YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Special Ed A Disaster


by turfgrrl


October 3rd, 2007 · 12 Comments

Norwalk’s Special education program has been under sanctions a number of years. So naturally, now that Corda has hired a new director of Pupil Personnel Services, he deflected answering any questions to the new director. Who would of course be unfamilar with all that has gone on for several years.

And what is with this title, “director of Pupil Personnel Services”? It has  a Soviet Sptunik era ring to it.

It is unclear how long Norwalk schools have been under the sanction, what the specific sanctions are or why the state felt it had to step in to correct the situation. Superintendent of Schools Salvatore Corda acknowledged Tuesday the state had identified areas “we have to address” and that sanctions
were in place.
“We’ve had several issues relative to special education,” he said.
Corda declined to be more specific and referred all questions to
Janie Friedlander, the newly hired director of Pupil Personnel Services.
Friedlander did not return calls for comment. According to research by NorwalkSEEKS (Norwalk Special Education
Empower Through Knowledge Source), “black kids in Norwalk
are more than five times as likely than their non-black peers to
be identified with an emotional disturbance.”

Lauren Garrison however was able to get Janie Friedlander’s comments at the BOE meeting.

The district’s new director of pupil personnel is recommending using additional state funding received by the city to hire a speech and language assistant to work at Kendall and Jefferson elementary schools.
Janie Friedlander, who offered her suggestion to the Board of Education Tuesday night, said that a speech and language assistant can provide therapy and “a lot of face time” to children, but cannot evaluate children or write Individualized Education Programs, or IEPs. The assistants work under the supervision of a speech and language pathologist who also provides services at the same school(s). Friedlander said she identified Kendall and Jefferson as “the two schools that were most in need of extra service,” though she said there were many other schools that could use additional speech and language personnel.
At Jefferson, an increase this year in kindergarten enrollment has driven the higher need for speech and language services.

I am struggling to understand how a language specialist is needed in kindergarten when the whole point of kindergarten is to teach, presumably, English to toddlers.  Here’s an interating thought for the over specialized, there’s this school or philosophy regarding language leaning called immersion. There’s a whole country, Canada, that has wrestled with this two language issue for decades without the need to “language specialists” in kindergarten. It’s called letting teachers teach. Might be handy here in Norwalk.

source: The Hour, Director recommends additional speech, language assistant , by Lauren Garrison, October 3, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

12 Responses so far “Norwalk: Special Ed A Disaster”



  • 1 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 9:15 am

    I googled “Pupil Personnel Services” - much to my surprise, this function exists in alot of school systems, notably, California. It looks like the short definition is to provide resources to aid in the education of students with disabilities.

    Why would there be a disproportionate number of black kids in special education? Because it is “easier” to label a kid than to put in the extra effort in the mainstream classroom?

  • 2 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 11:38 am

    #1. I Imagine that by labelling kids as emotionally disturbed, or in some other way as Special Needs, that they are lumped in a separate category for NCLB-related testing purposes.

    Rather than working to educate all of Norwalk’s children to a standard that should be expected, we can label those who are easy to teach as Mainstream (a decreasing proportion of the pool) and write off the rest to Special Needs. And the test scores look better. It’s a win-win all around.

  • 3 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 12:01 pm

    Well the test scores might look better but what about Special Needs spending and its impact on the taxpayer? And for what? To cover up poor management?

  • 4 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    For Corda it’s a win-win-win, since it’s not his money, either.

  • 5 anon432 // Oct 3, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    It is not always a win-win for the teacher.In a class of 28 to have anywhere from one IEP to follow to 18 is a big challange. ADD, ADHD, OCD, ESL, SED…and the alphabet soup pours on. #2 is right there are very few Mainstream students. And if they are in the mainstream without a special need they better be good students that do not need that much direction because the teachers are dealing with distrubing behaviors, trying to translate and working on multiple modifactions for those in need. It may take a law suit from a so-called normal child to stop the maddness.

  • 6 anon // Oct 3, 2007 at 9:07 pm

    This kind of thing bothers me when they say there is a difference in the number of certain races that are identified with a certain problem. What’s next, there are going to be people that complain that blacks are more likely to get sickle cell anemia than hispanics! We already know this. Or maybe someone will get angry when they cite that Jewish people are being treated with more Crohn’s Disease than Indian people in Norwalk! Statistics only show you part of the picture when it comes to a group of children.
    You could also say that 100% of the children who get suspended or get high honors in Norwalk breathe oxygen! So do I. We all do, but instead of saying that blacks are more than five times getting identified with ED, ask “Why are they?”
    Ask any police officer what the percentage of students are who have been arrested in Norwalk,what race they are, and they may give you a statistic that you don’t like to hear. That doesn’t make it untrue. As an educated African-American father of three, I can’t stand to listen to people cry about ridiculous statistics as these. Why don’t you find out about these kids’ parents. It may be them who needs to be identified. I bet if you talk to them you will probably find out a lot about why their children are ED.
    Many teachers wonder why a child acts the way they do. And after they meet the parents it all becomes clear; dysfunctional parents create dysfunctional kids.
    And even when you think you have done everything you can as a parent, read up on all different kinds of things to do for your children, and create a strong emotional family unit that is guided by fairness, equity, and love…sometimes this can not change what might be the inevitable. Your child might have ED.
    Take a walk into our schools and spend some time there volunteering. Watch children as they interact. If there is a disproportionate number of black students with ED, it may be because they have ED, not that the schools are creating the ED. Give the schools a break. And parents…If your child comes home and says that they got in trouble with another child in their class, instead of calling the school and saying, “It wasn’t my kid.”, let the school take care of it first and if it becomes a propblem later, then intervene. We have to remember as parents that teachers went to college to teach and to have children learn. I doubt any teacher said to themselves, “I can’t wait to get into that classroom and change one black child’s demeanor so I can take time away from the other 95% of my students to deal with that one student.”
    Teachers in Norwalk really care about our children. If a teacher is trying to help a student that is causing trouble in the classroom, they are not only looking out for that child, but the rest of the class as well. Stop using statistics to tell the whole story. It’s just a piece of the big picture that can be used to help reinforce what might already be known or unknown. Teachers…Keep up the good work! CMTs and the CAPT don’t always tell you everything either, but until Bush is out…Keep raising those scores. Peace.

  • 7 anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    So do you guys think we leave more kids in the mainstream and increase support services, for example, language specialistS?

  • 8 Anonymous // Oct 4, 2007 at 7:18 am

    Talk, schmalk. There are children who are seriously in need of help, period! Unfortuntately, our system isn’t equipped to deal with it because it is a money issue. Go to the burbs where half of an elementary class receives social work. When a child gets to the PPT level after the catch-basin of the SRT process, it is fully warranted. The problem is that special ed et al specialists should be co-teaching in the classroom. Tell that to Dr. Corda who doesn’t provide the district with enough specialists to go around in each school. Co-teaching especially applies to ELL/ESL to teach that hispanic sub-group to address the test score data.

  • 9 nutty // Oct 4, 2007 at 7:59 am

    I am no fan of Corda. No fan of any of the “big 3″. However, right is right and this story was wrong. Norwalk is not under any sanctions for overidentifying special education students. Not now and not ever. The reporter was wrong. There was no fact checking done by the reporter and he the single source was a parent with an agenda. That reporter should be fired for writing a made up story. The fact is that Norwalk, and almost every other urban district in the state, has been monitoerd by the state for disprportioate identification of minority students. This first occured in Norwalk several years ago and the stae issues a report every year showing Norwalks progress in a number of areas. In fact, Norwalk is doing quit well in most of the areas. Better than the urban distrcits and, in some cases better than the state averages. This years report said that Norwalk needs “continued monitoring, no corrective action recommeded”. That does not sound like “sactions to me”. The Hour of course, printed articles on this topic in 2005. So the idea that this issue has been kept a secret is a joke. This issue is a national one and all of this data including Norwalks report is available on the state department of education’s web site. I rembered reading of this issue in the Hour a few years ago which prompted my research. I was able to get all of my information in a few hours on the web and a couple of brief phone calls. Sounds like the job of a reporter. A single source, no fact checking and an bad information. This reporter should be fired…..but with those skills, Corda will rehire him as his assisstant. Two wrongs don’t make a right and the Hour shoud print a full page correction.

  • 10 Slayer // Oct 7, 2007 at 9:17 am

    It is becoming increasily difficult to teach in classrooms that are filled with students with severe problems.

    An emotionally disturbed (label from Special Ed, not mine) student is allowed to disrupt classes on a daily basis. He cannot follow directions, is oppositional, and disrespectful. Do we have a choice for alternative placement. No. The teacher and students must suffer daily. The federal laws guiding special education students have gone too far. When they use the term “least restrictive environment” does this term mean that every regular ed student must have his/her education disrupted? It is not fair. It is also not politiclly correct to say anything.

    What has happened to the rights of a regular ed student? The Tourette’s child in another story. We know that the child cannot help him/herself. However, how can a teacher conduct the daily business of the classroom when the kid is yelling Bitch, Cunt, Whore at the tops of his lungs. The other special education students in the class want to then follow his lead. How disruptive is this behavior? His voice can be heard two classrooms down the hall. This student disrupts the learning environment of approximately 100 plus kids on a daily basis. Can we intervene and create another environment? NO. How selfish of the parents. I ask why? How fair is this placement?

    Teachers have all kinds of students in their classes, and they abide by many IEPs; however, some children would be better served in another venue. The board won’t pay, and now, we all must suffer–even the special needs kids.

  • 11 Anne Sullivan // Oct 7, 2007 at 9:38 am

    Anon #6 - thank you for your support and understanding. SUPPORTIVE parents like you give teachers the boost to continue their dedicated service to ALL Norwalk’s children.

  • 12 Aunt Bertha // Oct 7, 2007 at 10:15 am

    Slayer- I am with you I have seen this behavior from Kindergarten al the way up to 12th grade. And the 12th grader who has stayed back once or twice is in classes with freshmen sometimes 6 years younger than them. I am disturbed over some of the things I have seen and yet we are told to be quiet.

Leave a Reply