YourCT.com header image 2

CL & P Wants You To Pay Executive Bonuses


by turfgrrl


November 5th, 2007 · 14 Comments

The Courant is reporting that CL & P is asking state regulators to change the rules that say that executive bonuses should be paid out of earnings to executive bonuses should be paid by rate payers. Millions of dollars of bonuses.

In the past, shareholders - not electricity customers - have paid for the often six-figure incentive plans for top officers of both Northeast Utilities and its CL&P subsidiary, including NU’s president and CEO, Charles Shivery, and CL&P President Raymond Necci.

Money from electric rates traditionally has covered only the salaries of company officers. Money for bonuses typically has come from company earnings.

Now CL&P is arguing that incentive bonuses are part of its costs, so customers should start paying them.

But consumer advocates and large-scale electric users are promising a fight, saying electric rates shouldn’t be used to fatten already lucrative executive pay packages.

“To develop a new stream of revenue from ratepayers to reward already highly paid executives seems outrageous,” said Tom Swan, executive director of the Connecticut Citizen Action Group.

Those opposed to the request also ask: Why now? State officials are investigating reports of poor customer service at CL&P and inaccurate electric meters. At the same time, consumers are angry over electric rates that have risen 90 percent in the past seven years, though that is mainly due to wholesale electricity prices over which CL&P has no control.

“How do you justify bonuses?” asked Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. “I’m tempted to say they really are their own worst enemy.”

As part of its proposal to increase electric rates on Jan. 1, CL&P asked the state Department of Public Utility Control to let it pass on to its customers the $3.5 million cost of annual executive bonuses. Ratepayers also would pay nearly $1.5 million in additional costs to enhance executive retirement plans, according to filings with the DPUC by consumer advocates.

Utility officials said a group of about 15 executives would qualify for the $3.5 million bonus pool to be funded by ratepayers, including Shivery and other top NU and CL&P officers. Shivery’s total pay package in 2006 was $4.2 million, according to federal filings.

Money for bonuses and additional retirement pay represents only a sliver of the $189 million in new revenue CL&P is asking to collect through an overall rate increase of 4.6 percent. That would amount to about $6.25 a month for a typical household.

But one consumer advocate described the bonus request as a “lightning rod” during deliberations about the larger rate increase. The DPUC is expected to decide on CL&P’s request in late December.

“As long as companies are allowed to pass on the extra compensation and benefits to ratepayers without any limitations, the companies will continue to add benefits that your typical ratepayer does not have,” Helmuth W. Schultz III and Donna M. Deronne wrote in recent DPUC testimony. The two are regulatory consultants who were testifying as expert witnesses on behalf of the Office of Consumer Counsel, a state agency that represents electric ratepayers and has been leading the fight against the bonuses.

SO what can you do? Well you can send a letter to the DPUC. The names of the commissioners are here..
Phone: 860-827-2802.
The address is: Ten Franklin Square, New Britain, CT 06051
FAX # (860) 827-2613

There’s also your usual state legislative delegation too.

source: The Courant, CL&P Bonuses Spark Fight By MARK PETERS. November 5, 2007

Tags: In the News

14 Responses so far “CL & P Wants You To Pay Executive Bonuses”



  • 1 MGeake // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:21 am

    What else can we do? Form the Norwalk Power Authority and stop paying anything to CL&P!

    Just like the Second and Third Taxing Districts today.

  • 2 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:31 am

    Gas prices, oil prices, Cablevision prices, Electric prices, food, Taxes, everything is going crazy. Soon you will be working 11 months of the year for the privilege of living in Connecticut.

    Somewhere, sometime, or someone has to stop this insanity. Soon, especially here in Fairfield county there will be two classes, the MASTERS and the PEASANTS.

    I look at it this way. The multi millionaires don’t care if gas is $25 a gallon. Not only can they afford it, but it will keep the Surfs (us) from clogging up their roads with our pathetic traffic.

    I never dreamed that I would see this country heading for a Mid Evil form of civilization.

    Am I being a pessimist? I don’t really know anymore.

  • 3 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:36 am

    I would be interested to see which party campaign contributions went to from those CL&P fatcats and which way they vote. Bet it’s not D.

  • 4 #21 of #25 // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:42 am

    This is another example of how Deregulation isn’t working for the public. If this is allowed to go through, many of us will all be moving out of Connecticut, or worse, living out of our cars!

    I urge all who read this blog to send a letter and/or call the state Department of Public Utility Control.

  • 5 MGeake // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:52 am

    Deregulation is what makes the Norwalk Power Authority possible. Consumers are allowed to choose which supplier’s electricity they buy, the owners of transmission facilities (i.e. power lines) must make them available to other suppliers at a reasonable cost, …

    The only reason deregulation “isn’t working” is because no other suppliers have entered the market. Creating the NPA would change that, would lower electric bills for most of Norwalk, would raise funds for badly needed infrastructure improvements, and could serve as an example for other municipalities.

    Okay, I’ll get down off my soap box.

  • 6 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:58 am

    Mr MGeake said; “Creating the NPA would change that, would lower electric bills for most of Norwalk, would raise funds for badly needed infrastructure improvements,”

    I thought when I first heard about this idea it was dumb. I am now starting to re-think my position. It might have some merit if in fact it is correctly implemented and the politicians from Hartford keep their damn fingers out of it.

  • 7 MGeake // Nov 5, 2007 at 9:10 am

    Okay, back onto the soapbox ;)

    The only part the politicians in Hartford had was years ago when they added all the necessary statutes into the Connecticut code as part of deregulation. Right now, all it would take is a 2/3 vote of the Common Council, followed by the mayor’s signature, and finally, a simple majority of the electors for the enabling referrendum.

    The city doesn’t even need generating capacity: the taxing districts get their power through the Connecticut Municipal Electric energy Cooperative (CMEEC).

  • 8 Anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 9:15 am

    Deregulation, whether aq good or bad idea has cause the need for more generation companies to begin the process of vying for our electricity While there are a few generation companies now in CT, the more competition the better. It will drive the companies to lower their prices for true competition. CL&P and UI no longer generate their own power and therefore buy it from other companies in Canada and the US because of the cost to them they in turn send the costs out to the consumer. Now if you are able, which you are at this point, to buy your energy directly from the generator don’t you think this makes much more sense? Even if the powers that be decide to re-regulate energy, it would be 15-20 years before generation plants would be up and running because the original ones were rendered useless after deregulation and dismantled. Until a time when Norwalk can come up with a feasible way to include the entire town in a Power Authority, people need to be aware that there are alternatives to what CL&P are proposing.

  • 9 Anon // Nov 5, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    I signed up with Dominion through Levco Energy
    http://levcoenergy.com/levcotemp/CL&P_residential.htm

  • 10 barnstorm // Nov 5, 2007 at 8:55 pm

    #2, perhaps you wouldn’t be so miserable if you knew that we are SERFS (not surfs) and that it’s MIDIEVIL not mid evil.

    If those electric company honchos want to get their bonus from me, they’ll have to settle for a finger. I’ll let you guess which one.

  • 11 anonymous // Nov 5, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    Well, republicans are the champions of deregulation (torture, unnecessary wars, etc.) - you get what you vote for…

  • 12 itspathetic // Nov 5, 2007 at 9:16 pm

    The request for additional money to fund a Public Power Authority feasibility study will be on the Council agenda soon. If you are serious about getting out from under the weight of CL&P then watch for the agenda item and show up to support at least funding the study. We have nothing to lose, and so much to gain. Mike, I wonder why CMEEC doesn’t fund these feasibility studies since the co-op has the most to gain from positive outcomes.

  • 13 Jean // Nov 12, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    Most businesses that give bonuses come from the profits for the year and not out of the consumer’s pockets. We pay enough already for the service we get for our money. I am not paying bonuses for the “big people” in any organization.

  • 14 Anonymous // Nov 12, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Connecticut households now have two new choices for companies that can supply their electricity.

    Direct Energy announced Monday it will begin selling electricity to residential customers of Connecticut Light & Power and United Illuminating.

    Its entry into the market comes two weeks after ConEdison Solutions, another national supplier, started mass marketing to the same estimated 1.4 million customers.
    “Once customers understand, and have the benefit of realizing they have choice, they will act on that,” said Mike Beck, vice president and general manager for Direct Energy.

    The two new electricity suppliers expand the competitive power market in Connecticut that has struggled to develop in the 10 years since the state deregulated the power generation industry.

    Landmark legislation passed in 1998 deregulated electric generation and allowed customers to chose a power supplier. The delivery of electricity — for most households in the state a service provided by CL&P — remained a regulated monopoly without choice.

    Direct Energy and ConEdison Solutions supply the actual electricity paid for through the generation service charge on a consumer electric bill. That item makes up more than 60 percent of a monthly bill.

    Changing to a different supplier doesn’t affect the remainder of the bill, which consists of CL&P’s delivery rate and federal and state charges. Customers who sign up with Direct Energy or ConEdison Solutions by phone or through the Internet will continue to receive a single monthly electric bill sent out by CL&P.

    Both companies offer prices that are slightly below what customers pay for generation through the “standard service” price CL&P is required to offer by law.

    Direct Energy says its offer will save a CL&P residential customer using 700 kilowatt-hours of electricity per month $4.24 off the total bill.

    The ConEdison offer would save the same customer $2.77 a month. ConEdison has a lower offer in UI territory, which is the New Haven and Bridgeport areas, compared to Direct Energy.

    Both suppliers see their arrival in the Connecticut market as a leap forward for competitive choice. The only option for residential customers besides the utilities’ “standard service” offer for generation has been Levco Energy, based in Norwalk.

Leave a Reply