Martin Overton, the former assistant director of the city Department of Public Works.

    David McKeegan, an environmental analyst with the DEP, said he could not specify how long these caps last. But absent hurricane-force storms or other stressors causing erosion - like kids on dirt bikes, for instance - the cap can last “for a very long time,” he said. Protecting public health requires a good maintenance plan, he said.

    OK when is the city going to get around to having the DEP check out the site?

    This transformation of a 13-acre trash heap into a park is how Overton, the controversial self-described “champion” of Oyster Shell, became involved with the project in the early 1990s.

    “It was in the dead center in one of the most important economic development centers in Norwalk,” Overton said from his office in Middletown, where he is an engineer with Malcolm Pirnie. “Because it was not closed or benign, we couldn’t sell development space around it. Closing it became part of our economic development, and public works got involved to do the technical part of building the park.”

    The way Overton describes it, he threw himself into the project. Over the next several years, he helped plan the capping of the landfill; he organized a “huge” advisory board for the park; and he got involved in aspects of park planning that wouldn’t traditionally be in the purview of a public works employee - a fact that still frustrates and confuses some city officials.

    “The problem from the beginning is that it was supposed to be a landfill cap,” said Michael Moccaie, director of the city Department of Recreation and Parks. “Then (DPW) got involved in park planning. They weren’t schooled or educated to do that. There were problems with the original designs because they didn’t have the experience. This was over nine or 10 years ago. The director of parks at the time didn’t get involved either because he didn’t ask, or because DPW felt it was doing the right thing.”

    Overton painted a slightly different picture. Because the project lacked a champion in the parks department and hadn’t garnered the political will needed to be completed, he said he was forced to assume the role.

    of course the whole story and posts are here

    http://www.yourct.com/newzee/2007/08/12/norwalk-oyster-shell-park-overtons-folly/

    I know its about the bridge but all of it has to be addressed, we didn’t do a very good job the first time around. You think we are the only ones who reconizes there may be problems under the bridge?

  • 15 Iremember // Nov 10, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    You are absolutely correct East Norwalk Native about the dredged toxic mud from Mill Pond being transported to Oyster SHell for fill. You could actually follow the dripping water from the dumptrucks from the pond to Oyster Shell. No need for detective work there. I guess the ‘experts’ in this town think what is bad mercury for the pond is good mercury for the Park. This town is so filled with dummies - the same dummies who think that the solution to all Norwalk’s problems is to let the developers have their way. No one gives a damn about our already very overburdened infrastructure. Our motto - let them build and they will come so that we can spread the tax base. I’m still waiting for just one year when my taxes go down –I would even be happy if they stayed the same.

  • 16 Anonymous // Nov 10, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    It could be said that we’d have the mill rate of Bridgeport were it not for all that development spreading the tax base.

  • 17 gfaux // Nov 12, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    well who should pay? we are telling the O&G’s and Devine that we want a walkway up the river sides. If that happens than the army corp’s will not ask for funding than what? Will Norwalk start a new tax on boat clubs or any items along the river? Norwalk was always a river base hub Now we want to switch that out and make it Eco-land. King Ids. has done it’s part in redoing their waterfront area. We have four active boat clubs up there NBC, ST ANN’s, Oyster Bend and The Norwal Rowing club. If we have stop the I-95 drain off we should install the filters and we should bill the spillers!! not the boaters. For many years we only find out what goes down the drains when the C.G. or the S.P. told us, Now we get updates to the habor master thur the fire dept. We should charge for our resorces like F.D. when they respond to a spill.

  • 18 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 13, 2007 at 7:49 am

    It is not like this problem has just been discovered. The Army Corp of Engineers has known of this problem for 100 years.(In fact I bet the Romans knew of this problem.) Am I wrong in saying that the State and Federal Government should kick in for whatever is necessary to stop this well known problem? Not only is it causing a silt/dredging problem, but those 8 inch storm drain pipes that come off RT95 empty everything right into Long Island Sound. OIL, GAS, PARTS, RUBBER, SALT, SAND, GARBAGE, you name it.

  • 19 Anonymous // Nov 13, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    they should kick in #13 I agree, and the city should come to the table with plans for securing oyster park. There is an outlet in the park that flows into that section of the river as well. It won’t take more than a second grade class to tell you its got something in it dirty , oily , toxic maybe.

    I’m curious #13 did you find burying contaminated waste on both sides of the bridge creating two toxic cells was a good idea for Norwalk?

    That stuff sits in the middle of the river on both sides of the bridge about a football field in size each suppose to be entombed, was that a good call?

    How could anyone take that area seriously once we did something like that as a city?

    I think the state is telling us look at our problems as well so the final cleanup will be everyones goal.This site is going to need work once the connector is done so why clean it up now when your going to have to do it again, money is hard to get the first time how are we going to find it again later down the road after all the what ifs are answered.

    as far as silt you think we are done distrubing whats up river with all of our future plans , I’d say not yet what a couple more years of building? silt distrubing?

    The sewers our Norwalk sewers are comtributing to the problem as well, but to ask outside help when our own house is in a mess is hard to do isn’t it?

    I’m for everyone kicking in including the ones who created most of the mess or overlooking what could of been done over the years to correct.

    We hear words of praise for King idustries the community based company, they won’t have any trouble paying for additional cleanup if their chemicals are found anywhere in the city.Cradle to grave means your responsible for your waste until the final resting place and the city parks and landfill isn’t the final resting place for any company who dumped there.Can’t find the companies find who dumped there.

    the other mis communicated fact is there are many chemicals that were found in the sediment

    The problem that was cited by the (state Department of Environmental Protection) was that we had a very high level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons … combustion products.”

    theres more chemicals than that listed, as one person asked where are the fact sheets the data the black and white facts.The news outlets have had enough time to produce them if they were serious about the news and facts so where are they, not even the commission seemed to know what they are.That i itself seems wrong.

    one question was asked to the entire Harbor Management board was does the data measure parts per million or parts per billion and they all looked at each other like they saw a ghost.There was no answer to the residents question.Why was that?

    do we wait until next year to ask it again?

    one can only comment on what we are told so its not that anyone is wrong, informed decisions are made from informed residents maybe its time to revist the facts.

    the Advocate did and where did it get us? followup? facts? players listed interviewed? press releases this list continues to grow.
    The Hour well they seem lost on this one entirely.Only one to date that did anything was Tim Stelloh his work is still being sifted through by people who wanted to be informed.

  • 20 gfaux // Nov 13, 2007 at 11:16 pm

    could someone take down the pic’s For security. thanks.

  • 21 Anonymous // Nov 14, 2007 at 6:07 am

    sept 1 1984

    I-95 BRIDGE CLOSED, JAMMING TRAFFIC
    By ROBERT D. MCFADDEN
    Connecticut closed the southbound part of a bridge on the Connecticut Turnpike in Norwalk yesterday after inspectors discovered cracks in two pin-and-hanger assemblies similar to those found when a bridge span over the Mianus River in Greenwich collapsed last year. The closing of half of the Yankee Doodle Bridge, ordered by state transportation officials, choked the major arterial link between New York and New England at the start of the Labor Day weekend and quickly produced confusion and traf…

  • 22 Anonymous // Nov 14, 2007 at 6:16 am

    Norwalk - Cemetery behind Mathews Mansion - While walking home, over the I-95 Yankee doodle bridge a witness saw a grayish white mist with a woman’s face travel across the highway off ramp through the woods in to the cemetery.

    this one had pictures of the bridge as well as the above posting

  • 23 Anonymous // Nov 14, 2007 at 6:25 am

    By John Nickerson
    Staff Writer, The Norwalk Advocate
    April 21, 2004
    NORWALK — East Norwalk residents told the city last night there should be a pedestrian walkway across the
    Interstate 95 Yankee Doodle Bridge, better access to city streams and ponds, smaller developments and a new
    community center.
    The city is updating the 12-year-old Plan of Conservation and Development, and the Planning Commission met
    with East Norwalk residents last night to hear their suggestions. It was the first of four hearings scheduled with
    residents across the city.
    Last night, the East Norwalk Neighborhood Association presented the commission with a detailed 27-page report
    itemizing dozens of recommendations designed to preserve that area’s residential character and historic and
    natural resources.

  • 24 Anonymous // Nov 14, 2007 at 6:33 am

    Large fish kill causes concern
    By Matt Breslow and Jonathan Lucas
    Staff Writers The Advocate
    Published August 26 2005
    NORWALK — Hundreds of silvery fish floated atop the waters of the Norwalk River and harbor yesterday
    around the Stroffolino Bridge.
    Dead bunker fish were washed up against the shore and on the boat landing at the David S. Dunavan
    Boating Center at Veterans Memorial Park.
    In one spot, more than 50 lifeless bunkers crammed together with dead plants and trash in the water by
    the southeast side of the bridge.
    Dick Harris, director of the Westport-based Harbor
    Watch/River Watch program, estimates several
    thousand bunkers have died in the past few weeks.
    “Obviously, everybody’s concerned,” said Harris,
    whose program monitors water quality.

  • 25 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 14, 2007 at 8:25 am

    OK! I am not sure this is not the “Bunker Dying Season.” Bunker are a very weak species and vulnerable to water temp change, heat, stress, and length of daylight. A real kill is like the ones that happen in the Summer when low oxygen in the water is the culprit. It has caused past bunker kills that FILLED THE EAST NORWALK BOAT BASIN, and large areas around the bridge to the point that the stench was so bad that the dead fish were bulldozed into trucks and carted away. We are talking THOUSANDS of fish, not limited to bunker.

    I know all this because I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

  • 26 anonymous // Nov 15, 2007 at 8:15 am

    Did you see Reilly’s editorial in the Hour today about the CT DOT ducking responsibility for coming up with a solution for the polluted run-off from the I95 bridge? He made a few good points, but as usual, tried to turn it into politics by challenging the legislature to get onto the DOT. The DOT is part of the executive branch, run by Jodi Rell, not the legislature. Our republican mayor should be on the phone and visiting the republican governor and the DOT to get something done for Norwalk. No doubt our legislators will work on it, it’s just too bad that won’t get any support from the mayor or the governor.

  • 27 Anonymous // Nov 15, 2007 at 9:26 am

    today in the Hour page 10

    The city of Norwalk has worked
    hard to reduce pollution that
    winds up in the Norwalk River
    and harbor through the network of
    storm drains around the city. The
    filters separate oil and grease and
    have proven effective in reducing
    pollution.
    The Norwalk Harbor Commission
    has properly called upon the
    state to place similar filters in the
    drains on the Yankee Doodle Bridge
    on the Lodge Turnpike (I-95).
    As the commission points out,
    the bridge carries 130,000 vehicles
    each day. All of them contribute to
    the polluting materials that are
    washed into the drains and into
    the harbor.
    In arguing for the effectiveness
    of the filters, one source said that
    they removed 1,200 gallons of oil
    and 35,000 pounds of trash, sediment
    and debris in the last 16
    months that would have wound up
    in the harbor.
    The Department of Transportation,
    not an agency with a great
    track record for efficiency, cried
    poor mouth, saying it couldn’t
    afford to install the filters. Besides,
    the DOT says its main concern is
    safety. We’re not sure what one
    thing has to do with another.
    It has been shown that material
    that will be dredged from areas in
    the harbor above and below the
    bridge location carry significantly
    greater amounts of pollutants.
    This just adds to the cost of the
    dredging problem and with the disposal
    of the dredged materials.
    It makes no sense when the city,
    using federal funds, works to dredge
    the harbor and remove pollutants
    that a state agency ignores a need
    — one that is its responsibility.
    We cannot understand why the
    DOT is shirking in this matter,
    since the bridge is entirely under
    its control.
    Now here’s a project from our
    local members of the General
    Assembly to sink their teeth into.
    It’s time to put some heat on DOT
    and make it respond to this situation.
    DOT

    details are not in this artricle as well

    Maybe the state has thought this one through, maybe they have asked how much is it going to cost to actually run a program like this. Lets be serious without a working service plan Norwalk has been pushing this system and not once said how much each unit is going to cost the city when federal money runs out.

    The way the drains are now serviced by an outside contractor has left the state and the federal agencies wondering who has a handle on disposal and replacement.Clearly the DPW up to about a month ago had no clue when asked about a service plan by the state. There was no program on file.

    Now we have the Hour writing on a subject not even their own paper can report on effectively and report the facts they way other municipalaties have as in NY where they too have the filters and the cost connected to having a sysyetm like ours here in Norwalk.

    We are basically getting from the state what one would expect once the program was looked at and clearly with issues that need addressing.Even the numbers are not adding up for when these systems should be replaced.I trust the Advocate is running behind the Hour when it comes to a news articles on the facts as well, with no envirionmental reporting both papers on this subject are useless to its readers unless they provide some more facts on the drain systems.

    Yes we are getting whats fed to us, what about the information we are not being told? Who reports that?

  • 28 MGeake // Nov 15, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Is the DOT exempt from EPA and DEP rules? Perhaps a formal environmental complaint would get their attention ;)

  • 29 Anonymous // Nov 15, 2007 at 11:47 am

    I think DOT is waiting on the complaints on Norwalk to see where it all goes.

Leave a Reply