YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Crime Stats Stay ABout The Same


by turfgrrl


September 30th, 2007 · 68 Comments

The Advocate reports that the Norwalk Police Department have released crime stats for the year, with the serious crimes (arson, assault, burglary, kidnapping, homicides, auto theft, and sexual assault ) clocking in 2 less than last year.

“Obviously I would like to see the numbers lower, but overall I’m pleased. We did not experience an increase that that other communities have seen,” Police Chief Harry Rilling said. “I think we have ended up rather well this year.”

Five homicides occurred last year, compared with eight in 2005. Automobile thefts declined 31 percent, kidnappings dropped 12 percent and burglaries fell 5 percent.

Serious crimes that increased include arson, which went from eight incidents in 2005 to 10 last year. The number of assaults rose from 863 to 923, while sexual assaults increased from 28 to 42 in 2005.

Mayor Richard Moccia compared the Norwalk figures to a nationwide violent crime increase of nearly 2 percent, according to FBI figures released last week.

“Overall, putting it into context I think we are doing well. If we look at violent crime, it is up nationally 2 percent. Our efforts are paying off,” Moccia said. “Would I like to see less crime? Yes. But I think we are making good progress. The important think is the police are making a lot of arrests when the crimes are committed.”

Violent crimes recorded by the FBI are homicides, aggravated assaults, forcible rapes and robberies. In those categories, Norwalk has mixed results.

While homicides are down 38 percent, aggravated assaults increased from 179 in 2005 to 214 last year. Forcible rapes decreased from nine in 2005 to six in 2006, but robberies went up 33 percent, from 95 to 126.

source: The Advocate, Norwalk bucks trend on crime, By John Nickerson, September 30 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

68 Responses so far “Norwalk: Crime Stats Stay ABout The Same”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 8:15 am

    Good job by the police department, police commision, mayor, and city council in fighting crime. Keep up the good work !!! This week the department will appoint its first female deputy chief. Good job on that to the Mayor ! The Mayor has agains shown his commitment to diversity.

  • 2 anon // Sep 30, 2007 at 8:35 am

    The Mayor should be commended for keeping a focus on reducing crimes, not just the big ones, but the little ones that affect the safety of all Norwalkers.

  • 3 Anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 9:56 am

    Crediting Moccia for crime prevention is like congratulating an ice berg for floating. How about actually doing something like getting foot patrols on SoNo communities? What about making sure that we have enough patrolmen hired? What about giving Riling a contract increase when Rilling wants to be in Weston? More Republican propaganda and drivel.

  • 4 Anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 10:27 am

    Mayor McCheese, now Police Chief Big Mac. Ya got the Hambungler, who’s next at the trough in the GOP lineup?

  • 5 anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 10:55 am

    How about you dems preening and fawning over knopp for the one year of his administration when crime was on the down trend ? stop being so dishonest you tax and spenders.

  • 6 Anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 11:55 am

    Crime was up and Knopp refused to acknowledge gangs as any more than cliques, Unfortunately that put us behind the 8 ball in determining what was actually happening and so many kids got into things they shouldn’t have and parents were never made aware of the dangers.

  • 7 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 12:00 pm

    more laughs than with Andy Capp in todays Sunday paper at least the comic is more like in the chain of events before the elections.

    What happened to all the other stats?

    you know the ones that make the administration look bad?

  • 8 anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    hey greenpeace which stats ? oh another one of your half baked inneundoes. maybe the stats make everyone look good.

  • 9 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/12/crime.rate/index.html

    http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3224.html

    any one report will show something to support or deny what the elected official does

    http://www.morganquitno.com/cit07pop.htm#25

    where did we sit on the safest city this year did we change or did we make the list at all, last years figures were so promising correct?

    Didn’t we have more help this year , all kinds of grants and outside police agencies coming into Norwalk helping us out? there was outside help correct?

    Will they be here next year, did we add to our dept?

    Did we suffer and injuries this year directly caused by law enforcment to our officers,

    yes we saw the a list is there another list we will be seeing soon of whats going on in Norwalk?

    How many guns were taken off the street ,according to Nickerson victims were responsible for some, did the mailboxes collect many this year.

    who is everyone? I saw that the mayor was making the comments and Rillings what about the arresting officers what do they have to say,,did anyone get hurt this year when not enough men were available?

    Yes we are what saying the mayor did a fine job with what was reported now is there another side to all of this could we have done better without the outside help?

    I have always said to your posts half baked ideas for a cooked city..so yes theres more but first what about us being one of the safest cities were we or were we not? That seemed to be a soap box moment for our mayor and council wasn’t it? where do we sit now?

    I guess asking these types of questions are childish , but seriously what about that fact last year? were we one of the top safest in the nation or am i mistaken?

  • 10 Anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    Greenpeace, what the heck does this mean?

