YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Straniti On Target, Garbage Bins Ugly


by turfgrrl


August 12th, 2007 · 23 Comments

When the garbage bins with ads weaved its way through various city agencies, the general consensus was that they were ugly. But somehow, the promise of getting someting for free once again trumped common sense, and the experiment began. From The Hour:

Last September, the Common Council authorized Mayor Richard A. Moccia to execute a 10-year agreement with Creative Outdoor Advertising, allowing the firm to place and maintain large trash bins featuring advertisements on city sidewalks in litter-ridden areas of Norwalk. The firm is also responsible for maintaining and emptying the bins.

Under the plan, Creative Outdoor Advertising initially would place 50 such containers on sidewalks and other public right-of-ways in commercial areas with litter problems, such as Wall Street and West Avenue.
The advertisements cost $99 per month on the fronts, $49 per month on the backsides, and $129 per month on both sides of the containers. The city is to receive 8 percent of the revenues from each container.

So far, the city has yet to collect its share of $10 per unit per month. Although the bins began going in months ago, many initially carried logos rather than advertisements, and the city is paid quarterly, according to Alvord.

Alvord acknowledges that commercial trash bins on public streets rub some people wrong.

“When we first floated the idea for this, we got people who said, ‘These things are ugly. We don’t want advertising all over the city,’” Alvord said. But “I haven’t heard a peep.”

He added, however, “That’s not to say there’s people who don’t like them.”

Indeed, not all council members were enthused about large trash bins with commercial advertising popping up on city streets. Among those to vote ‘No’ was District D Councilwoman Kelly L. Straniti.

And what does Straniti think of the bins now that they are in place?

“They’re hideous. I’ve seen them all over. There on East Avenue and down in the Wall Street area. It doesn’t matter what the ad is, they’re just so big and ugly,” Straniti said. “I hear that, ‘Oh well, they’re really working, they’re doing to job and there’s less trash.’ But I just wish there was another way to resolve that.

“They’re four- or six-feet wide. If they didn’t have the ad, they might not be that bad, but with the ad and colors they just stand out,” Straniti said.

For Straniti, the only redeeming aspect of the agreement between the city and Creative Outdoor Advertising is that the council’s Public Works Committee, upon which she sits, has review authority for future bin locations.

Garbage is still littered throughout Norwalk. Part of the problem is that people are still piling up garbage in boxes and plastic bags at curbside awaiting trash pick up. Birds, animals and sometimes people, open and rummage through the trash allowing winds to scatter it beyond the curb. This practice should stop. What the city needs is a trash disposal ordinance that requires any trash to be be picked up be contained in a lidded trash barrel or bin. And empower the trash collectors to leave a fine for trash not in a container at pick up.

source: The Hour Advertising bins serving double duty, by , August 11, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

23 Responses so far “Norwalk: Straniti On Target, Garbage Bins Ugly”



  • 1 Anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 9:57 am

    The best thing that the City could put on the bins is the new logo. It would be fitting. Garbage in, garbage out.

  • 2 Indiga // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:09 am

    I belive a lot of people mentioned that these were big, ugly, intrusive and would not solve the trash problem. Once again, $$$ (or the promise of them) won out over reason and aesthetics. So, now in the historic Wall Street district we have ugly trash bins, blatant advertising, more litter than ever, grass growing through the highly touted brick sidewalks, weeds around the poor sturggling ginko trees (that repalced the butchered flowering pears), and the entire area looking like a third world country. What are our taxes for if not to do some maintenance around the city? I mean, all it would take to get rid of the grass grwoing through the sidewalks is an application of Round Up in the Spring. How expensive could that be?

  • 3 ANonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:13 am

    Free to the city vs paid for ny taxpayers? SIGN me up.

  • 4 Anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:16 am

    I think they’re still giving out government cheese, you can get some down at the homeless shelter. I suppose for you the only thing taxes are good for is supporting war.

  • 5 Anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Waddya wanna bet ANonymous has no problem with Social Security? Unless you and Blood from a Stone are so wealthy from your stock investments that you don’t have to worry about retirement and will be donating all those benefits to the GOP or Lyndon LaDouche.

  • 6 ANonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:19 am

    Not a big fan of govt cheese. It is a tax subsidy for the dairy industry. The cheese could be sold to developing countries for a profit rather than being paid for ny taxpayers.

  • 7 Anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:32 am

    Ads for Moccia’s reelection campaign would be fitting, what could be more natural than his face on a garbage can?

  • 8 anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:38 am

    I don’t think they’re bad looking at all and the ads don’t bother me either. I like the filigree, the openings for different types of trash and their neat appearance. But they don’t address routine household or business trash, nor illegal dumping.

    I agree there should be a law about garbage cans for commercial entities. IMHO it’s in poorer residential areas where you see bags of garbage instead of cans and fining would hurt the less affluent disproportionately.

  • 9 ANonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Why don’t we give free garbage cans to any home whose family income is less than 65000 a year. And since you mention social security, I would definitely opt out. I will never collect as much as I put in. Give me my contributions back and let me invest in my own retirement plan.

  • 10 Anonymous // Aug 12, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    Turf Girl, the city does have an ordinance, if you remembe the Mayor delivered some notice of fines to Wall street last summer. It has gotten better, however I also understand that more notices have gone out to violators with $250.00 fines. As you are aware homneowners area different animal, no pun, I understand the DPW is trying to get notices out to homeowners, but but that is a diffcult challenge. The bins have helped the streets are cleaner/ No solution is perfect.
    But ask yourself if the old wire bins with trash over the top and through the sides were better, plus people use to steal them. The streets of Darien and Westport, and Wilton are cleaner. For 2 basic reasons, the people have pride and the samller towns can deal with cleanup far better than an urban center. Always remember, the litter ain’t falling from the sky for the most part it is our own citizens and we know we can not put a litter cop on every street. Education and yes even the ugly bins will help.

  • 11 turfgrrl // Aug 12, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Anonymous 10: I do remember the Mayor kicking off the fines in the Wall street area, but I see the bags and boxes on North Main, Van Zandt, Fort Point and Woodward. Businesses seem the greater culprit on these routes than residential. I have also seen bags next to these new bins too. Maybe it’s time for a polluted Norwalk photo series.

    Education will help, but so will fining those property owners who don’t provide adequate trash bins to their retail tenants. How about looking at how larger towns get the job done?

  • 12 anonymous2 // Aug 13, 2007 at 9:36 am

    Home owners are culprits when they don’t containerize their garbage…trash all over the street. We need enforcement from the town and peer pressure from neighbors to clean up our streets. There are ordinances about keeping the front of your property clean.
    But the worst I’ve seen lately is the recycling truck tooling down the road spilling plastic and aluminum containers all over the road and yes they were speeding and never looked back. I’ve observed this twice.
    In other parts of the country and the world, business owners take pride in sweeping and picking up in front of their retail property EVERY DAY! A clean sidewalk is the most unlikely place someone will drop litter.

  • 13 Anon // Aug 13, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    I find that when I put out the recycling bin, and I have the newspapers and the cardboard on top, as I was told to do, scavengers go around, steal the deposit bottles and cans, and do not replace the stuff that they moved in the first place. I would like to get them for disturbing the recycling and making a mess in front of the house - isn’t it enough that we get commercial large trucks parked on the residential streets and the police do nothing about it?

  • 14 Anonymous // Aug 13, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    In my neighborhood, the winos come out every Wednesday morning with shopping carts and root through the bins for recyclables. And a sip from the occasional dregs of a liquor bottle.

    Not once have I ever seen the police around while this is going on, and I have been here for almost 10 years now. Is this illegal? Apparently not.

  • 15 ANonymous // Aug 13, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    I think once items are placed curbside, they are considered abandoned, much like garbage cans.

  • 16 ANonymous // Aug 13, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    Has anyone looked into the percentage of items placed in recycling bins that is actually recycled? I have heard that much if this is later disposed of as regular garbage because their are not enough recycling facilities to keep up.

  • 17 ANonymous // Aug 13, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    14

    I keep my bottles in a separate bag that I place next to the bin. That way the hit with the cart doesn’t have to mess up my bin and I make sure that the recycling company from new jersey doesn’t get the money. I admire the guys who get up at 4 in the morning to collect bottles and do what they have to do to make it. Maybe it keeps a few people off welfare.

  • 18 Norwalker // Aug 13, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    Here is a suggestion, save your cans and bottles and give them to either NHS or BMHS bands for their fund raisers.

  • 19 nwlknative // Aug 13, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    I don’t mind the really poor and homeless collecting bottles and cans from my recycling. I do get annoyed when the guy with the brand new car parks with his flashers on and raids all the recycling bins on my street.

  • 20 anonymous // Aug 15, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    Can anyone buy one or do you need to be one of the 25?

  • 21 anonymous // Aug 15, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    Saw one today. They could look a lot worse.

  • 22 Anonymous // Aug 15, 2007 at 2:57 pm

    How many are around town and who is responsible for collection, the city or someone else?

  • 23 Mr Greenpeace // Aug 15, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    Do the day workers on the bridge on MLK get new ones the four trash cans they were filled to capacity yesterday and the grass is all overgrown the area its a real mess there.

    I think that area should get the cities attention and forget the housing and the parks and the dowtown areas and take care of the ones who need trash removal.Its a fire hazard to those living in the tall grass and tree line there,We as a city let them live there we should take care of them.I wonder if that is considered affordable housing by the council as well?

Leave a Reply