YourCT.com header image 2

Toni Boucher has Bigger Mojo That Bob Duff


by turfgrrl


September 28th, 2007 · 10 Comments

Well this is certainly a depressing development. While State Senator Bob Duff-D works to get Super 7 on the radar of legislators, State Rep Toni Boucher-R uses her bigger stash of mojo to erase any mention of Super 7 studies from the bonding bill. The Hour reports:

Duff inserted language on line 3,046 of a bonding package that would require the state Department of Transportation to report, using available funds, on the viability of Super 7 by the end of 2008.

The move riled Rep. Toni Boucher [R-143] who tried to introduce several amendments to the language and threatened to tie up legislation with hours of debate on the house floor. She later received a pledge from Speaker of the House Jim Amman and Transportation Committee Chairman Antonio Guerrera to remove the language if the bill passed.

“Revisiting this issue at this time is irresponsible,” Boucher said in a written statement. “To have this language inserted during this special session by Senator Duff was a surprise as the concept of a Super highway was soundly defeated in committee.”

Other lawmakers weighed in with their own comments. Sen. Judith Freedman [R-26] called the plan “ancient and environmentally destructive,” and Rep. John Hetherington [R-125] called it “meaningless and ineffective.”In a letter to politicians, town officials and the press, Wilton First Selectman William Brennan lauded Boucher for fighting Super 7. He said the proposal was “ill timed and devious,” as well as a “self serving, publicity stunt” for Duff.

In an interview, Boucher agreed with the sentiment. “It seems to me that any time the Senator likes to get publicity, all he has to do is sneeze the words Super 7, and he gets in the paper again,” she said.

Duff said in an interview he wasn’t surprised to face opposition from Wilton lawmakers.

“They’re holding on to an old idea that their communities are against Super 7, when in fact it is a vocal minority,” Duff said. He added that the widening of Route 7 from two to four lanes currently underway in Wilton is a waste of money that will harm the town in the long term. By comparison, he said an expressway would keep traffic off of Wilton’s back roads.

The Wilton route 7 construction project is turning that once leafy lined scenic drive into a traffic congested parking lot. When finished, they will have the equivalent of a Boston Post Road, lined with strip malls, similar to what transpired in Ridgefield’s portion of route 7. And still, the cars that commute daily from the Danbury, Brookfield, New Milford and New Fairfield areas will descend daily, adding 30 minutes onto a commute that would otherwise by 13 minutes, if there was a highway.

Bob Duff needs to get some bigger mojo. It’s not good when Speaker Amann cuts a deal with someone who systematically votes against the majority position on legislation.

source: The Wilton Villager, Political Tennis: Boucher returns Duff’s serve, JARED NEWMAN, September 28, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk · Wilton

10 Responses so far “Toni Boucher has Bigger Mojo That Bob Duff”



  • 1 Sen. Bob Doof is not relevant ! // Sep 28, 2007 at 8:09 am

    Sen. Bob Doof is not relevant. His own party votes against him. What clout ! No wonder we get screwed on money from Hartford.

  • 2 how about better train service? // Sep 28, 2007 at 9:56 am

    I thought we were past the “more highways, more better” era. How about instead of encoruaging more driving with a super-highway, we encourage more train riding by NOT making it easier to drive. Highways are not the answer — no mattr what DOT thinks.

    Hey, did you all know that there was a plan to have a cross sound bridge from LI to Norwalk, conneting wtih I-95 and Super 7? That would have put somethign akin to the Verrazanno coming up and over SoNo. Pretty ugly and city-destroying. It was stopped by the residents on the LI side…who waged a campaign not unlike the Wilton folks.

    Let Super 7 die. It’s a bad idea for the city no matter what the “boosters” say.

  • 3 turfgrrl // Sep 28, 2007 at 10:27 am

    how about better train service?: Sure, train service or subway service would be great too. But its unrealistic to expect cars to go away, or for that matter trucks. Even in Europe, where mass transportation has been integral to the growth of countries, roads are still being built, bridges are still being built, and yes, rails are still being built. The reality of economic global competition is the ability to move people, goods, and services as efficiently and cost effectively as possible, We in Fairfield County pay a premium in our goods and services, and especially housing due to the inefficiencies of our transportation system. Duff was right to keep the fires burning on Super 7, it will happen eventually. The old guard is dying off, stop light by stop light.
  • 4 how about better train service? // Sep 28, 2007 at 10:48 am

    The “old guard” are the folks hanging on to the “highways for a better tomorrow” mantra that may have been appropriate in the past but doesn’t work for the future. The Robert Moses era died with him. If you’re such a fan of the European model, I’m sure you’ll be supporting roundabouts, waloons, and all the other really cool traffic management ideas being implemented in Europe. Even here, NY State is way ahead of us in putting in roundabouts. There’s a really cool one that connects some major highways as you get off the Thruway at (I think) Kingston. Our DOT keeps dusting off plans that were made decades ago — incuding Super 7. Let’s get out of this traffic as throughput syndrome — faster and with more volume is NOT better. TG — you are waaaay behind the times on this one as is Bob Duff.

  • 5 turfgrrl // Sep 28, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    how about better train service?: Roundabouts are the greatest invention since sliced bread. But forget Moses, who I think has gotten a bum rap over the “revisionists” who fail to see the genius in his urban landscape. I’m a bigger fan of Haussmann and the “grandes boulevards” approach to roads and transportation in urban environs. Waloons, you’ll have to enlighten me, I always thought that referred to people from Belgium.
    Super 7 will happen. It’s just a matter of time. It’s actually forward thinking, to plan for a transportation scenario that actually acknowledges needs far into the future. Look where all the reactionary let’s not invest in transportation the same attitudes have gotten us:

    30 year old decrepit Metro North trains.
    No high speed (as in 200kmh+) rail service
    No subway system or light rail linking urban centers to mass transit hubs.
    Bridges that are crumbling, historic or otherwise.
    Highways with potholes and on/off ramps that are dangerous.

    Stamford, gets the transportation infrastructure needs. That’s why get the exit 8 bypass exit and roads designed to handle the increasing volumes as well as future mass trans options.

    Norwalk accepts the traffic of grist mill road, and old Belden Hill road because of bottle necks caused by route 7 traffic descending from upstate on their way to Merrit 7 and Stamford.

    Try not to conflate building roads as an either or proposition. Connecticut DOT has to do many things, building Super 7, integrating a rail mass trans system with it, add parking to train stations along train corridor and work with towns in a regional plan to address regional cross traffic. I think its extremely short sighted for anyone to suggest that roads be “off the table.”

  • 6 nwlknative // Sep 28, 2007 at 8:17 pm

    Expanding the current Route 7 from two to four lanes has done more to hurt the environment than the Route 7 expressway every could or would have. Duff is correct when he says it is a vocal minority that keeps fighting the Super 7. Most people I know that live in Wilton are mad as hell about the widening of the current road and it has ruined the rural feeling of that stretch. They are tired of the traffic jams and the construction disrupting their commutes to Norwalk and beyond.

    “How about better train service?” seems to think more trains is the answer. It isn’t. In order for people to travel by train, there has to be public transportation at the other end to get you where you are going. Let’s say I want to go to New Fairfield or Brookfield - not only are there no train stations there - but no public transportation. I don’t even think there is a train station in Ridgefield - and public transportation? So how are people supposed to get to and from the trains? It would take billions of dollars to upgrade rail service and public transportation to the point that it would be used instead of the automobile.

    It is hard to believe that Toni Boucher and her group have been able to hold off the State for thirty plus years. I hope when the construction is finished and Wilton is no longer the sleepy little community it used to be, people will realize what a foolish move it was to stop Super7.

  • 7 Chris MC // Oct 1, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Where is the House Minority leader on this issue, one might reasonably wonder?

  • 8 AnonAgain // Oct 1, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    I think we need to implement all ideas. Train service won’t solve the problem alone but must be updated and expanded. Look at all solutions because one alone won’t do. Let’s not get hung up on only one form of transportation. Some people will never take the train, or never take the bus, or never drive on super-highways but all good ideas must be considered and implementation of a comprehensive regional and statewide transportation plan is essential.

    I think it is unfair to ask train commuters to keep paying more while cars are polluting our air and clogging our highways. In the mix of ideas, we must consider tolls at our borders and of course it should be the most up-to-date EZPass method that does not cause traffic jams.

  • 9 The Dude // Oct 2, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    Duff is an awful legislator. Difficult to work with and petty. The super 7 is an issue that is going no where in Hartford and will continue to go no where, but aside from that Duff is the wrong man to push whatever transportation package would be right for Norwalk.

  • 10 Anonymous // Oct 2, 2007 at 1:34 pm

    Hey Dude, do you know the Big Lebowsky?

Leave a Reply