YourCT.com header image 2

Baby Einsteins or Baby Homer Simpsons?


by turfgrrl


August 7th, 2007 · 16 Comments

As I have long suspected, a new study has come out that the LA Times is reporting on. Now wait for it, the study says that babies who watch television turn out to have less of a vocabulary that ones who don’t. Mmmm, donuts. Of course the baby Einstein, DVD player in the car parenting set will not want to read about this. They forget that prisons put televisions in the common areas to keep the inmates, er, calm. In a television stupor more accurately. And so legions of babies fixate on dancing carrots and can’t express themselves with words. Or so the LA Times reports:

Parents hoping to raise baby Einsteins by using infant educational videos are actually creating baby Homer Simpsons, according to a new study released today.

For every hour a day that babies 8 to 16 months old were shown such popular series as “Brainy Baby” or “Baby Einstein,” they knew six to eight fewer words than other children, the study found.

Parents aiming to put their babies on the fast track, even if they are still working on walking, each year buy hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of the videos.

Unfortunately it’s all money down the tubes, according to Dr. Dimitri Christakis, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Christakis and his colleagues surveyed 1,000 parents in Washington and Minnesota and determined their babies’ vocabularies using a set of 90 common baby words, including mommy, nose and choo-choo.

The researchers found that 32% of the babies were shown the videos, and 17% of those were shown them for more than an hour a day, according to the study in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Of course someone got grant money to d this study, which could be filed under D’oh. If television reduces the intelligence of adults, how can anyone expect “baby television” to result any differently?

source: LA Times, ‘Baby Einstein’: a bright idea?, By Amber Dance, August 7, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News

16 Responses so far “Baby Einsteins or Baby Homer Simpsons?”



  • 1 Jerry Aldrich // Aug 7, 2007 at 11:25 am

    I did read something that was interesting in the same vein. The Navy, Air force, Army and Marines are looking for young men who are experienced in playing Video games and on line games. It has something to do with their minds and reflexes being very well trained to accept changing conditions and problems. They are needed to man the consoles of the new unmanned air surveillance drones, automated robotics bomb and weapons console operators.

    It seems that it is much easier to train people who are at home operating consoles under any type of conditions without confusion, fatigue or inability to recognize danger on a on screen military computer, and convert it to real life reactions.

  • 2 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 12:07 pm

    Dancing with the Stars = Opiate of the Masses

  • 3 Jacqueline Vogt // Aug 7, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    Dancing with the Stars = Opiate of the Masses

    NUMBER 2 OPIATE OF THE MASSES

    Number 1 has to be,

    “American Idol”

  • 4 anon // Aug 7, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    Fox news would have to be the LSD of the masses.

  • 5 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 1:08 pm

    Either that or the pablum of Christian biblebeaters, “values” voters and right-wing conservatives…

  • 6 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    I heard today on NPR that Walmart is now going to start selling god-friendly toys for kids…like 12 inch Jesus dolls. Of course they will all be made in China. LOL

  • 7 Aunt Bertha // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:26 pm

    I like Fox News. What’s wrong with that?

  • 8 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:36 pm

    It’s a biased outlet for the right-wing, that’s what’s wrong with it.

  • 9 John Second // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    It’s a biased outlet for the right-wing, that’s what’s wrong with it.

    Thank heaven it is the only news outlet in the TV news today that is not a left wing mouthpiece for the Far Left radicals. You want to silence them like the Nazi’s did to all who opposed their line of thought.

    I guess you would call CNN, The New York Times, and National Public Radio, FAIR AND BALANCED.

  • 10 Edward Levine // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, would pimp their grandmothers to have the ratings that Fox does.

  • 11 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:47 pm

    Nah, Fox would do it for them.

  • 12 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:48 pm

    Here we go again with the right wing trolls. Time to crawl out from under your rocks, boys, now that the discussion has turned to the media. Beating the same tired old drum. Ho hum.

  • 13 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 7:57 pm

    I realize that this is probably a waste of time for most people who watch the Fox Propaganda Channel, but here’s an analysis of its radically skewed bias: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1067

    Maybe there are some people who watch it that are just too dumb to know any better. We can always hope.

  • 14 Never Again Dem // Aug 7, 2007 at 8:55 pm

    GOOD TO GO JOHN SECOND! You said it like it is brother. Once upon a time I thought that the Dem party represented what I believed in, and stood up for the average american. But over time their radical actions, extreme liberal ideas, double standards, the bitterness and hatred they show towards anyone who does not agree with them, along with their pattern of lies made me wake up. More people need to wake up and see how these so called champions of the people and guardians of our rights are doing nothing more then selling us down the road for their own personal power and control. It is clear to me that they would love to take away our right of free speech. Im so very disgusted with them!

  • 15 Anonymous // Aug 7, 2007 at 9:23 pm

    I think you meant to say the Republican party… that’s OK. We understand.

  • 16 Never Again Dem // Aug 7, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    #15 Annon - Hardly so my boy. Dems never understand.

Leave a Reply