YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Twas The Night Before The Election


by turfgrrl


November 5th, 2007 · 62 Comments

‘Twas the night before the election, when all through Norwalk

Not a creature was stirring, not even a Ewok;

The ballots were hung by the optical scanner with care,

In hopes that Norwalk Voters soon would be there;

The children were nestled all snug in their beds,

While visions of no school dancing in their heads;

And candidates in their houses, and I at my keyboards,

Had just settled down for a long night of blog words,

When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,

I sprang from the computer to see what was the matter.

Away to the window I flew like a flash,

Tore open the shutters and threw up the sash.

The moon reflected brightly on the new-planted sign

That called for the BOE to just all resign,

Then, what to my wondering eyes should appear,

But Dr. Sal Corda, and eight tiny reindeer,

He raised his fist, so angry and mad,

He yelled at my window, “your blog is so bad.”

“I can’t spend tax dollars without spineless members,”

“The voters seem angry, even past this September”

“The voters all say they want better scores”

“My administrators demand their own floors”

“To top it all off, my golf game has suffered,”

And the union is fighting my contract they offered”

And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the blog

The pinging and ponging of a new comment log.

The voters were speaking, they all talked tough,

The BOE needed change, enough was enough.

Corda’s eyes — how they narrowed, his brow now a frown,

He realized there was indeed a new change in town,

He sprang to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle,

And away they all flew like the down of a thistle.

I typed on the blog, as he drove out of sight,

“Go Vote for a new BOE, and to all a good-night.”

Tags: Education · In the News

62 Responses so far “Norwalk: Twas The Night Before The Election”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Mary Pugh // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:32 pm

    sweet

  • 2 Umpire // Nov 6, 2007 at 12:08 am

    Amen

  • 3 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 3:27 am

    make your vote count

    todays Hour

    City teen stabbed multiple times

    A city teen was stabbed multiple times early Saturday, causing his intestines to spill out of his abdomen. The incident occurred in Broad River park near the intersection of New Canaan and Silvermine avenues.

    Boy, 14, beaten, robbed of $10 by three men

    NORWALK — Three men allegedly beat and robbed a 14-year-old city boy as he was walking home Saturday night.
    The boy, whose name was not released, told police he was walking home at about 10:19 p.m. on Connecticut Avenue, turned to head north on Clinton Avenue and “stopped to use the phone to see if his mom could pick him up,” said police spokesman Sgt. Andre Velez.

    That was when the three men sprang on him. One grabbed him in a chokehold; another picked up his legs and they carried him to the side of the road, Velez said.

    “He was then punched several times by all three males, mostly in the stomach and ribs,” he said.

    One suspect took the boy’s cell phone, as well as his cash — only $10 — from his pants pocket, police reported.

    why would the Hour want another mayor this one sells papers

  • 4 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 3:31 am

    but we are on the move!

    The shelves were sparse, the mood somber.
    Gregory’s Store, an institution in the Cranbury section of Norwalk since 1844, closed its doors for the final time on Monday afternoon. It had been one of Norwalk’s longest-running businesses.

  • 5 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 6:17 am

    Lets put Moccia on the move some place other than Norwalk. Stop the condo madness.

  • 6 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 6:27 am

    I understand Moccia bought a condo. Let’s send him packing back to it.

  • 7 Mystery Songster // Nov 6, 2007 at 6:29 am

    I see that my efforts have been inspirational. Well done, Turfie.

  • 8 Vet Park Junkie // Nov 6, 2007 at 7:41 am

    Great job! It’s a nice ditty to hum on the way the polls.

  • 9 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 6, 2007 at 8:14 am

    Turfy I love ya, but don’t leave your day job to become a song writer………

  • 10 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 8:16 am

    Another curious coincidence in favor of the mayor: the Hour’s publication of its insert in today’s paper of the Redevelopment Agency’s “On the Move” promotion. Plus yet another editorial - the second since the Council vote - against the demo delay ordinance. With help like that, no wonder the odds are stacked in favor of the incumbent.

  • 11 anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 8:27 am

    The Hour’s (Reilly’s) agenda is so obvious. “Norwalk is a colonial town” - so I guess no great design could ever have been done in Norwalk later than the 50’s or ever in the future? We should start demanding higher standards of publishing from The Hour. Reilly’s petty politics are just that, petty.

  • 12 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 8:47 am

    Lets count on the New Advocate to change that balance by next election. Already the news is changing and the reach is better with the news.

    http://www.topix.net/forum/city/norwalk-ct/TDFRDFO2HUO543BPF

  • 13 veto moccia // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:13 am

    John Reilly’s son is a rabid republican and deputy chief on the Norwalk Fire Department. Reilly is biased since he is pushing for his son to be the chief of the FD. Why doesn’t reilly tell the readers about this ?

  • 14 Indiga // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:19 am

    Here’s the letter that the Hour DID NOT print even though it was submitted. It’s not from NPT which (as a non profit) can’t endorse or be seen to endorse a candidate. It’s just one man’s opinion — but an informed one. It did go out to the Norwalk Preservation Trust but, that is, unfortunately, preaching to the choir. So — once again — regular ciizens got more of the Hour’s bias.

    To the Editor,
    Contrary to Mayor Moccia’s objection in his veto of the Demolition Delay Ordinance, the provisions in the current and proposed ordinance about the age of a building do not mean that all buildings fifty years old or older will automatically be subject to a 180 day delay before receiving a demolition permit. What it does mean is that a building must be at least fifty years old before it can be evaluated to see if it is historically or architecturally significant enough to preserve. This procedure follows the standards set for the National Register of Historic Places by the National Park Service. It protects property rights and streamlines the demolition process for most applicants by exempting all but significant buildings from the delay.
    The new ordinance, as passed by the Common Council but vetoed by the Mayor, is virtually identical to the one that has been in force since March of 2003. The record shows that the delay was applied to only about 10% of all applications for demolition permits during that time. The only changes involve the length of the delay, increased fees and fines, better notification procedures and a required rather than a suggested public hearing.
    Even the small number of delays that have been used have resulted in saving at least five important pieces of Norwalk’s visible history. The beautiful 1910 home at 5 Elmcrest Terrace; three houses dated from the 1700s and 1800s that have been incorporated into a condominium development on Main Street; and the 1845 Winthrop House in Rowayton which is now three condominiums, are all standing today and contributing to our economy because of negotiations that took place during the delay period.
    Extending the demolition delay to the time now allowed by State law and putting some teeth to the fines makes sense. The Mayor’s veto of this ordinance is not a blow for property rights as much as it is a step toward allowing more unrestricted development in Norwalk at the potential cost of our heritage.

    Tod Bryant

  • 15 anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:25 am

    Today we will see what the majority of people feel about the 180 day ordinance. Briggs or Moccia, let the majority decide and the others can stop sniveling.

  • 16 Miserable #17 // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:39 am

    Why is the mayors race all about a demo delay ordinance? Oh yeah, because Moccia decided that he must take out petty revenge against old buildings. Take that 100 year old building, Dick says fall down. What this really shows is that Dick Moccia will bend over and allow his buddies at the Norwalk Inn to dictate what policies he supports and doesn’t. So vote for Moccia if you want all crony issues focused on, forget the real problems like water in your basements. Coming soon to your park is the Norwalk Inn concession stand. Don’t forget that parking will always be free around the Norwalk Inn, every where else pay through the nose. The streets will be paved in gold by the Norwalk Inn. See you at Inn tonight, Dick. The drinks are on the taxpayers.

  • 17 Excuse Meeeeee! // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:43 am

    #8 & 9
    That was a poem, not a song. Don’t you have kids to read to? Or were you ever a kid?
    Merry Election Day to all and to all a good night!

  • 18 anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 9:55 am

    Miserable 17, me thinks you overreact a bit. Moccia is not taking any action FOR the inn, he is just refusing others from forcing their opinion ON the owners of the inn. They own it, let them tear it down. If individuals or groups really feel that strongly about it, offer the owner enough money to get him to sell it to you. Once YOU OWN IT, I will support your right to preserve it or do whatever else you want to it.

  • 19 Indiga // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:00 am

    The election is not a referendum on historic preservation; issues that have a more direct impact on people — safety, speeding, flooding — whatever, take up front of mind. We all know that. BUT, if you look beyond your own backyard to the kind of City you want to live in, historic preservation moves up in the priorities. There’s no way anyone interested in preserving the look and feel of Norwalk as we grow could support Moccia. He is just so blatently anti-preservation.

  • 20 Harry Patzer // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:05 am

    At the poll today (Fox Run) I noted that the “Tot Count” ticker did not change after I entered my ballot, indicating that my vote was not counted. I mentioned this to the poll worker. She could not be bothered. I had to go to work, but mentioned it to a “get-out-the-vote” worker outside the school who said he’d look into it.

    If you haven’t voted yet, please check that the count changes after your ballot is entered. Who knows how many ballots are not being counted today?

    Anyone know what to do in cases such as this?

  • 21 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:11 am

    Re #17 then let me be more specific. Turfy I love ya, but don’t give up your day job to be a poet either.

  • 22 Indiga // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:11 am

    #18, then I assume you are also against Zoning and Environmental laws. These restrict an owners right to do what he or she wants with property, maintaining that there is a community interest that goes beyond the owners’ self-interest.

  • 23 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:13 am

    Re#20

    OH BOY! That means will will be counting hanging chads even though there are none. The election will be contested and we won;t have the results until next July.

    It could happen.

  • 24 Anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:20 am

    Not even a week has passed , so what de expect from the city the rest of the week?

    Police investigate two severe beatings

    - City police reported that two men were severely beaten in separate incidents.

    The first assault occurred before 9 p.m. Thursday on Soundview Avenue. A city man told police three or four men exited a tan car and jumped him, Sgt. Andre Velez said.
    The victim said after one of the men punched him in the face and knocked him to the ground, another man hit him in the head with a silver gun. A third man beat him with a baseball bat.

    After the men left in the car, the victim found a cell phone that was apparently left behind by one of his attackers, Velez said.

    Shortly after 9 p.m., the man was walking by Observatory Place when the car reappeared and struck the man, the victim told police. He said the driver then backed over his legs before the men got out of the car and beat him again, demanding the cell phone, Velez said.

    In the second incident, a New Haven man was arrested in the beating of another man outside a Wall Street bar early Friday morning, police said.

    Pablo Calva, 21, of 44 Admiral St., New Haven, was charged with first-degree assault and held on $20,000 bond.

    The incident occurred at about 1:15 a.m. when an officer parked across from El Mexicano, at 22 Wall St., saw six or seven men run from the establishment to the side parking lot.

    One of the men fell and was surrounded by the others, who began punching and kicking him, Velez said.

    The officer saw Calva pick up a baseball bat or a large stick and beat the man.

    The officer pulled into the parking lot and blocked Calva’s car from leaving, Velez said.

    The victim sustained a large bruise and cut on his forehead and lost at least one tooth in the fight. The victim’s mouth was injured so badly that he was unable to talk to police after the incident.

    say what you want about the Inn , we were told about the quality of life and how its risen.

    It would of been nice if the powers to be looked like they were even concerned about the vicious crimes that are taking place.Its one thing to be ignored, another to be laughed at but bottom line is when crime effects even the residents who laugh with them, its time for a change.

    The most serious crimes in the city declined 11 percent during the first six months of the year compared to the same period in 2006, Police Chief Harry Rilling said yesterday.

    wouldn’t that put us in June of this year?

    what about the last 5 months?

    Moccia, who also serves on the police commission, said that officers have been making many arrests, which has led to the drop in crime.

    He should know, now if someone could tell him how many officers are on at night we will be getting somewhere.

    A city teen was stabbed multiple times early Saturday, causing his intestines to spill out of his abdomen. The incident occurred in Broad River park near the intersection of New Canaan and Silvermine avenues.

    Boy, 14, beaten, robbed of $10 by three men

    me thinks I overreact as well :)

    maybe we need someone who knows what the residents are experiencing, not once have we heard from the mayor or police . The last time was when someone got killed?

    Of course witness the trafiic stops and the cruisers driving around with the lights on today, traffic stops will be near all voting places today, visibility will be at the highest , observe it you won’t see it for another 729 days a damm shame.

    simple lets have new mayor every six months, then maybe we will get police presence fit for a city.

  • 25 anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:26 am

    22. Nope. Not against environmental or zoning laws. Not crazy about changing zone designations though, unless all current owners agree with change. It is what it is when you buy it. If I bought a 20 year old house and live in it 40 years later, my right to do what I want with the property shouldn’t change. Don’t like eminent domain either. You want to do something with my property, make me want to sell it to you by offering me enough money that I can’t refuse to sell. Environmental regulations are designed to stop problems from my property going onto yours, and I am sorry, but ugly doesn’t count as an environmental problem. Want to paint my house black, pruple, and pink, that’s my business. Want to tear it down and build something properly zoned, also my business. Theoretically, I think you should be able to tear down and build anything that would have been ok under the zoning rules WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE PROPERTY. Don’t like the idea of people telling me what I can do with my property when I buy it, then change the rules after I own it. Know that’s not the way it is, but my opinion

  • 26 Indiga // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:37 am

    #25 — FYI…Inn bought 93 East Avenue in 2000 or 2001; 93 East Avenue was listed on the National Register in 1983 as part of the Norwalk Green Historic District — legally and legitimately with all attendant public notification. CT EPA protection of historic porperties was on the books when the Inn bought the property. So, then based on your rule of thumb, you support the preservaton of 93 East Avneue according to the laws in effect when the owner purchased the property.

    Greenpeace, agree 100%. First people have to be safe on the streets and not worried about their basements flooding everytime it rains.

  • 27 anon // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:38 am

    So #25 if you own property that was a chemical factory, and you wanted to put an incinerator there, under your zoning scenario, property rights should always rule over community goals?

  • 28 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 6, 2007 at 10:54 am

    #25 I can’t disagree with you, buy a house on Beacon Hill in Boston and in order to change your front door it has to pass through two boards, that also includes the color of your house as well.But then again you buy with this in mind.

    I’m for teaching the boards environmental and building codes and not have them rely on outside pro’s being paid by developers to ease their concerns. I have to admit i havn’t seen much leadership in this area , but we have new era of members coming in i trust that will enhance new thinking as well.

    open minds before tax incentives, concerns before time lines and bond packages.

    Wouldn’t hurt to look around at what the cutting edge of other cities and towns are doing that are seeking tax dollars as well.

    Brownfields Initiative, some time ago it was suggested some areas in the city were overlooked as being the worst contaminated sites and becasue they were not considered high value lots they were ignored.I hope this wasn’t the case we could lose money from the feds if this was true and proved otherwise.

    For what was spent and what was done I feel Michael Moore stating 231 potential sites, should of given us some harder numbers than that.

    http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=5xm9zj1mg2u&thumb=4

    is this a site Mike on water street? Looks like it has hit its potential doesn’t it?

  • 29 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 6, 2007 at 11:09 am

    #27 I know what your saying, but using that what if was bad for Norwalk, we as a city already have enough permits by the EPA to release tons of toxins in the air that borderlines on a health issue one never reads about.

    Simply go to the EPA website and see from our power plant we see no electricity from to the housing complexes we are permitted to expel tons of pollutants that go unoticed by our news outlets. they also could use a class or two in environmental reporting.

    The Ely and Washinton Village and Colonial are all listed as permitted release sites. The power plant could in itself use a whole article on this.

    The Hour won’t go near it.

    The Hour’s (Reilly’s) agenda is so obvious. “Norwalk is a colonial town” - so I guess no great design could ever have been done in Norwalk later than the 50’s or ever in the future? We should start demanding higher standards of publishing from The Hour. Reilly’s petty politics are just that, petty.

    this answers a lot of questions now doesn’t it?

    Its ok the Hour should worry about the Advocate, now theres a story up and coming.

  • 30 anonymous // Nov 6, 2007 at 11:16 am

    Did the designation prohibit demolition of the building when he bought it?

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply