YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: The Corda Offensive


by turfgrrl


October 17th, 2007 · 67 Comments

General Corda drew up his “surge” plans in a counter offensive to the revelations that he can’t count, fudges statistics and otherwise allows Opdahl free reign to mismanage operations. So we have multiple BOE stories in the papers today.

In the battle of the budget, which will once again loom in early January Corda is taking a proactive communication campaign by fueling the “woe is me” cuts to the athletic departments. The Advocate reports:

In March, the athletic directors, each facing potential $250,000 budget cuts that would have meant elimination of all freshman sports, along with varsity ice hockey, wrestling, golf, tennis and swimming, had considered a pay-to-play fee for athletics, Mones said. Those larger budget reductions were avoided.

The athletic directors have placed big-ticket expenses on hold, trimmed some costs and renegotiated other expenses. The girls consolidated golf team, which had five members between the two schools, was cut.

“The cuts have affected us, but in the same sense, we’re getting by,” Brien McMahon High School Athletic Director Joe Madaffari said.

He and Mones had to forgo installing safety nets to protect spectators from errant lacrosse balls, and Mones also postponed plans for a training room whirlpool, scoreboard maintenance, new weight equipment, weight-room flooring and a freshman girls lacrosse team. Madaffari eliminated crowd control staff at home games.

“We’re not happy. It’s more hours for us because where we had workers, now we have to do it, but it’s about the kids,” Madaffari said.

Funny thing is, that since that worked so well for him last go around, I’m kinda surprised that he’s trotting out the same old gameplan. But then, this is Sal “if it’s not working throw more money at it” Corda. Do not be fooled by the man behind the curtain, if you really think there isn’t $250k in operational savings between the stacks of paper in the third floor bathrooms and the unused textbooks that gather dust in Opdhal’s closets then kool-aide must be your favorite beverage.

The rallying student athlete troops wasn’t the only battle plan Corda deployed. He had to address the special ed debacle and his sufficient progress under the five year plan. The telling part is this graf:

Corda said he did not know if Norwalk had achieved all the goals the State Department of Education set for it following the P.J. case, but said it had made “sufficient progress.”

Yep, nothing like marching blindly without a goal in mind to determine that you made “sufficient progress.” This means that he can avoid the old, moving the goal posts trick, and bamboozle parents with progress measured against nothing. Show me the detail:

“We still have some progress to make—I don’t want to suggest we don’t,” Corda said. But, he said, the state has indicated, “‘Your progress is at a sufficient point where you have met the requirements that have been set for you.’ We have done that at a level that succeeds what takes place in most districts and at a rate that is faster than what happens in most districts.”

Corda separately addressed an issue that has gained media attention of late—that of overidentification of African-American students as emotionally disturbed, a subgroup of special needs. One goal set forth in the settlement agreement for the P.J. case is, “A reduction in the disparate identification of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability by local education agency, by racial group, by ethnic group or by gender group.”

The district has been working with the State Department of Education on the issue since Dec. 2004, Corda said, with positive results. In the 2005-06 school year, 1.8 percent of the black student population was identified as emotionally disturbed compared with 0.33 percent of all other students.

How does anyone let Corda get away with these mind numbing statements about nothing? We need to make more progress, but the state has said progress has been made, and would you like fries with that? I’ve got sort of a different progress in mind, “He pressed us to take special heed that we took not up any truth upon trust — as from this or that, or any other man or men” and I sincerely doubt that we can fancy a chuckle while Corda has ruined our schools by too confident a security in his unchallenged role.
source: Advocate, Parents step in as budget cuts strain sports programs, By Alexandra Fenwick, October 17 2007

source: The Hour, Corda cites progress in meeting state’s special education goals, October 17, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

67 Responses so far “Norwalk: The Corda Offensive”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Harry Patzer // Oct 17, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    When and where is tomorrow’s BOE debate?

