YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Candidate Responses Kevin Poruban


by turfgrrl


November 3rd, 2007 · 20 Comments

1. This year’s flooding problems showed that infrastructure should be more of a priority in Norwalk’s spending. Where do you think we should be spending our money?

There is no doubt that we need to address infrastructure. When we first heard of flooding problems 5 years ago, it seemed as if it was an anomaly. When we had additional flooding reports in following years, it was a definite pattern. As chairman of the Public Works committee from 2003 to 2005, I began researching rainfall levels published by the Yale School of Forestry and the New England Foresters Association. Their publishing showed we were experiencing increasing rainfall levels in shorter time spans. I’ll leave climate change to Al Gore; however, we are definitely experiencing a pattern change in our weather. It was apparent that existing drainage systems were inadequate to handle the rain levels we were experiencing. This is still a number one priority.

Additional areas I believe we should address are the Fire Department facilities. I feel we still lack adequate coverage in the Route 7 / Cranberry area. We need a station in that area of the city.

2. We have several different redevelopment projects planned for the urban corridor. What will you do to ensure that the developers work together so the end result will benefit the city?

city?
Having open meetings and thorough discussions of the projects ensures that the community has input on these projects. As a Councilman, I would want to serve on the Planning Committee of the Council to ensure that this process is happening. I believe that some of the planning has gone “sub rosa” over the past two years and I would work to change this.

3. The past budget cycle was contentious about funding for education. Do you philosophically support funding Norwalk’s education more or less - and why?

The school budget has become contentious because of the size. There are aspects of the budget that we have no choice in such as salaries, benefits and state or federal mandates. These must be funded and make up a large portion of their budget. In addition, much has been done to replace equipment such as desks, chairs and other fixtures that are not included in building renovation budgets. Past “cost cutting” measures left us with administrators that pulled “double duty”, overseeing not just the area they were hired in but also some other area where they had little to no training. I believe this had an adverse effect on the curriculum that our children were studying and placed us in the situation we are now in.

Teachers are making great strides to get our children to learn new curriculum and increase their test scores. Budget cuts effect more that school sports and if we continue voting on budgets that do not accurately reflect the increases seen by Education (6% nationally per the Bureau of Labor Statistics) then we will eventually be cutting more that “top level” staff. Politically, it’s easy to say “cut the budget”, but if you don’t know what you are really eliminating, you are short-changing our children and the future of our community.

4. What will you do to address quality of life issues such as crime, traffic, housing, etc.?

We have passed many “quality of life” issues in the past years. Enforcement needs to increase. To do this, we would need to increase staffing levels in various areas. England has become o model of camera surveillance for public safety. I support increased use of cameras to monitor problem areas, but first we would need to enact a policy to address the use of cameras. We would also need to establish a monitoring center. I believe an increased use of cameras would overwhelm the combined dispatch center. I would also work with our Legislators to get red light cameras approved for use at intersections.

5. If elected, what would you do to reach out to the community?

Mayor Knopp held “brown bag” lunch meetings where residents could voice concerns. I would hold an evening meeting once a month with the same opportunity for residents to discuss QOL issues so that I would be kept current on their concerns.

6. The year is 2030 and aliens from outer space have just landed in Norwalk. How would they describe what they see?

They would see an active community with much to offer for its people. A number of box-like containers which hang from a rail circles the main area of the city and the majority of humans travel by machines which have only 2 wheels. They move in large herds in the areas with greater structures and occasionally by a machine that emits a large heat signature, but no exhaust. There is a waterway that much centers around and many travel to this area from similar boxes that roll on two rails. They are healthy and live in domiciles that also allow them to engage in their primary function of educational training.

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

20 Responses so far “Norwalk: Candidate Responses Kevin Poruban”



  • 1 Anonymous // Nov 3, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    It’s curious that all the noise about the flooding problems have become prominent only during Moccia’s administration, but his apologists will tell you that they existed long before he was elected. How come I don’t remember any media coverage of it then?

  • 2 barnstorm // Nov 3, 2007 at 2:16 pm

    Just a hunch on my part but the problem originates during the reign of King Esposito. He let the infrastructure deteriorate due to neglect. Can’t fix anything without money, and he was so busy NOT raising tax revenue that stuff went by the boards. But, as Neil Young says, rust never sleeps, so by the time folks were finally fed up with Frank, Alex had his hands full just fixing school roofs and other vital projects that affected everyone, not just scattered neighborhoods.
    Some places that have had flooding for years were joined by other areas as Zoning gave the OK for any Tom, Dick, or Harry to put up condos and further decrease our watershed. Add to that the climactic shifts mentioned by Mr Poruban and you’ve got a recipe for a much bigger problem.
    No one individual can take the blame for this, and no one individual will be the answer. However IMHO we will ALL be paying for this for years to come.

  • 3 enough already! // Nov 3, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    #1-Beacuse Alex had the newspapers and everyone else on silence mode. Ask the flood people and we will tell you how many times we went to him and he ignored us. #2-Alex put a bandaid on leaky roofs and we are paying for it now. Just like he wouldn’t let gangs be called gangs and just like he didn’t read his mail when there was a racial complaint at the fire dept.

  • 4 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Nov 3, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    The sad part about all politics is that the best person does not always win.

  • 5 anon // Nov 3, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    Thanks for posting your answers Kevin. It helps all of us to see where candidates stand.

  • 6 anonymous // Nov 3, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    Yes, Kevin. I agree. Thanks for posting.

  • 7 nwlknative // Nov 3, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    Another reason for the flooding problems is that developers are allowed to build on what was originally swampy land that served as natural drainage areas in town. Just look at Westport Avenue from Strawberry Hill to the Westport town line. That was known as Peat Swamp and it was just that - a swamp. Now we have a new CVS being built in the area of that property that was filled in swamp. Grand Union (now Marshalls) and the shopping plaza next door were built on filled in swamp. Look behind the buildings - some of the swamp is still there. Norwalk High School’s softball field on the corner of Strawberry Hill and County was filled in swamp. During the last heavy rainstorm, Strawberry Hill was flooded right there. Perhaps the new addition is draining into the field, which is on filled in swamp and the water has no place to go? This has never happened before in my memory and when I turned the corner from County to Strawberry Hill, I thought the water was going to come inside my car - it was that deep. Developers come into town, fill in land, build a building, sell the building and leave. Isn’t there a record kept someplace of what lies beneath?

  • 8 Anonymous // Nov 3, 2007 at 10:56 pm

    What lies beneath: the founding fathers of this City and the Native Americans from whom the land was traded. They all would be ashamed to see what has become of their blood and sweat and labor.

    Maybe the question that should have been asked of the debate participants is: You are trying to eke out an existance as a new American in this land of opportunity. What do you see has become two hundred years hence of your homestead?

    Parking lots n’ Costcos… nowhere but America.

  • 9 Anonymous // Nov 3, 2007 at 10:58 pm

    nwlknative - pete’s Swamp was built on over 50 years ago. Many buildings and businesses came and went. Back then we didn’t have the regulations we have now. This is a good reason why we are seeing the flooding now because the drainage cannot handle the growth over the past 50 years.

  • 10 Mr Greenpeace // Nov 4, 2007 at 12:25 am

    I have never seen any mention of tidal doors in and around the city. Do we have any and if we don’t are there plans to place them is any areas around water street.This flooding is also happening all along meadow street as well.

    I realize property is the first concern and should be but every time the sewers and drains overflow to apoint where streets are not able to let traffic flow, the damage its doing to the streets and drains are still going to be a concern.

    fire stations , bear in mind when station five becomes busy it can be to go to Rowyaton or accross the city which leaves one of the most populated areas in dire straits when it comes to multiple problems, is there going to be any plans to add an engine company to that area.With the way flooding is there maybe the fire boat would be a great choice for a second company.

    when one talks of a dispatching center, how much is it going to cost to run once the grants run out ? What would be the cost of manning the dispatching center and letting the fire dept handle their own calls?

    Why doesn’t the fire dept handle their own calls?

    Once a fireground is established who calls the shots at the dispatching center?

    What will be the cost of the 911 system once installed for lets say one call to all houses on the system?

    Would a audible system be more effective if we lose the phone lines or electric service most phones operate only when the power is on?

    Does Norwalk stil have a air system at the fire stations like Rowyaton?

    Does Rowyaton have the same consderation when emergencies happen that Norwalk residents have?

    a just wondering rant

  • 11 Merrell's Hat // Nov 4, 2007 at 11:03 am

    Those who complain about shopping complexes, more housing, more cars have to ask themselves the following question?
    Where do you and your family shop?Where do you work?
    How did you get your home.
    Is your home to big for your needs?
    Do you have children? Would you like to have them live here too? How are they going to live without more housing?
    Who many cars in your driveway?
    Population growth is not a zero sum game.
    Don’t like density? Then don’t support candidates who want affordable housing. You could lower density on new developments by taking out the manditory inclusion of affordable housing.

  • 12 turfgrrl // Nov 4, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Merrell’s Hat: The Norwalk Affordable Housing regulation requires that any development over 20 units include 10% affordable housing. That per se, does not increase density. But there are many other zoning regulations like including fountains that incent extra density. Shall we do away with all those too? You are right to question the tradeoffs of development, but wrong to single out one incentive when there are scores of incentives out there for examination.
  • 13 Merrell's other Hat // Nov 4, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Take out requirements ,reduce size bulk and height by the same. Take PKO for example 35% affordable housing, that a pretty significant reduction. (95/7 take it out reduce a story.

  • 14 turfgrrl // Nov 4, 2007 at 11:40 am

    Merrell’s other Hat: Height is not a bad thing. Remember when all those Parisians were out with pitchforks condemning Gustave Eiffel’s tower? Sears tower? Prudential Building? Empire State Building? Isn’t it time we recognize that landmarks are a good thing?
  • 15 easy button // Nov 4, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    Want to know which way to vote to keep taxes down? Drive by housing projects and see who has the most signs….then vote the opposite.

  • 16 Anonymous // Nov 4, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    like most of Norwalk would be able to find the housing projects?

  • 17 anonymous // Nov 4, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Call me crazy, but doesn’t supply and demand control property values. Why do we need more affordable housing? If prices get so high that people can’t afford them, prices will drop. Seems like low income housing and affordable housing lowers property values for homeowners. Let the market correct itself

  • 18 Anonymous // Nov 4, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Another true Republican speaking. “Self-governance” is just another word for “don’t spend my taxes on anything that smacks of government handouts.” I want to see all the pompous, self-righteous asses who proclaim the moral values of the conservative agenda renounce their Social Security benefits. Then I’ll believe they something besides a bunch of moneygrubbing hypocrites.

  • 19 barnstorm // Nov 4, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    okay #17…you’re crazy.LOL.

    Seriously, your example of supply and demand is flawed. There is always a demand for housing. Prices rise, and only those people who can afford housing will buy. True enough, but the people buying are coming into the city, whereas the people who can’t afford to buy are long-time residents who are forced to leave. Where do they go when they’ve been priced out of the market? Many have already been forced out of Stamford, and Bridgeport’s getting full.

    The market “correcting itself” doesn’t happen to any meaningful degree, just like the “trickle down” theory of economics didn’t work in reality. These theories look fine on paper, but leave a lot to be desired in the real world. Affordable housing (although hardly affordable for most low-income wage earners in Fairfield County) is, for a lot of folks, the last chance they may have to find the American Dream. We are already too diversified to become another Greenwich.

  • 20 Merrell\'s other Hat // Nov 4, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    #18 &19
    If they would stop deducting the SS I would handle it my self.Since I have been paying forcibly I would expect to collect at least what I put in .Its called being self sufficient. Try it sometime.
    The market will correct itself wait till you see housing prices over the next two years. Heading toward 2000 prices.

Leave a Reply