YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Briggs Says Moccia Veto Secretive


by turfgrrl


November 5th, 2007 · 33 Comments

The Hour repots:

Democratic mayoral challenger Walter Briggs on Saturday denounced Mayor Richard A. Moccia’s recent veto of the 180-day demolition delay ordinance, saying that if elected, he would only enact a veto under extreme circumstances.

“It would have to be so onerous that we’d be sending someone to the electric chair,” Briggs said, “or something unconstitutional.”

Briggs criticized Moccia’s veto as secretive. “The fact that this veto was done in secret, rather than being announced on the floor of the council, shows that (Moccia) hoped it would go unnoticed,” said Briggs. “(Moccia has) tried to paint himself as a bipartisan politician — but this pocket veto shows that he doesn’t just lack vision, but that he’s the kind of secret-agenda Republican that Americans have come to know so well since 2001.”

According to Common Council president Michael Coffey, D-At Large, who joined Briggs on Saturday for the press conference, he was never formally notified that Moccia had vetoed the bill.
“I’d had some inquiries from members of the public and press about what had happened with the bill,” Coffey explained. After contacting the city’s corporation counsel and the city clerk, he discovered that “it was not passed.”

Briggs further criticized Moccia’s veto as being contrary to what the mayor claims to stand for.

“Moccia calls himself a preservationist, but he’s tipped his hand that if he gets re-elected with a Republican council, our laws protecting historic buildings will be the first on the chopping block. We need a Briggs administration and a Democratic council to protect our valuable and irreplaceable historic properties from demolition and neglect.”

Looks like it is truly Dems thar fightin’ words.

source: The Hour, Briggs slams Moccia on veto of demo delay, By LAUREN GARRISON, November 5, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

33 Responses so far “Norwalk: Briggs Says Moccia Veto Secretive”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 ENrwlker // Nov 5, 2007 at 10:36 am

    This is so lame. The City Charter (Section 1-197) gives the Mayor 6 days in which he can veto (”disapprove”) a Council action. If he does so, he must “return it to said body [the Council] at its regular meeting with a statement of his objections in WRITING.” The reason Mike Coffey hasn’t received anything is that the writing gets delivered to the Council at its next regular meeting after the ‘veto’, which meeting will occur on November 13.

    Just “announcing” a veto at a meeting is of no effect; the action must be taken in writing, and Moccia did so in accordance within the Charter time-frame.

    Also, Briggs’ description of this as a “pocket veto” shows his ignorance of the Charter. A pocket veto under Federal law is a de facto veto a President can use when Congress has gone out of session; it prevents a law from going into effect even without the President taking any action. Norwalk’s Charter has no pocket veto provision; if the Mayor doesn’t affirmatively disapprove the Council action in 6 days, it automatically becomes effective.

    If Mr. Briggs wants to argue about the merits of the ordinance or Moccia’s opposition to it, fine; but he should get his facts straight before going off and spouting nonsense about ‘pocket vetos.’

  • 2 Veto Moccia this Tuesday !!!! // Nov 5, 2007 at 10:43 am

    Enrwlker, a veto is a veto is a veto, just like the voters will be doing tomorrow. You work in town so come on down to the rally at 12.

  • 3 ENrwlker // Nov 5, 2007 at 10:54 am

    I must admit that it would be tempting go down and see the people who’ll be losing the election tomorrow doing their St. Vitus’ dance today on the Green … but I think I’ll pass. Have fun!

  • 4 Veto Moccia this Tuesday !!!! // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:01 am

    The only person dancing will be Walt Briggs who will be dancing in the streets after the residents veto moccia for what he has done to harm the residents of the city over the past two years.

  • 5 Merrill's Marauders!! // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:06 am

    Dr. Scott has started his barrage ! i just received a robo call from him talking about his fiscal conservatism on taxes and how moccia increased spending like a true libera. Go Dr. Scott, Go !!!!!

  • 6 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Yeah..let’s go downto the green and see the ONE person! I think the only thing green there will be the funny green cigarettes he’s been smoking while writting on this blog!

