YourCT.com header image 2

Super 7 Study Controversial


by turfgrrl


September 22nd, 2007 · 8 Comments

The fear of actually solving the route 7 corridor traffic congestion must drive State Senator Judith Freeman-R and State Rep Toni Boucher-R to fits. Why else would a zero dollar funded study proposal send them into lame quotes like these:

State Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, worked to include the study - which did not include a request for funds - because he said traffic continues to worsen as commuting increases from northern suburbs into Stamford and Norwalk.

It took the Senate several hours to pass a Democrat-backed $3.2 billion bond package on a 21-12 vote that fell along party lines. The House passed the bill on a mostly party-line 84-38 vote shortly before midnight.

Opponents of the Super 7 study said they were confident it could be removed later when the General Assembly meets for another special session.

The proposed four-to-six lane super highway connecting Interstate 95 in Norwalk to Interstate 84 in Danbury has gone nowhere in the legislature for more than 50 years because of opposition from environmentalists and residents of Wilton, Redding and Ridgefield.

The bond package calls for a state Department of Transportation study of the Route 7 corridor between Norwalk and Route 33 in Wilton.

The report is to be submitted to the legislature’s Transportation Committee by the end of this year and include an engineering analysis, time frame for completion of the stretch of Super 7 from Norwalk into Wilton, identification of obstacles, cost estimates and potential funding sources.

The study also is to analyze what to do with Wilton land the state has accumulated for the project if Super 7 is never built.

“I thought this was an issue that was clearly put to bed a long time ago,” said state Sen. Judith Freedman, R-Westport, who proposed an unsuccessful Senate amendment to strike the Super 7 language from the bonding bill. “I believe this particular project keeps reviving itself over and over again when it has been told that it’s going nowhere.”

State Rep. Antoinetta “Toni” Boucher, R-Wilton, a longtime critic of Super 7, was optimistic that the study could be quashed later this year.

Boucher called Duff a “political opportunist,” for adding the study into the bonding bill at the 11th hour.

The 11th hour? How about all these years when Boucher killed studies and solutions to route 7 in many previous years? It’s about time that the legislature stops catering to bucolic idealists and starts realizing that north western part of the state and the southwestern part of the state should be part of the greater tri-state economic corridor.

Trucks, cars, trains, transportation friendly housing, commutes and property taxes all impacted by the ability of the legislature to govern for the future, not by clinging to out dated and antiquated ideas about what bedroom communities of the 50’s want.

Norwalk is planning to build millions of square feet of office and retail space. Where does Freeman and Boucher expect the workers and shoppers to live? It should not take 1 hour to travel 17 miles from Norwalk to Danbury. It’s a good thing that Bob Duff is living up to his promise to work hard to support making Norwalk a better place to live.
source: The Advocate, Super 7 study included in bond package, By Mark Ginocchio, September 21 2007

Tags: CT Senate · In the News · Transportation

8 Responses so far “Super 7 Study Controversial”



  • 1 Mr Greenpeace // Sep 22, 2007 at 10:06 am

    as long as they can help prevent or descrease the four or five accidents a week on the connector for its lenght the 17 miles will not be a burden on Norwalk,

    Its usaully on the beginning or the end of a highway you have problems, the fire dept might as well put the new fire station in the meduim strip on rt95 , that way they will be close to all the interchanges and the state can give us the land.

    millions of square feet and office space will make Norwalk more of a city, with the visiting population we will soon baost what 200,000 people in Norwalk out growing other cities in the area,,we are prepared for that correct? I’m sure we will see at least 1 additional police officer and firefighter and many more living under the bridge in South Norwwalk.I trust the homeless will be able to cut down their travel time as well on rt 7..

    Wasn’t there a feeling out here at one time we need to take care of our priorities first? seems we are trying to form our own population based on wealth and not the needs of some of our residents who need assistance.Cuts in social programs , housing and an increase in food programs in the schools tells me we are still a long way off on taking care our own so they without assistance can survive in Norwalk..

    But its great we are going to get another study they are by far the best way to spend our money it helps everyone ..

  • 2 Chris MC // Sep 22, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Duff is representing the interests of his constituents, and Freedman and Boucher continue to represent the interests of theirs. But success in the Legislature requires more than one or two votes, and that is where Duff’s position is strategic, not opportunistic.

    Turfy’s right, and there is broad (if rough) consensus on her point: all of western Connecticut: from Greenwich & Stamford to Danbury, to New Milford, to Newtown, to Shelton, to Bridgeport & Stratford - all the area west of the Housatonic - is already part of the same economic and residential corridor.

    History has literally overtaken Sen. Freedman and Rep. Boucher’s position, and it is only a matter of time before reality (including the economic interests of Republicans in other western Connecticut communities) redraws the issues map around western CT.

    Stepping forward (and looking back) at the position Gov. Rell is taking, it really does reveal that the criticisms of her are quite valid. Popular though she is, she is clearly a Republican politician of, by and for the old order - as similar in perspective as she is in resume and appearance to Sen. Freedman and Rep. Boucher. They are the past.

    In stark contrast, Malloy, Finch, Duff, and the Democrats in the Legislature who represent this part of the State have keenly focused - not on helplessly contemplating the gordian knot of an archaic tax structure, overburdened infrastructure, wildly disparate standards of living, and a balkan political map - but on examining the assumptions and addressing the structural obstacles to putting Connecticut where it belongs - in the vanguard of educational excellence, economic opportunity, quality of life, and competitive strength in the global economy.

  • 3 dem4life // Sep 22, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    Bob Duff has always put the needs of his constituents first. Toni Boucher must be really happy with the barren stripped zone the widening project is giving the residents of Wilton.

  • 4 here we go again // Sep 22, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    Conn is deeply in debt,we have the third highest bonded debt,per person on any American state,Rell said reported by the Hour today..we are the vangaurd of something thats for sure,,

    Thank god for the democrats?

  • 5 dem4life // Sep 22, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Wasn’t that Republican accrued bonding debt, here we go again?

  • 6 Chris MC // Sep 22, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    here we go again regurgitates a Rell sound-byte as though it offers something relevant to the subject. It was intended to be a substance-free remark when Jodi uttered it, and it is no more substantive here, except to illustrate the very point I am making - this Administration and its like in the legislature have no idea where to begin to cut the knot, while the Dems offer innovation and provide leadership.

  • 7 here we go again // Sep 22, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    I agree Chris everywhere but in Norwalk has innovation and leadership been provided after elections.

  • 8 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Oct 5, 2007 at 11:24 am

    Remember the movie “The longest Day?” We have route 7 “The Longest 16 Miles.” How can the South Western part of the state have a piss poor road like old route 7 even with it’s sorry widening, that connects it’s 2 largest Interstate? High speed Interstate’s that are only connected by a 45 minute minimum 16 mile ride to get from one to the other. In this day and age is is beyond believe. The DOT has no balls or they would have had this road decades ago and if those who stopped had to pay the legal costs and the increased cost of building this road 50 years late, come out of their pockets.

    They got away with this BS then, but today it is a LIFE BLOOD ISSUE.

    The people have to be shocked into the 21st century, or they will drag us all back into the 19th century.

Leave a Reply