YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Campaigns On Fire


by turfgrrl


October 2nd, 2007 · 294 Comments

Borrowing a good joke from Andy Garfunkel, things are heating up in District C. It seems that vandals are busy torching political signs in East Norwalk, and seemingly centralized on Strawberry Hill. Rebels without a cause in previous decades had plenty of other activities to inflict smells like teen spirit on the neighbors, but it looks like Norwalk teens have a penchant for setting fire to political signs and band equipment.

Signs supporting Mayor Richard Moccia, at-large Common Council candidate Fred Bondi, and District C opponents Laurel Lindstrom and David Park were also ruined in an apparent spree of political sign-burnings early Sunday on and around Strawberry Hill Avenue.

Garfunkel, Lindstrom and Bondi are all Democrats. Moccia and Park are Republicans.

Police reported Monday at least five burned signs, and candidates reported more — all of them reportedly lit between Saturday night and Sunday.

“I theorize that it was all part of the same thing,” said police spokesman Lt. Paul Resnick. “It was the same geographical area — it just fits. The police department will be doing extra observation for vandalism and burning signs.”

The investigation has been referred to the Detective Bureau, Resnick said, adding that police had found no witnesses to any fire-setting as of Monday morning.

The first report came in at 3:36 a.m. Sunday, when a patrol officer noticed “a small fire” at 5 King St. He discovered it was a burning political sign but did not report who the sign was supporting, Resnick said.

“He put out the fire, he’s driving back to headquarters and he sees another paper political sign on fire at the corner of Heather and Tierney … eight minutes later,” he said. “So he advised headquarters and put out that fire as well.”

In one case reported later Sunday morning, a burning David Park sign was apparently tossed onto the garage roof at 204 Strawberry Hill Ave. — and melted there.

“I don’t think it’s politics; I think it’s pranksters who crossed the line into dangerous territory,” Park said. “If you’re burning a David Park and a Laurel Lindstrom — that’s not political. I’m speculating that it was teenagers up in the middle of the night, you know, roaming around. That whole area there, I’ve had problems. I haven’t had problems anywhere else.”

The 204 Strawberry Hill resident told police that this was the third time a Park sign had been removed from her yard. Park said he will not replace the sign there after the roof incident, because the situation could be dangerous.

The burning and other vandalism angers him because it’s costly, he said, explaining that his signs cost more than $3 each and he lost three between Saturday night and Sunday morning.

Among the vandalized signs were those in the yard of Bondi’s King Street home and another rental property he owns on Strawberry Hill Avenue. Bondi said he learned of the vandalism Monday morning.

“My son came over and asked me if I had seen what happened to the sign,” Bondi said. “When I went outside, I saw the burned pieces and some white stuff in the grass where someone must have used a fire extinguisher to put out the flames.”

Lindstrom said she learned of the burned signs from a resident.

“I got a call Sunday morning from a resident that two signs on his property, which is at the corner of Tierney and Heather Streets, had been torched overnight,” Lindstrom said. “The grass around the sign was scorched.”

source: The Hour, Political signs torched in weekend spree by Noelle Frampton, October 2, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

294 Responses so far “Norwalk: Campaigns On Fire”


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All



  • 1 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 9:38 am

    In the full story,you’ll notice Lindstrom’s apparent paranoia (or is she just self centered). Yes, Laurel they drive around every day picking on you - they’re out to get you, just you. NOT!
    Get over yourself! They practice mischief of a dangerous sort but it is equal opportunity stupidity. Just concentrate on campaigning and you’ll win.

  • 2 anon again // Oct 2, 2007 at 9:50 am

    Next we’ll hear that Joanne is out at 3am torching Andy’s signs. Come on Laurel, its not always about you! There is a bigger problem here and that is that parents are not responsible for their kids. The bigger problem is that someone’s house could have caught on fire and not whether or not you will win the election. Setting signs, band equipment buildings, school playground equipment etc on fire is becoming all too common. We need to ask ourselves, “WHERE ARE THE PARENTS”? We keep giving these kids a slap on the hand and it continues, how about making the parents responsible for their children being out at that time of morning and causing this damage?

