YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Transportation-spotting


by turfgrrl


August 7th, 2007 · 3 Comments

Even in the face of life or death issues, Hartford won’t give up it’s addiction to pork. Yesterday Governor Rell and House Speaker Amann sparred over the governor’s proposal to put $100 million into bridge repair. Amann countered with the oh yeah, whaddabout our fix-it first proposal. They coulda been vaudeville performers. Brian Lockhart reports:

“We ignore the fundamentals of our transportation system, roads and bridges at our own peril,” Amann, D-Milford, said at a news conference at the Capitol.

And the skit is on.

“The governor rejected our plan, saying it’s unaffordable. It’s a shame it takes a tragedy and press conference to wake this up,” he said. “I challenge the governor to work with us in trying to make this funding available.”

“It is shameful that Speaker Amann is throwing another political tantrum,” Rell spokesman Rich Harris told The Associated Press. “A tragedy occurred in Minnesota last week that has claimed the lives of at least five people.”

Rell, her office said, has taken the lead on transportation initiatives in the past, including a 10-year, $3.6 billion total package approved in 2005 and 2006 that tackled additional commuter rail cars to targeted highway improvements.

In the latest negotiations over bonding, Rell had proposed spending $40 million to increase the frequency of bridge inspections and repairs over the next two years. On Sunday, she upped that figure by $60 million, for a total of $100 million.

“If Speaker Amann can find the funds to do more - without raising the gas tax and without imperiling the state’s credit rating - then the governor is certainly willing to consider all ideas,” Harris said.

On Sunday, Rell said, “There’s a lesson to be learned from the recent tragedy in Minneapolis. We must take aggressive action now.”

State budget director Robert Genuario of Norwalk yesterday called Amann’s comments disrespectful. Amann and the Democrats never explained how they planned to fund their $150 million initiative, Genuario said.

“They can say whatever they want in terms of how much they were willing to borrow,” he said. “They were never willing to pay for it.”

Genuario said Rell’s $100 million bridge investment is manageable through bonding, but legislators must give up some of an estimated $208 million in “personal pet projects.”

“It’s ball fields, athletic fields. A lot of local streetscape projects. Some gazebos, skate parks and the like,” Genuario said.

Amann denied yesterday that his party had a substantial number of pork projects on the table for bonding.

The legislature must weigh other means of establishing a reliable income stream for financing transportation maintenance, he said. Amann said he’s willing to consider higher gas taxes or some form of tolls, such as an EZ Pass system, to upgrade Connecticut’s roads and bridges.

What next from these talking blowhards, that someone’s proposal involved dog fighting in Michael Vick’s backyard? Note the dance around the heroin like addiction to the gas tax, the one tax that logically should go exclusively towards transportation projects yet gets diverted in some way to the general fund. But they have an idea up there in the land of 8 lane highways;

Following Amann at the podium was R. Nelson “Oz” Griebel, president of the Metro Hartford Alliance and former chairman of the state Transportation Strategy Board.

The state must consider tolls and privatizing roads, Griebel said.

The speaker who followed Griebel, Michael Riley, president of the Motor Transportation Association of Connecticut, said “I was all set to agree with Oz until he said the ‘t-word’ (for tolls).”

Riley said the state must recommit itself to using all gas and petroleum tax revenue for transportation issues.

Tolls and privatizing roads. Yegads. They want more money from the drivers of the world, and want it when drivers have no alternatives. Kinda like the 18th century pirates who would ply the shipping lanes looking for easy targets. Business suits aren’t the appropriate outfits in Hartford, swashbuckling eye patches, sabers and the tricorner pirate hat. Then at least we’d know what they really wanted when they got up to speak.

So here’s a novel idea, put to the gas tax into a transportation use only fund,  and gut the management of the DOT, since they’ve managed to waste millions on crooked deals and incompetence. Better yet, fix the DOT first, then redirect the funds. I’m sure that this is way to simple to be implemented. There’s that pork addiction to feed.

source: Advocate, Speaker, governor spar over bridge repair funds, , August 7 2007

Tags: CT House · In the News · Transportation

3 Responses so far “Norwalk: Transportation-spotting”



  • 1 ken wellman // Aug 7, 2007 at 8:43 am

    I found this online today. See below:

    Connecticut Laborers’ District Council To Lead Campaign To Establish State “Quality Construction Task Force”

    Industry Leaders From Unions, Associations & Private Industry To Meet This Week To Discuss Goals & Agenda

    The Connecticut Laborers’ District Council announced today that it is leading a campaign to establish a state “Quality Construction Task Force” that will consist of construction industry leaders from private companies, associations, unions as well as community officials. An initial meeting, with members from the Connecticut Construction Industries Association, Connecticut Road Builders Association, Connecticut Laborers’ District Council and several construction contractors, will be held this week to discuss the new group’s focus and agenda.

    “In light of what recently happened in Minnesota to discoveries found at the University of Connecticut, the Connecticut Laborers’ District Council will be coordinating an effort, along with numerous industry participants, to establish a Connecticut ‘Quality Construction Task Force’ that will have an overall objective of making important recommendations to the Connecticut General Assembly in early 2008,” explained Charles LeConche, business manager, Connecticut Laborers’ District Council. “I understand our legislators want to prevent future accidents by allocating more taxpayer dollars for the Connecticut Department of Transportation. However, this will not assure that our state bridges, roads or public buildings will be stronger and safer for all of us.”

    “There are a host of issues to examine in order to improve the construction process of our public roads and buildings. That is what the task force will examine up close. From outdated laws that force municipalities to accept the lowest bid from unqualified contractors to the Department of Administrative Services’ prequalification screening process to overhauling the inspection process, the task force will offer an independent package of recommendations to the legislature for hopeful adoption,” said LeConche.

    The Connecticut Laborers’ District Council represents approximate 6,000 members employed in the construction industry and other building and trade fields throughout the state. The Laborers’ International Union, founded in 1903 largely by immigrant workers, includes more than 800,000 members who work in construction and hazardous materials remediation, as well as in health care, the U.S. Postal Service and other public service sectors of the economy.

  • 2 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Tuffie, you are wrong again. Congestion pricing and other user fees are the only way we can give dis-incentives to drivers. We need a sane plan for mass transportation and we need it to be affordable, accessible and attractive. Oz Griebel knows what he’s talking about. He and others on the Transportation Stragey Board have studied and made recommendations for years to our leaders about multiple ways to relieve traffic and improve our transportation systems. If we want to continue our automobile addictive ways, we should have to pay. We can’t keep putting our heads in the sand.
    Trains, lite rail, buses, commuter vans have to be supported and automobileand truck drivers should be the ones to pay until it hurts.
    Tolls make sense and they work in other areas of the country and the world. Politicians need to be brave, step up and do what is necessary to relieve the congestion on the roads. To most, getting re-elected is more important than long range plans to resolve the problem. Where are the profiles in courage?

  • 3 turfgrrl // Aug 7, 2007 at 9:45 am

    Anonymous 2: Congestion pricing, works in Europe where there are alternative means of transportation. Connecticut is far away from that scenario for a number of reasons. Cheaper housing and cost of living are only obtainable away from the job centers (Fairfield County, New Haven, and Hartford). To implement any form of tolls or congestion pricing models would adversely affect an employers ability to retain workers, which already is a problem. Corporations move to where they can operation efficiently and that includes the lifestyle amenities of its workforce.

    The problem with the thinking in Hartford is that they have been robbing the funds generated by transportation user fees (tolls previously and the gas tax currently) to pay for many other things. That is wrong and until that gets fixed, until a dedication to maintaining the current infrastructure is in place, we will continue to have the crappy roads, overburdened with cars and trucks with the danger of collapse, sinkholes and disintegration.

    I-95 is the Interstate link between the economic centers of NYC and Boston. It is criminal that this road is not 8 lanes. It is also criminal that there’s no high speed train linking he two cities with light rail serving Connecticut. But short sighted thinking comes from the DOT because of incompetence. The political flunkies like those grandiose plans without addressing the failure of the current operations.

Leave a Reply