  • 2 Anonymous // Oct 17, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    The BOE debate is the 25th at NCC East Campus

  • 3 Anonymous // Oct 17, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    Fire Corda and his staff and pave the roads with the money the city of Norwalk will save. The Norwalk school system is a mess. The reason most people leave Norwalk is due to the poor school system. Vote out the entire current BOE and make a statement. We spend so much money for a sub standard school system and a poor education for children in Norwalk.

  • 4 Anonymous // Oct 17, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    The only way to rectify this is to put people in place who are not yes men and women for Sal Corda and Stu Opdhal. Unfortunately too many peoples strings are being pulled by lies that we may find ourselves in the same boat after election day.

  • 5 anon // Oct 17, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Jodi Bishop Pullan has got to go. Is there anyone more useless?

  • 6 Aunt Bertha // Oct 17, 2007 at 6:26 pm

    I think both Athletic Directors at the high schools are really nice guys. However, we as a community should speak out on their behalf. What they are doing with out is not acceptable. The students at NHS should have weight equipment,a gym floor and working scoreboards. BMHS should have nets to protect on lookers to the lacrosse games and their girl’s teams. Why is it okay to cut sports? I know that there are some students that live to play their sport and they do well in school to qualify to play. We ALL should be doing what is right for the children. I know that these two gentalmen must have stuggled to make the cuts, my question is why did they have to make those cuts in the first place? Look to the top for the people that need to go and the people who put them into their positions.

  • 7 Silence Dogood // Oct 17, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    Aunt Bertha: Why did they cut sports? They did it so that the athletes and their parents would storm the Common Council to demand more money for education. It was the oldest trick in the book, and it was a shameful thing to do. The Common Council saw through this transparent trick, and it denied the BOE any additional City of Norwalk funds. Once the state came up with more money, staff cuts were restored, as they should have been, but I know of nothing that was restored in the athletics budget.

    As an educator, I know of areas of the school budget that are badly underfunded, e.g., high school teaching staff. Just look at the number of students in study halls because there aren’t enough classes for them to take. As an educator, I should vehemently demand more money for the Norwalk Public Schools, but I can understand the City’s reluctance. It’s simple; they don’t trust the BOE and its appointed King Corda to put the money where it is most needed.

  • 8 disgusted non-partisan voter // Oct 18, 2007 at 12:56 am

    I have to say that I look at this with a jaded eye. You see, when I married my sweetheart and moved to this fine city 6 years ago, the schools were an issue. It stands out in my mind because of the timing more than it would to the “ordinary” person. And what happened to cause this mess is pretty clear to me.

    6 years ago, when I moved here, Alex Knopp had made the schools an issue on which he campaigned. There were those (staged) daily photos in The Hour of him with a ruler measuring damage in science lab, and there was endless discussion of leaky roofs. All he talked about was schools, schools, schools… And with that campaign, Alex got into office. But he could be perceived as being beholden to Sal - it is hard to tell the school superintendant that you won’t fund school spending when you are running around town screaming that you single-handedly saved the school system. Even Alex could not manage that.

    And almost immediately before Knopp’s election, Jodi Bishop Pullen’s son was one of the 5 students who had placed racist and discriminatory remarks in the school yearbooks. What happened was serious and there was a possibility of charges being filed, lawsuits being filed, scholarships being lost and college acceptances being withdrawn. But Sal and the school officials stood by her son and the other students, did not suspend them and put pressure on critics to let it pass. Sal really managed to bury the incident. So then Jodi could be percieved to be beholden to Sal as well. She should have resigned her position due to a conflict the moment her son was found to have been involved, in my opinion, but at this point it is water under the bridge.

    Shortly after these occurences Stu Opdahl took the expensive lathing equipment (and other items) for his personal use and lo and behold - nothing happened to him. What is that word that they use to describe taking expensive items from an employer that you have no right to take - I think it begins with an E. It was outrageous from a legal standpoint, but it happened. I use this as an example, to show their perceived level of power. In the Knopp years Stu and Sal had a lot of swagger in their steps.

    The fact that it appeared they could control Jodi and Alex gave them, in essence, absolute power. And as Lord Acton said, “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Point in fact - would Stu have taken those lathes if Moccia was mayor or if Hempstead or Coffey were chair of the BOE? I think not.