  • 3 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 10:06 am

    Ok, I read the article and I have one question, why weren’t any of Kydes signs burned? See, Romano is smart, she knows enough not to put out signs this early. But I still want to know why Kydes signs weren’t targeted.

  • 4 anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 10:36 am

    David Park sounds a bit self-centered — “That whole area there, I’ve had problems. I haven’t had problems anywhere else.” Get over it, David. It’s not just you.

    Also, the Hour, has the cop quoted as saying “the same geo-political area…” Gotta love it…

  • 5 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 10:51 am

    Anyone who thinks they are being targeted by a bunch of high school kids is really paranoid. They couldn’t care less who is running for what. they just think they are being funny. That includes Laurel, David and anyone else who has the need to play the “Pity Me” card. So far signs have been removed all over town, how many adults will really get up in the middle of the night just to remove signs? Just so everyone is aware, removing these signs from someones lawn, other than your own is simply ILLEGAL. You can be arrested and you can be fined.

  • 6 anon // Oct 2, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    Joanne, will you please stop your hooligan friends from targeting your opponant? We know you guys are out there lurking in the shadows just waiting for those signs to appear so you can snatch them away and dump them in the woods and now setting them on fire? This is way over the top!

  • 7 anon again // Oct 2, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    You could be right #6- I saw her at the stop light on Strawberry Hill Saturday Night with a kid in a car seat, ya think she’s recruiting them a bit young? I know, she parks her car on a side street and sends the little one out scurrying for signs, the only thing I don’t get is how the kid got the one on the roof?

  • 8 ENrwlker // Oct 2, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    C’mon, #7, you underestimate Joanne’s resourcefulness. Didn’t you know that she has recruited alien beings with powers of levitation who can float up to the roofs and drop the signs there? It’s all part of the Interplanetary Conspiracy to Destroy Garfunkel’s Signs, which is being run from a bunker under the White House (from which direct communications with the Andromeda Galaxy are managed). Of course, the National Security Agency has been tasked to destroy Lindstrom’s signs. Cleverly, both of these operations also destroy Moccia and Park signs to cover their tracks. Good thing we have Lindstrom and Garfunkel supporters on this blog to lead us to the truth behind this vast conspiracy!

  • 9 Joanne // Oct 2, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    ENrwlker-stop giving out my trade secrets. Look, my 5 yr old grandson figured it would be more productive to just get rid of the competition than to run around wearing one of those lame “Vote for my Grandma” tee-shirts. Besides, he was bored playing candy land and wanted to get out in the world of politics.

  • 10 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Who says its the kids?

  • 11 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    I can’t believe you are pointing fingers at Norwalk teens when you know it is just some crazy Norwalk politician!! As if adults behave better. Ha!

  • 12 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    #11, be serious here. do you really believe an adult would risk getting caight lighting objects on fire?

  • 13 Mr Greenpeace // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    so who has the most BTU’s in their sign?

    figure I might save on wood this winter..

    I have no clue why someone would burn them I’m going to sell the ones I get at my half baked sale after the election.

    on second thought has the DEP tested these for lead?

    http://www.local830.org/single_pic.cfm?PicID=39961&gallery=New%20Engine%201%20Arrival

    I’m sure as a city we will be all set our new fire truck looks like it will handle anything that comes up..I have to say this truck is just the color most jakes like.

  • 14 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:27 pm

    Number 12, yes I do! Not the politicians themselves but opponent loyalists. People do funny things and by the way what teens do you know of that are up early on a Sunday mornings?

  • 15 anon // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    14 that’s any easy one. The teens coming home from a night of carousing at Andrews field.

  • 16 ROTFL // Oct 2, 2007 at 4:32 pm

    Was there anyone in particular you were suggesting in your headline turffie?

  • 17 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 5:07 pm

    She was referring to the following:

    Garfunkel said he will replace the signs that were burned and carry on with his campaign.

    “I guess now I can say that my campaign is on fire,” he joked.

  • 18 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    It just goes to show you who’s got the better sense of humor. Lindstrom and Parks need to chill out.

  • 19 anon again // Oct 2, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    All of a sudden he has a sense of humor? In an earlier post he basically accussed Romano’s team of vandalising and stealing his signs.

    “At least a dozen of my lawn signs have already been vandalized or removed. I would hope that the opposing party doesnt think that this is called positive campaigning and will advise its members to refrain from such activities”.

    by Andy Garfunkel — September 10, 2007 @ 5:24 pm

    Glad to see he developed one since then

  • 20 indythinker // Oct 2, 2007 at 8:59 pm

    Garfunkel said he didn’t “think” the burnings were politically motivated.
    What that means is there’s doubt in his mind and I would say that’s being paranoid. Does he really think that Joanne would have someone do something like that? I think that she is more interested in getting her message out and running on her record as someone who has done so much for many of us than trashing his signs. But then again, that alien theory is a good one!

  • 21 just wondering // Oct 2, 2007 at 9:45 pm

    Who says Garfunkel says Romano has anything to do with the signs missing? Someone is certainly jumping on here and projecting paranoia, and it isn’t Garfunkel.

  • 22 Joanne // Oct 2, 2007 at 10:14 pm

    Ok folks,
    The alien thing was funny, my grandson stealing signs was funny since he won’t even steal a cookie and the thought of me getting up at 3am to set signs on fire..way past my bedtime. This is a serious thing that is being discussed. No matter who the candidate is, they work very hard to gather donations to pay for their signs and their campaigns and for someone to set them on fire or steal them and throw them away is just wrong. No matter how many you remove it won’t change who votes for the candidate. So blaming one or the other is pointless and petty. I would hope that adults have more scruples than to do this sort of thing.

  • 23 Mike Lyons // Oct 3, 2007 at 9:40 am

    Look, there have been isolated incidents in past years of operatives from both parties tearing down signs. It’s childish, petty, and illegal. But most vandalism of signs is done by teenagers. As I mentioned a post a week or two back, I’ve seen this for years with political signs I put up at the end of my lane. I have a TV security camera aimed there (put up — successfully — to stop the regular detonations of my mail box), and when the signs are damaged or gone, I replay the tape. In every single case, the vandals were teenage kids (probably devoid of any political philosophy). So rather than getting paranoid about political opponents, you should face the reality that most of this is done by unsupervised kids, not politicians.

  • 24 turfgrrl // Oct 3, 2007 at 9:45 am

    Mike Lyons: you wrote: So rather than getting paranoid about political opponents, you should face the reality that most of this is done by unsupervised kids, not politicians.

    But what we likely have here is worse; unsupervised, anonymous and paranoid politicians. ;)

  • 25 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 11:14 am

    I think it was Mr Greenpeace who set the signs on fire, and used them to send smoke signals which were easier to understand then some of his statements on the blog. Just kidding Mr Greenpeace, I have noticed a subtle change in your comments, they now seem to be a lttle more satrical and self-depricating, and they actually are more fun. Keep it up. but be careful you may lose your membership in the miserable 25, who have been rather silent. By the way any prediction as who will win? Merrill or Briggs?

  • 26 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 11:22 am

    Neither!

  • 27 anon once more // Oct 3, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    What’s with that big sign of Andy on Main Street?
    Come on he’s running for Town Clerk, not president!
    What a waste of money!

  • 28 one more anon // Oct 3, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    You are kidding right? I guess he really wants this job bad. Probably can’t make that kind of money at roofing. Give me a break, he must really think he’s the best there is. I wonder what his employees think of him. But then they can’t say anything because if he wins they’ll lose their jobs.

  • 29 dem4life // Oct 3, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    Andy’s employees think he’s doing a great job. They’re union so they are not afraid of getting fired. It’s pathetic how many times anonymous Republicans try to distort the truth.

  • 30 Anonymous // Oct 3, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    Once again dem4life you have absolutely no idea what party anyone is on. Not every dem is in love with the democratic slate. And not all of Andy’s employees are exempt from the chopping block, the Assistant’s are at the pleasure of the sitting Town Clerk and can be replaced by whomever wins that spot so you might once again check the facts.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All

Leave a Reply