YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Bad, Bad Trucks:45 Violations At Check Point


by turfgrrl


July 27th, 2007 · 8 Comments

Maybe they should have Darien set up a check point on a regular basis. Sometimes, waiting for the state to do something is the wrong approach. Truck drivers will not want to waste time sitting at a checkpoint, so why not get the word out by staging excessive checkpoints along 136? It seems like it would pay for itself.

On Wednesday morning, police
issued three-dozen tickets and $5,591
in fines at truck checkpoints along
Route 136 and Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr.Blvd.
Thirty-seven trucks were found in
violation of various laws. Police
reported 45 types of charges, three-

being issued at the
two checkpoints.
Seven trucks
were found to be
without licensed
operators. One
truck was over-
weight. Another
had equipment
problems and was
sent back to its
garage. Other
charges included no medical cards,
various equipment violations, as
well as overcrowding and driving
while talking on a cell phone,accord-
ing to police.
“We usually do (the checkpoints)
twice a year,”said Norwalk Police
Lt. Thomas Kulhawik of the Com-
munity Policing division.“There are
still a lot of drivers operating with-
out licenses, especially among the
landscapers. There are a lot of over-
weight vehicles. We’ll continue to do
the checkpoints as long as we need
to.”
State police and the Community
Policing Unit set up one checkpoint
on Route 136 at McKinley St., from
6:30 to 9:30 a.m.,and another on Mar-
tin Luther King Jr.Blvd.,from 9:30 to
1:30 a.m.Wednesday.

Mayor Richard A. Moccia credited
Police Chief Harry W. Rilling, Kul-
hawik and Officer Joseph Jensen of
the Community Policing Unit, and
State Police “for doing a fine job.”
The crackdown comes as Norwalk and
Darien officials wait for the state Traffic
commission to reach a decision on a joint
request by the two communities to ban
through-truck traffic on Route 136.

source: The Hour, Truck checkpoints yields 45 violations, By ROBERT KOCH , July 27, 2007

Tags: In the News · Transportation

8 Responses so far “Norwalk: Bad, Bad Trucks:45 Violations At Check Point”



  • 1 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 27, 2007 at 11:30 am

    It was said by one officer, doing this on Water,Meadow st and Woodward ave would probably generate the same stops if not double the fines and stops ,,now someone has to give the mayor a map of South Norwalk so he can pass it on to Chief Rillings….

    It would be conveniant for the state as well there are no less than 3 truck scales on Woodward ave.

    One would think a crackdown would be for the childrens safety where thay are out of school.

    Cellphones are used on Water st as well, overweight trucks going over the Washinton St Bridge should be caught before they go over CORRECT? I’ll stop the make sense post here.

  • 2 Jake Kocian // Jul 27, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    Too busy wasting officers on other soft target,non dangerous enforcement.

  • 3 nwlknative // Jul 27, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    “seven trucks were found to be without licensed operators”

    Were these landscaping trucks by chance? Were the overcrowded trucks landscapers also? The way some of these guys load into trucks and drive like maniacs, it would not surprise me. I think if these trucks were stopped in any other part of town, the outcome would be the same. How about having a checkpoint on Strawberry Hill Avenue or Winfield Street. Rowayton is not the only area in the city that is inundated with semi’s, landscapers, buses, UPS, Fedex, Mail trucks, etc. speeding down their streets. It is a problem all over town.

  • 4 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 27, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    your right nwlknative they only think they are the only ones that have any problems, they also vote,my area is mostly illegals,,they don’t vote ..= they don’t count in the eyes of politicians

  • 5 gfaux // Jul 27, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    the state said that when ups/MLK dr. was done they would make the on ramp to 95 at West Ave take the trucks, if you look at the entrance you only have a very small area to come up to speed. So maybe we can close the right lane and let all the trucks on at one time, that way no one will use I-95 and they will use all the side roads.

  • 6 nwlknative // Jul 27, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    The entrance ramp at 15 is dangerous and most truckers don’t want to use it. They will come up Fairfield Avenue and turn onto Connecticut Avenue to get on at 14. This will cause even greater congestion on US1. Not a very well thought out plan - but par for the course it seems.

  • 7 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 29, 2007 at 5:08 am

    we won’t see them checkpoints on Woodward ave and Burritt is because its to narrow, dangerous and not enough votes.

    Dangerous as in officers wouldn’t stand in the street there the gangs, drugs and guns are everywhere, the trucks have nothing to do with it…

    Of course Rowayton has been given the consideration what about water st before the bridge ,,push them out of one spot onto another odds are the other will be Woodward,Meadow,Burritt and Water streets,,is asking the mayor to use common sense a mistake?

    The trucks start at 5am and go right thru to 6 at night every weekday so chief pick a day and we will see what the numbers say,,

    ranting in disgust again

  • 8 gfaux // Jul 30, 2007 at 5:22 pm

    please also stop the cars with cell phones no seat belts no lights no reg. or insur. that way we can all go there safely.

Leave a Reply