YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Debate The Debates


by turfgrrl


October 14th, 2007 · 15 Comments

Monday night starting at 6:30pm City Hall will be the epicenter of political hot air, as candidates and supporters will cram into the community room to participate in the spectacle of election debates. This year, the debates are being sponsored by the League of Women Voters and the local cahpter of the NAACP. This year the council and mayoral candidates are on tap. The problem is that the most important issue facing Norwalk these days isn’t who is mayor, or who is on the common council. The $145 million BOE budget drives everything that anyone can cite as the most important issue, and none of the BOE candidates will be on hand to debate that race Monday.

Despite that glaring omission, the round of debates will offer residents an opportunity to hear something more or less about each candidate. The 6:30 start features the 10 at large council candidates. Then the showdown of audience questions with the mayoral candidates. For 15 minutes. Each. There are 15 reasons why this format, impromptu questions on index cards might not be a useful format for peeling out real issues that should be answered by these candidates. The odder thing is local LWV president’s assurance that, “we trained members collecting the cards to pull out all personal attacks.” Who is the arbitrator of what is a personal attack? Isn’t it a valid question to ask why Scott Merrel is running, why Walter Briggs tenure as Planning Commission Chair took so long to develop a Master Plan, and why Dick Moccia as Mayor keeps pointing to the removal of parking meters on Wall Street when new parking meters get added to areas in SoNo? Are these personal attacks? We don’t know, because the LWV has provided no guidelines for us to determine in our judgment what a question should be.

As for the council races, there are many questions that might be good to have answered by all the candidates, regardless if they are in district or at large. The long term capital budget planning issues of infrastructure, maintenance of city property and the planned growth fostered by redevelopment would be of interest to all residents.

Taxes, will be of many minds Monday night. But real answers, without the BOE, will be short on substance. As long as most of the tax revenue Norwalk raises ends up directly in the unaccountable pockets of the BOE, nothing any of these candidates will say will mean anything.

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

15 Responses so far “Norwalk: Debate The Debates”



  • 1 #21 of #25 // Oct 14, 2007 at 10:58 am

    What happened to the moritorium on Condos? I heard that this was implemented in the 80’s, so why not now?

  • 2 in the know // Oct 14, 2007 at 11:04 am

    There will absolutely be a BoE candidates debate I believe on or about October 25th. Details are to be released soon.

  • 3 turfgrrl // Oct 14, 2007 at 11:11 am

    I heard that the BOE would be on another night, raises a separate but equal issue there.
  • 4 Mr Greenpeace // Oct 14, 2007 at 11:30 am

    most who buy a condo are unsuspecting of what goes on in the city, they live close to the nightlife and have no kids in school, so lets cut taxes, deny the fire dept what they want, hold line items on street and sewer repair read about how great the city is run and not care about a farmers market at their door..

    If you paid 1.5 million for a condo at Maritime would you be interested in how many residents belong to the methadone clinic on the other end of the street?

    By the way thats near washington Village for point of referance :) on Concord street where this sunday morning they have only taken one patient to the hospital so far for the day.

    Not too long ago I spoke to new condo owners who if they knew then what they know know would of never bought in Norwalk,,sentiment ran the same for the others in the complex,,yet they bought because the police station was accross the street go figure..

    A dozen or so condo’s sold and were in the Hour just recently, are they really worth that much?

    Why waste good land on afforable housing when you can buy condo’s there is plenty of room in South Norwalk and under the bridge to house more people..

    I think we should limit the residency under the bridge and Oyster park for now decide on a cap and move others into other parts of the city that can handle to overflow,,no I’m trying to make a point ,,not trying to be funny its a subject no one wants to talk about..debate whats there to debate no one knows the facts do they>

    There are pictures on whats going on maybe a link to a photomural would help everyone out,,see what is being described before the elections may help people and not the politicians,,anyone willing to see just pictures?

    photomurals were coined years ago when a web design company made up of all MIT grads desided create such novel ideas before other sites like them cropped up,icq at the time was given out for free if that dates the company,,

    just an unedited rant

  • 5 anonymous // Oct 14, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    There is affordable housing all over the country. If you can’t afford to live in fairfield county, you can move to other towns where you can buy homes for much cheaper. It is a market driven economy, and property owners should be able to sell for whatever the market will bear. Let’s stop subsidizing everything. Throughout the ages, w hen property was too expensive or unavailable, people used to move to where they could afford a better life. That is how cities, towns, and villages sprung up across the country. How many people have left their homes and everything they owned in foreign countries to come tp America for a better life,yet many citizens here are looking for entitlements in their own community instead of venturing out where they can make it on their own.

  • 6 Wake Up Already! // Oct 14, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    Wow #5! You hit the nail on the head with hat post. I could not af said it any better. I wonder how many of these so-called “affordable housing advocates” when it comes time to sell their own home, would sell it at a reduced rate so that someboby could find it “affordable”. I doubt you’d find one of these hypocrits who would and if they say they would, they’d be a liar.

  • 7 nwlknative // Oct 14, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    If a condo at Maritime sold for 1.5 million, how much to the “affordable” units sell for?

  • 8 Anonymous // Oct 14, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    your both right 5 and 6 most of us are looking for handouts instead of moving on to more affordable track of land, many houses are now being bought and filled with many residents, some all in the same room, I’m sure these area’s in town will feel the new wave of new americans finding a better life.

    I know the police dept and board of health are finding many of these homes that have turned into hotels for the day workers,,you may wake up some day and find one next to your home,,then like us find a better life elsewhere , I wish you luck where ever your forced to take your family,,I’ll be right here fighting for what I fought for during the last big war,,my home, my country my city,my house my family ,talkabout jackass postings consider mine as one also if you like.

    To #7 with all due respect I found the real estate news and saw the actual reporting of that condo, I’m surprised the houses are going for much less in South Norwalk than in the Strawberry hill or Cranberry sections of the city and much less than the condo..

    anyone know how much the affordable housing units do sell for?

  • 9 Wake up already! // Oct 14, 2007 at 10:54 pm

    Your right #8, I DO consider your posting to be that of a jackass (J.A.)! Why don’t you set an example, take your $400K house or whatever it’s market value is and chop at least 25% of it off when you sell it if it makes you feel better. The fact J.A. is that SOMEONE has to pay for affordable housing. and J.A. if you’ve read any of the other postings on this blog, you’d know that they also pay LESS taxes than the rest of us who may be working an extra job or two to make ends meet. In fact J.A., I’ll bet your one of those “living wage” buffons as well! If you choose to stuff bags at the STOP & SHOP, well hell then, you DESERVE to have an easy go of it with subsidized taxes, reduced home prices, etc. what else can we do for you? Wipe your backside too? I wan to live in South Beach or even Beverly Hills..According to you, if I can’t afford it, then SOMEONE has to pay for me to live there. Right? It’s my right to live there because I want to. Hey J.A., we do more3 than our Fair Share we it comes to “affordable housing” what are we at 13, 14 or 15%? we are required for only 10%. What have our neighboring towns done for affordable housing? You could probably TOTAl theirs together and it wouldn’t compare with ours. Yes, indeed, you are a Jack Ass.

  • 10 Watchdog // Oct 15, 2007 at 7:03 am

    Number 9 - I’m not exactly sure, but isn’t number 8 agreeing with you? At least, that’s the gist I’m getting from his/her message.

  • 11 Watchdog // Oct 15, 2007 at 7:06 am

    Oops… maybe I’m wrong. It’s early in the A.M. and I just sipped some more coffee.

  • 12 Anonymous // Oct 15, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    Totaly agree with # 7,8, and now that 9 had his coffee I agree with 9 too. #9 you should really consider running for mayor, you have my vote. Coffee before you type. Thats what we need a good kick in the ass, no one gives me anything I want it I work for it. Hand outs should be for the retired elderly and the sick, help them in every way possible. I cant afford the house in Darien that cost 1.2 mil can someone help me? Will the darien first select woman make it affordable to me, around $725.000 please.

  • 13 GreenpeaceIsKillingUs // Oct 15, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    unedited rant all right! Please, please stop!

  • 14 old timer // Oct 15, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    I think his idea of pictures are great #13, all you do is encourage him or her, maybe GreenpeaceIsKilllingUs is Grenpeace themself wouldn’t that be provocative?

  • 15 anonymous // Oct 22, 2007 at 9:09 am

    huh?

Leave a Reply