    So there is my take on it. Once the milk has gone sour, putting it back in the fridge and hoping it will taste better tomorrow morning is not an option. I think that the city needs to cut its losses and hire someone who lives here and actually gives a damn about the city to run its schools.

  • 9 Watchdog // Oct 18, 2007 at 7:38 am

    Number 8 - that was amazing! You managed to totally fill me with disgust, and I thought I already was!

    And THIS you say so very well:

    “Once the milk has gone sour, putting back in the fridge and hoping it will taste better tomorrow morning is not an option.”

    Let’s pray November will play out in Norwalk’s favor. This abuse is an outrage.

  • 10 putting my money where my mouth is // Oct 18, 2007 at 7:40 am

    #8 you are my new hero! Thank you, thank you and thank you. Trust me, your post did not fall upon blind eyes and I will use it and make sure it doesn’t fall on deaf ears. Please get out the vote to change the BoE this election and I promise you your post will resonate loud and clear to everyone. Parents like you are whats needed at the BoE meetings, not like Lynn Massey, who wanted the Corda contract issue to Be taken care of “behind closed doors”. Like we haven’t had enough of that already. Please stay involved, we all need one another.

  • 11 anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 7:45 am

    Are you running for the Board of Ed #10?

  • 12 putting my money where my mouth is // Oct 18, 2007 at 7:56 am

    It just may be…regardless, there are 5 of the 9 seats up for this election. We have an oppourtunity to change the whole direction of the Board of Education. Let’s not squander it - PLEASE VOTE TO CHANGE THE BoE and bring others with you to the polls on election day.

  • 13 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 8:49 am

    How did Corda assume his position?
    How was he selected?
    What a gaffe to the Norwalk taxpayer!

  • 14 NoName // Oct 18, 2007 at 9:19 am

    I would take all your ramblings more seriously if the Republican challengers were not a bunch of buffoons. None of them know anything about education or how the Boe works.

  • 15 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 9:23 am

    #14-Sure they do , they know its not working, they have or have had children in the system and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that this BOE has hijacked the taxpayers and the kids!

  • 16 NoName // Oct 18, 2007 at 9:51 am

    But what do they propose to do to fix it?

  • 17 putting my money where my mouth is // Oct 18, 2007 at 10:00 am

    #14 You should of signed your name as NoBrains instead of NoName because you surely don’t know what your talking about. When it come to te Board of Ed, we should be Apolitical, one’s party affiliation should not be the “litmus test”. Afterall, republican, democrat or independant, we all want the same things, don’t we? Good schools and teachers with transparency and accounability to the taxpayers.
    However Nobrains, you take an approach of “all republicans are buffoons”. If you knew any of them, you’d know that they are consciencious parents who are concerned about the educational welfare of the children of Norwalk, of which their own children, are included. They are also enraged at the lack of accountability and lack of transparency displayed by this superintendant,and board. It is your vile partisanship that has created this mess that is the current Board of Ed. You knock the republicans, but you helped form the ALL DEMOCRAT BoE for the past 8 years, didn’t you. BoE member, Bruce Kimmel has become an independant over this BoE malay and at least he has the concern of the children before party affilliation. Good for him….and goog for us all. In my estinmation, calling the republican candadiates “buffoons” is nothing more then you calling the kettle black. You really need to do some soul searching NoBrains and look in the mirror as to why we have arrived to this sorry state of affairs. It is transparent to me, and others who are reading this thread, that your mentality is part of the problem, not the solution.

  • 18 putting my money where my mouth is // Oct 18, 2007 at 10:07 am

    NoName, I would like to see you at the debate on the 25th at NCC. It would be nice to at least hear what the republican candidates have to say BEFORE labeling the “buffoon” tag to them. If you can’t for whatever reason, I know that each candidates palm card(literature) has contact information on it (phone number and/or e-mail address) so that you can contact them directly and ask them for yourself - no press, no cameras - how straight to the point is that?

  • 19 nwlknative // Oct 18, 2007 at 10:50 am

    #8 - thank you for your very informative comments. I do remember those things happening, but had no idea of the time line. Your remarks have served as a reminder and sheds some light on to why Jodi Bishop Pullen seems to be in Corda’s pocket.

  • 20 anon // Oct 18, 2007 at 11:33 am

    What was done in that yearbook was disgusting and hurtful to the students . Not just the ones that were in the pictures but the entire class because this was their yearbook and they could not be replaced. Black magic marker acroos 1/2 of the book is horrible. This is a book that they will never be able to show their kids and grandkids.

  • 21 disgusted non-partisan voter // Oct 18, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    Yes, it was disgusting. The daughter of my husband’s secretary was one of the kids who was “targeted”.

    Aside from that, they targeted a deaf girl for no other reason than the fact that she happened to have been born with a birth defect. I have 2 brothers and a sister will hearing loss. They are all successful but their loss (marginal compared to that poor girl) has caused them great obstacles in life.

    What those kids did showed a lot about their character. The fact that Jodi chose to stay on the BOE and use her position to help her kid get away with it sickens me. And it certainly showed her true colors. If my child had done anything like that he would not have seen the light of the sun for at least a couple months and it would probably be about as long for him to be able to sit down.

  • 22 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    The BOE and Jody as well as Alex Knopp and Corda tried to put a gag on the Human Relations commissioners. Not their call. Thankfully they did not take to threats as easily as some and the hearings proceeded. However, no one looked at this as anything other than a prank and they voted these people back into office. Is anyone out there getting the fact that this BOE MUST GO!

  • 23 disgusted non-partisan voter // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    #22. You are right. Knopp did put pressure on everyone involved not to speak. If he had not gotten in with the full council this could not have happened. But without anyone able to talk about it for fear of retribution, the incident was swept under the rug.

    If there are had been a balance of power in the city at the time, details might have been public. There would have been a public outcry and the BOE would never have been re-elected.

    I am NOT a fan of Art Scialaba (spelling?). And please no comments on that - this thread is not about him and we don’t have to like everyone. But the one thing I credit him for is that he stood up to Knopp’s pressure and held hearings on the incident. It at least made those kids targeted feel like SOMEONE cared what was done to them.

  • 24 Democrat // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    I think those of you complaining about the “yearbook scandal” have the dates and people wrong. Be careful about whom you are smearing. I believe you are referring to an incident that happened prior to Mayor Knopp and Jody-Bishop Pullam being in leadership positions.

  • 25 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    So there are no misconception about the chain of events here is the link to the full report. Alex Knopp was indeed in office when the investigation was going on, Sal Corda was in office and I believe that Jody is not involved but you would have to read the entire report.

    http://www.norwalkct.org/humanrelations/YRBKREP2.pdf

  • 26 anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    Jodi was definitely on the board at the time, and I am almost positive it was during Knopp”s reign. Let’s not forget Bruce Morris” refusal to cooperate with the investigation.

  • 27 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    Yes, Jody was on the board but don’t think it was her son, you’d have to read the report. It was during Knopp’s admin and you are correct in saying Bruce refused to cooperate.

  • 28 Democrat // Oct 18, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    OK, so Knopp took office about 6 weeks prior to this report being issued by Human Relations commission chairman Art Scialabba. I believe he was also chair of the Repunlican party in the 2001 election, and then was defeated by Bob Duff in the special election for state rep. Can you spell “politics” affecting this report?
    Knopp is always criticized for everything but don’t think you can smear him wth this stupid allegation. Jody wasn’t invloved either, the BOE chair was Roz McCarthy.

  • 29 Anonymous // Oct 18, 2007 at 4:09 pm

    whats the mayor think of all this?

  • 30 Wake Up Already! // Oct 18, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    I can see by the way you signed your name to post #28, that you definetly know how to spell “politics”. If Knopp were a repiblican, you’d of lynched him back then. And what #28, no mention of Bruce Morris “the fleece” refusal?? Now who did you say sounds political? You need a long hard look in the mirror pal.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply