YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Yet More Reasons Opdahl Should Be Fired Now


by turfgrrl


August 23rd, 2007 · 42 Comments

Remember when Corda and Opdahl were so eager to outsource the school kitchen services so that the ongoing deficit allegedly incurred would go away? Ah, promises, promises. Today we find out that the deficit hasn’t gone away because some parents have failed to pay for school lunches to the tune of $90,000. It’s funny how no one in this school administration ever admits to any responsibility for anything that goes wrong. Here parents are to blame, the implication either that parents are too cheap, too poor, to irresponsible to pay for school lunches for their kids. Nowhere in the Hour’s report, does Opdahl or Corda accept responsibility for communication failures that lead to this situation.

Norwalk is not the only public school system who faces the delicate task of collecting on school lunch fees. Recently, in the Los Angeles, debate swirled over the introduction of the cheese sandwich:

When too many parents fell behind on paying for school lunches, the Chula Vista Elementary School District decided to get tough … on the children.

They told students with deadbeat parents that they had one lunch choice: a cheese sandwich.

The sandwich, on whole-wheat bread, came with a clear message: Tell your parents to pay up or no more pizza and burgers for you.

Cheese sandwiches and other “alternate meals” have been added to menus in school districts across the country as districts try to take a bite out of parents’ lunch debts.

The strategy worked in Chula Vista: Lunch debts in the district fell from about $300,000 in 2004 to $67,000 in 2006. Some angry parents say success came at too high a price, however.

The cheese sandwich, they say, has become a badge of shame for the children, who get teased about it by classmates. One student cried when her macaroni and cheese was replaced with a sandwich. Another girl hid in a restroom to avoid getting one. Many sandwiches end up untouched or in the garbage. Sometimes, children pound them to pieces.

The results according to the article are spectacular.

Districts stress that the alternate meals are a last resort.

They send letters to parents. They hire collection agencies. Some place stickers on children’s hands or put rubber bands on their wrists as reminders, Peterson said.

But alternate meals get the best results.

An effective alternate meal has to do two things: meet federal nutritional standards and flunk child taste tests. The cheese sandwich, typically served on untoasted whole-wheat bread, apparently qualifies as one perfectly healthful stinker of a meal.

Does Opdahl say anything about solving the problem? No, its the same old stick the hand out for more money. Even though Whitson’s the food service company running the kitchen should, as an outsourced service, be the entity worried about showing a profit. Opdahl thinks its all the parents fault, according to the Amanda Pinto Hour report:

The problem — largely seen at elementary schools — is exacerbated when children repeatedly arrive at school without lunch, and without access to the free or reduced lunch plan, Opdahl said.

“I think it’s the same abuse over and over,” he said.

Parent response to unpaid balances has been slow, Opdahl said.

“The only way we can (collect payment) is to consistently send letters out to parents and hope that they either fill out the free or reduced lunch form or come in with some money,” he said. “For some reason, some parents feel like they don’t have to pay. It’s becoming a huge problem for us.”

Not surpisingly parents disagree.

Karen Bartron, PTO President at Silvermine Elementary School, said she does not think a consistent effort has been made to make parents aware of unpaid balances.

In the one such instance she heard about at her school, a mother was surprised in July by a substantial bill for lunches, she said.

“I’m more concerned that the attempt to make the collections and the communication is up to snuff on this,” Bartron said.

And what of Opdahl’s alleged stripper friend who worked as a $60k/yr food tester? Did anyone on the BOE ask about that while Opdahl was blaming parents?

If the mismanagement of the school cafeteria services wasn’t enough, here’s that Chief Operating Officer providing “clarity and understanding” about how the educational bonding hold up by the Governor is affecting Norwalk.

Stuart Opdahl, Norwalk schools chief operating officer said the $39,171 for Brookside Elementary likely represents the state’s final payment for the renovation work that wrapped up there about a year ago.

“The project is closed and the state has closed it out, so there must be a small amount due. It’s probably on the playground,” Opdahl said. Otherwise “I don’t know of any money that’s outstanding that we haven’t gotten. (The state) is always holding a certain amount of bond money when a project ends. Sometimes it takes as much as five or six years before we get the final payment.”

As such, the hold-up of the bond money earmarked for Brookside Elementary does not pose a problem, according to Opdahl.

The smart Hour reporter, Robert Koch, decided to check with Tom Hamilton.

Thomas S. Hamilton, the city’s finance director, said he does not know what amounts will be included for Norwalk in the final state bonding package, but added that the city does “anticipate receiving a considerable sum of money for school construction reimbursement over the course of the next year for ongoing projects at Norwalk High School, Nathan Hale, Ponus Ridge, and Roton Middle schools.”

Hamilton’s response certainly seems a little more concerned than Opdahl’s. Maybe because Hamilton, unlike Opdahl has a professional background in finance. The “what me worry” attitude of Opdahl has already cost Norwalk millions.

Opdahl, should know exactly how much bonding money is tied up, because he is the guy overseeing all these construction projects. But he’s the guy who doesn’t operate construction projects with any project management tools, or financial reporting, because accountability is something that would crimp his style. Will Jefferson school ever see any renovation? The Jefferson school fund has been raided so many times, I’m surprised that the parents haven’t called in the Police to file a robbery report.

source: The Hour, School lunch price hike on the menu By Amanda Pinto, August 23, 2007

source: Los Angeles Times, Alternative school lunches leave a bitter taste, By Richard Marosi, June 18, 2007

source: The Hour, Education construction bond delays create ‘emergency’ By Robert Koch, August 23, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

42 Responses so far “Norwalk: Yet More Reasons Opdahl Should Be Fired Now”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 Aunt Bertha // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:20 am

    Hey, when I was a kid my mom gave us cheese sandwiches EVERYDAY on white wonder bread! Some times we lucked out and got a piece of ham and mustard! I don’t get today’s parents. Toughen up!

  • 2 overtaxed // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:49 am

    I have a suggestion, do away with school lunches. From now on every student must bring their own lunch. If a parent can’t afford to give their kid a sandwich for lunch they should stop having kids.

  • 3 They are inept // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:59 am

    If the BOE would do what any business does, they would not be in the hole. Communication is essential. If a parent owes you money you:
    #1 send a monthly bill
    #2 include papers re: eligibility to sign up for “free lunch” along with forms to do so
    #3 follow up with phone calls to the home by a responsible, sensitive representative of the administrative office. In other words - collection calls.
    Taxpayers do not deserve to be unnecessarily charged extra for lunches or any other items that can be paid for in some other way. Other children will now pay for the lunches that the BOE (Opdahl) did not collect on. He is totally inept, as are those who supervise him.

  • 4 Silence Dogood // Aug 23, 2007 at 10:11 am

    They are inept, you said, “Other children will now pay for the lunches that the BOE (Opdahl) did not collect on. He is totally inept, as are those who supervise him.”

    What is wrong with your statement is that you actually think that anyone supervises him. He seems to do whatever he pleases, but that is his prerogative because he is the Duke of Opdahl. The King and Queen are busy with other matters. I haven’t yet figured out what those matters are, but other matters.

  • 5 anonymous // Aug 23, 2007 at 10:15 am

    Went to mcdonalds the other day. Didn’t have any money, didn’t get any lunch. I understand about kids forgetting. Maybe let them owe for one lunch, but shouldn’t be able to get more until parents pay for the one that is owed.

  • 6 nwlknative // Aug 23, 2007 at 10:25 am

    When my kids were in school, if they didn’t bring their lunch money, they didn’t eat. I would get a call at work or at home to tell me that they had no lunch money or lunch and had to make arrangements to get the money there. How can hugh bills be run up without the parent’s knowledge and why isn’t there any follow up. Are these students from out of district or from non-English speaking homes? Are they students who really deserve free lunch and have not had the paperwork filled out? Someone in the school should be following up on this. I am tired of my tax dollars going for “free lunches”.

  • 7 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 23, 2007 at 11:15 am

    “They are inept” is on the right path. Our little boy (1st grade) managed to run up a bill to our surprise. He was given lunches but soon discovered the “free lunch” route. Clever, but misguided. Perhaps he was driven by too many cheese sandwiches? Anyway, we had our conversation with him and got it settled. We discovered it because our school followed up. I wonder if the follow-up is ubiquitous across the district. Doesn’t sound like it.

  • 8 Sick of the waste // Aug 23, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Didn’t you all know that Norwalk is the home of FREE lunches? From Developers to Interlopers, from Carpetbaggers to just plain scammers, this is the way the city does it’s business.

    We should put up a small copy of the Statue of Liberty in our harbor that states, “Give us your rich, your carpetbaggers, interlopers and scam artists, and we will give them city jobs!”

  • 9 Aunt Bertha // Aug 23, 2007 at 11:29 am

    #3 follow up with phone calls to the home by a responsible, sensitive representative of the administrative office. In other words - collection calls.
    You might even find that some of these students are out-of-district because you will not be able to reach them by phone. Kill two birds with one stone.

  • 10 nwlknative // Aug 23, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    The more I think about this the madder I get - $90,000.00 is a lot of lunches. I don’t know what lunches are running these days, but this has got to represent somewhere over 25,000 lunches I would think. A free lunch here or there isn’t that important, but at $90,000 plus the $39,000 from the Brookside project - and who knows what else isn’t being watched - no wonder our taxes keep going up. All this wasted money and they can’t afford to put bathrooms in the new wing at NHS. It really is criminal.

  • 11 #21 of #25 // Aug 23, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    We need to have a panel of citizens to review how our tax money is being spent, both in ALL City Departments and with the BoE. We should demand it. It appears that these city employees and elected officials do not know the meaning of “fiscal responsibilty”. They act like they can pick our pockets at any time, or pick our money off of the money tree growing behind City Hall!

  • 12 Watchingandlistening // Aug 23, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    #21 of #25- You DO have a panel of citizens reviewing how your tax money is being spent for ALL City departments, BUT NOT for the BOE. The Board of Estimate and Taxation spends weeks reviewing the budget and meets monthly to review actual expenditures. And for the most part, they do a good job.
    But for Education, they can only allocate an overall amount. They, and the Common Council, do NOT have line item control over BOE expenses. Only Corda, Opdahl and the ELECTED members of the BOE have that.
    So if your unhappy, START CHANGING THE BOE STARTING IN NOVEMBER!!

  • 13 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Aug 23, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    “They act like they can pick our pockets at any time, or pick our money off of the money tree growing behind City Hall”

    This is a problem right from the Federal level to the State level right on down to our wallets here at home.

    It has become a way of life in Washington, and in this problem the trickle down theory works perfectly down to the local level.

    We have some power to fight to correct it at the State and Local levels, but it would take an act of God to stop it at the Federal level.

  • 14 Charles the Hammer // Aug 23, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    Is this the deal? The $90K free lunch tab is run up by kids whose families don’t even qualify for free or reduced lunch? Yikes! The free lunch program is rife with waste and other problems without adding simple deadbeats to the rolls.

    What’s wrong with encumbering transcript records pending payment by parents? No registration or promotion without settling up. Further, chronic failure to provide proper lunch of some type for one’s child should not become a taxpayer burden or a price hike to other students. It should result in a referral to CT DCF for negligence.

    $90K has got to be more than 30,000 free lunches! How can that happen? Outrageous! I smell a scam.

  • 15 Silence Dogood // Aug 23, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    I have enjoyed nice relationships with cafeteria staff in the Norwalk schools, and I have had conversations about kids who want credit. Unless things are done very differently in the primary grades, there is no credit system.

    The Duke has been known to make excuses before. I suspect that he often thinks that people won’t question him or check for the facts.

  • 16 Anonymous // Aug 23, 2007 at 6:27 pm

    #14 Charles the Hammer - I smell a scam here too! $90K or 30K lunches is way too much waste!!!! FIRE OPDAHL! FIRE CORDA! FIRE THE ADMINISTRATORS! They are all a bunch of “meeting people” who do very little and are over paid!

  • 17 nwlknative // Aug 23, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    I think someone on the BOE should ask for a total count school by school. If the figure is actually $90,000.00, he had to get that figure someplace. There should be records kept of how many lunches were served, how many at reduced price or legally free and how many were “charged” on a daily basis. This is basic record keeping. I have a feeling he is including reduced price and legally free lunches in this figure. If not, he and the food service company are idiots for letting this happen.

  • 18 Marg5150 // Aug 23, 2007 at 6:39 pm

    I personally volunteer to take on the duties of calling the parents. And as pay, I will take 10% of what I bring in, so for $90,000 I would make $9,000. Anyone what to better me? Opdahl are you listening?

  • 19 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Aug 23, 2007 at 7:08 pm

    This is a simple case of “Creative Book Keeping.”

    The BOE takes these risks in the hope that they can get away with it year after year.

    Hey! If no one ever took risks, Michelangelo would have been famous for painting the Sistine Chapel floor.

  • 20 Silence Dogood // Aug 23, 2007 at 7:26 pm

    Another thought: With the prior years’ deficits, the Duke of Opdahl never mentioned kids who weren’t paying for their lunches (and whose lunches weren’t reimbursed by state/federal funding). He ran out of the other excuses because he can no longer blame Mr. Harris, and so now he is looking for new excuses.

    Let’s have transparency here, too. If the Duke is being honest with us, let him show the figures to the public.

  • 21 Norwalk Taxpayer // Aug 23, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    How much more does this site have to document? The BOE should be ashamed that they support Opdahl. Vote them out.

  • 22 Mr Greenpeace // Aug 23, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    hold on Norwalk Taxpayer I’m sure tommorrow will bring some more ammo,how much you ask? as much as it takes it all xcatches up to people who simply do a bad job below the blog screen.

  • 23 anon // Aug 23, 2007 at 8:56 pm

    More than anything, the thing that is most aggravating is the fact that noone in this administration, from Corda on down, appears capable of accepting responsibility when things go wrong; few are capable of admitting mistakes, noone tells it like it is unless they have no other choice. Between Bush and these guys, I’ve got a headache.

  • 24 CYA // Aug 23, 2007 at 8:57 pm

    Wow you guys are good. You are scoring bulleyes on this one. Each and everyone of your comments about the Duke is right on traget….. direct hits. Someone should ask the Duke how much lunch revenue money Whitsons has put into a reserve account for themselves. If anyone asked me to take a quess I would say……. $31,995. And if someone were to ask what Whitsons had to pay and charge back the BOE for the Dukes food tester before she disappeared….. I would quess the amount to be $19,425.67. And I bet we could get her name right too.

  • 25 Mr Greenpeace // Aug 23, 2007 at 8:58 pm

    I once asked about what our responsibilities are to new children showing up to the school on first day,

    Whats going to happen to all those day workers who do landscaping when snow hits? what is a conservative figure 200 ?

    Who is paying for the hospital emergency room care of patients not covered?

    Who pays for the ambulance runs for the residents of the homeless shelter?

    Who pays for the homeless shelter?

    Who is paying for the free care on water street at the medical center?

    Who is helping all the families and mothers with infants at Neon?

    Who is helping the churches give food and shelter to those who need it?

    Who is helping the elderly and the ones who need assisted living?

    I would expect at this point we as a city realize the children who get a free meal are the least of our worries and not the olny thing we are paying for.

    Heating season = more chance of fires= more fire intervention

    Police intervention is will also be on the increase along with social services

    anyone can add to my list I imagine i missed a few topics..

    I’m not surprised to hear any of this compared to the other things we are facing within the school system but with all honesty when I brought up the issue of radon and what was done to correct it why can’t we just for a second revisit the thread and see if all precautions are now being taken to ensure our children,,okay at least mine are safe this year.

    I noted last year even though radon was addressed it should be on an agenda again this year or a budget to test the classrooms again which is a standard in simple workplaces not just schools.

    I trust I lost a couple of bloggers on this one its been a long time since the last serious rant that makes no sense.

  • 26 Silence Dogood // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:18 pm

    If I could believe that there are that many students whose parents cannot pay for their lunches, I wouldn’t say anything, although I would insist that they apply for free/reduced lunch, which includes breakfast.

    I simply don’t believe the Duke’s claim. Also, Whitson’s has one heck of a sweetheart deal in that its contract guarantees that Whitson’s will not lose money.

  • 27 nwlknative // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    It may be a rant, but you bring up some very good questions, Mr. Greenpeace. I was wondering who pays the hospital emergency room myself when I was there recently for a family emergency. The waiting room was filled with Spanish speaking people - mostly young with small children. It looked more like a free clinic than a hospital emergency room. The hospital is non-profit and has to provide medical care for the uninsured. You can bet that our insurance premiums are paying for this service in some way.

    As for the others you mentioned, some rely on social service agencies and donations and, of course, the United Way. Our church houses the overflow from the homless shelter at no charge and they are very appreciative of the space.

    As for the elderly - they don’t get much help. There isn’t much out there for them. We really need more elderly housing in Norwalk. Fitch School would have been a good location - but it won’t happen. Can’t make a profit on elderly housing.

  • 28 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 23, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    Hey Greenpeace,

    All great questions. You may have noticed that I’m a tad focused on the BoE. This is really due in part to your rants. The school budget is 54% of the total City budget. I keep thinking that for each 1% that we save in the schools we could increase Protection by 4%. That 1% is real money — $1.4 million. It irks me when numbers bigger than this are bantered about as if it’s chump change. Tax increases make it harder for those on the lower rungs to climb up.

    Keep going!

  • 29 woofie's sister // Aug 24, 2007 at 6:35 am

    I believe the $90,000 figure is correct or just the tip of the iceberg. Having passed out these letters(with applications for free/reduced lunch) to students month after month and seen the amount due climb each month I could never understand why the students would continue to get lunch.
    I had assumed the collections would be made over the summer, and the parents with an outstanding balance would not be allowed to have their child get lunch the following school year.
    Now that this information has been made public why would anyone pay for lunch, especially at a increased rate, when they could get it for free?

  • 30 anonynous // Aug 24, 2007 at 7:38 am

    Somehow I can’t get all bent out of shape about my tax money going to feed hungry children. If the lunches help them grow up healthy and focus better on their education, if they get healthy food, if it (even slightly) lessens their chances of getting diabetes or cancer or ADD, I think it’s a good investment of my $$$. I’d rather pay for lunches (and pay more to the teachers) than — say– continue to pay for a non-performing employee at the Museum. Most of the posts seem to be from “got mine” people who don’t want anyone else to get any. The whole tone of this thread (except for Mr. G.) seems rather churlish, small-minded and mean.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply