YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: CMT Scores Out; Corda Thinks He’s Done A Great Job


by turfgrrl


July 28th, 2007 · 22 Comments

Sal Corda may think he’s doing a great job but he’s frogotten to “create an understanding” of what the results of the Connecticut Mastery Tests Scores really mean. Why not talk about individual school preformance like other school disttricts do? Compare and contrast:

Stamford

Administrators will use the data to hone educational approaches, school Superintendent Joshua Starr said.

“There are a few thousand data points on the CMTs which we use to help us ask better questions about how to improve instruction for each and every student,” he said in a statement.

Students in grades 3 through 8 are tested in math, reading and writing. The state will use the results to assess schools’ compliance with the federal No Child Left Behind Act and announce the results in the next few weeks.

The district has been focusing on math because of concern that students have lagged in the subject, said Judith Singer, research director for the district.

“That’s an area we’ve really worked at,” she said. Another is achievement by black students and other subgroups.

“For the black student population, there are small gains in many areas in nearly all grades,” and big gains in grades 3 and 6, she said.

The report gives the district a profusion of scores because the test data are broken down by school, race, grade and other categories of students. Scores at the various grade levels are compared with scores of students who were in those grades last year. Among the findings:

* More students in grades 3, 5, 6 and 7 met the state goal in math. The biggest increase was among sixth-graders, 54 percent of whom met the state goal, compared with 48 percent last year. The smallest increase was among fifth-graders, from 60 to 63 percent.

* More students in grades 3, 5, 6 and 8 achieved the state goal in writing. Third-graders made the biggest jump, from 54 percent meeting the goal last year to 60 percent this year. Eighth-graders made the smallest leap, from 54 to 55 percent.

* Only third-graders did better in reading. This year, 49 percent achieved the state-defined goal, compared with 46 percent last year. The biggest drop was among fourth-graders, from 55 to 48 percent meeting the goal. Eighth-graders’ results stayed flat at 60 percent.

* Among subgroups, black students showed the greatest gain. The share of black students meeting the marks in math and writing jumped more than 10 percentage points in grades 3 and 6.

* The district found some improvements when comparing the same group of students from one year to the next. Seventeen percent more students met the math goal after moving from grade 4 to grade 5, for instance. Starr said the findings suggest that “the more time students spend with our teachers in our schools, the better off they’re going to be.”

And then here’s Norwalk.

Norwalk

The highlight of this year’s CMT test results were the district’s scores in math, school Superintendent Salvatore Corda said. The scores at or above proficiency level gained in every grade but fifth, and the percentage of students scoring at the more rigorous “goal” standard increased across the board.

“These are the biggest gains we’ve seen,” Corda said.

He credited Mathematics Instructional Specialist John Keogh, teachers and principals for the gains in scores, achieved in part through a new math curriculum, consistent districtwide standards, staff development and “just hard work.”

The largest single gains in Norwalk came in math scores in the third grade, where test results matched state scores for the first time with an increase of 8 percentage points over last year.

“I’m very encouraged by that,” Corda said.

The district’s worst scores came in reading, where five out of the six grades tested reported decreases in proficiency. The most drastic decline occurred at the sixth-grade level, with 6.4 percent fewer students at proficiency than last year. Only seventh-graders made gains in reading scores, with a 2.1 percent increase.

“Reading - we see some negatives there, but we see some negatives with the state,” Corda said.

Compared with 2006 results, writing scores were relatively stable with the largest improvement among third-graders, at 4.8 percent, and the largest decline at the eighth grade level, with a drop of 2.9 percent.

The scores released yesterday also included data for student subgroups, which consist of at least 40 students in various demographic categories designated by race, economic status and whether their primary language is English.

Under No Child Left Behind, if one student subgroup fails to make adequate yearly progress, the entire school fails.

For now, Corda said the CMT scores show the district has reached a tipping point in making gains on past scores.

“We’re seeing the kind of results we felt we’d see if we stayed at it long enough,” he said.

Which school superintendent do you have greater confidence in? Which school superintendent would you want running your schools? Oh and if you want to find out the Norwalk actual test scores by school, don’t count on Corda creating an understanding about them, he doesn’t want anyone to know anything. The web site for complete test scores is here www.cmtreports.com, a bit overwhelming if you’re not a data junkie, but here’s a sample report I ran showing that Norwalk Third Graders are “seeing some negatives” and Corda’s blithe dismissal of his responsibility for once again failing to improve test scores by spending the highest per student dollar amount in the region certainly doesn’t leave anyone thinking he knows what to do to get better performance.




Average Score State vs. Norwalk Third Grade
2007
Average Scale Score Average Unit Score
Mathematics Reading
State Norwalk State Norwalk
Total 252.2 246.4 48.9 46.1
Male 252.3 247.8 48.9 46.1
Female 252.2 245 49 46.2
Black 219.5 219.9 40.5 39.9
Hispanic 222.9 237.5 39.9 42
White 265.4 265.6 52.8 52
Asian American 276.2 264.4 53.6 52.8

source: Stamford Advocate, Mastery test report shows mixed results, By Chris Gosier, July 28, 2007

source: Norwalk Advocate, Mastery test report shows mixed results, By Alexandra Fenwick , July 28, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

22 Responses so far “Norwalk: CMT Scores Out; Corda Thinks He’s Done A Great Job”



  • 1 Beach Bum // Jul 28, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Turfgirl, Can’t seem to access the above stated website. Is it correct?

  • 2 turfgrrl // Jul 28, 2007 at 10:30 am

    The link is fixed, but the site now appears to be down. Perhaps they are getting too much traffic this morning :)
  • 3 Beach Bum // Jul 28, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Just got on the website. How very, very interesting! I suggest all who are interested in the public education of our children need to check the website out. Some very interesting surprises! But it will take time to find them.

  • 4 Silence Dogood // Jul 28, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Dr. Corda may be patting himself on the back for CMT gains, but:

    1. He deserves absolutely no credit because he doesn’t have a clue about what happens in Norwalk’s schools.
    2. John Keogh deserves tremendous credit. He is a great asset to Norwalk’s schools.
    3. Whatever the gains, remember that NCLB requires all subgroups to meet the proficiency standard. Norwalk will be failing again. All you have to do is look at the Black, Hispanic, free/reduced lunch data.
    4. It is absolutely amazing that in a district with a significant minority enrollment, the state doesn’t even report minority scores for a number of elementary schools because they don’t have at least 20 Black or Hispanic students in a given grade. (In other words, the BOE allows minority enrollment to be concentrated in certain schools.) We don’t know how those schools with low minority numbers are doing with their minority students. However, their students will count for the Black and Hispanic and free/reduced price lunch data for the entire district.

  • 5 norwalk teacher // Jul 28, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    Dr. Corda isn’t talking about the CMT scores because Norwalk did poorly. Sweeping it under the carpet.

  • 6 Slayer // Jul 28, 2007 at 5:07 pm

    There is a misconception concerning the scores and how they are reported. One must add together bands 3, 4, and 5 to get the true picture. Bands one and two are basic and below basic. After crunching some numbers here are the results for N. Hale for example by race:

    % At/Above Proficient
    Math Reading Writing
    Norwalk 73.1 66.9 72.7
    Black 56.8 51.0 59.2
    Hispanic 68.3 59.6 68.1
    White 87.3 81.8 85.3
    Asian American 93.3 96.7 90.0
    Am. Indian
    - - -
    Nathan Hale MS 82.6 78.1 84.6
    Black 2007 70.4 59.3 70.4
    Hispanic 77.1 70.8 81.3
    White 2007 90.6 90.6 92.9
    Asian American 2007 - - -
    This school did fairly well.

  • 7 Slayer // Jul 28, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    Here are the other schools’ scores. These scores are the percentage of students who attained proficiency or better or the combination of bands 3,4, and 5.

    Math Reading Writing
    Roton MS 73.0 66.2 80.3
    Black 55.1 49.0 69.4
    Hispanic 68.9 56.8 82.2
    White 90.7 87.0 87.0

    West Rocks MS 69.3 67.3 70.0
    Black 46.5 49.3 49.3
    Hispanic 63.5 57.6 62.4
    White 2007 88.3 85.3 89.3

    Ponus Ridge MS 70.4 57.7 61.1
    Black 59.1 48.5 54.7
    Hispanic 70.6 58.6 60.0
    White 79.2 62.5 68.6

  • 8 Anne Sullivan // Jul 29, 2007 at 10:03 am

    Could it be that reading scores dropped because Norwalk stopped employing reading recovery teachers four years ago? The emphasis during the past four years has been on improving writing skills….

  • 9 Slayer // Jul 29, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    Refer to # 7: Clarification on the data. The top numbers after the name of the school is the average of all of the schools.

  • 10 Vet Park Junkie // Jul 29, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    Going through the high-level School District budgets that are available on the city website is frustrating. I was taking a look at the 2008 budget and wondered how accurate the budget vs. actual numbers were. Budget numbers are on one report and actual are on the next year’s report. Also, getting something to work with from a pdf file is frustrating, but possible. Anyway, I looked at the 2005-06 numbers, the last year with actual amounts that were spent. In total, the actual dollars spent came in $109,798 less than budget. I then ranked accounts by variance from budget, using % variance and dollar amount. The high dollar amounts that were off-budget showed up. They were:

    Budget to Actual 2005-06
    Variance $ % Description
    $ (270,000) 100% DEGREE_LEVEL_CHANGES
    $ (335,867) 134% OUT_OF_DIST._TUITION-EXCESS_COST
    $ 161,015 116% INSTRUCTIONAL_EQUIPMENT
    $ 201,505 134% REGULAR_ED._OUT_OF_DIST._TUITION
    $ 218,107 242% NATURAL_GAS
    $ 282,505 34% TEXTBOOKS
    $ (512,674) 2% FRINGE_BENEFITS
    $(1,008,323) 2% TEACHERS_(NON-RATIO)
    $ 113,189 52% OVERTIME_SALARIES
    $ 372,573 10% CUSTODIANS
    $ 394,165 30% ELECTRICITY
    $ 212,328 7% TUITION+STATE_AGNCY
    $ 228,369 28% TUIT_TO_OTHER_LEA’S
    $ 188,753 28% OTHER_NON-CERTIFIED

    The numbers are only available in aggregate with no school by school breakdown. So I can’t take the next logical steps to see what the drivers were. They could all be very reasonable. I would have liked to baseline the items to see if some schools were more or less efficient than others. Budget comments would have also helped.

    Note, I’m not an accountant but I tried my best. The scientist in me asks for someone else to attempt the same analysis to see if I am right. I’ll be happy to provide my spreadsheets, that should save you two hours of reformatting.

  • 11 Charles the Hammer // Jul 30, 2007 at 7:46 am

    Slayer, those CMT score breakouts make for interesting interpretation. Here are a few items that come to mind:

    1. Why are Nathan Hale’s scores significantly higher across the board, particularly for minorities?

    2. Why are minority students at West Rocks performing so far below the other two schools?

    One possible explanation might be that West Rocks principal Dr. Lynne Moore has embraced many of the flawed assumptions now proposed in Dr. Corda’s grading and homework policy changes: no zeroes, acceptance of late homework, retesting, etc. West Rocks has operated under these erroneous “do-over”, “dumb down” notions for some time now. It this wrong-headed philosophy goes district wide, the results will be catastrophic.

    Look at the numbers. High expectation, not permissive coddling, is the path to achievement.

  • 12 Silence Dogood // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:44 am

    Dr. Corda’s embracing the proposed grading/homework policy changes is further indication of his being out of touch with the schools. It is ironic that the school where some (all?) of these policy proposals originated is the school that is doing poorly.

    Nathan Hale’s staff deserves great credit for significant improvements, but under NCLB, all of the schools are going to be underperforming for subgroup performance. Whatever Dr. Corda’s relationships with the minority community, e.g., through Norwalk ACTS, he has not been able to demonstrate positive changes in the performance of these students.

    What remains to be seen is the aggregate performance of minority students in the elementary schools because in a number of schools, there are too few minority students (fewer than 20) in a given grade for the testing company to report their scores. Yet, all of the scores will count when the performance of the overall district is evaluated. Some of the schools that draw from more affluent areas of the city look better than their overall performance truly warrants because they don’t report all of the scores. Some of the schools that have greater representation of underprivileged students may, in fact, be doing more with their students.

    BOE, have you given King Corda, Queen Karen and Stu generous raises for next year? Have you again praised them for their accomplishments? If the answer to either questions is “yes,” what were you thinking? We need more than Sal’s rhetoric and Karen’s “on-paper” curriculum; we need instructional programs that work for all of our students.

  • 13 Slayer // Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57 am

    When a local reporter asked Her Highness Lang to make some obervations about the CMT scores for the elementary and middle schools, she said that she had not crunched the numbers (my words not hers). Why would she rush to find out the areas of weakness? Isn’t she in charge of curriculum and instruction. Why wouldn’t you want to know what schools are doing well, and what schools need help? Once again, an opportunity for early intervention will be lost.

    Well, I am not the Ass. Super. for Curriculum and Instruction; however, I did crunch some numbers and look at the minority breakdown. I was shocked to see the numbers or rather the lack of minority representation at various schools. I do not know how well the cut and paste will transfer to this blog. Go to (www.cmtreports.com) and all of the information is there. When you get to the site, just enter the grade, hit the button that says state and change it to schools, hit Norwalk and the schools will be listed at the bottom. When you want to generate the report, only check number of tested, percentage of proficiency,for math, total reading and writing, and then check ethnicity. You will be amazed at how easily anyone can access this very important information. You can also identify the various strands, which would tell teachers where the academic weaknesses are. These scores should be shared with parents, teachers, and administrators, to help improve student learning. I am looking forward to the release of the CAPT.

  • 14 Watchdog // Jul 31, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    Slayer:

    Thanks for your profound interest in this area.

    If you are one of the “insiders,” would you say that administration is waiting for each building site to do the work?

    Perhaps on the professional day prior to the first day of school, each building site will analyze their own numbers and, correspondingly, provide documentation stating how they will address deficit areas. Whattaya think?

  • 15 Anonymous // Jul 31, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    It would be great to think that the admin would be thinking about the content of the PD days. I heard that the morning of convocation, teachers will be with their supervisors. On the second day, I have no idea. I thought the schools were going to have site-based staff development based on the needs of the building. Once again, C. Office has to control. They are clueless about the needs of the students and teachers. In other districts, the data is analyzed, and then, the Super of Curriculum and Development sets up the PD to address the areas of weakness. Why are the citizens of Norwalk paying all of those people downtown, if the teachers have to do their own analysis? IT IS OUTRAGEOUS!!

    Additionally, guess who was playing golf on Norwalk taxpayers’dime? King Corda and attendent Lenny Mecca, another carpetbagger from Elmsford, N. Y. They both swear that they did not know one another. Guess what??They are old, golfing partners. What was yesterday’s 1/2 day absence charged to? Meeting Time? Yeah, meeting on the golf course. Norwalk taxpayers’ dollars at work. Now, the district has another retired, NY, administrator to join The Carpetbagger Club.

  • 16 Silence Dogood // Jul 31, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    “When a local reporter asked Her Highness Lang to make some obervations about the CMT scores for the elementary and middle schools, she said that she had not crunched the numbers (my words not hers). Why would she rush to find out the areas of weakness? Isn’t she in charge of curriculum and instruction. Why wouldn’t you want to know what schools are doing well, and what schools need help?”

    Not only did she not “crunch the numbers,” but in the time she has been in Norwalk, I have never — repeat, never — known her to share any of her wisdom about scores in a given school. The schools are left to their own devices to do their data analysis, and the central office helps NOT ONE BIT. To make matters worse, the central office people interfere with the individual schools’ efforts to provide professional development. How, you ask? First, the funding available for the schools’ professional development doesn’t even reach the level of being inadequate; it is just ridiculous. Second, when the schools want to plan professional development activities, the central office interferes by pulling out entire departments for central office activities.

    If King Corda and Queen Karen really care about what is needed to make the schools more effective, I have never seen or heard of evidence of it.

  • 17 Aunt Bertha // Jul 31, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    Silence Dogood speaks loudly and honestly through out this post. The test scores are upsetting to most everyone except for the administration. Listen to Silence.

  • 18 Silence Dogood // Jul 31, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    Thanks, Aunt Bertha. I tell it as I see it. It isn’t good.

  • 19 Anonymous // Aug 1, 2007 at 8:17 am

    Reduce the 75.1 positions at the Central Office!

  • 20 anonymous // Aug 1, 2007 at 11:05 am

    #15 is right….Anyone see them on the golf course?

  • 21 Anonymous // Aug 1, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    #15-Additionally, guess who was playing golf on Norwalk taxpayers’dime? That could explain why Mecca was not available for comment on the bathrooms at Norwalk High. When are we going to get administrators who have a stake in Norwalk? When will we stop stacking the deck with retirees from outside Norwalk? Double dipping on Norwalk taxpayers seems to be the norm at the BOE and with members who feel no reason to question our Superintendant this will be a continuing practice that we are requyired to pay for.

  • 22 anonymous // Aug 1, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    Be interesting to research some old golf tourneys in NY and are if they played together in the past. Also be interesting to hear about the investigation at Nathan hale after last years CMT’s when the state investigated the school for cheating. (oops, that was supposed to be a secret)

Leave a Reply