YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Corda Can’t Count


by turfgrrl


October 3rd, 2007 · 21 Comments

It’s become apparent that the math skills of embattled Superintendent Sal Corda are unsatisfactory. I think an individualized educational program is in order here. How else to explain the faith based budgeting numbers he dreams up, the excuses (then) that you just have to wait and see what the budget numbers are after the end of the school year, and not this latest example.

In a stunning, only for the timing, shocker, the enrollment projections that Crew Corda came up with in the summer are off. By a triple digit number in the high schools. It’s October, let’s start there. School started in August. We are now just hearing about the enrollment numbers. It’s almost as if Corda wants the public to believe that there was a sudden rush of parents that waited until September to enroll their kids into high school. Don’t they have computers there in the central office? Don’t they have someone capable of pressing that button to get a forecast based on enrollments that actually represents forecasts off actual data?

I hope that Sal “no central office administrator left behind” Corda is rethinking through the capability of his staff because they are sure making him look bad. But maybe he doesn’t see the clowns for what they are.

So let’s take a look at the enrollment numbers from Alexander Fenwick’s Norwalk Advocate article:

There are 136 more students than projected this year at Brien McMahon High School, where the number of freshmen enrolled jumped by nearly 100 students above estimates. Enrollment in other grades at McMahon remained fairly close to projections.

“We are in the process of trying to determine where those students came from,” Corda said. “There is a shift in the number of students who moved from the Norwalk High School side of town to the Brien McMahon side of town.”

At Norwalk High, enrollment was 76 students less then projected. Enrollment fell in every grade, with the biggest decline in the number of 10th graders, down 30 from projections, and 11th graders, down 25 students.

“When it comes to high school, it’s much shakier ground,” Corda said of predicting enrollment figures.

Enrollment figures in ninth grade are especially difficult to pin down, he said. The influxes and decreases may be attributed to former parochial school students enrolling in the public high schools, students switching to private schools or families moving across the district, among other factors.

Corda said he doesn’t yet know what this year’s high school enrollments mean for future projections.

“I don’t know yet whether that is an aberration or if it signals a trend for us.”

A little effort, since August, would have been able to target whether there was indeed a shift in the number of students who were once registered at Norwalk High School and then moved across town and “transfered” to Brien McMahon. I would guess that running a “transfer” report might yield that answer. A 10,000 record database would spew out this number in about 3 minutes including actual names. But this is Corda so let’s assume that someone would have to combine several databases to get the data.

District officials provided analysis of enrollment numbers at yesterday’s Board of Education meeting, describing jumps and drops in high school enrollment and elementary figures that prompted the hiring of one more elementary teacher than budgeted and a recommendation to hire an associate teacher in speech.

Board member Bruce Kimmel and Chairwoman Jody Bishop-Pullan questioned how funds are redistributed if schools fall a great deal short of enrollment projections or greatly exceed them.

“Over the course of time that balances out. We don’t say to a principal, we’re going to reduce your allocation,” Superintendent Salvatore Corda said.

Chief Operating Officer Stuart Opdahl said after the meeting that the district does have some leeway built into enrollment-based budgets and Corda said he would revisit the process.

Each July, the district puts about 10 percent of schools’ per pupil budgets in reserve, and in October the funds are redistributed based on actual enrollment, Opdahl said.

If schools are still lacking resources, principals can ask the Central Office for assistance.

“If there are hardships, problems are addressed,” Opdahl said.

Kimmel said it is important that school budgets be adjusted based on actual enrollment figures, otherwise, projections that overshoot real numbers could mean bloated budgets.

“You want an incentive for the projections to be as close as possible,” he said.

Projections are made by Central Office administrators based on attrition rates, or the average number of students lost or gained from grade to grade over five years, Corda said.

Is there really any question about what to do with budget numbers here? If different enrollments than what you projected are occurring, don’t you immediately revisit budget allocations? What is the budget, good ship Titanic, full speed ahead, ram the ice berg, stay on the ship till it sinks?

In May, Corda revealed his master budget strategy of overestimating everything so he could build a slush fund in order than he could move money around where he needed it. Now note what he is saying, “Over the course of time that balances out. We don’t say to a principal, we’re going to reduce your allocation.”

Will anyone please start holding Corda accountable?

source: Advocate, School board considers how to handle fluctuating enrollments, By Alexandra Fenwick, October 3, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

21 Responses so far “Norwalk: Corda Can’t Count”



  • 1 anon432 // Oct 3, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    Why then did NHS get more teachers than BMHS? BMHS is now servicing more students in all areas of study and there are less teachers in many content areas to teach the students the required for graduation classes. Why not send the extra teachers from NHS over to BMHS to make up for the inequity?

  • 2 nwlknative // Oct 4, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    I find it hard to believe that that many students moved from the NHS side of town to the McMahon side of town. Perhaps it is a case of students seeing that McMahon is like a beautiful college campus with all the bells and whistles and NHS looks like a disaster area. There were a lot of out of district students in the NHS area previously. It would be interesting to see where all these students came from and if they actually “moved across town” as Corda says.

  • 3 anonymous // Oct 4, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    See how many students who live in nhs district transferred to bmhs and play sports there.

  • 4 Anonymous // Oct 4, 2007 at 10:32 pm

    believe it! it started about 2 years ago because sports really are important to many kids

  • 5 Bruce LeVine Mellion- President Norwalk Federation of Teachers // Oct 5, 2007 at 10:05 am

    You had to be there to really see how bad the presentaion was and all the math mistakes. I have not seen worse regarding enrollment in 39 years. Clearly BMHS should have more teachers and the per pupil dollars they are entitled to without having to beg for them. The retired Prin. was correct with a 1662 student projection but no one wanted to listen and he was accused of cooking the books. The truth shall free you.

  • 6 here we go again // Oct 5, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Bruce if you could read into one of the threads, it suggests the teachers ask for clean bill of health with the Radon issue,,any chance you can read into the police station thread simply look ,,it concerns teachers

  • 7 Slayer // Oct 7, 2007 at 9:42 am

    The false reporting of numbers at BMHS continue.

    I am a bit confused about the number of students at BMHS. Noone is looking at the Global Studies program, which has, I believe, approximately 247 students. These students are being included in the overall number count of BMHS when they should not be because a magnet’s students are separate.

    It seems as if there is some double dipping. If the board is paying a per pupil amount for the 247 at the Global Studies program and the state is also paying for these students, the taxpayers are paying double.

    YOU CANNOT COUNT THESE STUDENTS TWICE. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE? Why are we paying for those students who do not live in Norwalk?

    NHS has approximate 1600 students and growing; BMHS has 1413. You cannot add the other 247 to BMHS’s numbers.

    Why isn’t the board looking in this debacle? You cannot have it both ways. Are the teachers for Global Studies included in the number of teachers for the whole school? I believe they are now being paid by the board; however, is the city reinbursed by the state? Where is that money? When you have a magnet in town, someone should be minding the fiancial business of the magnet and making sure the citizens are not paying money for those students who live else where.

    This numbers game at BMHS has been going on since the days of Forcellina, well before the Magnet. Additionally, funny games continue with students who say they are going to the Global Studies and then, end up playing sports.

    Maybe a parent or two could ask some questions about how they count students at BMHS. Maybe a reporter could get the facts….or maybe board of ed members can ask about the financial implications of this number game…

  • 8 Aunt Bertha // Oct 7, 2007 at 10:09 am

    The magnet or CGS students attend BMHS classes. Therefore, they are not counted twice they are considered BMHS students that are tracked through the CGS magnet.

  • 9 anon // Oct 7, 2007 at 10:31 am

    The numbers at BMHS are not a fiction. CGS students spend part of their day in the CGS, where they have access to a few specialized courses, but most of it in regular BMHS classes. They are in regular BMHS classes for the arts, for math, for science, for some of their social studies classes, for phys ed/health, for music, for business education, for JROTC and more. They use the BMHS library and cafeteria. How does it not make sense to count them as BMHS students?

    As for NHS, check the district enrollment figures. NHS does not have 1,600 students, and its enrollment is shrinking.

  • 10 anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 10:58 am

    The students at CGS are counted as students, but the CGS teachers are not counted as BMHS teachers. Should be consistent. If you are going to count CGS students, then add CGS teachers as staff to figure out the teacher-pupil ratio.

  • 11 anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 11:03 am

    My other question would be how many out of district student-athletes were accepted in CGS and once at the building dropped out of CGS, remained out of district at BMHS and play sports? Someone should ask to see the Private Investigator”s report to Superintendent with video documentation.

  • 12 Aunt Bertha // Oct 7, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    #11.Many of the CGS students wanted to play for BMHS sports and could not because they were to play for their home school,ie.Fairfield,Wilton….what ever.this was a hardship on the students because they had to leave BMHS and get to their home school to participate in practices and games often times wearing out the child and the parent driver. I don’t think you have the full story.

  • 13 you've got to be kidding? // Oct 7, 2007 at 5:22 pm

    Bruce LeVine Mellion wroye in above post #5 that:

    “You had to be there to really see how bad the presentaion was and all the math mistakes. I have not seen worse regarding enrollment in 39 years.”

    Bruce, you are so right! I was there and couldn’t believe all the mistakes and sloppy presentation of facts coming from Corda. He must of put this together while having a sloe gin fizz on the 9th hole. But you want to know what the REAL KICK IN THE A$$ is? This is the same guy who the BoE hands 145 Million dollars to for a budget he authored. If he can’t estimate student attendance and plug the correct numbers into a chart that should read as easy as 1+1=2, what does this tell us of his ability to formulate a budget of 145 Million?? God help us! And for this Corda gets paid what?? A quarter of a million with stupid benefits up the ying yang! WAKE UP PEOPLE! WAKE THE HELL UP AND VOTE FOR CHANGE AND SOLUTIONS TO THIS MESS!

  • 14 Slayer // Oct 7, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    I am still confused. If you are all correct in what you are saying, what classes are the students in the Global Studies taking. The ratio in the GS is 15 students to 1 teacher; this teacher also does not have a duty. The state is giving the district money for those students enrolled in the GS. How is that amount figured into the per pupil allotment for these kids, who are, it appears, taking most of their classes at BMHS? Further, I thought that the figure for attendance at the GS was suppose to be a great deal higher or the state would ask for their money back. Remember how much money the state gave to the district to build the center. Anyone have any answers?

    If the poor darlings are so stressed out that they cannot play sports in their hometown district, why don’t they return to their home turf. You can’t have it both ways. My concern is Norwalk High students are playing for McMahon after they have abandoned the center not out of distric students. Who keeps a watch on those students?

    If the students are taking most of their classes at BMHS, what a grand hoax the center is. How much money is the state giving the district for this magnet? Is there an accounting of the money? I am sure that accounting is shared. Yeah! Right!!

  • 15 anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    Aunt Bertha. Better recheck your facts. CGS students are playing at BMHS, as are some CGS kids who left CGS and remained at McMahon. Check the football roster and last year’s baseball team for a start

  • 16 nwlknative // Oct 7, 2007 at 8:33 pm

    From all the comments I have read, it seems that Norwalk is paying for these students AND the State is paying for these students. I was under the impression that the CGS was a totally separate program. So if there are 247 students in the CGS who are actually taking classes with the BMHS students and are being counted as BMHS students, then we have students from other towns that we are also paying for or the other towns paying for their students to attend? It is about time someone demanded a full accounting of the actual costs of this center and who is paying what. It really isn’t rocket science to figure the cost/reimbursement - it is basic accounting.

  • 17 anon // Oct 7, 2007 at 8:47 pm

    Basic accounting, basic math. Each is beyond the capabilities of this BOE.

  • 18 Anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 8:49 pm

    The out of town student population is what is staggering. He refuses to address this situation and continues to say its but a handful. SAL WAKE UP and get you butt out at the train station and go to the bus routes coming from the Milford bus and see alo the kids that are going to our schools that DON’T BELONG HERE! How much louder can we tell you that you aren’t doing your job????? Why should Norwalk taxpayers continue to foot the bill for your lack of oversight and accountability? When is the Board of Ed going to wake up and look at whats wrong with extending his contract? maybe he should take a look at the kids who no longer go to Norwalk schools because parents are disgusted? Time to speak up everyone, we can’t let this continue!

  • 19 nwlknative // Oct 7, 2007 at 8:56 pm

    Where are these kids getting off this Milford bus - at the pulse point? Do they get on other buses to take them to the schools? I see a lot of students getting off of a local bus at NHS and Nathan Hale in the morning and was wondering why they weren’t taking school buses. Now I will be more aware.

  • 20 Anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 9:09 pm

    Try sitting at Marshalls and see who gets off the Milford bus on Westport Ave and then go to the East Norwalk Station south bound and see who gets off and takes the Wheels bus. Or you can just go to Sal Corda and I am sure he’ll tell you that its your imagination. Actually, just ask your kids, they know who doesn’t belong at Fox run and who doesn’t belong at Nathan Hale etc.

  • 21 Anonymous // Oct 7, 2007 at 9:17 pm

    It ISN’T Sal Corda’s fault, people! LOOK at this board!! What did they just do? They KNOW that the teachers are not happy with Corda and openly protested by walking out on him on Convocation Day. Did the board get the message? Obviously not!! What DID they do? They pushed through Corda’s contract and GAVE him more goodies! Bruce Mellion (Thank GOD!!) has been forced to make yet another statement with a lawsuit since the BOARD hid this action from the public. The public is grumbling, the parents are grumbling, the teachers are grumbling, and this man manages to collect more money from this board with zero accountability! It is not surprising that his presentation was off the mark. Where are the standards? Who is evaluating him? Oddly enough, the state has stepped in. This is no longer about a superintendent that does the minimum or gives rotten presentations - this is about a district that now requires state intervention. THIS BOARD HAS TO GO!!!

Leave a Reply