    “What happened to all the other stats?”

    Is there always someone on the “Grassy Knoll” with you?

  • 11 Anonymous // Sep 30, 2007 at 8:54 pm

    The article referred to reported that non violent crimes were way up.

  • 12 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    http://www.disastercenter.com/conn/crime/1651.htm

    something else that makes you wonder if the numbers are right that are always given..

  • 13 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    http://www.disastercenter.com/conn/crime/1611.htm

    two cities two reports two police forces two sizes

    I like comparisons it give you some relationship in enforcement and population

    the grassy knoll was cut the other day and they found some more documents enjoy them I’m sure you were waiting for them.

    http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/ctcrime.htm

  • 14 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 9:52 pm

    Its ok I just gave him something to read, there are no pictures or anything to color in, so we may not here from him for a while.

  • 15 here we go again // Sep 30, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    I don’t know about the rest of you but the numbers seem to be a bit off looking at the link next to the number #13 post and the Advocates figures given by the police dept.So are we going to get more officers or was this just a staged press release ,,wasn’t it in years past we had a double shooting one death at the end of Oct.?

    ended up rather well this year? they base crime with fiscal budgets or something , or do we still have 3 months left?

  • 16 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 30, 2007 at 11:19 pm

    http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/ctcrime.htm

    this got dropped by the system this does give you some more details my other post was before #12

  • 17 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 8:58 am

    Crime in Norwalk is still to high and gangs are on the rise. We need to do something soon before its to late and we totaly lose control. The mayor and police chief have a long way to go to make Norwalk a safe place to live, no congrats from here. We need police that live in Norwalk to police Norwalk so they feel the direct effects or nothing will get better. I would like to know how many police that work in Norwalk live in Norwalk.

  • 18 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 9:23 am

    #17-Excellent! Now we just need to start making it attractive for them to live here. Most live outside because they can’y afford to live here.

  • 19 here we go again // Oct 1, 2007 at 10:53 am

    why would they , they know the crime stats better than we do. Professionals they are,,,,,,,, stupid, they are not.

  • 20 anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:20 am

    Stop, many of them live outside our city because they want to. Many of them earn much more than the city average. Over 400 city employees earned over 100k last year. That’s more than I make and still afford to live in the city. Factor in pensions and health care that they receive for life and it is a sweet deal. It is a fallacy, the spin that they put out. They earn alot of money.

  • 21 anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:29 am

    And they work 60-80 hours a week to make 100,000. Most of it directing traffic like the guy who got hit in the head by the truck the other night.

  • 22 Mr Greenpeace // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:48 am

    the officer was hit by a trench box , like the ones they don’t use in East Norwalk.

    Is that what the firefighters make as well on overtime?

  • 23 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:49 am

    #19, that is the biggest line of BS I have ever heard.
    Do you honestly believe they make that kid of money working 40 hr work week? Be serious. The overtime (which some do daily) is fatored into those salaries you hear about and in order to make those salaries they must fore fo the holiday’s, birthdays etc that we get to enjoy.

  • 24 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:51 am

    Oh my God, get the spelling police, I killed the english language in the last post! So sorry,was answering phone(not cell) and typing at the same time.

  • 25 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    Have to admit that the CT Avenue road work is pretty scary. I drove through it after dark on Tuesday and it was difficult to navigate and I would not want to be working that job at night. It wouldn’t surprise me if an auto accident occured there. Also, there are at least three sites being dug and worked simultaneously. Stay away if you can.

  • 26 two cents // Oct 1, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    I don’t know if I would want to work in the same town that I was enforcing the law in…just from the safety standpoint: the safety for my family. You arrest some thug, he gets a promise to appear…and follows you home, sees where you live and all. The job is dangerous enough as it is…I wouldn’t want to have to watch my back at home…although I can tell you a lot of police do it anyway…always on guard. Most have unlisted numbers for that reason. Just something to think about. I can understand the other side of the arguement too…

  • 27 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    Mr Greenpeace the only half baked on is you and your drivel, please you are kliing Turff Girl’s blog with you inane drivle, Moccia get grants he does not get grants, crime is down, crime is up, what happens now what happens later, no one knows what you are talking about. Please go to detox and save the blog. Talk about bi-polar.

  • 28 Mr Greenpeace // Oct 1, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/jvambul.htm

    I’m sorry #26 try try this post I’m sure you may enjoy this one.

  • 29 Mr Greenpeace // Oct 1, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/jvvegs.htm

    This is for Dick he helped make the real one go away

  • 30 Anonymous // Oct 1, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    Great site, figures you would pick one that you need crayons to write with. Keep working you might move up to lead pencils after some years of rehab. A quote by Miguel de Cervantes. “By the street of by and by we arrive at the house of never.” You are close.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply