YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Fodor Farm Plan Advances


by turfgrrl


September 23rd, 2007 · 8 Comments

After months of wrangling in the newspapers, it looks like a plan of sorts is headed to the full council soon.

“We’re talking about maybe keeping a caretaker (at the third house), have it for community use, educational purposes — just a facility that could be utilized by the city while maintaining a nice entryway into Fodor Farm,” said Mayor Richard A. Moccia. “I think Tod (Bryant) and the Fodor Farm people knew my concerns about the historic district. But I also tried to reassure them that we didn’t need a historic district to maintain those houses.”

The houses at 322 Flax Hill Road and 25 Pogany St. would be sold based on request for proposals prepared by the city’s law department. Deed restrictions would be written to “maintain (their) historical appearance,” wrote Moccia in an e-mail this week highlighting the alternative plan.

Proceeds from the sales would go to restore the house at 328 Flax Hill Road. The house “could be used for educational purposes or community use.” Remaining open space would be “protected by a conservation easement” and allow public access to the area, Moccia continued.

The plan appears to resolve differences between Moccia, Recreation and Parks Director Michael A. Mocciae and Recreation & Parks Committee Chairman Fred A. Bondi on one side, and the Fodor Farm Study Committee, headed by Bryant, president of the Norwalk Preservation Trust, on the other.

The Study Committee has pushed to create a state-registered local historic district out of the 9.2-acre property. Moccia said the city would cede control of the property to an appointed panel under the historic district plan. He backed a plan advanced by the Parks Committee, called for selling all three houses under deed restrictions aimed at preserving their historic integrity.“The (alternative plan) came from the Fodor Farm Historic District Study Committee. Since it became clear that the local historic district wasn’t going to happen, we were looking for a way to still preserve the houses and the land,” Bryant said. “So the committee met and came up with these ideas.”

The requirement that the two houses be sold using request for proposals will ensure that they are restored to the highest standards, according to Bryant.

“The city need not take highest bidder,” Bryant said. “It makes sure that the people who buy the houses have the expertise, understanding and passion to do a good job with the houses and rehabilitate them the right way.”

Mocciae suggested that the city keep the house at 328 Flax Hill Road and restore it using proceeds from sale of the other two houses, according to Bryant.

Preserving open space here is a welcome outcome to the city.

source: The Hour, Proceeds from sale of 2 Fodor properties may be used to restore third structure by RObert Koch, September 22, 2007

Tags: In the News

8 Responses so far “Norwalk: Fodor Farm Plan Advances”



  • 1 here we go again // Sep 23, 2007 at 10:23 am

    right before election time,,city preservation or self preservation? how conveniant.

  • 2 Joanne // Sep 23, 2007 at 11:09 am

    here we go again-
    you might want to realize that more than 2-3 people have had input on this particular site. It has always been my and Rick McQauid’s, as well as others intention of preserving these homes and to preserve open space. It was the question of how we would get there. We have listened to everyone, we have been at the site on numerous occasions and we felt that selling the homes with deed restrictions would keep the property in the mode that it was intended. I for one would like to see the two homes sold to those who would have the best interest of the property at heart while keeping the property open to the public. Walking trails and gardens and gathering areas for the citizens. The Main house needs much work but with the right people and the funds, this can be a project that we can all be proud of. It should and could be used for education and community purposes like that of a Town Meeting House where we can go to learn about the history of the area and those who were an intregal part of building the area into what it is today. Many people worked the lands and many people contributed to the over all ambience and community feeling of this area. We haven’t always agreed on how this should be done but we have all had the same outcome in mind. Thanks to Todd, Mike Mocciae, the Mayor, Fred Bondi, my fellow Rec and Parks members and especially to those who kept this alive and who has had input and passion to keep a beautiful part of Norwalk history alive. This is not a political maneuver and its not a partisan maneuver, it is the culmination of many, working towards the same goal.

  • 3 here we go again // Sep 23, 2007 at 11:50 am

    but i didn’t mention any parties or names I did suggest it has the aroma of grandstanding.

    Has all the issues with Oyster Park been resolved I thought that was going to be walking trails and gathering spots for citizens as well or did we all miss something?

    As long as I can’t buy a bucket of balls and practice, or take my grandchildren to a putt putt I then will be pleased we have done the right thing.

    Hard to support more open spaces and public accessible areas when all you read is things about Vets park and what someone not all wants to see,,shame this may turn into just another target for those who didn’t lift a finger to do what you and others have done.

    What names other than elected or appointed officials can you add to the list to make us all feel good that ordinary people with no land value resale ties had with this project,,that would make me and others feel this was more than a election year name , back slapping foremat , see what we did blurb, before election,,point made by your posting.

    I’m interested in seeing what group will have the preservation thoughts in mind,,I’m from a Ct town not far away where we have a group of historical members involved in things like this knowing the rich history and making sure it is preserved correctly,,which historical members here in Norwalk are leading this project, i moved here and made the mistake of reading only the Post and Advovate until I moved.

    I guess i should of asked nicely and not jaded as I am a new taxpayer reading nothing but wasteful spending and poorly planned projects in the news ,places I may not be able to enjoy living in a city with all the dirty public land not being addresed.I take it this farm is clean for the public, again I’m new and certainly tired of the way it seems don’t know don’t ask don’t care.

  • 4 here we go again // Sep 23, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    http://www.cttrust.org/index.cgi/2130

    read the blog one would think this has been in the making for a couple of months,and only our current administraion is responsible ,doesn’t say that here.

  • 5 here we go again // Sep 23, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    http://www.stlawrencewind.com/hari/resumes/JamesSexton.pdf

    who is this guy?

  • 6 anon // Sep 23, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    Joanne, I don’t think it was you that #1 was referring to, your motives appear true; but perhaps the Mayor is doing a little grandstanding here. All of a sudden he cares about historic preservation and working with various parties to keep Norwalks history alive!!?? He’s trying to cover his behind for the mess he’s allowed to happen, on his watch, with 93 East Avenue and the travesty right under his nose, across the street from City Hall.

  • 7 here we go again // Sep 23, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    on the money #6 simple and plain, no reflection on #2 its as simple as that.

  • 8 Truthfull Taxpayer // Oct 10, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    #6 you are so right on the money! Will Fred’s son be buying one of the houses,or will he just be playing a re-enactor?

Leave a Reply