YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Benny Hill Like Flasher Roams Rowayton


by turfgrrl


August 16th, 2007 · 30 Comments

First there’s the trucks. Then in an unrelated series of incidents, a nekkid man or peeping tom or 5 foot 11 white man with sandy hair has been roaming the neighborhoods of the Peoples Republic of Rowayton, looking not for evidence of trucks passing through, but people to expose himself to. Or assault, according to the latest incident. From The Hour:

Last month, residents said, the man, known as “the naked man” and “peeper” among Rowaytonites, allegedly showed up at 1 a.m. outside a Ridgewood Road home while the homeowners’ 16-year daughter was downstairs in the family room.

“The dogs started to go berserk and the girls started screaming,” said a neighbor who didn’t wish to be identified Wednesday. “They just saw the man’s white legs.”

Some are concerned that the attacker fought off by a Roton Avenue woman Sunday night was the same man, who has been seen leering in windows and flashing people for nearly 20 years.

The middle-aged woman, who was “extremely physically fit” and able to fight off the man when he tried to grab her behind her house, was taking out her trash at about 11:40 p.m., and was wearing sleeping apparel, police said.

She described her assailant as white, 5 feet, 8 inches tall, with a thin to medium build and sandy-brown hair, police said. This description is strikingly similar to the one witnesses gave a year ago, when the peeper made several appearances and shook up the close-knit, typically quiet waterfront neighborhood.
Last August, The Hour reported the following description: White, about 5 feet, 11 inches tall with light brown hair and a medium build.

“If it’s the same person, which it most likely is, he’s becoming increasingly bold and dangerous,” said a Witch Lane resident who’s apprehensive about the safety of her children, neighbors, and herself after reading The Hour’s Monday account of the Roton Avenue incident.

“People are concerned. This has been going on for too long and it seems to be escalating,” she said. “I think something’s just got to be done. The police don’t seem to think this is important. Enough people have seen him — you would think that they would have a better description.”

A lack of communication from city police on the recent sightings is “perceived as lack of interest,” she said.

Police have acknowledged that there could be a link between Sunday’s alleged attack and the recurring incidents, but haven’t determined yet if it was the same man.

The Police likely are a tad more focused on gun crimes and robberies than nekkid man, but exposure can go both ways. Cell phone camera photos of nekkid man would certainly help in the identification. That’s what snagged a flasher on the R subway:

A cell phone photo taken on an uptown R train on August 19 helped police identify a flasher who has been targeting women on the subway system, the New York Daily News reported. The suspect flashed train rider Thao Nguyen, who no doubt surprised him by snapping a picture of him in the act. More surprising still, perhaps, was the Daily News’s Saturday front page, which showed off the photo to millions of readers.

The paper also carried Nguyen’s story: “‘I saw him massaging himself and then he unzipped and pulled it out. I thought, “I can’t believe he’s doing this in the middle of the day!”‘ The subway car was mostly empty and Nguyen felt nervous, so she pulled out her Samsung P777 cell phone, equipped with a 1.3 megapixel digital phone. ‘I turned on the camera,’ she said. ‘He was still masturbating. I aimed it and quickly took the shot. As soon as I took it, he zipped up and got off the train.’ Nguyen said she was disgusted by the incident and immediately reported it to a police officer at the 34th St. station. The next day she filled out an official complaint, and the following day a detective had her look at hundreds of photos of ex-cons. None of them was the culprit, but Nguyen wasn’t about to give up. She posted the degenerate’s photo on the Web sites Flickr and Craigslist, and bloggers began linking to her site.”

The Daily News has since received tips on the suspect’s identity, which it published in today’s paper. Try riding the subway now, flasher man.

source: The Hour, ‘Peeper is back,’ say some Rowaytonites, by Noelle Frampton, August 16, 2007

source: Washington Post, Cell Phone Camera Fazes Flasher, By Robert MacMillan, August 30, 2005; 10:00 AM

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

30 Responses so far “Norwalk: Benny Hill Like Flasher Roams Rowayton”



  • 1 Leroy Dumont // Aug 16, 2007 at 9:38 am

    It has to be one of the Miserable 25. We will do anything to get attention. You know how we are always trying to add to the negative image of Norwalk, Opps! I mean Rowayton, Opps! I mean South Norwalk…

  • 2 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2007 at 10:29 am

    How about a police sketch of the perp to post so that people can try to identify this guy? Most likely someone in the 06853 zip code.

  • 3 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Peepers have been in the Rowayton area for many, many years, going back to the 60’s when I lived there.
    Most peepers are harmless, wierdos. I doubt that the aggressive guy who roughed up the lady with garbage is the same as the peeper(s). What do the misables think?

  • 4 Watchdog // Aug 16, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    #3 - With regard to your statement:
    “Peepers have been in the Rowayton area for many, many years, going back to the 60’s when I lived there.”

    Odd, indeed.

    What might you think attributes to this phenomenon of ongoing Rowayton peeping? It would be good to hear from our old friend… whatshisname… you know… the one on the beach with the snifter of cognac with regards to this issue.

  • 5 Truthfull Taxpayer // Aug 16, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    Watchdog-I remember his handle to be: Interested Republican Rowaytonite. Maybe he has seen the Benny Hill type flasher up close! But he could be a little to stoned on his cognac to notice!

  • 6 Roton Reader // Aug 16, 2007 at 8:41 pm

    Maybe IRR is the peeper.

  • 7 nwlknative // Aug 16, 2007 at 8:59 pm

    IRR is probably on his yacht up at the Vinyard or Block Island for a vacation with the rest of his elite friends.

  • 8 interested Republican Rowaytonite // Aug 17, 2007 at 6:30 am

    I am actually just back from my family’s holiday in Nantucket. Thankfully, that awful tank farm will not pollute my fine neck of the woods down here in Rowayton. That petroleum could have polluted the Sound and would interfere with my boating activities. How dare they try to put that in our area. The way it was voted down truly shows the amount of power and influence that us rich folks have. Last week it looked like it would pass, then we do what we do behind the scenes, and voila, its fails. Many of those commissioners just flat out changed their votes to support the agenda of us disgustingly rich folks. That was really a glimpse of how true power works. A few of us made phone calls to the powers that be and took care of the real business of running the city. Thankfully, many of the people on that commission understood what an inconvenience it would have been to see and smell those fuel trucks on the way to our big mansions. Off to work, so that I can make more money than many of you will make in a year today while I continue to short several mortgage companies.

  • 9 Interested Republican Rowaytonite // Aug 17, 2007 at 6:35 am

    By the way, no I am not the peeper. My wife is steaming hot. I do not need to look at many of the other old leather skinned trophy wife’s down here when I have my well bred and fantastic looking wife to keep me company. I do say though that compared to other parts of the city are women are blonder, taller, skinnier, sexier, prettier, richer, and better bred than women in other parts of the city. There is no comparison to the hags that inhabit much of the rest of the city.

  • 10 Anonymous // Aug 17, 2007 at 7:21 am

    Using a possessive for a plural. Methinks Irritating Rowayton Republicanite is not what he claims. Your pretense is showing, pal.

  • 11 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 17, 2007 at 7:25 am

    Perhaps it’s time to resurrect U and non-U so that IRR could be a bit more convincing.

  • 12 Aunt Bertha // Aug 17, 2007 at 8:34 am

    HAHAHAHAHA,LMOA you all are really funny. However, peepers are scary people. I saw one once while walking back to the dorms from Toads place in New Haven, it was very bizaar and creepy.

  • 13 Anonymous // Aug 17, 2007 at 8:39 am

    I wonder if Turfie would be making so much fun of them if these incidents were taking place in areas besides Rowayton.

    I can see the next one: pedestrian hit by FedEx truck on 136, what a laugh! They shouldn’t be ordering so many luxury goods, those people.

  • 14 Interested Republican Rowaytonite // Aug 17, 2007 at 8:39 am

    I have no intention of distracting my many assistants with proofreading of my musings. I think that the Mayor has done a spectacular job attracting top flight investment into Ely Avenue.

  • 15 turfgrrl // Aug 17, 2007 at 8:47 am

    Anonymous 13: What fun would you be referring to? The practical advice to snap the guy’s photo?
  • 16 Watchdog // Aug 17, 2007 at 8:55 am

    Don’t be so hard on IRR, my friends. He is a fictitious product of our own prejudices… although, I must admit, he is quite entertaining. Once again, I am on the floor.

  • 17 Watchdog // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:08 am

    Addendum:
    Back to Turf’s post:

    Peeping is quite different from the horrific assault experienced by a Rowaytonite woman recently. The comments in this thread are not meant to reference that shocking incident.

  • 18 #13 of the Miserable 25 // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Please leave Benny Hill out of this. He was one of the greatest modern slap stick comics that ever came out of England, and that includes the #2 Monty Pythons Flying Circus.

  • 19 anon // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:25 am

    I don’t think it’s unknown for peepers to escalate to “grabbers”. Any of it is very scary for women. If you talk to any woman, you’ll soon find that almsost all have been subjected to some sort of unwanted sexual contact — whether it’s flashers, touching, pinching or even date rape or stranger rape. It’s never funny. You’d be surprised at how many women you think you know have a rape in their past. I know I was when I started researching this.

  • 20 Anonymous // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:34 am

    Turfgrrl: No, the opening para referring to the nekkid man and the search for trucks, etc. Anyone can see your tone is one of sarcasm. I don’t think the people who have experienced this person looking through their windows would use Benny Hill as a reference point, either.

  • 21 turfgrrl // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:39 am

    Anonymous: You are left then with nit picking style over substance. Each of my posts is barbed with irony, sarcasm or wit. Take your pick.
  • 22 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 17, 2007 at 9:40 am

    I was hoping that there would be a follow-up to #2’s post. Does a sketch exist? Do the police do sketches for things like this? I’ve seen composite picture software in the Educational Innovations catalog (a super-cool Norwalk-based company). But it looks difficult.

  • 23 anon // Aug 17, 2007 at 10:03 am

    TG, style spins substance and provides insight into the writer’s point of view. You have spun this one in the trivialization direction. What if this were about peeping at a child? Or grabbing a child? Would you treat that with similar snideness? You’d get your butt chewed, I’ll bet, if you did.

  • 24 turfgrrl // Aug 17, 2007 at 10:18 am

    anon: I believe it was Swift who suggested eating babies as a way to curb famine. So, no, I think arguments based on what my writing style is versus the issue at hand to be somewhat silly.
  • 25 anon // Aug 17, 2007 at 10:38 am

    I’ve read Swift. I appreciate Swift. You, TG, are no Jonatthan Swift.

  • 26 turfgrrl // Aug 17, 2007 at 10:46 am

    anon: An you my friend are parodying Lloyd Bentsen, but I won’t hold that against you :)
  • 27 Anonymous // Aug 17, 2007 at 10:59 am

    You say potatoe, I say spud.

  • 28 anon // Aug 17, 2007 at 11:03 am

    True. Bentson did have an easy shot there. After all, he was debating Dan Quayle. But I also like Ronald Reagon’s take on it, subsitituting Thomas Jefferson. Now, that’s funny.

  • 29 turfgrrl // Aug 17, 2007 at 11:23 am

    anon: Ah, the good old days, when political flunkies, on the Republican side, could actually speak English …
  • 30 anon // Aug 17, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    And, of course, there’s the line attributed to W.C.Fields, “So nice out today, I think I’ll leave it out.”

Leave a Reply