YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: The Next Council


by turfgrrl


November 7th, 2007 · 7 Comments

While there’s still more number crunching to do, both on the part of the Registrars — A and E should be getting the mandated recounts, and on all the political junkies who follow the spreadsheets of politics — there’s the small matter of what is going to happen next.

There’s some truisms about this election, and the Mayor said it best last night, “Norwalk is a Democratic town.” He said this in 2005, and he said it again last night. With the council majority in the hands of Democrats then and now, you might think it was a partisan statement, but what I think it really acknowledges is that Norwalk is saying that it wants its government to work for the people. That means fixing the things that are problems yet keeping an eye on spending. Even here, on the blog, I don’t think we’d find any disagreement there.

How we can all go about it of course, becomes the points of contention. Part of the fun of doing this blog is getting the opportunity to kick off discussions about things happening around Norwalk. In that light, I’d like to start off with a list of things that it’d be nice if the next council tackled form the start.

1. Budgeting
We’ve seen the process both at its worst and best last year, imperious budgets from the BOE and city government belt tightening. The BOE must have a finance committee, and must represent actual spending over the course of the year to the Common Council. It is highly recommended that the BOE finance committee, meet with both the BET and the Common Council to discuss budgeting priorities for the next year and beyond. City departments should begin at zero based budgeting and provide detail from a line item priority as to that spending needs to happen to achieve policy goals.

2. Communication
Much of the council work gets done in committee, but much of the pubic doesn’t get to see that. The meeting minutes are not always posted, and often they are summarized accountings of what actually happened. Committee meetings should be better managed to allow for more direct public participation and the archiving of a permanent record of actions. We shouldn’t still be talking about flooding in 2007 when it was brought up in 2002. Issues such as when road work starts shouldn’t be a surprise one morning to businesses and residents alike. There’s a simple communication called email, and web sites. They are low cost and enable mass communication to happen and be archived. It should be used more.

3. Development
There are some big projects out there. There are little projects that fly under the radar. Both can impact neighborhoods and traffic. We have parks that are underused, and areas of Norwalk that are fighting to preserve what they look like and others fighting to get economic activity. It’s a struggle to manage all this, and there’s not one single area in Norwalk that doesn’t affect everyone else. But, the reality is Norwalk can’t stay exactly as it is. It has to grow, it has to compete with other towns and it has to be a place that we all agree is the best it can be. The council is responsible for all things infrastructure, yet it seems that we can’t even manage what we currently have. Somehow this dichotomy must be breached. The first two items will help solve this one, but we also have to remember that making development decisions based on election priorities is not the way to manage growth. You can’t have one group of politicians calling for more future affordable housing while voting for projects that remove real affordable housing. Long term and short term priorities need to be developed.

The rest of the list is up to all of you.

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

7 Responses so far “Norwalk: The Next Council”



  • 1 Anonymous // Nov 7, 2007 at 8:18 pm

    Norwalk is moving backwards and no end is insite its going to get worse just wait and see. The housing market is bottomed out yet norwalk plans to build a thousand or so condos alot will remain empty I’m sure. Timing is everything and we need more condos like we need a hole in the head too much traffic, people, and everything that goes along with over population. Norwalk has to supply all the affordable housing for the state of CT enough let somebody else start. Wake up city leaders give us quality of life instead of traffic and congested residental roads everywhere.

  • 2 Aunt Bertha // Nov 7, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    When Bridgeport cleared all those apartment housing units did they build anything to place those who lost their homes? Are many of the displaced now living in Norwalk with family members? This has put a great burden on our city. Housing and schools need to be looked at and we need to stop the condo growth. It is just too much.

  • 3 anonymous // Nov 7, 2007 at 8:47 pm

    Most of those in public housing went from stamford and bridgeport to norwalk and new haven. That’s why bridgeport and stamford are improving and we are sinking with new haven. Yet we want more new public housing and affordable housing. Don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out where this is going.

  • 4 veto moccia // Nov 8, 2007 at 7:47 am

    I read in the hour today that tricky dicky said he might run for a third term. I thought a couple of months ago he told the hour this was his last term ? What gives?

  • 5 anonymous // Nov 8, 2007 at 7:55 am

    Maybe he wants to stick around to give you agiata Veto….In that case, I’ll vote for him again!

  • 6 anonymous // Nov 8, 2007 at 8:02 am

    You can’t have it both ways. You can’t be for affordable housing and against condos. Condos are much more affordable to the middle class than single family homes in norwalk. It is all based on the value of land in fairfield county.

  • 7 ENrwlker // Nov 8, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Speaking of vetos … the recount in District E is pretty important. If Conroy (R) holds on to his win, that will give the Republicans 6 seats on the Common Council. That would end the “veto proof” status of the Council Democrats — they wouldn’t have enough votes to over-ride future vetos by Moccia (they need 10 but would only have 9 for the next two years).

Leave a Reply