YourCT.com header image 2

Fairfield Tavern Restored


by turfgrrl


August 5th, 2007 · 94 Comments

For about $200,000 Fairfield DPW workers and an outside construction firm managed to assemble the political will and funds to restore a Revolutionary war era tavern. From the Connecticut Post:

The town is nearly finished restoring a historic structure where George Washington slept in October 1789 during his tour of colonies invaded and torched by the British.The original Sun Tavern on Town Green didn’t survive the British invasion of Fairfield in 1779, but Samuel Penfield, a prominent Revolutionary War-era resident, rebuilt the tavern in 1784.

Washington, inaugurated as the country’s first president in April 1789, stayed overnight in Sun Tavern from Oct. 16 to 17 of that year, according to the Fairfield Historical Society.

“There is pretty sound evidence to support George Washington having stayed here when he came to Fairfield,” said David Parker, a local architect who’s done a lot of research on Sun Tavern. “In that way, this building ties us to the history of the United States.”

Sun Tavern, one of six town-owned historic structures managed by the Fairfield Historical Society, needed a lot of work, Parker said.

Goals of the restoration were to make the tavern structurally sound and return it to the way it looked in the early 19th century, Parker said.

The restoration was done by town Department of Public Works employees and Domus Constructors of Norwalk and is expected to cost nearly $200,000 by the time it’s finished, according to Michael Jehle, executive director of the Fairfield Historical Society, and Chief Fiscal Officer Paul Hiller.

It’s always nice to see how other towns manage to get things done. The restored tavern is part of a six building complex that will also have a new building to house its museum and library.

source: Connecticut Post, Fairfield tavern returns to Washington era,  ANDREW BROPHY abrophy@ctpost.com, August 5, 2007

Tags: Fairfield · In the News · Local

94 Responses so far “Fairfield Tavern Restored”


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All



  • 1 anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:33 am

    Norwalk should take a lesson. The failed and now out of power leadership of the historic commission couldn’t get this done. Good riddance. Hopefully the new leadership will get this done with our Norwalk historic sites.

  • 2 indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 11:20 am

    Not with a mayor who thinks his old Chevy has more historic value than the buildings around the Green, it won’t.

  • 3 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Nothing will be accomplished with respect to historical preservation as long as Demo Dick is in office. Just look at 93 East Avenue and Fodor Farm.

  • 4 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    What’s really shameful in comparing Fairfield and Norwalk on this issue is that the DPW in Fairfield spearheaded the preservation of that property.

    That in itself is astonishing; the DPW here is described on the City website thusly: “Engineering, Sewers, Dump permits, Recycling, Traffic & Parking, Garbage, Construction and maintenence of streets and highways”

    Norwalk should already be embarrassed of this administration’s attitude and record toward its history, this makes for an even more embarrassing comparison.

  • 5 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    indiga and anonymous 3: I think you are mistaken to attribute the lack of preservation successes to Dick Moccia’s term as Mayor. It looks like there was a whole 4 years of ALex Knopp where nothing got done about restoring the city properties either. More to the point you have 6 years of a common council that managed to do nothing about extending department resources much like Fairfield has managed to do. So blaming failure on on individual is short sighted. Instead, if change is really going to happen, engaging all and everyone on a shared and accountable mission would be better.
  • 6 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    What the hell is a mayor for if not to lead by example? This mayor has been an utter failure in the arena of showing how valuable Norwalk’s past is to its future.

  • 7 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Alex stepped up to the plate and proactively supported preservation efforts, including backing the 90 day delay and providing much needed “air support” for negotiations on 5 Elmcrest Terrace and backing the NPT and HC efforts wtih the State for 93 East Avenue. Alex also showed up to support neigborhood attempts to save the Stuart Avenue houses from demoltion. Moccia never showed up even though the efforts were spear-headed by Diana Palladino, one of the bright lights in the Young Republicans. I guess Diana was punished for her work since we don’t see her on the slate anywhere. Moccia (and Nolin) have done everything possible to set the clock back to the “tear it down” mentality under Esposito — including putting some of the same anti-historic preservation people on boards and running them for Council. Nolin(and Moccia) deliberately fed misinformation about the Norwalk Green National Register District to the press. In fact, Nolin lied about it after admitting to NPT that he recognized that the Distric existed. The Norwalk Inn’s attorneys spent 9 days in court trying to prove Nolin’s bogus theory. Funding for the HC’s maintenance budget was more than doubled under Knopp; Moccia pulled any capital funds away from the HC because it was oppossing his buddy Handrinos. Moccia will say anything, but look at the actions. Give Moccia and the boys another 2 years and watch them get rid of the 90 day delay. Take a look at how they are turning a blind eye as the Norwalk Inn deliberately destroys 93 East Avenue. Fodor Farm will — I’m sure — wind up in a developer’s or “friends of Dick’s” hands and be found to be “unsalvageable.” Do I see condos and soccer fields in its future?

    But, you know what, it’s too nice a day to think about these yahoos. Go ahead. Vote for Moccia and the rest of the bunch if you like, but don’t be surpised if we keep losing out on “historic preservation” efforts. It takes interested citizens (which we have) and political will to get things done. And the political will is just not there — and won’t be — if we keep electing the good old boy network.

  • 8 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Indiga: I’m confused here. How is the city’s law suit in a private property demolition dispute? Peter Nolin or DIck Moccia could say whatever they want, but the city has no say in this, right? And Alex Knopp would show up to any photo op whether he cared about an issue or not. Hence photo-op Knopp.

    Anyone who really cared about preservation, and had a majority on the council and the mayor’s office could have actually initiate anything. He didn’t. Try not to rewrite history. Take a good look at “historic” SoNo and see how Knopp policies destroyed a vibrant retail area of Norwalk. Look at the reality, Moccia stopped the economic destruction of the Wall Street area, also because of Knopp policies.

    Moccia may not be perfectly supportive of everything on the preservationist agenda, but its under his administration that the concept of a historic wall street district is being shepherded.

    Can Moccia do better? I think so. But why wold anyone, and I don’t limit it Moccia, do anything after the continued politicization of an issue that all sides could really come together and move forward on?

  • 9 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    So why is the issue politicized? The latest round seems to hover over that good Republican and Moccia supporter, the owner of the Norwalk Inn. It’s a shame when a private business owner dictates public policy.

  • 10 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    The only reason Moccia is behind the Wall Street district is because of the development money involved. Plus, he has no right to take credit for the initiative that was started under previous admins.

    Photo-op? That’s calling the kettle black. As I have seen and heard before on this rag, Moccia would show up to the opening of an envelope.

    Tell me how SONO has been destroyed, please? I was down there yesterday and today, every day I drive down Washington St. I see no evidence of the lack of retail vibrancy.

    Turfgrrl, you are yourself guilty of politicizing this issue by attacking Knopp’s record, which puts those of Esposito and Moccia in the dust. Puh-leeze.

  • 11 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    Plus, with Bondi,Coffey,Grant and Bolden voting with the Mayor more often than not, I think you could safely say that Moccia could have gotten historic preservation friendly policies through if he’d had a mind to. I’m quite sure that Krummel, Poruban, Brigss, Sutton and (maybe) Miklave would have supported preservation efforts initiated by the Mayor. It would have been a true non-partican effort. That there have been none, is a clear indication of this administrations anti-preservation bias.

  • 12 nwlknative // Aug 5, 2007 at 6:19 pm

    I think thatt the NPT, NHS, Historical Commission and others wanting to preserve East Avenue and the historical district are a little late. So many of the really historical homes that lined East Avenue have been torn down and the ones left have been altered so much it is hard to tell what they looked like before. You can’t blame any of the last three mayors for this because this happened many years ago before people cared about preservation.

    Let’s face it, we will never have a typical New England Green with historical houses around it because we have brick office buildings and apartment houses there. Yes, Mill Hill could be a significant area, but reconstructing that ugly Merritt/Rich/Incerto house (or whatever it is called) there would just spoil that spot also. That whole fiasco was a total waste of money and effort and I, for one, would not support or contribute towards it being reassembled on Mill Hill. If the NPT, Historical Commission and Historical Society really got together and had some good plans, I think they would get the backing they need. There is so much fighting and finger pointing going on that no one seems to get anything accomplished. Fodor Farm is also worth saving but there are too many fingers in the pie trying to determine what to do with it. I’m afraid that too will be lost if someone doesn’t step in soon.

  • 13 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 6:48 pm

    That’s the spirit! Just because it’s too late, why bother? Sounds like someone who’s aligned with Biggus Dickus.

    Your bias towards the Incerto house gives you away as someone working towards doing away with that project once and for all. Too bad, you’re the reason why preservation efforts in this town are an uphill battle.

    Who the hell are you to judge whether that project was worth the effort?

  • 14 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Anonymous 10: Try looking at the 12 empty storefronts that didn’t exist before Knopp pissed away the parking revenues in a poor contract with LAZ. If there was one single issue that defined the devastation of Knopp as mayor that one is it. Try talking to the merchants who very hard at making retail work in SoNo. And you missed how Moccia apparently ignores the historic “photo-ops” so I doubt that label will stick.

    Knopp’s record in SoNo and for historic failures is not a political issue, it is just reality. I think we can all do better, and lionizing someone who did a poor job just to score some political points off the current mayor is dumb. Better to advance what can be done or identify what should be done and what shouldn’t be done, accurately.

  • 15 nwlknative // Aug 5, 2007 at 8:04 pm

    Poster #13 - I never said “why bother”. I simply pointed out that the Green will never look like Fairfield or Greenfield Hill or any old New England town green because it has already been distroyed by modern brick office and apartment buildings. As far as that Incerto house goes - it has been pointed out in many articles that the historical significance was questionable except for the beehive fireplace (?). There are many far more historical homes in Norwalk - just take a ride up William Street, Newtown Avenue, Canon Street, County Street/Old Kings Highway. Homes dating back to the early 1700’s. There are homes still standing that my great, great grandparents built - so please don’t feel I think the history of Norwalk isn’t important.

  • 16 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Indiga: In a strong council/weak mayor system, the initiatives for legislation don’t percolate from the top necessarily. Where was the vaunted leadership on preservation with someone like Krummel, Poruban, Miklave, Hilliard, Sutton, Bondi, Poruban and Coffey? THey were all on previous councils? Briggs, Bolden and Grant were all first termers, so a bit harder to advance stuff. The council committees all could have done anything they wanted, yet they all chose not to.
  • 17 ANONYMOUS // Aug 5, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    Fodor farm was a huge waste of taxpayer money. If members of the community wanted to stop development, they have purchased it with private funds. Since the city now owns it, they should at least develop a youth center or at least some sports fields on the property so the public gets some use out of it. Maybe a pavilion and some picnic tables so it can be enjoyed, not just left as a backyard for a few people.

  • 18 nwlknative // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:08 pm

    I have heard that one of the buildings on Fodor Farm was used as a machine shop manufacturing parts for aircraft during World War II and when the war was over, it closed down. There were still parts lying around and the original time cards still in place - like time had stood still. I have never heard any more about this, and wondered if this was true. I agree with poster #17 - the City should do something with that property instead of just letting it sit. If nothing else, plow the fields and let people plant gardens there and perhaps have a Farmer’s Market during the season.

  • 19 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    Norwalk native and the other bloggers…here’s a chacne to do something. 124 East Avenue (directly across from city hall) is in the Village District. Zoning approved plans that showed the historic original house being retained, the modern addition demolished, and a new additon built in keeping with the style of the existing building. NPT talked to the owner who reassured NPT of their intent was to preserve. Mike Greene reassurred NPT that the owners intent was to preserve. In fact, he even asserted that they (P&Z) had encorahged the owner to save the grand old copper beech at the side of the house — and he had agreed. Today, it looks like demoliton has started on the original building — the one everyone swore would be preserved. Maybe a few calls to Mike Greene to inquire about the situation from other than the “preservation nuts” would show a sincere committment to retaining Norwalk’s history. How about it Norwalk native? Someone’s great-great grandfather built that house. Its’ Village District designaton gives credance to its architectural value. Or maybe call the mayor. He can probably watch the demoltion from his office window.

  • 20 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:24 pm

    #17 Anonymous - A Youth Center! Is that what our (Destroy) Parks and (Cause) RECKS want? Or is this what the Bondi’s want next?

    Many cities across the nation, even much smaller and poorer than Norwalk are preserving their heritage with historic districts. Unfortunately, the powers that be in Norwalk don’t understand what a historic district is and being ignorant of the possibilities just listen to what their developer buddies tell them!

    Soon it will all be gone to line the pockets of just a few. What a difference between Westport and Norwalk’s DPWs.

  • 21 Watchdog // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:26 pm

    #16
    My thought exactly, Turfster. I was about ready to respond when I saw your post. The Democratic faction on the Council holds the majority and therefore has had the power to achieve many goals this term, had it been focused and unified. In my view, one can’t really point that fickle finger of blame as easily as one would like.

  • 22 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    So, TG, you believe that you have the insight to call all the historic preservation folks — of any party –wrong in their assessment that Moccia is the worst thing to happen to preservation efforts in Norwalk since Tryon. I think it’s amazing how you have developed this knowledge without once being involved in a preservation issue.

    And, hey, how about making that call to P&Z tomorrow to get the scoop on 124 East Avenue. Was the developer told — off the record — “hey, it’s OK. It’s Norwalk. Do whatever you want.”

  • 23 Anonymous // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:07 pm

    I had seen the process at 124 East Avenue and have to say that I am not surprised that history is repeating itself. History in this town will repeat itself in this manner until there is no history left but the kind that is only obtained in books and sentimental letters to the Editor about “Remember When?”

    This City government disgusts me.

  • 24 ANONYMOUS // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:26 pm

    #20
    Youth center, ball fields, dog park, public gardens…doesn’t really matter what it is used for as long as it gets used. Everyone whined and complained that we needed to spend our tax dollars for this space, and now it is not being used. Do something useful with it so all the citizens of Norwalk can make use of it.

  • 25 nwlknative // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:30 pm

    The problem with the Village District designation is that property owners are only encouraged to preserve the building - it is not manditory. As long as they build a building that fits in with the existing buildings, they are in compliance. If the owner of 124 East Avenue was in violation of any codes, don’t you think someone from Zoning or the Building Dept. would be over there with a cease and desist order? What happened to the 90 day demolition delay? Is there a demolition permit issued? Who is the owner and, better yet, who is representing him?

  • 26 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:33 pm

    Indiga: No you are entitled to your opinion. However, if there’s a story to tell about Norwalk’s preservation record over the last 10 years, it has to include an honest assessment of what has really transpired. And from the over promise and under deliver department of the common council’s various committees that could have really done something good over the past 10 years, what has been really accomplished? Does a record of finger pointing over why things stall out, or get abandoned, delayed, or under funded accomplish much? I don’t think so.
  • 27 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:36 pm

    indiga: As for 124 East ave, wasn’t there a whole new facade approved for that building that was accepted by the NPT? Are you saying the entire building is being demolished?
  • 28 Indiga // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    NPT did not ask for the 90 day delay becuase of P&Z (and the owners) assurance that they would demolish only the modern addition. Were preservationists lied to? Was P&Z lied to? Has the developer now found “oops…must be structurally unsound” — with no independent verification? Maybe it’s just remeidation. Maybe it’s not demolition (though it sure looks pretty geared to demoliton to me.) I say, again, call P&Z to let them know that people care what happens to our history. It’s not just the Historical Commission that cares. Oh wait, I forgot. The HC is not allowed to care about private buildings anymore — as per consigliore Nolin.

  • 29 turfgrrl // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:42 pm

    Indiga: I will check into the building, but wasn’t the old facade part of the original building? Wouldn’t adding an entire front section require some removal of what was there before?
  • 30 ANONYMOUS // Aug 5, 2007 at 10:43 pm

    Here’s an idea. Raise enough private funds to either make it worth while for the owner to sell the property to those who want to restore it or pay to have it restored for them.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

Leave a Reply