  • 7 veto moccia // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:16 am

    time for a change. veto moccia tuesday. see you at the green at 12.

  • 8 Gordon Tully // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:44 am

    For newcomers in town (I am a relative newcomer, only 10 years), please vote for the Democrats. There are two very good reasons.

    One is that in this town, it is the Republicans who owe favors to local businessmen and who have a history of placing family members in crucial posts. They need to prove that we aren’t going back to the bad old days of Esposito before they can gain my vote.

    Note that nepotism respects no party lines. In many communities, it is the Dems who pass out favors (think Chicago and Boston). It just happens to be the Republicans in this town.

    The other reason is that local Republicans, like their federal counterparts, have been hi-jacked by the lunatic notions of libertarians. Libertarians, as far as I understand their “philosophy”, believe that everything should be privately owned, because private ownership brings with it responsibility. To see through that nonsense, take a look at how the Norwalk Inn is dealing with one of our historic treasures at 93 East Avenue.

    It is true that we need to deal with the “tragedy of the commons” in which a resource held in common is overused (think fisheries). However, libertarianism is not the solution. Libertarianism is as far off the center as Marxism, but in the opposite direction.

    Both purport to be scientifically based systems. The opposite it true: neither are based on a sound economic principles or on what we have discovered through science about human nature. Human behavior is far more complex than the simplistic ideas of Marx or radical libertarian economists like Hayek.

    Because the Republican party has been hi-jacked by these ultra-right radicals, the Democrats (and a few liberal Republicans like Shays) have to hold both the center and the left. This splits the Dems and makes it very hard for them to win elections.

    That’s certainly true in Norwalk, which is why we need a strong turnout that votes the full Democratic slate. Norwalk needs to grow up and realize that it is a city and not a collection of villages. Democrats understand the difference between the “Smart Growth” we need and the suburban sprawl that makes it harder to adjust to the upcoming resource constraints.

    Briggs and the rest of the Democratic slate do not have the political savvy of the Republican machine, but they know what needs to be done and will move us in a progressive direction.

  • 9 veto moccia // Nov 5, 2007 at 11:58 am

    Compassionate coonservatism at work on the blog today. they can’t take the heat. veto moccia

  • 10 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:01 pm

    Of course we’re compassionate….Veto is mentally deficient. He is probally like that “Special Ed” character on comedy central. If you want to see for yourself, go to the green and you’ll see him sitting there by himself, of course, waving a home made banner that was drawn with crayons with a big wet spot in the front of his pants. Lets not say anything to him how ridiculous he is, we need to be a little understanding and compassionate of retarded people like Veto.

  • 11 indiga // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Ummm…TG..I would call that an attack and slanderous comment regarding Mr. Tully personally and not his views, wouldn’t you? I know that this is the “silly season” and the current postings on both sides of the issue have become sillier than usual, but this comment is out of line and damaging to the integrity of a poster who has bothered to post a reasonable comment — whether you agree with it or not.

  • 12 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    NEWS FLASH!! JUst in from the green. Veto Moccia is here and I have filmed him. See for yourself:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3EWvtiLTKI

  • 13 Disgusted Republicans // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    Can we please stop the childish name calling? Our record of holding the line on property tax reform, the AAA bond rating and fiscal responsibility needs no defense. Let the Democrats have their rally, we are going to turn out good tax paying citizens who will vote for the right reasons.

  • 14 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:15 pm

    Of course your right #15, but c’mom a little fun just before the election. Let’s not take ourselves so seriously!

  • 15 fun fun fun till daddy takes the keys away // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    Say no to Republicans. Vote Democratic, at least they went to college.

  • 16 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:20 pm

    Yeah!!!LOL Like Bruce Morris!!

  • 17 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    “Holding the line on property tax reform.” Wow, what a non-statement if I ever heard one. That’s kind of like “tackling crime and gangs.” Gives the voters the impression that something is actually being accomplished.

  • 18 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    Now Now..Stop with the name calling little boy!

    Yeah, this little Brucie went to the meat market, and this little Brucie went to the bakery, and the this little Brucie went to college….BUT HE DIDN”T STAY THERE AND GRADUATE!.. He has NO DEGREE but he has a job that not only requires a degree but a masters! GEE WHIZ! How did that happen?? Hey Sherlock, why don’t you go find out how he got that job and who gave it to him! Bet it wasn’t a republican!

  • 19 just the facts // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    #19-Bruce Morris attended college, did not graduate. He has admitted it so why can’t you? Look at his State Rep Bio, he attended college. #20-tackling crime and gangs was what Knopp shyed away from calling them cliques and lying about the stats and putting a gag order on anyone and everyone who knew the truth and I can tell you this because I was on the inside at the time and he didn’t want to tarnish his great reputation, yeah right! Thats why we wanted him gone and kept gone! His lack of leadership and oversight brought us to where we are today, we expect Moccia to have cleaned up Knopp’s 4 year mess in 2 years. We expect Moccia to take the blame for years of neglect under more than one administration. And we believe in fairytales

  • 20 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    More excuses, expect two more years of excuses from the Republicans if Moccia gets reelected…

  • 21 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    This is why the dems have problems #23 Stop blaming republicans for your shortcommings. Look in the mirror pal…you’ll see you have enough problems in your own house before looking into other houses.

  • 22 veto moccia // Nov 5, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    come on down to dem hq for the veto moccia phone banks from 6-9 tonight. see many of you there.

  • 23 turfgrrl // Nov 5, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    OK I’ve taken down two 3 posts that attacked other posters. If there’s anything else that is like that please let me know. Posting volume is up, so while I do read each and every post, I am also juggling a large workload too. There are plenty of issues to talk about, and long after the election too.
  • 24 ENrwlker // Nov 5, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    #8 — “the Republican party has been hi-jacked by these ultra-right radicals”. Gordon, are those libertarian, “ultra-right radicals” the same people who approved the biggest expansion in the welfare state since 1964 (with the prescription drug bill)? And pushed through large increases in Federal spending on education and passed NCLB? And increased Federal spending faster than the Democrats who preceded them? And adopted a ‘nation-building’ foreign policy in the Middle East? All of these big-government, high-spending, aggressive foreign-policy policies (and many, many others) are ANATHEMA to libertarians (visit the Libertarian Party website if you doubt this).

    Locally, we have a Republican mayor who didn’t veto the socialist “Living Wage Ordinance” and actively supported the pro-union (and anti-taxpayer) “Responsible Contractor” ordinance. In the Governor’s office we have a Republican who proposed large tax increases to pour even more taxpayer money into the best-funded public schools in the country.

    To call these Republicans “libertarians” is bizarre. These Republicans have much more similar views to those of the Democrats than they have to those of the libertarians. You’re frightening yourself of ghosts, Gordon; there are no libertarians in the Norwalk GOP.

  • 25 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 5:07 pm

    Sounds like the GOP has no idea what it stands for anymore besides cronyism, corruption, and incompetence.

  • 26 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    #25, you don’t “sound like” but in fact are, a twit.

  • 27 also disgusted // Nov 5, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    I don’t know about anyone else on this blog but I really can’t wait for tomorrow to be over and all this back stabbing to stop. This is more like a soap opera than an election. I keep expecting Sonny or Jason to come out weilding machine guns and wipe us all out. And after some of the posts on here in the past few days they certainly would be justified.

  • 28 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    Sonny or Jason? Are they running with an (R) behind their names?

  • 29 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    I think the outrage is just hilarious. Nobody cares whether the candidate’s background says anything about her qualifications for the office.

  • 30 Completely disgusted // Nov 5, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    See you are wrong on that #29-we do care about peoples backgrounds but not when it is a downright disgusting attempt to discredit someone who has done so much for this city and all the people she has helped. For someone to stoop this low the night before elections is disheartening.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply